Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

2017-03-02 Thread morgan.richomme 
Gabriel and Kubi made an update recently on 2 stress tests that should
be defined/available/documented for Danube

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf?preview=/2926539/9568872/Stress%20Testing%20Update.pptx
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/TestPerf?preview=/2926539/9569090/stress.mp4

I think we could imagine to run such tests during the plugfest
for E we should elaborate a stress / robustness tests (with long
duration tests) on the test working group

/Morgan




Le 02/03/2017 à 00:16, Cooper, Trevor a écrit :
>
> I support Al’s suggestion. As a goal for the Danube Plugfest I think
> we should define at least one performance oriented test that we run
> using different deployments / configurations … with an objective to
> define a range of good vs bad performance in order to get started with
> performance as a dimension of CVP. Plugfest is a good opportunity for
> accelerating this IMO … we can discuss it in the Test Working Group
> and try to make an initial proposal.
>
>  
>
> /Trevor
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Raymond Paik
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:36 PM
> *To:* MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com>
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest
> planning call
>
>  
>
> Al, 
>
>  
>
> I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in
> OPNFV Plugfests.  A number of projects like Storperf participated in
> past two Plugfests.  Of course we can't get into things like Storperf
> results were better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why
> performance testing can't be done during the Plugfest.
>
>  
>
> Thanks, 
>
>  
>
> Ray
>
>  
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
> <acmor...@att.com <mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Ray and Plugtesters,
>
>  
>
> Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting
>
> (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility,
>
> but makes attending some meetings impossible).
>
>  
>
> Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of
>
> testing has been decided, and whether a
>
> **performance-oriented** test case might be entertained
>
> this time?  This topic has been out of scope in the
>
> previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK.
>
>  
>
> It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now.
>
>  
>
> regards,
>
> Al
>
>  
>
> *From:*opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
> [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
>     <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>] *On Behalf Of
> *Raymond Paik
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> <mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest
> planning call
>
>  
>
> All, 
>
>  
>
> A few things after our call on Monday
>
>  
>
> First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting
> for Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly
> meeting.  I will go ahead and cancel the current series and start
> a new one that starts on March 13th.  (so the upcoming meetings
> are March 13/27 plus April 10th).  Apologies for the thrash, but
> you can also find the upcoming meeting info.
> at 
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings
> 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k=>
>
>  
>
> Second, I started a test cases page
> at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases
> 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw=>.
>  
> I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see
> it's just a skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were
> on the call yesterday) to contri

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

2017-03-01 Thread Cooper, Trevor 
I support Al’s suggestion. As a goal for the Danube Plugfest I think we should 
define at least one performance oriented test that we run using different 
deployments / configurations … with an objective to define a range of good vs 
bad performance in order to get started with performance as a dimension of CVP. 
Plugfest is a good opportunity for accelerating this IMO … we can discuss it in 
the Test Working Group and try to make an initial proposal.

/Trevor



From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:36 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com>
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning 
call

Al,

I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in OPNFV 
Plugfests.  A number of projects like Storperf participated in past two 
Plugfests.  Of course we can't get into things like Storperf results were 
better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why performance testing 
can't be done during the Plugfest.

Thanks,

Ray

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
<acmor...@att.com<mailto:acmor...@att.com>> wrote:
Hi Ray and Plugtesters,

Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting
(Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility,
but makes attending some meetings impossible).

Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of
testing has been decided, and whether a
*performance-oriented* test case might be entertained
this time?  This topic has been out of scope in the
previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK.

It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now.

regards,
Al

From: 
opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>
 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org>]
 On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM
To: 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

All,

A few things after our call on Monday

First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest 
planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting.  I will go ahead and 
cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th.  (so 
the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th).  Apologies for the 
thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k=>

Second, I started a test cases page at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw=>.
  I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just 
a skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) 
to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming 
Plugfest.

Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of 
OPNFV.  You can register at 
https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8=>

Thanks,

Ray

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

2017-03-01 Thread Raymond Paik 
Al,

I'm not sure if performance testing has been specifically excluded in OPNFV
Plugfests.  A number of projects like Storperf participated in past two
Plugfests.  Of course we can't get into things like Storperf results were
better on X vs. Y discussions, but there's no reason why performance
testing can't be done during the Plugfest.

Thanks,

Ray

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:24 AM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmor...@att.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ray and Plugtesters,
>
>
>
> Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting
>
> (Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility,
>
> but makes attending some meetings impossible).
>
>
>
> Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of
>
> testing has been decided, and whether a
>
> **performance-oriented** test case might be entertained
>
> this time?  This topic has been out of scope in the
>
> previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK.
>
>
>
> It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
> Al
>
>
>
> *From:* opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:
> opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] *On Behalf Of *Raymond Paik
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM
> *To:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> *Subject:* [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest
> planning call
>
>
>
> All,
>
>
>
> A few things after our call on Monday
>
>
>
> First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for
> Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting.  I will
> go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on
> March 13th.  (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th).
> Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info.
> at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-
> DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k=>
>
>
>
> Second, I started a test cases page at https://wiki.opnfv.org/
> display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw=>.
> I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's
> just a skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call
> yesterday) to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for
> the upcoming Plugfest.
>
>
>
> Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members &
> non-members of OPNFV.  You can register at https://www.regonline.com/
> OPNFVPlugfestApril2017
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8=>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Ray
>
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

2017-03-01 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Hi Ray and Plugtesters,

Apologies for missing Monday’s meeting
(Jury Duty is a Civic responsibility,
but makes attending some meetings impossible).

Regarding test cases, I wonder if the Scope of
testing has been decided, and whether a
*performance-oriented* test case might be entertained
this time?  This topic has been out of scope in the
previous Plugfests and ETSI CTI’s Plugtest™, AFAIK.

It may still be too soon, but it’s worth asking now.

regards,
Al

From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Raymond Paik
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2017 1:21 AM
To: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

All,

A few things after our call on Monday

First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for Plugfest 
planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting.  I will go ahead and 
cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on March 13th.  (so 
the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th).  Apologies for the 
thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info. at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Plugfest-2B-2D-2BDanube-2BRelease-23Plugfest-2DDanubeRelease-2DPlugfestPlanningMeetings=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=hGHI9eHyvlhG1A_irMzzC6Tat-VZQAcFQ6t8KMYaa4k=>

Second, I started a test cases page at 
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.opnfv.org_display_EVNT_Danube-2BPlugfest-2BTest-2BCases=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=PQLI3Pwk95McmnXgKYUFxdh80nOSy3T6ARcoQx4zKBw=>.
  I followed the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just 
a skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday) 
to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the upcoming 
Plugfest.

Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members of 
OPNFV.  You can register at 
https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.regonline.com_OPNFVPlugfestApril2017=DQMFaQ=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw=xOGhTlU5-EMqlnyLFtqPizrXQ-akx_8ep_lJEF5cyOM=ecQNyyn30-voJn-s3qMzlmTxUcdUF4RcE3TfQ2oMAZ8=>

Thanks,

Ray
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Quick follow-up from the Plugfest planning call

2017-02-28 Thread Raymond Paik 
All,

A few things after our call on Monday

First, I realized that I had sent out a recurring weekly meeting for
Plugfest planning when this is supposed to be a bi-weekly meeting.  I will
go ahead and cancel the current series and start a new one that starts on
March 13th.  (so the upcoming meetings are March 13/27 plus April 10th).
Apologies for the thrash, but you can also find the upcoming meeting info.
at
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Plugfest+-+Danube+Release#Plugfest-DanubeRelease-PlugfestPlanningMeetings

Second, I started a test cases page at
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Danube+Plugfest+Test+Cases.  I followed
the template from the last Plugfest, but as you can see it's just a
skeleton.  I encourage everyone (esp. those who were on the call yesterday)
to contribute ideas/suggestions for what we should focus on for the
upcoming Plugfest.

Finally, a reminder that the Plugfest is open to both members & non-members
of OPNFV.  You can register at
https://www.regonline.com/OPNFVPlugfestApril2017

Thanks,

Ray
___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss