Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-28 Thread Al Morton 
Reminder: there will be a Testing WG meeting today,
Feb 28th, at UTC 15:00-16:00

https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Bi-Weekly+Meeting

I hope someone will act as backup chair if I am delayed
(I’m attending a face2face meeting this week).

see you then,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 12:03 PM
To: ahot...@cisco.com; David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Sorry, I didn’t see that mistake, I’ve been copying the line
from other meeting headers.

I’ll fix it on the wiki, 0700 PST. AFAIK the Beijing time is correct,
and IST is on a half-hour, which is also correct.

Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 11:17 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}


Hi Al,

Sorry, I missed the working group meeting as I was fooled by the time 
announcement in the wiki 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting)
“Testing WG Meeting - 21 Feb 2019  - Usual Time: UTC 15:00-16:00 / PST 
8:00-9:00 / Beijing 23:00-24:00 / IST 20:30-21:30”

Meeting was done when I joined. Turns out the meeting was actually an hour 
earlier (should be PST 7:00-8:00 or PDT 8:00-9:00), I should have verified in 
my Outlook calendar.
I hope California will ditch this DST soon.


   Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:02 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>, 
David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "test...@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi Alec, please see below.

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:19 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).
[acm]
No calendar invites yet this year, just mail and updates on
the Test WG wiki page.

Our meeting Thursday will determine what the new invite would look-like.
Right now, there seems to be consensus on “bi-weekly meetings”,
and it appears we no longer need the APAC-time-friendly week.

Thanks for filling out the wiki page, and hope to see you
Thursday if you can make it.

regards,
Al

  Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>, 
"Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>, OLLIVIER Cédric 
IMT/OLN mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>, 
Mingjiang Li mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>, Trevor 
Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"HU, BIN" mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-21 Thread Al Morton 
Sorry, I didn’t see that mistake, I’ve been copying the line
from other meeting headers.

I’ll fix it on the wiki, 0700 PST. AFAIK the Beijing time is correct,
and IST is on a half-hour, which is also correct.

Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2019 11:17 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; David McBride 
; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}


Hi Al,

Sorry, I missed the working group meeting as I was fooled by the time 
announcement in the wiki 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting)
“Testing WG Meeting - 21 Feb 2019  - Usual Time: UTC 15:00-16:00 / PST 
8:00-9:00 / Beijing 23:00-24:00 / IST 20:30-21:30”

Meeting was done when I joined. Turns out the meeting was actually an hour 
earlier (should be PST 7:00-8:00 or PDT 8:00-9:00), I should have verified in 
my Outlook calendar.
I hope California will ditch this DST soon.


   Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:02 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" mailto:ahot...@cisco.com>>, 
David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "test...@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi Alec, please see below.

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:19 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>>; David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).
[acm]
No calendar invites yet this year, just mail and updates on
the Test WG wiki page.

Our meeting Thursday will determine what the new invite would look-like.
Right now, there seems to be consensus on “bi-weekly meetings”,
and it appears we no longer need the APAC-time-friendly week.

Thanks for filling out the wiki page, and hope to see you
Thursday if you can make it.

regards,
Al

  Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>, 
"Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>, OLLIVIER Cédric 
IMT/OLN mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>, 
Mingjiang Li mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>, Trevor 
Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"HU, BIN" mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-21 Thread Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org 

Hi Al,

Sorry, I missed the working group meeting as I was fooled by the time 
announcement in the wiki 
(https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting)
“Testing WG Meeting - 21 Feb 2019  - Usual Time: UTC 15:00-16:00 / PST 
8:00-9:00 / Beijing 23:00-24:00 / IST 20:30-21:30”

Meeting was done when I joined. Turns out the meeting was actually an hour 
earlier (should be PST 7:00-8:00 or PDT 8:00-9:00), I should have verified in 
my Outlook calendar.
I hope California will ditch this DST soon.


   Alec



From:  on behalf of Al Morton 
Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 at 7:02 AM
To: "Alec Hothan (ahothan)" , David McBride 
, "opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 

Cc: "test...@lists.opnfv.org" 
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi Alec, please see below.

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:19 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; David McBride 
; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).
[acm]
No calendar invites yet this year, just mail and updates on
the Test WG wiki page.

Our meeting Thursday will determine what the new invite would look-like.
Right now, there seems to be consensus on “bi-weekly meetings”,
and it appears we no longer need the APAC-time-friendly week.

Thanks for filling out the wiki page, and hope to see you
Thursday if you can make it.

regards,
Al

  Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>, 
"Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>, OLLIVIER Cédric 
IMT/OLN mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>, 
Mingjiang Li mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>, Trevor 
Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"HU, BIN" mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-20 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Hi Alec, please see below.

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 8:19 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) ; David McBride 
; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).
[acm]
No calendar invites yet this year, just mail and updates on
the Test WG wiki page.

Our meeting Thursday will determine what the new invite would look-like.
Right now, there seems to be consensus on “bi-weekly meetings”,
and it appears we no longer need the APAC-time-friendly week.

Thanks for filling out the wiki page, and hope to see you
Thursday if you can make it.

regards,
Al

  Alec



From: mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>> on behalf of Al 
Morton mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>>
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>, 
"Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>, OLLIVIER Cédric 
IMT/OLN mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>, 
Mingjiang Li mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>, Trevor 
Bramwell mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>, 
"HU, BIN" mailto:bh5...@att.com>>, test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-20 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Thanks Mark, it will help a lot if you attend,
and we all appreciate that you are giving-up
vacation time!

Can you "unpack" your point: "discussion around Akraino" ?

Test WG Priority for the upcoming release would be a good
pre-requisite for the topic David McBride suggested:

  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements
  for the new release process.

I see that quite a few more people have responded on the wiki
(thanks!), so I think we will have a good representation of
testers tomorrow.  I will send a one-time invite.

regards,
Al

From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 6:38 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Cc: David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; Foley, Emma L ; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) ; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

I am actually on vacation this week, but with the discussion around Akraino am 
interested in participating.

I would also like to get an idea from other test WG members as to what our 
priority for the upcoming release should be.
Regards,
Mark

On Feb 19, 2019, at 18:11, Al Morton 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:

[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I'll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that's an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn't find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-20 Thread MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L ; Yuyang (Gabriel) 
; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: status of test working group meeting?

Al,

Thanks for the response.  I'm not sure why the email distribution was slow.

In any case, I think that having a regularly scheduled meeting is important.  
If weekly seems unmanageable, then I'd suggest bi-weekly meetings, instead.

Here's a suggested plan.  If you don't mind Al, I'd like to designate you as 
Chair for the next meeting.  If you could, please send an invitation.  A 
suggested agenda is as follows:

  1.  Decide on meeting frequency
  2.  Decide on rotating chair schedule for the next 6 months (who & when)
  3.  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new 
release process.
Item #3 is going to take some time, so barring any other urgent issues, I 
suggest that be the topic for the meetings for the foreseeable future.  Let me 
know what you think.

David

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:53 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:
Hi David,

We planned two meetings in January:
the f2f meeting during the plugfest was
quite well-attended, and we planned a
follow-up on Jan 24 (when Cedric would
present his Xtesting material again).

I chaired both January sessions, but
the meeting on the 24th had to be re-scheduled:
My eye-doctor moved my appointment to a time
that conflicted with the meeting.

I sent mail to tech-discuss and test-wg
lists to find a time to re-schedule, but the messages
were long-delayed before distribution (??)
and then no one replied. I assumed that
it must be a busy time, it certainly was for me!

For the future:
We

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-19 Thread Alec via Lists.Opnfv.Org 

Is there a recurring meeting invite still ongoing? I don’t see the meeting in 
my calendar any more (last one was Dec 27).

  Alec



From:  on behalf of Al Morton 
Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2019 at 3:09 PM
To: David McBride , 
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" 
Cc: "Foley, Emma L" , "Yuyang (Gabriel)" 
, OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
, Mingjiang Li , Trevor 
Bramwell , "HU, BIN" , test-wg 

Subject: Re: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of 
test working group meeting?}

Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of 
MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride ; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L ; Yuyang (Gabriel) 
; OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
; Mingjiang Li ; Trevor 
Bramwell ; HU, BIN ; test-wg 

Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: status of test working group meeting?

Al,

Thanks for the response.  I'm not sure why the email distribution was slow.

In any case, I think that having a regularly scheduled meeting is important.  
If weekly seems unmanageable, then I'd suggest bi-weekly meetings, instead.

Here's a suggested plan.  If you don't mind Al, I'd like to designate you as 
Chair for the next meeting.  If you could, please send an invitation.  A 
suggested agenda is as follows:
1.   Decide on meeting frequency
2.   Decide on rotating chair schedule for the next 6 months (who & when)
3.   Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new 
release process.
Item #3 is going to take some time, so barring any other urgent issues, I 
suggest that be the topic for the meetings for the foreseeable future.  Let me 
know what you think.

David

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 9:53 AM MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:
Hi David,

We planned two meetings in January:
the f2f meeting during the plugfest was
quite well-attended, and

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test working group meeting?}

2019-02-19 Thread Mark Beierl 
I am actually on vacation this week, but with the discussion around Akraino am 
interested in participating.

I would also like to get an idea from other test WG members as to what our 
priority for the upcoming release should be.

Regards,
Mark

On Feb 19, 2019, at 18:11, Al Morton 
mailto:a...@research.att.com>> wrote:


[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Hi all, as a Reminder ...

I’ll determine if we have a Quorum of Testers
on Wednesday, to give time for a meeting announcement
(or cancellation) to reach everyone before the proposed
Thursday meeting.

Let everyone know your plans here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting
(partial responses in the table are acceptable at this point).

thanks,
Al

From: test...@lists.opnfv.org 
[mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2019 1:36 PM
To: David McBride 
mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org>>; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: [test-wg] Future Testing WG meeting logistics was{RE: status of test 
working group meeting?}

***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT ***
Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information.
Hi David and all,
(sorry for the response-delay:
testing demands lots of time/weekends...)

I suggest to start the meeting logistics discussion by poll,
then convene a meeting on Feb 21 if there will be
a quorum of testing folks to finalize. This week would be the
APAC meeting time anyway, and that’s an additional
point to discuss.

So, let me kindly ask that folks assemble their preferences here:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/meetings/Test+Working+Group+Weekly+Meeting

Also, on item 3 below:
Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new release 
process.
Is this the current status (or is there info I didn’t find)?
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/testing/Gating+the+New+CD+Process

However, item 4 of
https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/Code_and_Release_Quality
has some relevant discussion.

thanks for your time, everyone!
Al


From: David McBride [mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2019 12:14 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) mailto:a...@research.att.com>>
Cc: Foley, Emma L mailto:emma.l.fo...@intel.com>>; 
Yuyang (Gabriel) mailto:gabriel.yuy...@huawei.com>>; 
OLLIVIER Cédric IMT/OLN 
mailto:cedric.olliv...@orange.com>>; Mingjiang Li 
mailto:rexlee8...@gmail.com>>; Trevor Bramwell 
mailto:tbramw...@linuxfoundation.org>>; HU, BIN 
mailto:bh5...@att.com>>; test-wg 
mailto:test...@lists.opnfv.org>>
Subject: Re: status of test working group meeting?

Al,

Thanks for the response.  I'm not sure why the email distribution was slow.

In any case, I think that having a regularly scheduled meeting is important.  
If weekly seems unmanageable, then I'd suggest bi-weekly meetings, instead.

Here's a suggested plan.  If you don't mind Al, I'd like to designate you as 
Chair for the next meeting.  If you could, please send an invitation.  A 
suggested agenda is as follows:

  1.  Decide on meeting frequency
  2.  Decide on rotating chair schedule for the next 6 months (who & when)
  3.  Start developing a recommendation for gate requirements for the new 
release process.
Item #3 is going to take some time, so barring any other urgent issues, I 
suggest that be the topic for the meetings for the foreseeable future.  Let me 
know what you think.

David

On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at