Re: [PROPOSAL] Release Pax Exam 5.0.0

[françois papon]

Sounds good for me :)

thanks,

*François Papon*
*papon...@gmail.com *


Le mar. 22 sept. 2020 à 14:04, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> None from me ;)
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 22 wrz 2020 o 13:45 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As we fixed several issues and did some changes in Pax Exam master, I
>> think it makes sense to cut Pax Exam 5.0.0.
>>
>> I have a couple of things to add but the release is almost ready.
>>
>> No objection ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3TDTkjhGfpFWVN2weRXNsn5phRE6d-bbLcOigW20ep%3DBg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3TDTkjhGfpFWVN2weRXNsn5phRE6d-bbLcOigW20ep%3DBg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhq-9ExM3-4QkpmwW_g0CVJFsm7impDinsW%3D4po6Ud%2B83A%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhq-9ExM3-4QkpmwW_g0CVJFsm7impDinsW%3D4po6Ud%2B83A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOiwBLLbLkDALx6YBTm5PiBtL_1BjHqKjFFSnyHaDpXUyQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: Jira or github?

[françois papon]

It make sense to use Github for all.
+1

regards,

*François Papon*
*papon...@gmail.com *


Le lun. 27 avr. 2020 à 10:12, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J <
ops4j@googlegroups.com> a écrit :

> +1 from me as we essentilally haven't used the real power of jira over
> the past years and it was a little bit brittle to register for two services
>
> Am 27.04.20 um 09:57 schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek:
> > +1 - especially for commit-issue references!
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/7d667970-1f3e-0946-bfa9-c5ef2e101306%40googlemail.com
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOjwjkTVP-AqF1OQS0UMWUEfPujmws-GZ_TfQ9fth8o7cA%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [VOTE] Decommissioning of old jenkins instance ci.ops4j.org

[françois papon]

+1 for decommission that instance and let's modernize things

regards,

*François Papon*

Le ven. 3 avr. 2020 à 10:27, Toni Menzel  a écrit :

> Hey,
>
> For some years we had a jenkins CI instance running on a rented hetzner
> server.
> As mentioned before, this instance seems dysfunctional and not used
> anymore.
>
> So I would like to vote for decommissioning that.
> The cancelation date would be *16th of April*.
>
> Once we decide on getting rid of that server bill, I am happy to sponsor a
> replacement SaaS if there is nothing suitable available for OSS capacities.
>
> I just feel that the manually maintained jenkins server is not that giving
> that much value and should be replaced by a more modern pipeline.
>
> [ ] yes, decommission that instance and let's modernize things
> [ ] no, don‘t do it now, my project is actually using it ci.ops4j.org and
> cannot use github actions or similar (please get in contact)
>
> Vote closes not earlier than next wednesday april 8th.
>
> Stay healthy everyone,
> Toni
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHSpTa%2B74YLivjwcdEwO4KTOJ8%3Dtm%3DFBhZZC%3DtnXgP828Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAEjgzHSpTa%2B74YLivjwcdEwO4KTOJ8%3Dtm%3DFBhZZC%3DtnXgP828Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOhSM0WcRattG8r9pJ-YMYBatvTzc%2B7JDJ7mgySc%2BSps0Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [VOTE] JB Onofre takes over ops4j domains

[françois papon]

+1

I can also participate with some € and I will be more than happy to
contribute in anything else around OPS4J!

regards,

*François Papon*


Le mar. 31 mars 2020 à 16:27, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> +1
>
> I can't declare anything about participating in costs, but I guess I could
> spend few €/year.
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 31 mar 2020 o 16:01 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J <
> ops4j@googlegroups.com> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I support that JB takes over.
>>
>> regards, Achim
>>
>> Am Di., 31. März 2020 um 08:23 Uhr schrieb Niclas Hedhman <
>> nic...@hedhman.org>:
>>
>>>
>>> Since the OPS4J inception in 2005, I have paid the ops4j domain names. I
>>> think 15-16 years is enough, and have recently announced that I am no
>>> longer willing to be the custodian of these domain names.
>>>
>>> JB Onofre has offered to take over.
>>>
>>> Vote;
>>>
>>> [ ] - JB Onofre as new custodian
>>> [ ] - No. Let's find some other solution.
>>>
>>>
>>> // Niclas
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> --
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKc%2BU1zrh162G2ohMDO2Vr3WP4TkFkHZ2QWe1KC5G9Mz-A%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKc%2BU1zrh162G2ohMDO2Vr3WP4TkFkHZ2QWe1KC5G9Mz-A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Apache Member
>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer
>> & Project Lead
>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13eU%2BYDTSZvtYGETcFqxt8g3yOGQi4ua1ayOxkeVYeCQgg%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAD0r13eU%2BYDTSZvtYGETcFqxt8g3yOGQi4ua1ayOxkeVYeCQgg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhoa%2BqcgcHSjdB%3D0CvkWM0%3DX55RtAaTXCB4NLUzFK2Vm4Q%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhoa%2BqcgcHSjdB%3D0CvkWM0%3DX55RtAaTXCB4NLUzFK2Vm4Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgYHkRc7697YHCiJHBujUFOL_Vi0hdxfASS19KZsMShzw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: ops4j domain names

[françois papon]

It make sense :)

regards,

François

Le lun. 23 mars 2020 à 09:58, Toni Menzel  a écrit :

> yep, moving CI to 100% githib actions would allow us to decommission the
> old Jenkins instance.
> Is there a resolution regarding the domain names yet?
>
> *Toni Menzel | Strategic Software Delivery Consultant @ rebaze GmbH*
> Consultant profiletonimenzel.com 
> Consultancy profile  rebaze.com 
> *#CloudNative #Accelerate #DevEx*
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:49 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> That's a good idea.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 8:50 AM Guillaume Nodet 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Imho, we should switch everything to github.  I wouldn't even bother
>>> paying for a domain, i think something like ops4j.github.org is enough.
>>>
>>> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 13:01, Toni Menzel  a
>>> écrit :
>>>
 *TL/TR:*
 I'd be also happy to pay for ops4j.org (the one that is actively used
 atm).

 *Long version:*
 Since this is coming up now, there is a general question were to go
 with OPS4J in general.

 It predated github and probably was back then the easiest way to get
 hands dirty in a non-trivial java based OSS community where trust was
 default. Think about it, back then everyone could get write access to the
 subversion repo and start hacking on new or existing projects. Including
 admin access to jira and whatever else was existing back then. Pax URL, Pax
 Runner, Pax Exam, Pax Construct etc. all got initiated by individuals
 without asking for permission. I mean.. thats Names like Pax Tinybundles
 got to life.. but oh well.

 Now, why am I writing this: there is - at least for pax url, web and
 exam - a huge user base that seems to be quite healthy. Even if there is
 just that "ops4j" name of the github organization now, no website etc.

 So, question: what are the options? Let me just drop them here that
 come to my mind (ordered from easy-as-py to more complicated options):

- keep things as is, find individual sponsors like I do with the
Build Server (who uses that still by the way??), and JB or me (this 
 means
I'd be also fine to pay for the org domain that is in active use,too 
 btw).
It would be good to have two different companies or legal entities 
 backing
this anyway.
- Modernize OPS4J a bit. Get it a landing page at least and a clear
who is behind all this, who pays etc. Maybe look at Github Sponsoring to
spread costs across user base - avoid single entity control.
- Maybe look into making it a proper foundation or at least an
entity that makes the work here eligible for future donations. I am not
sure of this is worth it. But i feel Open Source != Open Governance.
- Retire non active projects and donate active projects to apache.
Probably difficult because of Intellectual Property)

 wdyt?
 Toni




 *Toni Menzel | rebaze.com  | growing developer
 culture*


 On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:37 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
 jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Niclas
>
> First of all, thanks a lot for all what you did (and still doing ).
>
> I’m ready to take the hand for the domain and finance them.
>
> Thoughts ?
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 12:13, Niclas Hedhman  a
> écrit :
>
>> Everyone,
>> In a few months time (June), the OPS4J domain names are up for
>> renewal. And I have been paying for those for 15 years now, and since I 
>> no
>> longer participate in OPS4J I would like to transfer the domain names. 
>> But
>> where to??
>>
>> Ideally a foundation that would be Ok to take it over, otherwise to a
>> trusted community member.
>>
>> Ideas are welcome, and should be discussed. I have no opinion and
>> will simply follow what you all can agree on.
>>
>> ops4j.org
>> ops4j.net
>> ops4j.com
>>
>>
>> Cheers
>> Niclas
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CADmm%2BKf7a0rzdkro7v-rxBV1p1-KkSMTE_BQT2HhUZyOUM9jyA%40mail.gmail.com
>> 
>> .
>>
> --
> --
> --

Re: [PAX EXAM] Release 4.13.2

[françois papon]

Thanks JB!

regards,

*François Papon*



Le ven. 21 févr. 2020 à 08:32, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> Pax Exam 4.13.2 has been released. I'm preparing the news on OPS4J site
> and I will send the announcement email.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:11 PM Oliver Lietz  wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 11:40:53 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>> > Sure. I will.
>>
>> Done. PAXEXAM-934 and dependency updates (fixing HTTP issue with Maven
>> Central).
>>
>> Please go ahead, JB.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> O.
>>
>> > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 11:23, Oliver Lietz  a
>> écrit :
>> > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 7:07:24 AM CET Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>> wrote:
>> > > > Hi
>> > > >
>> > > > I will.
>> > >
>> > > Let me add some dependency updates and improvements before cutting the
>> > > release. Can you add version 4.13.2 to JIRA?
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > O.
>> > >
>> > > > Regards
>> > > > JB
>> > > >
>> > > > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 00:35, Oliver Lietz  a
>> > >
>> > > écrit :
>> > > > > Hi *,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I need a new release of Pax Exam: 4.13.2
>> > > > > Who can manage versions in JIRA?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > O.
>> [...]
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/6567372.OaYqkxrSbj%40madness.front.ruhr
>> .
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3SXR2F_Yd2THvwGROG6vpZKHED5Gh7CR%3Dfz3bpkzmL-ZQ%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAB8EV3SXR2F_Yd2THvwGROG6vpZKHED5Gh7CR%3Dfz3bpkzmL-ZQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOiQUm6-281MM80b230SLsKyOJfd15paAzaBcoiwvMktNg%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

[françois papon]

Hi,

I think Travis is good but I never tested CircleCI.

I don't know if I can but I would be happy to help :)

regards,

*François Papon*
*papon...@gmail.com *


Le mar. 3 déc. 2019 à 08:48, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J <
ops4j@googlegroups.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> at some point I was under the impression, that Jenkins just was turned of.
> Therefore I switched to CircleCI and Travis to find which one would work
> best.
> The missing staging repo is strange though ...
> If we still have the jenkins server around we should get in Contact with
> Niclas and Toni.
> Cause then something is awfully wrong with it and should be "terminated".
>
> regards, Achim
>
>
> Am Mo., 2. Dez. 2019 um 12:48 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some Pax projects (like Pax Web) used both Jenkins AND Travis. We still
>> have the configuration in place.
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> On 02/12/2019 11:24, françois papon wrote:
>>
>> Thanks JB!
>>
>> I also check http://ci.ops4j.org/jenkins/ and it's very slow and
>> unusable.
>>
>> Is there an another CI for the projects? (like Travis).
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> *François Papon*
>> *papon...@gmail.com *
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 2 déc. 2019 à 11:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
>> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Let me check.
>>>
>>> I keep you posted.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> On 02/12/2019 11:01, françois papon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ is
>>> not available.
>>>
>>> Is it normal? May be the repository have been moved?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> * François*
>>> --
>>> --
>>> --
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgGX7SC5V27x88U%2BDAen02eMWm1WUbyZpoFq-jotondUw%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgGX7SC5V27x88U%2BDAen02eMWm1WUbyZpoFq-jotondUw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> --
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1eabdde2-01a1-8cfe-ac12-a2b7902aeb6e%40gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1eabdde2-01a1-8cfe-ac12-a2b7902aeb6e%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOjmxWkaVa8ELw4q_bA9jCp%3Dw1n09%3DP22tBY7i3iv0pp9Q%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOjmxWkaVa8ELw4q_bA9jCp%3Dw1n09%3DP22tBY7i3iv0pp9Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/6ac8d225-fa0c-2942-d5c2-bb5651298ca1%40gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/6ac8d225-fa0c-2942-d5c2-b

Re: [snapshot] - Repository

[françois papon]

Thanks JB!

I also check http://ci.ops4j.org/jenkins/ and it's very slow and unusable.

Is there an another CI for the projects? (like Travis).

regards,

*François Papon*
*papon...@gmail.com *


Le lun. 2 déc. 2019 à 11:20, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> Let me check.
>
> I keep you posted.
>
> Regards
> JB
> On 02/12/2019 11:01, françois papon wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ is not
> available.
>
> Is it normal? May be the repository have been moved?
>
> regards,
>
> * François*
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgGX7SC5V27x88U%2BDAen02eMWm1WUbyZpoFq-jotondUw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgGX7SC5V27x88U%2BDAen02eMWm1WUbyZpoFq-jotondUw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1eabdde2-01a1-8cfe-ac12-a2b7902aeb6e%40gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/1eabdde2-01a1-8cfe-ac12-a2b7902aeb6e%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOjmxWkaVa8ELw4q_bA9jCp%3Dw1n09%3DP22tBY7i3iv0pp9Q%40mail.gmail.com.

[snapshot] - Repository

[françois papon]

Hi,

The https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/ops4j-snapshots/ is not
available.

Is it normal? May be the repository have been moved?

regards,

* François*

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOgGX7SC5V27x88U%2BDAen02eMWm1WUbyZpoFq-jotondUw%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [PAXLOGGING] Integration tests using Karaf

[françois papon]

Thanks Grzegorz for sharing!

regards,

*François Papon*

Le jeu. 18 juil. 2019 à 14:12, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Hello
>
> With https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXLOGGING-262 I added Karaf (4.2.6)
> test support to Pax Logging.
>
> As guessed, it was tricky:
>  - custom Karaf distro had to be prepared to contain pax-logging bundles
> from current reactor
>  - logging configuration for pax-exam-container-karaf forked by
> maven-failsafe-plugin and forking another (3rd) JVM with Karaf itself has
> to be careful
>
> Some findings/highlights:
>  - I created very slim pax-exam configuration for custom Karaf distro
> built just before the integration tests (separate Maven artifact)
>  - there are no conflicts between logging from Maven, logging from forked
> pax-exam and forked Karaf
>  - default service log provided by pax-logging-api (even before it starts!
> just after it resolves) works like a charm - bundle started BEFORE
> pax-logging-api can successfully log through SLF4J API
>
> I described the details in
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/tree/paxlogging-1.11.x#testing-in-karaf
>
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhq8b3y-fPtJOBaf15%2BNOFPEQK%3DxrCpXHMn4L2ZHwkXNuw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhq8b3y-fPtJOBaf15%2BNOFPEQK%3DxrCpXHMn4L2ZHwkXNuw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOhM3r9sHPCHMz90jVgzs-DanF8g-je_%3DjOpwAMcVWc1Yg%40mail.gmail.com.

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Releasing 1.11.0 soon?

[françois papon]

Thanks guys for the great job!

regards,

*François*


Le lun. 3 juin 2019 à 15:07, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> +1 for 1.11.0, I will test on karaf-4.2.x branch (maybe 1.10.2 to
> cherry-pick PAXLOGGING-257 is also an option).
>
> Definitely, I would like to update master to 2.0.0 version with OSGi R7
> support (PAXLOGGING-255 I started during the week end).
>
> Regards
> JB
> On 03/06/2019 12:08, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> After longer-than-expected work, I think master-improvements branch is in
> good shape now. Jean Babtiste-Onofre fixed PAXLOGGING-257, splitting
> pax-logging-log4j2 into "core" and "extra" (fragment) bundles, decreasing
> the number of cases when pax-logging-log4j2 refreshes.
>
> Total number of 91 integration tests pass (90 more than initially ;)).
>
> What do you think about releasing 1.11.0.CR1? Then we can try implementing
> R7 org.osgi.service.log in 2.0.0.
>
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAAdXmhoYWarwC-2RxgqM4YNzoOnMKHPauHGvDZzUh6Lq3YPW3g%40mail.gmail.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/f9b7b695-dad3-c85f-0a0c-e76abb4e29d1%40gmail.com
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ops4j/CAJ1FmOitBVjro0uc1h9Oqdvk-F1AAzmwgc-T518yyDQbWGrCfQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] New integration tests

[françois papon]

Great work!

Thanks ;)

regards,

*François*


Le jeu. 16 mai 2019 à 19:40, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Hello!
>
> Even more integration tests (including Logback) - I finally created the
> tests I always wanted - that restart/refresh pax-logging bundles inside the
> test itself!
>
> I finished Log4J1 cleanup, the API/Implementation is separated the best
> way I could do it. Everything is described in the readme -
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/blob/master-improvements/readme.adoc
> .
> I even described *all* packages from log4j:log4j and
> log4j:apache-log4j-extras:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/tree/master-improvements#summary-of-package-splitting-for-log4j1
> - where does given package come from, in which bundles it's
> Private-Packaged or Export-Packaged (or both!).
> There's even nice table summarizing log levels/thresholds for
> Syslog/Log4J1/Log4J2/Logback/Slf4J/JUL/OSGi:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/blob/master-improvements/readme.adoc#level-and-threshold
>
> I took care that pax-logging project doesn't include *any* unchanged
> source file from log4j (or extras) - everything is either included and
> changed, or embedded using Private|Export-Package or
> maven-dependency-plugin:unpack (yes - it was needed). Details are described
> in:
>  - osgi.bnd file for pax-logging-service:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/blob/master-improvements/pax-logging-service/osgi.bnd#L22-L45
>  - pom.xml file for pax-logging-service:
> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.logging/blob/master-improvements/pax-logging-service/pom.xml#L97-L142
>
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.264 s -
> AllLoggingFacadesIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.254 s - CleanIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 4, Time elapsed: 1.310 s - DefaultLogIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 2, Time elapsed: 1.349 s -
> DefaultLogThresholdIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 2, Time elapsed: 1.343 s -
> DefaultLogToFileSingletonIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 4, Time elapsed: 1.511 s -
> Log4J1BuiltinAppendersIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 9, Time elapsed: 1.498 s - Log4J1IntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.436 s -
> Log4J1LocationInfoIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.403 s - Log4J1MDCIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.355 s -
> Log4J1OsgiAppendersIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.360 s -
> Log4J1OsgiErrorHandlersIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 2, Time elapsed: 1.430 s -
> Log4J1OsgiLayoutsIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.414 s - Log4J1
> *RefreshPaxLoggingApi*IntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.521 s - Log4J1
> *RestartBothPaxLoggingBundles*IntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.441 s - Log4J1
> *RestartPaxLoggingApi*IntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.529 s - Log4J1
> *RestartPaxLoggingService*IntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.455 s -
> Log4J1UpdateJULLoggerLevelsIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 3.390 s -
> Log4J1WithConfigAdminIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.457 s -
> Log4J1WithDefaultConfigurationAndNoLog4jDebugIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.363 s -
> Log4J1WithDefaultConfigurationIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.458 s -
> Log4J1WithoutEventAdminIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 4, Time elapsed: 1.411 s - LogbackIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 3.374 s -
> LogbackWithConfigAdminIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.423 s -
> LogbackWithDefaultConfigurationAndNoLogbackDebugIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.406 s -
> LogbackWithDefaultConfigurationIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.352 s -
> LogbackWithoutEventAdminIntegrationTest
>  – [INFO] Tests run: 1, Time elapsed: 1.356 s -
> SimplestPaxLoggingServiceIntegrationTest
>
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 14 maj 2019 o 15:45 Grzegorz Grzybek 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Hello
>>
>> I continue my work on making pax-logging more maintainable.
>>
>> The branch with work-in-progress is here
>> 
>> - check the long(ish) readme.
>>
>> Here are integration tests in 1.10.1:
>>
>> Running org.ops4j.pax.logging.it.appender.CustomAppenderTest
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 1.28 sec
>> - in org.ops4j.pax.logging.it.appender.CustomAppenderTest
>>
>> Results :
>>
>> Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>>
>> And here are tests I did so far:
>>
>> [INFO] Running org.ops4j.pax.logging.it.AllLoggingFacadesIntegrationTest
>> [INFO] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed:
>> 1.544 s - in org.ops4j.pax.logging.it.AllLoggingFacadesIntegrationTest
>> 

Re: [PAX-LOGGING] Cleanup

[françois papon]

Thanks Grzegorz!

regards,

*François Papon*
*papon...@gmail.com *


Le jeu. 18 avr. 2019 à 09:54, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Hello
>
> I have few issues backlogged for PAXLOGGING Jira:
>  – PAXLOGGING-243: Incorrect bundle names in the logs in case of the logs
> come from embeded lib
>  – PAXLOGGING-247: pax-logging-api/Slf4jMDCAdapter uses stale MDC after
> refreshing service bundle
>  – PAXLOGGING-249: JUL loggers are not properly configured if used before
> calling PaxLoggingServiceImpl#setJULLevel
>  – PAXLOGGING-250: Log4j2 - JNDI based JDBC appender should be more lazy
>
> So I started to review the code (licenses, deps, upgrading from old
> org.ops4j:master:3.3.0, ...).
>
> I see some code could be refreshed and improved. Here are my concerns
> which I'll try to handle if I won't get any feedback):
>  – should we switch compiler settings to Java8? Not necessary
>  – I want to upgrade log4j2, slf4j, logback and jboss logging deps
>  – I want to get rid of those source files from external libs which can be
> simply private packaged
>  – I want to switch org.ops4j.pax.logging.OSGIPaxLoggingManager usage to
> singleton - now, each logging facade uses own copy of this manager, which
> is effectively a tracker for given PaxLoggingService.
>
> What do you think?
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PAX-JDBC Error during pax-jdbc-config bundle deactivation

[françois papon]

Thanks !

*François Papon*


Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 13:54, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Release is done. pax-jdbc-1.3.1 should be in maven central soon.
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> śr., 26 wrz 2018 o 10:10 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> +1 for the release
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>> Le 26 sept. 2018, à 03:46, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
>> écrit:
>>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 is fixed now. I'd like to
>>> cut a release of pax-jdbc 1.3.1 this week - there are no more unresolved
>>> PAXJDBC issues. Anything more before I start the release?
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>
>>> śr., 26 wrz 2018 o 09:13 françois papon < papon...@gmail.com>
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> Thanks Grzegorz !
>>>>
>>>> *François Papon*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 11:02, Grzegorz Grzybek < gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hello
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for reporting - I've created
>>>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 issue and I'm working on
>>>>> it - I think I'll release 1.3.1 this week.
>>>>>
>>>>> best regards
>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>
>>>>> wt., 25 wrz 2018 o 11:51 Matej Ferencak < matej.feren...@traxpay.com>
>>>>> napisał(a):
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We noticed a problem since PAX JDBC 1.3.0.
>>>>>> When using pax-jdbc-config bundle, there is a
>>>>>> ConcurrentModificationException thrown during its deactivation.
>>>>>> This for instance leads to failed feature deployments in case the
>>>>>> bundle has to be restarted.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We are using Karaf 4.2.1, which recently switched to pax-jdbc 1.3.0.
>>>>>> Earlier Karaf versions which included 1.2.1 did not have this problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The actual issue was introduced with git
>>>>>> revision 02e93e6dd45057d026bf7cefd4ccbe724531fab4
>>>>>> Take a look
>>>>>> at 
>>>>>> pax-jdbc-config/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/jdbc/config/impl/DataSourceConfigManager.java
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Override
>>>>>> public void deleted(String pid) {
>>>>>> ServiceTracker tracker = trackers.remove(pid);
>>>>>> if (tracker != null) {
>>>>>> tracker.close();
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> synchronized void destroy() {
>>>>>> for (String pid : trackers.keySet()) {
>>>>>> deleted(pid);
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The newly introduced destroy() method has a loop which causes an
>>>>>> exception in case there are more than one data sources configured (which 
>>>>>> is
>>>>>> needed to replicate the issue).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Matej.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co

Re: PAX-JDBC Error during pax-jdbc-config bundle deactivation

[françois papon]

It's good for me :)

regards,

*François Papon*


Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 11:46, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Hello
>
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 is fixed now. I'd like to cut
> a release of pax-jdbc 1.3.1 this week - there are no more unresolved
> PAXJDBC issues. Anything more before I start the release?
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> śr., 26 wrz 2018 o 09:13 françois papon  napisał(a):
>
>> Thanks Grzegorz !
>>
>> *François Papon*
>>
>>
>> Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 11:02, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Hello
>>>
>>> Thanks for reporting - I've created
>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 issue and I'm working on it
>>> - I think I'll release 1.3.1 this week.
>>>
>>> best regards
>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>
>>> wt., 25 wrz 2018 o 11:51 Matej Ferencak 
>>> napisał(a):
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> We noticed a problem since PAX JDBC 1.3.0.
>>>> When using pax-jdbc-config bundle, there is a
>>>> ConcurrentModificationException thrown during its deactivation.
>>>> This for instance leads to failed feature deployments in case the
>>>> bundle has to be restarted.
>>>>
>>>> We are using Karaf 4.2.1, which recently switched to pax-jdbc 1.3.0.
>>>> Earlier Karaf versions which included 1.2.1 did not have this problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The actual issue was introduced with git
>>>> revision 02e93e6dd45057d026bf7cefd4ccbe724531fab4
>>>> Take a look
>>>> at 
>>>> pax-jdbc-config/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/jdbc/config/impl/DataSourceConfigManager.java
>>>>
>>>> @Override
>>>> public void deleted(String pid) {
>>>> ServiceTracker tracker = trackers.remove(pid);
>>>> if (tracker != null) {
>>>> tracker.close();
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> synchronized void destroy() {
>>>> for (String pid : trackers.keySet()) {
>>>> deleted(pid);
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> The newly introduced destroy() method has a loop which causes an
>>>> exception in case there are more than one data sources configured (which is
>>>> needed to replicate the issue).
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matej.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> --
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: PAX-JDBC Error during pax-jdbc-config bundle deactivation

[françois papon]

Thanks Grzegorz !

*François Papon*


Le mer. 26 sept. 2018 à 11:02, Grzegorz Grzybek  a
écrit :

> Hello
>
> Thanks for reporting - I've created
> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXJDBC-133 issue and I'm working on it -
> I think I'll release 1.3.1 this week.
>
> best regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> wt., 25 wrz 2018 o 11:51 Matej Ferencak 
> napisał(a):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We noticed a problem since PAX JDBC 1.3.0.
>> When using pax-jdbc-config bundle, there is a
>> ConcurrentModificationException thrown during its deactivation.
>> This for instance leads to failed feature deployments in case the bundle
>> has to be restarted.
>>
>> We are using Karaf 4.2.1, which recently switched to pax-jdbc 1.3.0.
>> Earlier Karaf versions which included 1.2.1 did not have this problem.
>>
>>
>> The actual issue was introduced with git
>> revision 02e93e6dd45057d026bf7cefd4ccbe724531fab4
>> Take a look
>> at 
>> pax-jdbc-config/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/jdbc/config/impl/DataSourceConfigManager.java
>>
>> @Override
>> public void deleted(String pid) {
>> ServiceTracker tracker = trackers.remove(pid);
>> if (tracker != null) {
>> tracker.close();
>> }
>> }
>>
>> synchronized void destroy() {
>> for (String pid : trackers.keySet()) {
>> deleted(pid);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> The newly introduced destroy() method has a loop which causes an
>> exception in case there are more than one data sources configured (which is
>> needed to replicate the issue).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matej.
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Need access to Issue Tracker

[françois papon]

Hi guys,

I'm also interested to be add in the Pax JIRA and I already had an account
on https://id.atlassian.com/login

Thanks ;)

François

*papon...@gmail.com <papon...@gmail.com>*

2018-05-15 18:24 GMT+04:00 Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
jeanbaptiste.ono...@gmail.com>:

> I will.
>
> Regards
> JB
> Le 15 mai 2018, à 16:15, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> a écrit:
>>
>> I have an account already, please add me. Thanks
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alex soto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On May 15, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Grzegorz Grzybek <gr.grzy...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> I think you have to start with https://id.atlassian.com/login
>>
>> If you already have account, I (think I) can add you to PAXJDBC people.
>>
>> regards
>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>
>> 2018-05-15 14:45 GMT+02:00 Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com>:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I need to create a new issue in Pax JDBC, but I don't have permissions.
>>> What is the procedure to gain access?
>>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> --
>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> --
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/to
>> pic/ops4j/4J0Em3mVVoQ/unsubscribe.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
>> ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>>
>> --
> --
> --
> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "OPS4J" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
-- 
--
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.