Re: [OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

2022-05-05 Thread Wubo (lana)
Hi Adrian,

Thanks for the review. 
We have submitted rev-08 to address this issue and also comments from YANG 
doctor Radek and Greg. 
Please see the 
diff:https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-08.

Thanks,
Bo

-Original Message-
From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] 
Sent: Saturday, April 30, 2022 5:25 AM
To: draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service...@ietf.org
Cc: 'opsawg' 
Subject: Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

Hi,

Apologies for not catching this in the previous review.

I noted that the Security Considerations section (Section 6) doesn't match the 
text suggested (required?) at 
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
Is there a reason for this? Fixing it will remove one f the complaints from 
idnits.

Thanks,
Adrian





___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg


[OPSAWG] Further small issue with draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm

2022-04-29 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi,

Apologies for not catching this in the previous review.

I noted that the Security Considerations section (Section 6) doesn't match
the text suggested (required?) at
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ops/wiki/yang-security-guidelines
Is there a reason for this? Fixing it will remove one f the complaints from
idnits.

Thanks,
Adrian




___
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg