Re: Tor raid [was: cease and desist from my vps provider...]
morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote: Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP belonged to. That's interesting, because it means that running the node away from home doesn't affect the chance of being harassed at 5 AM. :-( -- http://www.predicatori.it/marco/ *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: What are email risks?
On 06/02/2011 17:30, Jerzy Łogiewa wrote: How do scrubbed versions of these headers affect deliverability? Do services flag as spam these messages? The major part of my full time job is as an email administrator. Scrubbing headers will affect deliverability to some systems. Probably not as much as having a Tor exit node IP in your Received headers though. Smarthosting through an anonymous GMail account is a good idea because they don't put the connecting IP address into the Received headers, and systems generally trust mail from GMail more anyway. -- Mike Cardwell https://grepular.com/ https://twitter.com/mickeyc Professional http://cardwellit.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/mikecardwell PGP.mit.edu 0018461F/35BC AF1D 3AA2 1F84 3DC3 B0CF 70A5 F512 0018 461F signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Tor raid [was: cease and desist from my vps provider...]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 thus Marco Predicatori spake: morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote: Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP belonged to. That's interesting, because it means that running the node away from home doesn't affect the chance of being harassed at 5 AM. :-( Well, it's not only due to 'their' misunderstanding of TOR, but it's part of the game: They want to scare you. Timo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNT8Rqfg746kcGBOwRAgpYAJ4hngGOaOT9AFqNrwpMYedyONSNtwCglFEK tCf2m2gHY91SQfQiZbJZ0yo= =jwtS -END PGP SIGNATURE- *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: What are email risks?
On Monday 07 February 2011 04:41:06 t...@lists.grepular.com wrote: The major part of my full time job is as an email administrator. Scrubbing headers will affect deliverability to some systems. Probably not as much as having a Tor exit node IP in your Received headers though. Smarthosting through an anonymous GMail account is a good idea because they don't put the connecting IP address into the Received headers, and systems generally trust mail from GMail more anyway. What about running an anonymous remailer on the same IP address as a Tor exit node? The remailer will probably be middleman, as it was, but I am hoping to run an exit node when I can afford to colo. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Sent e-mails going into spam folders.
I am wondering to what degree people on this list have problems with e-mails going into spam folders because they are using tor nodes. I refer to sending from a webmail (Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, AOL, etc) to another webmail. It seems to me that e-mails sent from Yahoo will end up as spam. Any other experiences or opinions would be interesting.
Re: Sent e-mails going into spam folders.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote: I am wondering to what degree people on this list have problems with e-mails going into spam folders because they are using tor nodes. I refer to sending from a webmail (Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, AOL, etc) to another webmail. It seems to me that e-mails sent from Yahoo will end up as spam. Any other experiences or opinions would be interesting. I don't have any problems generally. It depends on what is in the body of the email and what one's filters are. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Sent e-mails going into spam folders.
On 2/7/2011 4:17 PM, Jon wrote: I don't have any problems generally. It depends on what is in the body of the email and what one's filters are. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/ No problems here. Are or-talk messages you're SENDING or RECEIVING getting flagged? Assuming ones received, just add or-t...@seul.org and or-talk@freehaven.net to your address book, or create filters to allow them through. I created subfolders in Thunderbird, for sent or-talk msgs, rec'd. That way, there's not so many in main inbox. *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor raid [was: cease and desist from my vps provider...]
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Marco Predicatori ma...@predicatori.it wrote: morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote: Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP belonged to. That's interesting, because it means that running the node away from home doesn't affect the chance of being harassed at 5 AM. :-( only if you purchase said services under your real name/accounts or without sufficient indirection. defense in depth++ but that is tangential discussion not for this list... *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Sent e-mails going into spam folders.
On 2/7/2011 1:00 PM, Matthew wrote: I am wondering to what degree people on this list have problems with e-mails going into spam folders because they are using tor nodes. I refer to sending from a webmail (Hotmail, Yahoo, Gmail, AOL, etc) to another webmail. It seems to me that e-mails sent from Yahoo will end up as spam. Any other experiences or opinions would be interesting. Interesting that you mention that. I have McAfee Anti-Spam running on my Thunderbird client which happens to be configured to access several web-mail accounts via localhost:8118 by FoxyProxy. That ports the mail through Polipo. Starting in early January McAfee began diverting about 40% of good mail to the respective Spam folders. McAfee acknowledges that there is a problem but so far they have not solved it. They have not examined my Thunderbird configuration nor have they even opened my Windows Registry, so they aren't very bright. David 0xDC7C8BF3.asc Description: application/pgp-keys
Design Change Causing More Traffic?
I am on dialup and so I am very sensitive to the amount of traffic overhead in the operation of Tor. Lately that seems to have increased significantly. Assuming I am not just imagining it (I have no objective measurements to back this up) is this just because of the build-out of the network or has then there been a design change that would cause this? Jim *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Re: Tor raid [was: cease and desist from my vps provider...]
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:15:59PM -0800, coderman wrote: only if you purchase said services under your real name/accounts or without sufficient indirection. Hetzner has plenty of nongerman customers, so using an LLC as an abstraction layer would probably work. Not sure they would accept yearly cash in advance, as Hetzner.co.za does. defense in depth++ -- Eugen* Leitl a href=http://leitl.org;leitl/a http://leitl.org __ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
