Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 13:27 +0100 schrieb Karsten Loesing: […] I figured out the problem. The metrics portal had the bridge user numbers from 2009-11-30 to 2010-01-05 imported twice. This affected all countries, but was simply most visible for Chinese bridge users. I removed those days from the stats and imported the descriptors again. The corrected graphs can be found on the graphs page: http://metrics.torproject.org/bridge-users-graphs.html#china So my next question is, why did the users count drop that much in the beginning of March? […] Thanks, Paul signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Re: Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
On 10 March 2010 07:42, Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.netwrote: So my next question is, why did the users count drop that much in the beginning of March? At the beginning of March, the great firewall of China blocked all (then) known tor exits and relays, and a substantial number of bridges - presumably enumerated over a prior, somewhat extended period.
Re: Drop Tor users via bridges by over 2/3 in the beginning of March (was: Tor in China)
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:31:06 -0500, Flamsmark flamsm...@gmail.com wrote: :At the beginning of March, the great firewall of China blocked all (then) :known tor exits and relays, and a substantial number of bridges - presumably :enumerated over a prior, somewhat extended period. This is our working theory as well. Pending research involves which set of bridges were blocked; website, email, twitter/qq account, or all of them. -- Andrew Lewman The Tor Project pgp 0x31B0974B Website: https://www.torproject.org/ Blog: https://blog.torproject.org/ Identi.ca: torproject *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
