RE: Distributed Option
Michael - I don't claim to be a replication expert, just read enough on the subject to avoid going in half-cocked. One thing I have read from the experts though is that any time you have the same data in multiple locations and try to keep it current, you are performing data replication. The tool you use may be home grown, a part of Oracle or another database vendor, or purchased from a third-party vendor, or not even performed at the database level (like the app server, for example). But the problems faced are the same either way, issue like frequency of synchronization, how to resynchronize when everything goes wrong, and it WILL go wrong. Back to your message, do you still have a question and I'm so slow on a Sunday morning I missed it, or do you have the information you need? If installing the distributed option into 7.3.4 is not feasible, you may want to review the 3rd party tools. A popular one is Quest Shareplex, but I believe it replicates entire rows which may not meet your requirements. Could be a good time to push your management to upgrade to a more modern Oracle which would give them more built-in replication capabilities. Dennis Williams DBA, 40%OCP Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L It's not quite the same, but very similar Let's say that web contains simply a name and address, maybe a cust number, but the cust numbers on database A and B are probably different, most likely... Now A contains not only this, but tons of other things that are pretty much in line with a typical subscription system. Now B contains not only name and address, but many things typically in line with something like Oracle Open World membership, meetings, suggestions, etc... Now all of those in B are most likely in A, but A contains a bunch of things that are not in B... Operations: If web is down, nothing works, but that's okay. If A does not happen to be available, then the change is put into Queue Table and it will be tried again on a periodic basis... Same with B. Now if A is down, and a change of a new record is needed on A and the record is not yet on WEB, then that change will not be allowed... (that could be programmed in with a full load and some sort of sync of the names and addresses.) Now if changes occur to A or B, then those changes would be brought to the WEB database, again using queue table if WEB can't be reached at the time. Other Options: A service machine in C, VB or what ever, could also be used to sync the databases. Changes would be done via the Queue table, and the service machine would have FULL links to all the databases. This would allow operations to occur with no care if the databases are all up or not. As soon as they are, the service machine would make sure everything was sync'd. This would also allow for the possible building of extensive audit reports, and even email messages should situations occur like two changes at once or a blank change, etc. If a change was sensed on A with 123 any street and on B with 123b any street, it could report that it's the same customer, but with different addresses. So it's not quite replication as it may only be 5-7 fields of a 40-100 column table. Nothing has been mentioned to this point if they are going to play with ship to, bill to and some of the other addresses... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Distributed Option Michael - Okay, this is a form of replication, known as synchronous replication. That means that the updates occur synchronously, or within a 2-phase commit. This is implemented through database links. The drawback is that the transaction is as slow as the slowest database. If one database is unavailable, no transactions can complete. This can be okay for non-mission-critical situations. Someone earlier (I'm sorry, I didn't keep that message) pointed out that this may be an extra pay option back in 7.3.4. I think maybe you could query but to update you needed the extra option. Details are available in the Oracle manuals, which you can view online. I'm sorry, but I haven't worked on 7 in quite a few years. Based on your description of your situation, you may want to consider letting the application server do the honors. A simple app server like Tomcat can simply connect to each database. A more sophisticated app server like Oracle9iAS or WebLogic is capable of maintaining separate message queues, so you aren't limited by the slowest database and if a database is down, can maintain the queue of messages and apply them when it becomes available again. I'm speaking a little beyond my knowledge at this point, but you get the general idea and if this sounds promising you can investigate further
RE: Distributed Option
Dennis, Thanks. I think the easiest thing will be to find out if we have the option available. If we are lucky on that aspect, then we should have most of what we need. Upgrades would be nice, but one of the apps is an old purchased app, and it can't be upgraded until the next one comes out which will then I think only take them to 8.0.5, though I hope the vendor is shooting for 8.1.7. In your way of thinking, yes, it's replication. It's basically two somewhat dissimilar applications with the web simply being a repository of the names and addresses of both databases and they want two way updating... A to/from WEB and B to/from WEB. Based on what I've heard, it sounds like an update on A may well update something on B, but I don't know if they got that far or not. I guess we won't know until we test it, but it appears that the distributed option will give us what we need, that replication, while quite the same is not necessarily needed. If they have the logic, and we find out distributed option is supposed to cost more, then we may pursue a C or VB program to sync the databases. It should be simple, only 3 databases, and probably only about 5-7 fields. Until the next curve ball comes our way. This app is an early prototype. Maks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 10:34 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Distributed Option Michael - I don't claim to be a replication expert, just read enough on the subject to avoid going in half-cocked. One thing I have read from the experts though is that any time you have the same data in multiple locations and try to keep it current, you are performing data replication. The tool you use may be home grown, a part of Oracle or another database vendor, or purchased from a third-party vendor, or not even performed at the database level (like the app server, for example). But the problems faced are the same either way, issue like frequency of synchronization, how to resynchronize when everything goes wrong, and it WILL go wrong. Back to your message, do you still have a question and I'm so slow on a Sunday morning I missed it, or do you have the information you need? If installing the distributed option into 7.3.4 is not feasible, you may want to review the 3rd party tools. A popular one is Quest Shareplex, but I believe it replicates entire rows which may not meet your requirements. Could be a good time to push your management to upgrade to a more modern Oracle which would give them more built-in replication capabilities. Dennis Williams DBA, 40%OCP Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Saturday, December 28, 2002 9:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L It's not quite the same, but very similar Let's say that web contains simply a name and address, maybe a cust number, but the cust numbers on database A and B are probably different, most likely... Now A contains not only this, but tons of other things that are pretty much in line with a typical subscription system. Now B contains not only name and address, but many things typically in line with something like Oracle Open World membership, meetings, suggestions, etc... Now all of those in B are most likely in A, but A contains a bunch of things that are not in B... Operations: If web is down, nothing works, but that's okay. If A does not happen to be available, then the change is put into Queue Table and it will be tried again on a periodic basis... Same with B. Now if A is down, and a change of a new record is needed on A and the record is not yet on WEB, then that change will not be allowed... (that could be programmed in with a full load and some sort of sync of the names and addresses.) Now if changes occur to A or B, then those changes would be brought to the WEB database, again using queue table if WEB can't be reached at the time. Other Options: A service machine in C, VB or what ever, could also be used to sync the databases. Changes would be done via the Queue table, and the service machine would have FULL links to all the databases. This would allow operations to occur with no care if the databases are all up or not. As soon as they are, the service machine would make sure everything was sync'd. This would also allow for the possible building of extensive audit reports, and even email messages should situations occur like two changes at once or a blank change, etc. If a change was sensed on A with 123 any street and on B with 123b any street, it could report that it's the same customer, but with different addresses. So it's not quite replication as it may only be 5-7 fields of a 40-100 column table. Nothing has been mentioned to this point if they are going to play with ship to, bill to and some of the other addresses... -Original Message
RE: Distributed Option
It's not quite the same, but very similar Let's say that web contains simply a name and address, maybe a cust number, but the cust numbers on database A and B are probably different, most likely... Now A contains not only this, but tons of other things that are pretty much in line with a typical subscription system. Now B contains not only name and address, but many things typically in line with something like Oracle Open World membership, meetings, suggestions, etc... Now all of those in B are most likely in A, but A contains a bunch of things that are not in B... Operations: If web is down, nothing works, but that's okay. If A does not happen to be available, then the change is put into Queue Table and it will be tried again on a periodic basis... Same with B. Now if A is down, and a change of a new record is needed on A and the record is not yet on WEB, then that change will not be allowed... (that could be programmed in with a full load and some sort of sync of the names and addresses.) Now if changes occur to A or B, then those changes would be brought to the WEB database, again using queue table if WEB can't be reached at the time. Other Options: A service machine in C, VB or what ever, could also be used to sync the databases. Changes would be done via the Queue table, and the service machine would have FULL links to all the databases. This would allow operations to occur with no care if the databases are all up or not. As soon as they are, the service machine would make sure everything was sync'd. This would also allow for the possible building of extensive audit reports, and even email messages should situations occur like two changes at once or a blank change, etc. If a change was sensed on A with 123 any street and on B with 123b any street, it could report that it's the same customer, but with different addresses. So it's not quite replication as it may only be 5-7 fields of a 40-100 column table. Nothing has been mentioned to this point if they are going to play with ship to, bill to and some of the other addresses... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 11:04 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Distributed Option Michael - Okay, this is a form of replication, known as synchronous replication. That means that the updates occur synchronously, or within a 2-phase commit. This is implemented through database links. The drawback is that the transaction is as slow as the slowest database. If one database is unavailable, no transactions can complete. This can be okay for non-mission-critical situations. Someone earlier (I'm sorry, I didn't keep that message) pointed out that this may be an extra pay option back in 7.3.4. I think maybe you could query but to update you needed the extra option. Details are available in the Oracle manuals, which you can view online. I'm sorry, but I haven't worked on 7 in quite a few years. Based on your description of your situation, you may want to consider letting the application server do the honors. A simple app server like Tomcat can simply connect to each database. A more sophisticated app server like Oracle9iAS or WebLogic is capable of maintaining separate message queues, so you aren't limited by the slowest database and if a database is down, can maintain the queue of messages and apply them when it becomes available again. I'm speaking a little beyond my knowledge at this point, but you get the general idea and if this sounds promising you can investigate further with someone that actually knows what they are talking about. -Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 5:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I believe this is different than replication, though many of the ideas and transactions would be the same. In this particular case, they are going to allow Name and address changes over the web. Those changes will cause updates to two some what different customer files on two different applications on two different other databases. What happens now is when they tried to do the update over the database link, and commit, they get distributed option not installed. This is further confused that one database has replication but still gets an error message about distributed option not installed. And the v$option shows distributed option as false or what ever. Connected to: Oracle7 Server Release 7.3.4.0.1 - Production With the parallel query option PL/SQL Release 2.3.4.0.0 - Production This is the sign on for one of the databases missing the option. My personal oracle shows: Connected to: Personal Oracle7 Release 7.2.2.3.1 - Production With the distributed and replication options PL/SQL Release 2.2.2.3.1 - Production Maks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS
Re: Distributed Option
In Oracle7 you had to explicitly select Distributed Option when installing the software. I believe it was also licensed as an option -- ie you had to pay additional for it. Hemant At 12:38 PM 27-12-02 -0800, you wrote: I've got a client that needs distributed option installed on several databases, versions 7.3.4, 8.0.5, and 8.1.7... Problem may be I'm not sure we'll have all the CD's as vendors of applications did most of the installs and we think we'll find that they took the CD's with them. After all, if it's up and running and vendor supported(or was), why would the client need the CD? Anyhow, is it just a free option that will need to be selected with the Oracle installer, or is it an add on that one is supposed to contact Oracle on? Or perhaps it just involves running one of those all but undocumented packages. There are many ways to work around this if we have to, but would like to know what all is involved if we can get the distributed option installed on all of their databases. It's on my Personal Oracle, but seems to be part of a general set of things that get installed. Kline's Consulting Michael Alan Kline, Sr., Owner 13308 Thornridge Court; Midlothian, VA 23112, USA. Work: 804-744-1545 Cell: 804-314-6262 Pager: 877-705-1155 ICQ: 1009605, 975313 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Michael Kline INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). Hemant K Chitale My web site page is : http://hkchital.tripod.com -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Hemant K Chitale INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: Distributed Option
Michael By distributed, I assume you mean replication? From what I can tell, basic replication is included with Standard Edition and advanced replication is included with Enterprise Edition. I think you run a script, something like catrep.sql in rdbms/admin, so you should be able to get the pieces installed. Replicating between different Oracle versions could be challenging, but doable. Others on the list can probably offer specific advice on pitfalls. We haven't implemented replication here, just studied. From what I can tell, planning for replication is everything. I have only been able to find 2 books on it. The prize is Marie Buretta's Database Replication. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613/sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 It really tells you everything you need as an organization to prepare for replication. Replication takes a lot of administration so it should be a gold mine since you are consulting. The other book is Oracle Distributed Systems by Charles Dye http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613/sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 Dennis Williams DBA, 40%OCP Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:39 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've got a client that needs distributed option installed on several databases, versions 7.3.4, 8.0.5, and 8.1.7... Problem may be I'm not sure we'll have all the CD's as vendors of applications did most of the installs and we think we'll find that they took the CD's with them. After all, if it's up and running and vendor supported(or was), why would the client need the CD? Anyhow, is it just a free option that will need to be selected with the Oracle installer, or is it an add on that one is supposed to contact Oracle on? Or perhaps it just involves running one of those all but undocumented packages. There are many ways to work around this if we have to, but would like to know what all is involved if we can get the distributed option installed on all of their databases. It's on my Personal Oracle, but seems to be part of a general set of things that get installed. Kline's Consulting Michael Alan Kline, Sr., Owner 13308 Thornridge Court; Midlothian, VA 23112, USA. Work: 804-744-1545 Cell: 804-314-6262 Pager: 877-705-1155 ICQ: 1009605, 975313 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Michael Kline INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
RE: Distributed Option
I believe this is different than replication, though many of the ideas and transactions would be the same. In this particular case, they are going to allow Name and address changes over the web. Those changes will cause updates to two some what different customer files on two different applications on two different other databases. What happens now is when they tried to do the update over the database link, and commit, they get distributed option not installed. This is further confused that one database has replication but still gets an error message about distributed option not installed. And the v$option shows distributed option as false or what ever. Connected to: Oracle7 Server Release 7.3.4.0.1 - Production With the parallel query option PL/SQL Release 2.3.4.0.0 - Production This is the sign on for one of the databases missing the option. My personal oracle shows: Connected to: Personal Oracle7 Release 7.2.2.3.1 - Production With the distributed and replication options PL/SQL Release 2.2.2.3.1 - Production Maks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 4:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Distributed Option Michael By distributed, I assume you mean replication? From what I can tell, basic replication is included with Standard Edition and advanced replication is included with Enterprise Edition. I think you run a script, something like catrep.sql in rdbms/admin, so you should be able to get the pieces installed. Replicating between different Oracle versions could be challenging, but doable. Others on the list can probably offer specific advice on pitfalls. We haven't implemented replication here, just studied. From what I can tell, planning for replication is everything. I have only been able to find 2 books on it. The prize is Marie Buretta's Database Replication. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613 /sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 It really tells you everything you need as an organization to prepare for replication. Replication takes a lot of administration so it should be a gold mine since you are consulting. The other book is Oracle Distributed Systems by Charles Dye http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613 /sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 Dennis Williams DBA, 40%OCP Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:39 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've got a client that needs distributed option installed on several databases, versions 7.3.4, 8.0.5, and 8.1.7... Problem may be I'm not sure we'll have all the CD's as vendors of applications did most of the installs and we think we'll find that they took the CD's with them. After all, if it's up and running and vendor supported(or was), why would the client need the CD? Anyhow, is it just a free option that will need to be selected with the Oracle installer, or is it an add on that one is supposed to contact Oracle on? Or perhaps it just involves running one of those all but undocumented packages. There are many ways to work around this if we have to, but would like to know what all is involved if we can get the distributed option installed on all of their databases. It's on my Personal Oracle, but seems to be part of a general set of things that get installed. Kline's Consulting Michael Alan Kline, Sr., Owner 13308 Thornridge Court; Midlothian, VA 23112, USA. Work: 804-744-1545 Cell: 804-314-6262 Pager: 877-705-1155 ICQ: 1009605, 975313 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Michael Kline INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services - To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing
RE: Distributed Option
Michael - Okay, this is a form of replication, known as synchronous replication. That means that the updates occur synchronously, or within a 2-phase commit. This is implemented through database links. The drawback is that the transaction is as slow as the slowest database. If one database is unavailable, no transactions can complete. This can be okay for non-mission-critical situations. Someone earlier (I'm sorry, I didn't keep that message) pointed out that this may be an extra pay option back in 7.3.4. I think maybe you could query but to update you needed the extra option. Details are available in the Oracle manuals, which you can view online. I'm sorry, but I haven't worked on 7 in quite a few years. Based on your description of your situation, you may want to consider letting the application server do the honors. A simple app server like Tomcat can simply connect to each database. A more sophisticated app server like Oracle9iAS or WebLogic is capable of maintaining separate message queues, so you aren't limited by the slowest database and if a database is down, can maintain the queue of messages and apply them when it becomes available again. I'm speaking a little beyond my knowledge at this point, but you get the general idea and if this sounds promising you can investigate further with someone that actually knows what they are talking about. -Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 5:14 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I believe this is different than replication, though many of the ideas and transactions would be the same. In this particular case, they are going to allow Name and address changes over the web. Those changes will cause updates to two some what different customer files on two different applications on two different other databases. What happens now is when they tried to do the update over the database link, and commit, they get distributed option not installed. This is further confused that one database has replication but still gets an error message about distributed option not installed. And the v$option shows distributed option as false or what ever. Connected to: Oracle7 Server Release 7.3.4.0.1 - Production With the parallel query option PL/SQL Release 2.3.4.0.0 - Production This is the sign on for one of the databases missing the option. My personal oracle shows: Connected to: Personal Oracle7 Release 7.2.2.3.1 - Production With the distributed and replication options PL/SQL Release 2.2.2.3.1 - Production Maks. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of DENNIS WILLIAMS Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 4:19 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Distributed Option Michael By distributed, I assume you mean replication? From what I can tell, basic replication is included with Standard Edition and advanced replication is included with Enterprise Edition. I think you run a script, something like catrep.sql in rdbms/admin, so you should be able to get the pieces installed. Replicating between different Oracle versions could be challenging, but doable. Others on the list can probably offer specific advice on pitfalls. We haven't implemented replication here, just studied. From what I can tell, planning for replication is everything. I have only been able to find 2 books on it. The prize is Marie Buretta's Database Replication. http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613 /sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 It really tells you everything you need as an organization to prepare for replication. Replication takes a lot of administration so it should be a gold mine since you are consulting. The other book is Oracle Distributed Systems by Charles Dye http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0471157546/qid%3D1041023613 /sr%3D11-1 /ref%3Dsr%5F11%5F1/102-1511927-6720101 Dennis Williams DBA, 40%OCP Lifetouch, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 2:39 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've got a client that needs distributed option installed on several databases, versions 7.3.4, 8.0.5, and 8.1.7... Problem may be I'm not sure we'll have all the CD's as vendors of applications did most of the installs and we think we'll find that they took the CD's with them. After all, if it's up and running and vendor supported(or was), why would the client need the CD? Anyhow, is it just a free option that will need to be selected with the Oracle installer, or is it an add on that one is supposed to contact Oracle on? Or perhaps it just involves running one of those all but undocumented packages. There are many ways to work around this if we have to, but would like to know what all is involved if we can get the distributed option installed on all of their databases. It's on my Personal Oracle, but seems to be part of a general
