RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-28 Thread Grant Allen
 IBM is loudly touting how much money they will be spending on
 Linux. Has
 anyone seen any sales statistics for DB2 on non-IBM
 platforms? I feel that
 IBM has a challenge to convince buyers to consider DB2 on Linux.



 Dennis Williams
 DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA
 Lifetouch, Inc.
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Dennis,

Humourously ... at least in Oz, the number one Unix platform for DB2 is
Solaris.  IBM will probably turn this around ... they are being quite clever
with the 5L releases of AIX, by enabling compatibility with both AIX and
Linux binaries.  So they feed you a little Linux box, wait for you to decide
you need something bigger, ease you on to an AIX 5L box still running your
linux code (but now you're paying AIX licencing), and then roll in with the
usual IBM steamroller.

That said, I've just had a free 3-day training course from them, so nothing
like biting the hand that feeds, so to speak :-)

Ciao
Fuzzy
:-)

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Grant Allen
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Jacques - We often don't realize that at end-user sites we look at the
immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that would be out of
business in a couple of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must predict where the
the market will be in a couple of years. About two years ago the META Group
predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would be running one of
three operating systems: 
1. Windows
2. Linux
3. Solaris
 
As near as I can tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix vendors are
showing signs of shifting to Linux. Obviously they won't announce that
directly since they need to keep selling computers today. 
 From Oracle's point of view, they don't care who is the winner, just
that Oracle is the leading database, and not something like MySQL.
 Remember how Unix emerged as the leading O.S. Since ATT couldn't sell
computers (for awhile due to antitrust restrictions), they gave source code
copies to colleges. New C.S. majors learned Unix inside out while in
college. I understand today that those people are learning Linux internals
in college. Obviously Microsoft is at a disadvantage since they don't want
to provide source code, although I heard Microsoft has an initiative to
provide limited source code to a college.



Dennis Williams 
DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA 
Lifetouch, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



For those not interested in marketing news, I would suggest skipping this
message. 

From a Computerworld article 
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00.
html
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00
.html  
Oracle ups Linux efforts with ISV program 
By James Niccolai, IDG News Service 
MARCH 26, 2003 

Oracle Corp. is shelling out US$150 million to encourage its software
partners to develop for Linux (two US$ for every US$ spent be the vendor.)

Some other interesting tidbits from the article: 
Separately, engineers at Oracle are working on the Linux kernel, the code
at the heart of all Linux distributions, to make it more suitable for
Oracle's software. The company plans to submit its work to Linus Torvalds,
who oversees changes made to the Linux kernel, with the hope its work will
be incorporated ... Among those efforts ... increase the amount of physical
memory that can be addressed by 32-bit Intel servers running Linux. Oracle
also hopes that a version of the clustered file system that it released for
Linux customers last year will become part of the kernel.

Why would Oracle give money to people to develop on Linux? Is it only to
help bring down Microsoft? 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Stephane Paquette
It reminds me a report (Gartner, Meta, ?) I've read in 1997 saying that
after year 2000 there should be only 3 players in the rdbms market : Oracle
because it has the biggest market share, IBM because it's IBM and Microsoft
because Bill was throwing a lot of $$$ to develop Sql Server.

In 2003, Ingres, Sybase and Informix have about a 5% marketshare all
together.

What's for the future ?

Stephane

-Original Message-
WILLIAMS
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jacques - We often don't realize that at end-user sites we look at the
immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that would be out of
business in a couple of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must predict where the
the market will be in a couple of years. About two years ago the META Group
predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would be running one of
three operating systems:
1. Windows
2. Linux
3. Solaris

As near as I can tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix vendors are
showing signs of shifting to Linux. Obviously they won't announce that
directly since they need to keep selling computers today.
 From Oracle's point of view, they don't care who is the winner, just
that Oracle is the leading database, and not something like MySQL.
 Remember how Unix emerged as the leading O.S. Since ATT couldn't sell
computers (for awhile due to antitrust restrictions), they gave source code
copies to colleges. New C.S. majors learned Unix inside out while in
college. I understand today that those people are learning Linux internals
in college. Obviously Microsoft is at a disadvantage since they don't want
to provide source code, although I heard Microsoft has an initiative to
provide limited source code to a college.



Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



For those not interested in marketing news, I would suggest skipping this
message.

From a Computerworld article
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00.
html
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00
.html
Oracle ups Linux efforts with ISV program
By James Niccolai, IDG News Service
MARCH 26, 2003

Oracle Corp. is shelling out US$150 million to encourage its software
partners to develop for Linux (two US$ for every US$ spent be the vendor.)

Some other interesting tidbits from the article:
Separately, engineers at Oracle are working on the Linux kernel, the code
at the heart of all Linux distributions, to make it more suitable for
Oracle's software. The company plans to submit its work to Linus Torvalds,
who oversees changes made to the Linux kernel, with the hope its work will
be incorporated ... Among those efforts ... increase the amount of physical
memory that can be addressed by 32-bit Intel servers running Linux. Oracle
also hopes that a version of the clustered file system that it released for
Linux customers last year will become part of the kernel.

Why would Oracle give money to people to develop on Linux? Is it only to
help bring down Microsoft?

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Stephane Paquette
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Gogala, Mladen
Lemme quote the infamous Michael Moore's book Stupid White Men:

In 1919, twenty years after the invention of the automobile, there were 108
automobile manufacturers in the UnitedStates. Ten years later the number had
whittled down to the 
Big 44 U.S. auto companies. By the end of the fifties it had dropped to 8,
and today we 
have a grand total of 2-1/2 U.S. car manufacturers. 

Do you see the trend?

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It reminds me a report (Gartner, Meta, ?) I've read in 1997 saying that
after year 2000 there should be only 3 players in the rdbms market : Oracle
because it has the biggest market share, IBM because it's IBM and Microsoft
because Bill was throwing a lot of $$$ to develop Sql Server.

In 2003, Ingres, Sybase and Informix have about a 5% marketshare all
together.

What's for the future ?

Stephane

-Original Message-
WILLIAMS
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:14 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Jacques - We often don't realize that at end-user sites we look at the
immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that would be out of
business in a couple of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must predict where the
the market will be in a couple of years. About two years ago the META Group
predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would be running one of
three operating systems:
1. Windows
2. Linux
3. Solaris

As near as I can tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix vendors are
showing signs of shifting to Linux. Obviously they won't announce that
directly since they need to keep selling computers today.
 From Oracle's point of view, they don't care who is the winner, just
that Oracle is the leading database, and not something like MySQL.
 Remember how Unix emerged as the leading O.S. Since ATT couldn't sell
computers (for awhile due to antitrust restrictions), they gave source code
copies to colleges. New C.S. majors learned Unix inside out while in
college. I understand today that those people are learning Linux internals
in college. Obviously Microsoft is at a disadvantage since they don't want
to provide source code, although I heard Microsoft has an initiative to
provide limited source code to a college.



Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:44 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



For those not interested in marketing news, I would suggest skipping this
message.

From a Computerworld article
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00.
html
http://www.computerworld.com/softwaretopics/os/linux/story/0,10801,79730,00
.html
Oracle ups Linux efforts with ISV program
By James Niccolai, IDG News Service
MARCH 26, 2003

Oracle Corp. is shelling out US$150 million to encourage its software
partners to develop for Linux (two US$ for every US$ spent be the vendor.)

Some other interesting tidbits from the article:
Separately, engineers at Oracle are working on the Linux kernel, the code
at the heart of all Linux distributions, to make it more suitable for
Oracle's software. The company plans to submit its work to Linus Torvalds,
who oversees changes made to the Linux kernel, with the hope its work will
be incorporated ... Among those efforts ... increase the amount of physical
memory that can be addressed by 32-bit Intel servers running Linux. Oracle
also hopes that a version of the clustered file system that it released for
Linux customers last year will become part of the kernel.

Why would Oracle give money to people to develop on Linux? Is it only to
help bring down Microsoft?

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Stephane Paquette
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP 

RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Orr, Steve
Actually, I don't think there are ANY automobile manufacturers... There are only 
assemblers because most of the parts are made by someone else. It's too complicated 
for any single company.

Specialization is the result of increased complexity. Assembling the component output 
of others into a working unit is more akin to opensource. That's the trend I WANT to 
see. It's interesting that Oracle and IBM are delving into opensource but Microsoft is 
not. 

It's a battle of titanic proportion. All hail the extinction of monoliths and other 
despots and dictators. Long live freedom and democracy. 

Oh, but what about Intel? Sigh...

When given a choice, choose wisely. 



-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Lemme quote the infamous Michael Moore's book Stupid White Men:

In 1919, twenty years after the invention of the automobile, there were 108
automobile manufacturers in the UnitedStates. Ten years later the number had
whittled down to the 
Big 44 U.S. auto companies. By the end of the fifties it had dropped to 8,
and today we 
have a grand total of 2-1/2 U.S. car manufacturers. 

Do you see the trend?

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


It reminds me a report (Gartner, Meta, ?) I've read in 1997 saying that
after year 2000 there should be only 3 players in the rdbms market : Oracle
because it has the biggest market share, IBM because it's IBM and Microsoft
because Bill was throwing a lot of $$$ to develop Sql Server.

In 2003, Ingres, Sybase and Informix have about a 5% marketshare all
together.

What's for the future ?

Stephane
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Orr, Steve
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Jacques Kilchoer
Title: RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers





So your interpretation would be: Oracle is not so much pushing Linux at the expense of Microsoft, but ensuring their dominance in the emerging Linux database market. Though of course a strong Linux market will also be a market in which presumably Microsoft will not try to compete with Oracle, unless Microsoft decides to port SQL Server to Linux.


 -Original Message-
 From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 
 Jacques - We often don't realize that at end-user sites we look at the
 immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that 
 would be out of
 business in a couple of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must 
 predict where the
 the market will be in a couple of years. About two years ago 
 the META Group
 predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would be 
 running one of
 three operating systems: 
 1. Windows
 2. Linux
 3. Solaris
 
 As near as I can tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix 
 vendors are
 showing signs of shifting to Linux. Obviously they won't announce that
 directly since they need to keep selling computers today. 
 From Oracle's point of view, they don't care who is the 
 winner, just
 that Oracle is the leading database, and not something like MySQL.
 ...





RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
Title: RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers



Interesting... whatever happened to HP/UX?


Patrice Boivin Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA) 
Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et 
Exploit. des systèmes Technology 
Services | Services 
technologiques Informatics 
Branch | Direction de 
l'informatique Maritimes Region, 
DFO | Région des Maritimes, MPO 
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


  -Original Message-From: Jacques Kilchoer 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 
  3:14 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: 
  RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers
  So your interpretation would be: Oracle is not so much pushing 
  Linux at the expense of Microsoft, but ensuring their dominance in the 
  emerging Linux database market. Though of course a strong Linux market will 
  also be a market in which presumably Microsoft will not try to compete with 
  Oracle, unless Microsoft decides to port SQL Server to Linux.
   -Original Message-  
  From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Jacques - We often don't 
  realize that at end-user sites we look at the  
  immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that  would be out of  business in a couple 
  of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must  predict 
  where the  the market will be in a couple of 
  years. About two years ago  the META Group 
   predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would 
  be  running one of  
  three operating systems:  
  1. Windows  2. 
  Linux  3. Solaris 
As near as I can 
  tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix  
  vendors are  showing signs of shifting to Linux. 
  Obviously they won't announce that  directly since 
  they need to keep selling computers today.  From Oracle's point of view, they 
  don't care who is the  winner, just 
   that Oracle is the leading database, and not something 
  like MySQL.  ... 



Re: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread Stephane Faroult
 6. Oracle has a strong history of picking tomorrow's platforms. My
 recollection is that they jumped on the Unix bandwagon pretty early.

Correction : Oracle has a strong history of following closely in IBM's
steps. My own recollection is that till 1988 Oracle still was very
closely associated to VMS - even if, granted, quite a number of Unix
ports had been available for a number of years. But I think they began
to take Unix seriously with the advent of AIX. Before, Unix (which one?
Never worked properly on Ultrix) was on the same footing as Apollo's
Domain or DataGeneral's forgot-the-name or (let's be esoterik) Norsk
Data's Sintran III. There has been a time when the challenge was to run
on as many platforms as possible.

 Which doesn't contradict your arguments, quite the contrary.

-- 
Regards,

Stephane Faroult
Oriole Software
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Stephane Faroult
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Oracle encouraging Linux software developers

2003-03-27 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Patrice
Brings up an interesting issue. Last info I had, HP wasn't funding a new
generation of chips. Instead they seemed to be betting on the Intel Itanium
(along with many other vendors). Simple math says that Intel has a lot more
money to fund chip development than the Unix vendors, and each new
generation of chips requires a magnitude greater investment. Presumably they
could port HP/UX to Itanium, but I believe Sun with Solaris is the only firm
holdout against Linux. Now, the bigger question, in my mind, is what
happened to the Itanium and where does that leave vendors like HP/UX?



Dennis Williams 
DBA, 40%OCP, 100% DBA 
Lifetouch, Inc. 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 

-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Interesting... whatever happened to HP/UX?
 
Patrice Boivin 
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA) 

Systems Admin  Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes 
Technology Services| Services technologiques 
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique 
Maritimes Region, DFO  | Région des Maritimes, MPO 

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 


-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



So your interpretation would be: Oracle is not so much pushing Linux at the
expense of Microsoft, but ensuring their dominance in the emerging Linux
database market. Though of course a strong Linux market will also be a
market in which presumably Microsoft will not try to compete with Oracle,
unless Microsoft decides to port SQL Server to Linux.


 -Original Message- 
 From: DENNIS WILLIAMS [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] 
 
 Jacques - We often don't realize that at end-user sites we look at the 
 immediate computer marketplace. Any vendor that did that 
 would be out of 
 business in a couple of years. A vendor, like Oracle, must 
 predict where the 
 the market will be in a couple of years. About two years ago 
 the META Group 
 predicted that in about 5 years most servers sold would be 
 running one of 
 three operating systems: 
 1. Windows 
 2. Linux 
 3. Solaris 
  
 As near as I can tell, they are on the mark. The other Unix 
 vendors are 
 showing signs of shifting to Linux. Obviously they won't announce that 
 directly since they need to keep selling computers today. 
  From Oracle's point of view, they don't care who is the 
 winner, just 
 that Oracle is the leading database, and not something like MySQL. 
 ... 

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).