RE: RE: Raw partition Vs File System

2001-11-20 Thread Steve Adams

Hi Bill,

No luck contacting Bert. My guess is that he did not have a very big SGA, so there was 
plenty of his 2G of RAM available
for filesystem caching. For example, if Oracle had 128M for the shared pool and 128M 
for its buffer cache (as at the end
of his previous article in the series), that leaves about 1.7G for filesystem caching. 
So file system based tests would
get the benefit of 1.7G of cache, whereas raw tests would only get the benefit of 128M 
of cache. To construct a fair
test, it would be necessary to give Oracle 1.7G of db_block_buffers. In the article 
Bert says that he doubled
db_block_buffers, but unless going from about 600M to about 1.2G, then it was not a 
level playing field. Unfortunately,
he does not give those numbers.

@   Regards,
@   Steve Adams
@   http://www.ixora.com.au/  -  For DBAs
@   http://www.christianity.net.au/   -  For all


-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2001 21:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi Steve,

Did you manage to contact Bert?  Would you be willing to let us know what
you think was wrong with the test anyway?

Many thanks
- Bill.



Hi All,

Does anyone have an email address for Bert? I looked for his email address
when I first read that article a week ago,
but did not find one. I think I know what was wrong with his test, but it
is hard to be sure because he left out a lot
of the details.

@   Regards,
@   Steve Adams
@   http://www.ixora.com.au/  -  For DBAs
@   http://www.christianity.net.au/   -  For all


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 21:20
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Did anyone read Bert Scalzo's article in Pipeline Newsletter this month
(http://www.revealnet.com/newsletter-v2/linux2.html)?  He was benchmarking
various filesystems under Linux (EXT2, EXT3, Reiser, IBM JFS and RAW).  I
was suprised (and so was he) to see worst performance on RAW devices.  I
presume this is a Linux-specific issue: can anyone suggest why RAW is so
poor on Linux (or want to contest the results?!)

Thanks
- Bill.

At 01:29 09/11/01 -0800, you wrote:
 If you're using a volume manager (veritias, or disk
 suite), then raw is pretty much just as easy as file
 systems.
 
 You could always do this incrementally - for example,
 high io stuff (typically redo, temp, possibly
 rollback) on raw, and all the rest of file systems
 etc.
 
 hth
 connor
 
   --- Vasu Ramasamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hello Gurus,
   I am trying to install Oracle Server in the
   environment as given
   below. I am in the processes of laying out Physical
   Database layout. I
   would like to know the pros and cons of going with
   Raw partition.
  
The environment :
  
 Solaris 2.6
 Oracle 8.1.7
 Size of database - 60GB
 No. of tables -  3000 (approx.)
 Max size of few tables  -  3 GB to 5 GB.
  
 Thanks for your help.
  
  
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
   http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: Vasu Ramasamy
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
   (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet
   access / Mailing Lists
  
 
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
   E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
   'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
   ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
   from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information
   (like subscribing).
 
 =
 Connor McDonald
 http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at
 http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)
 
 Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email
 and Music Charts
 http://uk.my.yahoo.com
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?=
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Intasys Billing Technologies Ltd.   www.intasysbilling.com
74 Commercial Street, Commercial Quay, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 6LX
tel (0)131 625 8200 fax (0)131 625 8201 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--

RE: RE: Raw partition Vs File System

2001-11-20 Thread Mohan, Ross

Bill, 

There is a chance that Linux is using direct io (most Unixes
have some variant of this) and that -- at least for some I/O --
that the OS buffer cache is bypassed. 

Food for thought. 

Ross

-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 6:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Hi Steve,

Did you manage to contact Bert?  Would you be willing to let us know what 
you think was wrong with the test anyway?

Many thanks
- Bill.



Hi All,

Does anyone have an email address for Bert? I looked for his email address 
when I first read that article a week ago,
but did not find one. I think I know what was wrong with his test, but it 
is hard to be sure because he left out a lot
of the details.

@   Regards,
@   Steve Adams
@   http://www.ixora.com.au/  -  For DBAs
@   http://www.christianity.net.au/   -  For all


-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, 9 November 2001 21:20
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L



Did anyone read Bert Scalzo's article in Pipeline Newsletter this month
(http://www.revealnet.com/newsletter-v2/linux2.html)?  He was benchmarking
various filesystems under Linux (EXT2, EXT3, Reiser, IBM JFS and RAW).  I
was suprised (and so was he) to see worst performance on RAW devices.  I
presume this is a Linux-specific issue: can anyone suggest why RAW is so
poor on Linux (or want to contest the results?!)

Thanks
- Bill.

At 01:29 09/11/01 -0800, you wrote:
 If you're using a volume manager (veritias, or disk
 suite), then raw is pretty much just as easy as file
 systems.
 
 You could always do this incrementally - for example,
 high io stuff (typically redo, temp, possibly
 rollback) on raw, and all the rest of file systems
 etc.
 
 hth
 connor
 
   --- Vasu Ramasamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Hello Gurus,
   I am trying to install Oracle Server in the
   environment as given
   below. I am in the processes of laying out Physical
   Database layout. I
   would like to know the pros and cons of going with
   Raw partition.
  
The environment :
  
 Solaris 2.6
 Oracle 8.1.7
 Size of database - 60GB
 No. of tables -  3000 (approx.)
 Max size of few tables  -  3 GB to 5 GB.
  
 Thanks for your help.
  
  
   --
   Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
   http://www.orafaq.com
   --
   Author: Vasu Ramasamy
 INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX:
   (858) 538-5051
   San Diego, California-- Public Internet
   access / Mailing Lists
  
 
   To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
   E-Mail message
   to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
   'ListGuru') and in
   the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
   ORACLE-L
   (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed
   from).  You may
   also send the HELP command for other information
   (like subscribing).
 
 =
 Connor McDonald
 http://www.oracledba.co.uk (mirrored at
 http://www.oradba.freeserve.co.uk)
 
 Some days you're the pigeon, some days you're the statue
 
 __
 Do You Yahoo!?
 Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email
 and Music Charts
 http://uk.my.yahoo.com
 --
 Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
 --
 Author: =?iso-8859-1?q?Connor=20McDonald?=
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
 
 To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
 to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
 the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
 (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
 also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Intasys Billing Technologies Ltd.   www.intasysbilling.com
74 Commercial Street, Commercial Quay, Leith, Edinburgh EH6 6LX
tel (0)131 625 8200 fax (0)131 625 8201 email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Bill Buchan
   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Steve Adams
   INET: [EMAIL