Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
To be clear: 9.0.x will *NOT* have any EAS (extended support) either after June 2003. Gruesome. regards, ep On 5 Jul 2002 at 1:18, Yechiel Adar wrote: Date sent: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:23 -0800 to 9.2? To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yes. No more bugs fixed after June 2003. from metalink: Product Obsolescence / Desupport Information: Oracle Corporation announces the end of Error Correction Support for Oracle Server - Client, Enterprise Edition, Parallel Server, Personal Edition, RAC Standard Edition version(s) 9.0.1 on the following platform(s): ALL Platforms, effective 30-JUN-2003. ... -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Eric D. Pierce INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
Yechiel, Are you serious about support for 9.0.1 will go away about June 2003? :( If that's true, I would reconsider my point to uprade to 9iR2. Alexandre - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 6:08 PM Hello Cherie I think that I saw somewhere that support for 9.0.1 will go away about June 2003 while support for 9iR2 will be until 2005. Yechiel Adar Mehish - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:53 PM Dick, Thanks for your comments. So, the bottom line is that you are recommending moving from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? Cherie [EMAIL PROTECTED] om To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om 07/02/02 09:23 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Cherie, For the most part I don't like using version X.0 at any point. Now in version 8, I did get onto 8.0.5, but I did wait for the .5 to show up. With 8i it's 8.1.6 that was our baseline although I'm a lot happier with 8.1.7. For 9i I won't touch anything before 9.2, which is waiting for a test home right now. On the other hand I think it's a pretty wise idea to be on the latest version before going into production since that way you have a longer period of time before having to upgrade again. I just like having some other poor slob find the bugs first. Dick Goulet Reply Separator Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 7/2/2002 5:58 AM We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA. These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which we could upgrade to 9.2 before we finish our QA cycle and move the application to production.We will be moving to production in the September timeframe. I know that 9.2 hasn't been out that long so I'm not sure how many people are using it. For those that are using it, what has your experience been? Is it very buggy? Any major problems? We have an OLTP database, a smallish datawarehouse that uses partitioning, and some datamarts that also use partitioning. We do not use MTS or replication. Our character set is UTF8. We will be essentially 24 X 7. These are web-based front-ends. What do you guys think? This OLTP database is very mission critical for us, once it gets to production. Is it worth moving to 9.2 at this point or should we wait awhile until a couple more patchsets come out? How long do people wait for a new release to settle before they move to it? Thanks for your feedback, Cherie Machler Oracle DBA Gelco Information Network -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL
RE: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
Wow! ECS does end then, as was stated. For those with a working Metalink (you'll need to join the URL pieces): http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_datab ase_id=NOTp_id=201685.1 Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA -Original Message- From: Alexandre Gorbatchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:22 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? Yechiel, Are you serious about support for 9.0.1 will go away about June 2003? :( If that's true, I would reconsider my point to uprade to 9iR2. Alexandre -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
Cherie, For the most part I don't like using version X.0 at any point. Now in version 8, I did get onto 8.0.5, but I did wait for the .5 to show up. With 8i it's 8.1.6 that was our baseline although I'm a lot happier with 8.1.7. For 9i I won't touch anything before 9.2, which is waiting for a test home right now. On the other hand I think it's a pretty wise idea to be on the latest version before going into production since that way you have a longer period of time before having to upgrade again. I just like having some other poor slob find the bugs first. Dick Goulet Reply Separator Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 7/2/2002 5:58 AM We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA. These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which we could upgrade to 9.2 before we finish our QA cycle and move the application to production.We will be moving to production in the September timeframe. I know that 9.2 hasn't been out that long so I'm not sure how many people are using it. For those that are using it, what has your experience been? Is it very buggy? Any major problems? We have an OLTP database, a smallish datawarehouse that uses partitioning, and some datamarts that also use partitioning. We do not use MTS or replication. Our character set is UTF8. We will be essentially 24 X 7. These are web-based front-ends. What do you guys think? This OLTP database is very mission critical for us, once it gets to production. Is it worth moving to 9.2 at this point or should we wait awhile until a couple more patchsets come out? How long do people wait for a new release to settle before they move to it? Thanks for your feedback, Cherie Machler Oracle DBA Gelco Information Network -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
Dick, Thanks for your comments. So, the bottom line is that you are recommending moving from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? Cherie [EMAIL PROTECTED] om To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om 07/02/02 09:23 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Cherie, For the most part I don't like using version X.0 at any point. Now in version 8, I did get onto 8.0.5, but I did wait for the .5 to show up. With 8i it's 8.1.6 that was our baseline although I'm a lot happier with 8.1.7. For 9i I won't touch anything before 9.2, which is waiting for a test home right now. On the other hand I think it's a pretty wise idea to be on the latest version before going into production since that way you have a longer period of time before having to upgrade again. I just like having some other poor slob find the bugs first. Dick Goulet Reply Separator Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 7/2/2002 5:58 AM We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA. These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which we could upgrade to 9.2 before we finish our QA cycle and move the application to production.We will be moving to production in the September timeframe. I know that 9.2 hasn't been out that long so I'm not sure how many people are using it. For those that are using it, what has your experience been? Is it very buggy? Any major problems? We have an OLTP database, a smallish datawarehouse that uses partitioning, and some datamarts that also use partitioning. We do not use MTS or replication. Our character set is UTF8. We will be essentially 24 X 7. These are web-based front-ends. What do you guys think? This OLTP database is very mission critical for us, once it gets to production. Is it worth moving to 9.2 at this point or should we wait awhile until a couple more patchsets come out? How long do people wait for a new release to settle before they move to it? Thanks for your feedback, Cherie Machler Oracle DBA Gelco Information Network -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see
Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?
Hello Cherie I think that I saw somewhere that support for 9.0.1 will go away about June 2003 while support for 9iR2 will be until 2005. Yechiel Adar Mehish - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 4:53 PM Dick, Thanks for your comments. So, the bottom line is that you are recommending moving from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? Cherie [EMAIL PROTECTED] om To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om 07/02/02 09:23 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Cherie, For the most part I don't like using version X.0 at any point. Now in version 8, I did get onto 8.0.5, but I did wait for the .5 to show up. With 8i it's 8.1.6 that was our baseline although I'm a lot happier with 8.1.7. For 9i I won't touch anything before 9.2, which is waiting for a test home right now. On the other hand I think it's a pretty wise idea to be on the latest version before going into production since that way you have a longer period of time before having to upgrade again. I just like having some other poor slob find the bugs first. Dick Goulet Reply Separator Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 7/2/2002 5:58 AM We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA. These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which we could upgrade to 9.2 before we finish our QA cycle and move the application to production.We will be moving to production in the September timeframe. I know that 9.2 hasn't been out that long so I'm not sure how many people are using it. For those that are using it, what has your experience been? Is it very buggy? Any major problems? We have an OLTP database, a smallish datawarehouse that uses partitioning, and some datamarts that also use partitioning. We do not use MTS or replication. Our character set is UTF8. We will be essentially 24 X 7. These are web-based front-ends. What do you guys think? This OLTP database is very mission critical for us, once it gets to production. Is it worth moving to 9.2 at this point or should we wait awhile until a couple more patchsets come out? How long do people wait for a new release to settle before they move to it? Thanks for your feedback, Cherie Machler Oracle DBA Gelco Information Network -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Yechiel Adar INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX
