Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread dgoulet

The Director of New Technologies here took a look at Oracle vs. DB2 vs.
SQL*Server around the first of the year to see if it made any sense to remain
with Oracle (remember my licensing problems of some months ago).  Anyway, dollar
for dollar he found that their all about the same in features/performance vs.
dollars expended.  Sure DB2 and SQL*Server were cheaper out of the box, but the
add-ons that we got with Oracle added up to a higher cost in the end.

To answer the questions you asked and buzzwords your faced with:

The TCO or Total Cost of Ownership is just about a wash.  Oracle leads
somewhat since there is a larger third party market (or so I've been told). 
Oracle people are expensive, but there are also more of them in the marketplace.

On the Future Market Position, some one correct me if I'm wrong, but Oracle
is the #2 software company right behind MicroSoft so their not going away any
time soon.

On Demonstrated Technology, here I think Oracle takes a bit of a hit.  Not
because they don't lead the market but because they ship it when it's not fully
cooked first.  Hence we end up with some odd behavior that gets fixed quite
soon.  It's also the reason I don't use Oracle version X.0.0 release 1, but wait
for release 2.

And on the front of Platform Compatibility again Oracle took the lead
covering more platforms than anyone else.  Believe it or not, their still
supporting HP MPE-IX even though all of the others have dropped it.  I should
know, had to call them yesterday.

In general though, which ever database vendor you use is getting to be more and
more a political decision within the company.  And in many cases I think we're
going to be faced with handling more than one vendor at a time.  The other items
that is somewhat perplexing is that certain vendors of application software are
writing to a specific database vendor and then imbedding that database into the
application as a black box.  The bigger problem is that your then stuck with
that database on that specific system (CPU and OS) and a vendor who has very
little knowledge of what's going on.  Especially when things break.  Like our
friends at a nameless payroll processing center who shipped us a server with
Oracle 7.1 on it  did not provide any details.  Then the damned thing breaks on
a Monday morning  they are afraid we can't get anyone to look at it for 2
weeks.  Yeah, right leave payroll undone for 2 weeks and see what happens.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   8/12/2002 3:31 PM



-- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/12/02 14:38:19 -0800

 Hi Everyone!
 
 Well, there's been a lot of Oracle vs. Microsoft traffic on the
 list, but now my Manglement wants a similar comparison to IBM's
 DB2.
 
 Does anyone know of web sites or locations where there are
 documented objective comparisons between Oracle and DB2?  I'm
 faced with answering buzzwords like 'Future Market Position', 
 'T.C.O. - Cost Effectiveness', 'Demonstrated Technology', and
 'Platform Compatibility'.

www.ibm.com

--
Steven Lembark  2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing  Chicago, IL 60647
   +1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread dgoulet

Humm,  If you've got Oracle DBA's who are swearing at their databases you might
question the way they do their work.  I've 25 instances  I don't have to swear
at any of them.  Now the users, that's another story.

Dick Goulet

Reply Separator
Author: Steven Lembark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   8/13/2002 7:13 AM



One thing that seems different to me: DBA's at the sites
we work in with DB2 seem to swear by it more than at it.
This is the reverse ratio I find at Oracle houses.

--
Steven Lembark   2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing   Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Steven Lembark
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2

2002-08-13 Thread Jesse, Rich

In the immortal words of Moe Syzlak:  Whaaa?!?

I need to ask for more money!  Or was the implication that I have
expensive tastes?   ;)

Rich Jesse   System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:44 AM
 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
 Subject: Re[2]: Oracle vs. DB2
 
 Oracle people are expensive
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread dgoulet

Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15% of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware, operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA

I too would love to see somebody give Oracle a reality check in regards to
the prices of their software, but as much as I hate to say it, I just don't
see it happening.  Why?  Because the ONLY reality check that Oracle is going
to actually LISTEN to and do something about would be for people to stop
using/buying their products.  And I just don't see that happening either.
In the enterprise data market, Oracle has the best product available (IMHO),
and I think most people, and especially including Oracle Corp., know this.
Based on that information alone, I just don't see them backing down their
prices when, as much as people hate paying, they still will, because it's
the best.  =(

-::YEX::-
)))

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one
before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15%
of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware,
operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's
software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of
this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support
Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



RE: Re[2]: Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-25 Thread Henry Poras

I guess they can make their money by targeting the high end and having a few
high paying customers, or be more reasonable and have a broader base. I get
the feeling that Larry's ego (psychoanalysis from a distance, ain't it
wonderful) would drive him to both the $ and the broad base. If you are
competing against Bill Gates, you not only need the money, but also the
exposure. Everyone knows Windows, you can't have just the elite knowing
about Oracle. So where does that put us in 6 months?

Henry

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 2:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


I too would love to see somebody give Oracle a reality check in regards to
the prices of their software, but as much as I hate to say it, I just don't
see it happening.  Why?  Because the ONLY reality check that Oracle is going
to actually LISTEN to and do something about would be for people to stop
using/buying their products.  And I just don't see that happening either.
In the enterprise data market, Oracle has the best product available (IMHO),
and I think most people, and especially including Oracle Corp., know this.
Based on that information alone, I just don't see them backing down their
prices when, as much as people hate paying, they still will, because it's
the best.  =(

-::YEX::-
)))

-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, 25 April, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


Tim,

Thanks for the copy of the marketing speil, I had not heard that one
before.
 But, I'll take great exception to the claim that:

 It would make sense to select a database product based on price alone if
database products were the predominant part of the overall information
technology expenditures  But this is simply not the case. Software costs
(including upgrades and technical support) typically represent less than 15%
of
an IT budget and are small compared to the overall costs of hardware,
operations
and maintenance, consulting and training.

I don't know about the remainder of you, but the cost of Oracle's
software
is quickly eclipsing the cost of everything else.  Hence the beginnings of
this
post, which I agree with.  In our company our yearly Oracle Support
Agreement
renewal is the #3 cost item and the cost of a new Oracle license exceeds the
cost of the server it's going on.  Someone PLEASE give these guys a reality
check or else a good swift kick in the pants!!

Dick Goulet
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: 
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Yexley Robert D SSgt AFIT/SCA
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Henry Poras
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).



Re: Re[2]:Oracle vs DB2

2001-04-24 Thread Dennis Taylor

At 01:35 PM 4/24/01 -0400, you wrote:
Dennis,

OK, but your sales critter is DEAD wrong.  We bought a Standard
edition from

Yep. Based on your statement, I checked with the critter. He says yes, you
can do it with Standard version. Which costs (ballpark) $33K Cdn for the
unlimited user version, vs $6K for DB2. Closer. Close enough that if you
already had a large investment in Oracle, you'd probably grit your teeth
and pay it.

The remaining issue as far as I'm concerned is the fact of having to pay
Oracle more $$ if I replace my server at any time, even if only with one
with a faster cpu.


Dennis Taylor

Beware of false economies.

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Dennis Taylor
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists

To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).