[OGD] Aerides name

2005-06-03 Thread Peter O'Byrne
Hi Roy.

That's what Phil Cribb told me several years ago, so I dutifully
changed all my Aerides name-endings to the neuter form. However, Phil
never told me why Aerides is neuter (and I had no reason to ask), so,
in the wake of Pandelis' "son of" revelation,  I'm hoping someone will
provide enlightenment.

If you know any more about the "why" aspect, I'd like to hear it.

Peter O'Byrne
in Singapore

>Peter I recently had cause to question the currenly accepted name 
>for what was known as Aerides fieldingii. I e-mailed the Registrar at 
>the RHS and his reply was the " Roseum" was the accepted name 
>in use at the RHS. Julian went into detail about masculine & feminine, 
>neuter? etc . The upshot is that Aerides roseum would be the name 
>used in the registrations.

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] List of Taxonomists (continued)

2005-06-03 Thread Dr. Braem






Message: 4
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:18:29 -0400
From: "Andy Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OGD] Well done Guido!


I guess I did give you the lead in for that shot at Kew. Fair enough too,
though I think we should allow for someone to learn taxonomy after their
earlier forays into other botanical fields.

Yes ... that is surely correct. However, when they then start putting 
the word out, that only they know the
truth, and when a President of the AOS (although he was not president at 
that time yet)  states that  the opinion
of Mr. Potatoexpert is the right one because he works for Kew, it is a 
bit much.



I do think the current AOS list
of approved taxonomists, to which you have just been added,


I hear rumours of it ... I have not yet received and official word on it


is a pretty
solid group. There are requirements to publish in the taxonomic arena on a
regular basis and individuals who make repeated peer-evaluated errors can be
dropped. It surely beats the system of five or more years ago when everyone
and his uncle could be a taxonomic expert.

As to not taking oneself too seriously, I agree and am sure that could never
be said about me. As one of the known hell raisers of the orchid world in my
younger days, I still enjoy taking the piss out of people like the Dragon
Lady and Alasdair.

I will forever praise you for that. I hear that the Dragon Lady put 
quite some pressure on poor Kenneth, who I will

be meeting with at the end of the month, by the way.


I have no orchid political ambitions either which is
quite liberating.


That makes the two of us ... Can we make some kind of aclub out of this?

Regards
Guido

Prof. Dr. Guido J. Braem
Naunheimer Str. 17
35633 Lahnau
Deutschland/Germany



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Epistephium link

2005-06-03 Thread Jose A. Izquierdo
 

Again, Nina Rach comes to the rescue.   http://sobralia.autrevie
com/Epistephium_TheGenus.html



It has some pictures.



Jose

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Iris' correction

2005-06-03 Thread Robert Bedard


Thanks Iris, you are right (although splitting hairs) over my incorrect 
use of the word "clones" when I clearly meant  "plants". (That is what I 
get for typing too fast, while thinking about something else.)


If you don't believe that I understand Orchid Nomenclature, you are free 
to visit this page:

http://www.robert-bedard.com/orchids/name.html

;-)

rob't



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Unknown orchid

2005-06-03 Thread Peter\(Can\) Croezen



Dennis is correct. Eric Christenson ad Dave Bennett 
are the ones who
will be able to identify the Sobralia. 

 
I was thinking of Sobralia altissima, which I believe grows at a much higher 
elevation than 1500 meters, where Oliver's' was found growing. However, I must 
say that I did see a collected S. 
altissima growing in Peru at 200 meters 
elevation, 
where it had already attained a height of 12 
feet.
 
 
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] RE: Orchids Digest, Vol 7, Issue 284

2005-06-03 Thread Horak, David


>>"Here is a picture of an orchid found growing at 1500m in Pampa Hermosa, near 
>>Satipo in Perú. >> http://www.trekperu.org/orchid.jpg 
>> I would dearly like to know what it is - even the genus! The flowers 
>> are as illustrated, around 12 cm across. The plant stands around 3-5m 
>> tall, winding through scrub with flexible 2-3 cm diametre stems. The 
>> leaves are extremely odd for an orchid. There is no petiole, and the 
>> leaf entirely encloses the stem, standing 2-3 cm proud on one side and 
>> 25 cm on the other. Leaves are extremely
>> fleshy and rigid - approaching an aloe, almost - and tapering to a sharp 
>> point
>> in a near straight line, much as an aloe does. I could not get to see the 
>> roots.
>> The area is Sobralia territory but I wonder if this is not a Vanilla? Or 
>> what?" 
>> 
>The plant is certainly a Sobralia, as Oliver suggests. It is most definitely 
>not Sobralia macrantha though. Too tall, wrong locale, and macrantha is one of 
>the Sobralias that has a greatly reduced inflorescence, not the long racemes 
>shown in the photo. Eric Christenson knows this genus well, perhaps he will 
>comment. 

Actually, both in appearance and the description above it appears to be an 
Epistephium species.

Dave Horak 

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: Orchids Digest, Vol 7, Issue 283

2005-06-03 Thread leo . schordje
Dear Oliver
  I am not an expert, but the description of the leaf suggests to me
the genus Epistephium. The flower certainly does resemble a Sobralia.

I would peruse the web page by Nina Rach, possibly contact her for her
opinion.  http://www.autrevie.com/Sobralia/
Another good person to contact would be Eric C., David Bennett and others
may be able to help with the identity.

Leo

 Here is a picture of an orchid found growing at 1500m in Pampa
Hermosa, near
Satipo in Perú.

http://www.trekperu.org/orchid.jpg



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Aerides name

2005-06-03 Thread ROY LEE
Peter, I recently had cause to question the currenly accepted name for what was known as Aerides fieldingii. I e-mailed the Registrar at the RHS and his reply was the " Roseum" was the accepted name in use at the RHS. Julian went into detail about masculine & feminine, neuter? etc . The upshot is that 
Aerides roseum would be the name used in the registrations.
Roy.Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com ___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] unknown orchid Pampo Hermosa, Peru

2005-06-03 Thread Greg Allikas



Oliver,
The orchid pictured is an Epistephium, perhaps E. 
hernandii. The flowers of the dozen or so species in the genus are all similar. 
Your guess as to whether it might be Vanilla was a good one, as Dressler places 
the genus in the subtribe, Vanillinae. Unlike Vanilla, Epistephium does not 
attach to its support but merely "leans" upon it. A few years ago we were in the 
Gran Sabana hoping to catch a glimpse of C. violacea in flower. As we were 
driving down a dirt road one of the members of our party shouted "stop!, I see 
one!". As we all clambered out of the car to view the bright cerise flowers, we 
discovered that that it was merely an Epistephium that had wound its way some 20 
feet up some shrubs.
 
Greg
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Well done Guido!

2005-06-03 Thread Andy Easton
Title: Well done Guido!






I guess I did give you the lead in for that shot at Kew. Fair enough too, though I think we should allow for someone to learn taxonomy after their earlier forays into other botanical fields. I do think the current AOS list of approved taxonomists, to which you have just been added, is a pretty solid group. There are requirements to publish in the taxonomic arena on a regular basis and individuals who make repeated peer-evaluated errors can be dropped. It surely beats the system of five or more years ago when everyone and his uncle could be a taxonomic expert.

As to not taking oneself too seriously, I agree and am sure that could never be said about me. As one of the known hell raisers of the orchid world in my younger days, I still enjoy taking the piss out of people like the Dragon Lady and Alasdair. I have no orchid political ambitions either which is quite liberating.

Andy Easton







___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: Clones

2005-06-03 Thread IrisCohen
In a message dated 6/2/05 10:50:52 PM, Robert Bedard writes:
The other clones of Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' that I have, have never produced a peloric flower. This clone is a pretty stable peloric.

You are having a problem with the term clone. Be Tris 'Ching Hua #3' is a clone. Everything with that label is vegetatively reproduced from one original plant. They should all be identical. If you have a specimen or mericlone of 'Ching Hua #3' that is peloric, the name should be changed, as it is a mutation, & therefore a new clone. You should label it 'Ching Hua Sport' or something to indicate the difference.

<>

It is not odd at all. You are correct. It is a throwback to a more primitive, radially symmetric flower. It occurs in many other plants, including columbines, snapdragons, and African violets.
Iris
___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] The Mistery Sobralia from Peru

2005-06-03 Thread Jose A. Izquierdo
I did a search on the Sobralias annotated for Peru (it is so nice to have
the advance search feature in the Kew Monocot Checklist) and I got the
following names listed. So it seems that Sobralia macrantha cannot be the
plant in question. According to the Kew list, this is the geographical
distribution of Sobralia macrantha: 79 MXC MXG MXS MXT 80 BLZ COS ELS
(Mexico and Central America). The second thing I have done is do a Google
search of each of the species listed. It yielded results for many of the
species in the list I have added ONE URL that I found can help you
(basically those who have photos) following the name of each species. Those
you can cut and paste if the links do not work.



1. Sobralia altissima D.E.Benn. & Christenson, Orchids 68: 1112 (1999).
http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_altissima.html

2. Sobralia biflora Ruiz & Pav., Syst. Veg. Fl. Peruv. Chil.: 232 (1798).
http://www.peruorchids.com/galeria/s/sobralia/sobralia-biflora1.htm

3. Sobralia bletiae Rchb.f., Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 10: 713 (1852).
http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_bletiae.html 

4. Sobralia calliantha D.E.Benn. & Christenson, Icon. Orchid. Peruv.: t. 760
(2001). I was not able to find a picture containing url . My apologies

5. Sobralia candida (Poepp. & Endl.) Rchb.f., Fl. Serres Jard. Eur. 8: 247
(1853). http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobcandida.htm 

6. Sobralia ciliata (C.Presl) C.Schweinf. ex Foldats, in Fl. Venezuela
15(1): 175 (1969). http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_ciliata.html

7. Sobralia crocea (Poepp. & Endl.) Rchb.f., Fl. Serres Jard. Eur. 8: 247
(1853). http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_crocea.html 

8. Sobralia decora Bateman, Orchid. Mexico Guatemala: t. 26 (1842).
http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_decora.html

9. Sobralia dichotoma Ruiz & Pav., Syst. Veg. Fl. Peruv. Chil.: 232 (1798).
http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_dichotoma.html

10. Sobralia dorbignyana Rchb.f., Xenia Orchid. 2: 179 (1873). I was not
able to find a picture containing url . My apologies 

11 .Sobralia elisabethiae R.H.Schomb., Verh. Befoerd. Gartenb. Preuss. 15:
137 (1841). http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobelizabetiae.htm THIS NAME IS
REDUCED TO A SYNONYM OF Sobralia liliastrum Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.:
177 (1833). BY THE PEOPLE AT KEW 

12. Sobralia fimbriata Poepp. & Endl., Nov. Gen. Sp. Pl. 1: 54 (1836).
http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobrfimbriata.htm

13. Sobralia hirta D.E.Benn. & Christenson, Icon. Orchid. Peruv.: t. 762
(2001). http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_hirta.html

14. Sobralia klotzscheana Rchb.f., Linnaea 22: 815 (1850). http://www
orchidspecies.com/sobklotscheana.htm

15. Sobralia liliastrum Lindl., Gen. Sp. Orchid. Pl.: 177 (1833). http://www
orchidspecies.com/sobliliastrum.htm

16. Sobralia macrophylla Rchb.f., Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 10: 713 (1852).
http://sobralia.autrevie.com/Sobralia_macrophylla.html

17. Sobralia rosea Poepp. & Endl., Nov. Gen. Sp. Pl. 1: 54 (1836).
http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobruckeri.htm

18. Sobralia ruparupaensis D.E.Benn. & Christenson, Icon. Orchid. Peruv.: t.
763 (2001). I was not able to find a picture containing url . My apologies

19. Sobralia scopulorum Rchb.f., Xenia Orchid. 2: 176 (1873). I was not able
to find a picture containing url . My apologies

20. Sobralia setigera Poepp. & Endl., Nov. Gen. Sp. Pl. 1: 54 (1836).
http://www.ne
jp/asahi/orchid/sophronitis/DSC03165Sobralia_setigeraMachu2000-2500_500x375
jpg 

21. Sobralia stenophylla Lindl., Fol. Orchid. 5: 2 (1854). http://www
orchidspecies.com/sobstenophylla.htm22. Sobralia suaveolens Rchb.f., Gard.
Chron., n.s., 9: 622 (1878). THIS NAME IS REDUCED TO A SYNONYM OF Sobralia
bletiae Rchb.f., Bot. Zeitung (Berlin) 10: 713 (1852). BY THE PEOPLE AT KEW

23. Sobralia violacea Linden ex Lindl., Orchid. Linden.: 26 (1846).
http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobviolacea.htm

24 . Sobralia weberbaueriana Kraenzl., Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 1: 188
(1905). I was not able to find a picture containing url . My apologies

25. Sobralia withneri D.E.Benn. & Christenson, Icon. Orchid. Peruv.: t. 764
(2001). http://www.orchidspecies.com/sobwithneri.htm

It is obvious that this search would have not been as productive as I think
it was if it wasn’t for the work from many photographers who are willing to
share their photos and of compilers of information such as the people at Kew
 Jay Norris of Orchid Species Fame and , last but not least, Nina Rach whose
Sobralia Pages are a mother lode of information. To all of them my thanks.

I wish you fun in finding the mistery Sobralia. 

Jose.

 

PD > Oliver my apologies for no cc this to you I deleted by mistake your email 
addy.

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Peruvian species in Pampa Hermosa

2005-06-03 Thread Gary Yong Gee

Hi Oliver,

Your Peruvian species may be Epistephium duckei Huber rather than a 
Sobralia.


Cheers,

Gary


Gary Yong Gee & Roger Sawkins
Phone 61 (0)7 3398 4222
PO Box 57, Cannon Hill Qld 4170 Australia
http://www.yonggee.name 




___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: Orchids Digest, Vol 7, Issue 283

2005-06-03 Thread Oliver Sparrow
Peter Croezen wrote:

>Flower looks like Sobralia macrantha.

Many thanks - I'll go with that. 

It was growing with some delicate snow white Sobralias, clinging to rocks. These
had the standard reed stem, about 80 cm long, and alternate rounded red-brown
leaves about 7 cm along its length. Flowers came one at a time from tight
bracts, opening to around 7 Cm in diameter. Snow white, with classical Sobralia
habit, some with a touch of yellow on the three-ridged, lightly calloused lip. 

Any thoughts on which they might be? 
_
Oliver Sparrow
Tel: UK (0)20 7736 9716
www.chforum.org 
www.treknepal.org
www.trekperu.org
www.datafreeze.com

___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com


[OGD] Re: Orchids Digest, Vol 7, Issue 283

2005-06-03 Thread Dr. Braem





From: "Andy Easton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [OGD] Reply to Dennis.


Andy wrote: "... Although I have been accused of hating all
taxonomists, I actually see where they have some value in the orchid world
as long as they don't take themselves too seriously. Many posters on this
list help to keep the taxonomists "down to earth"! Of course Guido is unique
and I always chuckle knowing that his PhD is from a British University. Just
imagine how the "Kewites" would treat him if his degree was from some
institution in Bulgaria!!!"

Well ... just know that the accredited taxonomist from Kew has done his Ph.D.
on "The History of the Andean Potato." So far for me caring about what some of the "Kewites" say about me.

I wonder how many of the AOS "Approved" taxonomists actually have studied
Orchid taxonomy? And Andy, what you say about takings oneself too serious should 
apply to all individuals of Homo sapiens.

Guido Braem





-- 
Prof. Dr. Guido J. Braem
Naunheimer Str. 17
35633 Lahnau
Deutschland/Germany



___
the OrchidGuide Digest (OGD)
orchids@orchidguide.com
http://orchidguide.com/mailman/listinfo/orchids_orchidguide.com