Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 12:09:47PM -0800, Ray Harrison wrote: Moving among different app servers, I still use ejb-ql functionality in the ejb-jar.xml file, its just that when it is deployed on Orion, I have to add the finder functionality to the orion-ejb-jar.xml file. I think in 1.5.4, it deploys, it just doesn't do anything. That sounds like a sensible idea. Tried a simple pair of CMP beans with a one to many relationship, and the finders haven't picked up the EJB-QL at all in the orion-ejb-jar.xml file (as other people have pointed out on this list) Thanks for the tip. Cheers, Simon -- There is a little place in the jumbled sock drawer of my heart where you match up all the pairs, throw out the ones with holes in them, and buy me some of those neat dressy ones with the weird black and red geometrical designs on them.
Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
Is it possible to use SSL with the EJB container of the Orion server? For example the client is a standalone Java application that makes only RMI-IIOP calls to EJB-s (no JSP, no servlets, no HTML involved) in the EJB container. And I want to do this with security in mind, for example using SSL. Is it possible? (I read that it is possible to use SSL with simple RMI applications, or with a web application in the Orion server, but I would like to use Orion server's EJB container only...). Thanks for helping.
Re: Why are administrator username and password required at runtime to connect to DB?
u specify the admin username and password in the data-source.xml. - Original Message - From: Daniel Huang To: Orion-Interest Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:12 AM Subject: Why are administrator username and password required at runtime to connect to DB? I have setup Orion and it works for me. However, I think I missed something in the configuration files. My client can connect to any EJB objects. The EJB objects talk to the DB. Whenan EJB objecttries to connect to the DB,Orion always prompts a window that requires the administrator username and password. I have to enter the administrator username and password to run the EJB. I think there must be a place that I can specifyusername and password but I do not know where. Anyone can help me? Thanks in advance. Daniel Huang
remove me
remove me _ Todd R. Rosner UNIX System Administrator FDfn ~ Fair Disclosure Financial Network You can catch me at ~ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] TELEPHONE: 604.717.8128 CELLULAR: 604.916.0243 FACSIMILE: 604.717.8101 Check out. http://www.fdfn.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 N:Rosner;Todd;R.;Mr. FN:Todd R. Rosner ORG:Fair Disclosure Finacial Network;Management Information Systems TITLE:UNIX Systems Administrator TEL;WORK;VOICE:+1 (604) 717-8128 TEL;CELL;VOICE:+1 (604) 916-0243 TEL;WORK;FAX:+1 (604) 717-8100 ADR;WORK:;;112 West 6th Ave.;Vancouver;BC;V5Y-1K6;Canada LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:112 West 6th Ave.=0D=0AVancouver, BC V5Y-1K6=0D=0ACanada URL;WORK:http://www.fdfn.com ROLE:Financial Audio Call Streaming EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED] REV:20020214T190837Z END:VCARD
Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
, Hello, Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full EJB 2.0) will be considered a stable version? Actually, let me ask the full question: Is there any correlation between Orion's version number and whether it is considered stable or unstable? Is their concept of stability just what they recommend based on the number and severity of the known bugs? I'm still evaluating Orion and I'm trying to decide whether I should look at 1.5.2 or 1.5.4. If 1.5.5 is going to be something more than a beta-quality release (the M-N relationship bug is big enough to say beta, IMO) and it will be out within 3-4 months, then I wouldn't hesitate to look at 1.5.4. Otherwise, I'd have to limit my evaluation to 1.5.2. Thanks, Michael On Tuesday 26 March 2002 04:36 pm, you wrote: sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible. I understand from some Oracle types that ejb-ql will be out later this summer. many-many is broken in 1.5.4, but Magnus et al indicate its fixed in bugzilla for 1.5.5 regards, the elephantwalker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Maurer Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:18 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Orion EJB 2.0 final Hi, does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ... Michael -- Michael Crozier Conducive Technology Corporation First we were Sight Sound, then we were Datalex, and temporarily Framework Technology. http://www.conducivetech.com Michael Crozier, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice: 503.445.4233 Fax: 503.274.0939
Re: [orion-interest]Re: Orion EJB 2.0 final
I think stable versions are declared when a version has been out for a while and doesn't do things like blow up unexpectly. Many people will run the development versions of orion on production boxes, since they provide many bugfixes over the last known 'stable' version. Of course, this is assuming you stay away from features which aren't necessarily as stable as the rest of the server (eg, you could use 1.5.4 and stay away from any n-m problems). 1.5.5 will be out soon (not a matter of months), but in the meantime I'd strongly recommend you use 1.5.4 rather than 1.5.2, as it has very many bugfixes and enhancements. There's no correlation between version numbers and development vs stable releases. On 28/3/02 2:44 pm, Michael Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: , Hello, Does anybody know if 1.5.5 (full EJB 2.0) will be considered a stable version? Actually, let me ask the full question: Is there any correlation between Orion's version number and whether it is considered stable or unstable? Is their concept of stability just what they recommend based on the number and severity of the known bugs? I'm still evaluating Orion and I'm trying to decide whether I should look at 1.5.2 or 1.5.4. If 1.5.5 is going to be something more than a beta-quality release (the M-N relationship bug is big enough to say beta, IMO) and it will be out within 3-4 months, then I wouldn't hesitate to look at 1.5.4. Otherwise, I'd have to limit my evaluation to 1.5.2. Thanks, Michael On Tuesday 26 March 2002 04:36 pm, you wrote: sans ejb-ql, 1.5.4 is compatible. I understand from some Oracle types that ejb-ql will be out later this summer. many-many is broken in 1.5.4, but Magnus et al indicate its fixed in bugzilla for 1.5.5 regards, the elephantwalker -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Maurer Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 9:18 AM To: Orion-Interest Subject: Orion EJB 2.0 final Hi, does anyone know when Orion will be 100% EJB 2.0 compatible including local/remote inerfaces EJB-QL ... Michael
CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better?
Subject: CMP 2.0 vs BMP - Which performes better? From: alt.cybercafes [EMAIL PROTECTED] === I am in the process of building a database intensive app and wanted to know whether to use container manage persistance versus bean manage persistence for this database instensive application. What are the pros and cons of CMP and BMP.? thanks
