RE: Last posting

2001-02-15 Thread Cliff Rowley

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thankyou for making our decision for us.  Orion will not be our
choice of J2EE platform, as our evaluation has shown that its users
are rude and obnoxious.  We have decided that it would not be in our
best interest to be associated with people of this nature.

Whilst everyone is flustering over rather pointless postings (as is
my observation over the last couple of days), real potential Orion
customers are being turned away by its self obsessed (and somewhat
childish) user group.

I asked a question, and was ignored.  It was quite obvious from my
question that I am under a fair amount of pressure, and I had
(wrongly) presumed that a commercial application server would have a
reasonably professional following.

Let me also point out that it was not arrogance, it was a cry for
help.  I currently close to redundancy, I have a wife who is 6 months
pregnant, and I have a 2 year old daughter.  Forgive me for appearing
a little stressed as I try to feed and clothe them, but it was not
something I had wished to share.

But I guess you wouldnt care, seeing as you're a typical
newsgroup/mailing list troll - we've seen you before, in various
forms, under various names.  Always the one to jump on the weak
whenever the opportunity arises.  And you have the cheek to call me
arrogant?

You're forgotten about already.

. o O ( Wonders where the 'human' element dissapeared to in all of
this - bring back the old Internet )

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike
 Cannon-Brookes
 Sent: 15 February 2001 01:27
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: RE: Last posting
 
 
 This is one of the most arrogant postings I've ever seen on a
 public user mailing list.
 
 rant
 Cliff, might I profer my humblest apologies for not acknowledging 
 your post,
 I'll make sure next time to send you an email saying that I got it.
 Right.  
 
 In addition, I agree that not answering YOUR query calls into
 question the professionalism of everyone on this list.
 
 You are not mistaken at all. You are a fool.
 
 /rant
 
 -mike
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cliff
  Rowley Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:58 AM
  To: Orion-Interest
  Subject: Last posting
 
 
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Pardon me if I sound a little rude, but since not a single person
  has even acknowledged my last post, do I assume that (a) noone
  cares or (b) noone knows?  I am very keen to get started, and
  very keen to evaluate the various avenues open to us, and I had
  expected a
  commercial application to have a reasonably professional
  following. Perhaps I was mistaken and I should look elsewhere?
 
  Cliff Rowley
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
  http://www.pgp.com 
 
  iQA/AwUBOosbgApjs58+bOhlEQKwigCgnaxMsVQAHoiFpkfbNk48fqTDWXsAoMNy
  HxbYNGGXjPNB/neGWBPbq8yf
  =RK40
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 
 
 
 
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOouwcgpjs58+bOhlEQIavgCaA0Q3ggIHpwV0U9fJA+ssaSSELDYAn13K
evgGHQ0JvZUEHhUrKQHxiiRt
=YQE8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





RE: Last posting

2001-02-15 Thread Cliff Rowley

Tim, thankyou for your mature and decent reply - it is very much
appreciated.

I must apologise for being rather obtrusive, I am almost ready to crack and
'let them take me away', and everyone seems to be taking a fair whack from
it just recently.  Some people react like bulldogs, and some people care to
remember they are dealing with real people with real problems.

Sorry if I caused you any displeasure.

Cliff

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Endres
 Sent: 15 February 2001 03:22
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: Re: Last posting


 Cliff,

 I think your posting was sufficiently complex and general that it was
 unlikely to generate a reponse. Speaking for myself, but suspecting
 that it applies to other "professionals", I am very busy, and do not
 have the time to devote to such a response. Sorry.

 However, I believe you would be more likely to get a reply if you try
 asking specific questions.

 tim.

  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Pardon me if I sound a little rude, but since not a single person has
  even acknowledged my last post, do I assume that (a) noone cares or
  (b) noone knows?  I am very keen to get started, and very keen to
  evaluate the various avenues open to us, and I had expected a
  commercial application to have a reasonably professional following.
  Perhaps I was mistaken and I should look elsewhere?
 
  Cliff Rowley
 
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
  Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com
 
  iQA/AwUBOosbgApjs58+bOhlEQKwigCgnaxMsVQAHoiFpkfbNk48fqTDWXsAoMNy
  HxbYNGGXjPNB/neGWBPbq8yf
  =RK40
  -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 









RE: Security between applications?

2001-02-15 Thread Cliff Rowley
Title: SV: Security between applications?



No, 
your answer is perfect - my aim was to try to be able to specify which 
applications can access particular datasources. Now I know that it is not 
possible using the defined mechanisms, I can move on to find another 
solution.

Thankyou *very* much for your help Magnus, it is very 
much appreciated. It's nice to know someone actually reads the posts 
:)

Cliff

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Magnus 
  RydinSent: 15 February 2001 07:22To: 
  Orion-InterestSubject: SV: Security between 
  applications?
  Im not sure I understand the question correctly. 
  There is no way to define a datasource and say which apps 
  should be able to access it. You can specify WHAT 
  datasource a certain app should use though. Is this 
  what you are after? WR 
   -Ursprungligt meddelande-  Från: Cliff Rowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]  Skickat: den 13 februari 2001 11:09  
  Till: Orion-Interest  Ämne: Security between 
  applications?   
   Greetings,  
   We are currently evaluating the various J2EE 
  solutions available for a  venture that we hope to 
  deliver to the world in a few months. Whilst  reading the documentation for each, I dont appear to be able 
   to configure  Orion 
  to suit the way the project will work.  
   In order for our application to be of any use, we 
  need to be able to  implement a fair amount of 
  security, since JSP pages may be  at the mercy 
  of  people who are not us.   Basically the application will 
  provide a farm of hosts on  which we will 
  be  offering certain services. Each 
  application needs to have a  data source 
   that it, and only it has access to. The current 
  problem as I  see it is that  if I define a connection in data-sources.xml, then every web 
   application  deployed 
  on the server or cluster of servers has access to  
  it. We need some  way of securing that while 
  still being able to use EJB in all  its 
  glory. We  need to be able to offer the 
  opportunity of creating and  editing 
  content  without compromising the security of 
  other applications on the system.  
   Could anyone give us some tips and pointers on 
  this?   Thanks 
Cliff Rowley 




RE: Security between applications?

2001-02-15 Thread Cliff Rowley

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Weblogic is next on the list, the only problem being that I am
funding this entirely myself until we have a solid enough
presentation to try for investment (and one of my own machines is
looking more like a colo every day :\).  We're not giving up hope
yet!

Currently I'm looking at a JBoss/Resin combination, as they both
offer certain features I'm keen to employ.  I run Resin on my
development BSD box, and I am impressed with its simple yet powerful
configuration, which enables me to easily auto-generate it, and JBoss
has some very nifty hot deployment features and I believe I can
secure it at EJB level as well as connection level using its JAAS
support
(http://www.jboss.org/newsite/documentation/HTML/ch08s32.html).

- ---
I'd like to apologise to anyone offended by my earlier postings, I
was out of line - and I perhaps deserved the reception I received.  I
dont think I deserved being called a fool, however, since I am not. 
I defy anyone to say they've never done anything irrational under
stress.

I'd also like to thank those who saw through it and answered in a
mature and professional manner, and I hope they forgive my outburst.
- ---

Cliff

 -Original Message-
 From: Konstantin Polyzois [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 15 February 2001 16:04
 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
 Subject: RE: Security between applications?
 
 
 Securing datasources is no match for Weblogic. I do not know how
 Orion handles this.
 /korre
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Cliff Rowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: den 13 februari 2001 20:09
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: Security between applications?
 
 
 Greetings,
 
 We are currently evaluating the various J2EE solutions available
 for a venture that we hope to deliver to the world in a few months.
  Whilst reading the documentation for each, I dont appear to be
 able to configure Orion to suit the way the project will work.
 
 In order for our application to be of any use, we need to be able
 to implement a fair amount of security, since JSP pages may be at 
 the mercy of
 people who are not us.
 
 Basically the application will provide a farm of hosts on which we
 will be offering certain services.  Each application needs to have
 a data source that it, and only it has access to.  The current
 problem as I see  it is that
 if I define a connection in data-sources.xml, then every web
 application deployed on the server or cluster of servers has access
 to it.  
 We need some
 way of securing that while still being able to use EJB in all its 
 glory.  We
 need to be able to offer the opportunity of creating and editing 
 content without compromising the security of other applications on
 the system.  
 
 Could anyone give us some tips and pointers on this?
 
 Thanks
 
 Cliff Rowley
 
 

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOowBNgpjs58+bOhlEQJiJQCgjNVh2G+Adqa2lDWOtOFxYht5WEoAoOgp
kwYzWr78KQOvNMVnHiArp4bz
=+nWQ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





Last posting

2001-02-14 Thread Cliff Rowley

 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Pardon me if I sound a little rude, but since not a single person has
even acknowledged my last post, do I assume that (a) noone cares or
(b) noone knows?  I am very keen to get started, and very keen to
evaluate the various avenues open to us, and I had expected a
commercial application to have a reasonably professional following. 
Perhaps I was mistaken and I should look elsewhere?

Cliff Rowley

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use http://www.pgp.com

iQA/AwUBOosbgApjs58+bOhlEQKwigCgnaxMsVQAHoiFpkfbNk48fqTDWXsAoMNy
HxbYNGGXjPNB/neGWBPbq8yf
=RK40
-END PGP SIGNATURE-





Security between applications?

2001-02-13 Thread Cliff Rowley

Greetings,

We are currently evaluating the various J2EE solutions available for a
venture that we hope to deliver to the world in a few months.  Whilst
reading the documentation for each, I dont appear to be able to configure
Orion to suit the way the project will work.

In order for our application to be of any use, we need to be able to
implement a fair amount of security, since JSP pages may be at the mercy of
people who are not us.

Basically the application will provide a farm of hosts on which we will be
offering certain services.  Each application needs to have a data source
that it, and only it has access to.  The current problem as I see it is that
if I define a connection in data-sources.xml, then every web application
deployed on the server or cluster of servers has access to it.  We need some
way of securing that while still being able to use EJB in all its glory.  We
need to be able to offer the opportunity of creating and editing  content
without compromising the security of other applications on the system.

Could anyone give us some tips and pointers on this?

Thanks

Cliff Rowley