RE: re Performance test...

2000-10-26 Thread Duffey, Kevin

No entity beans..not even using EJB on this particular test. It will be a
few weeks before I get the clustered test posted. Business needs are
consistently coming in and we don't have time to do much else. But as soon
as I can I will post those results.



 -Original Message-
 From: Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2000 5:21 PM
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: re Performance test...
 
 
 Kevin, quick question on your login test.  Does your application use
 EntityBeans to represent your users (and therefore are you calling
 EntityBean.ejbFind() to load from Oracle?).  Or are you using another
 mechanism to represent users within your application?
 
 Many thanks for posting this info, it's extremely helpful!
 
 --Mark
 
 
 
 Hi all,
 
 Well, using a pretty nifty (and very expensive) testing tool, 
 I was able
 to
 do some "minor" testing on a login process of our site. Using Orion,
 Oracle
 8i database, and e-load test suite, here are some numbers that I got:
 
 25 users  - 15 connections in the pool
 
 pages per second  - 43
 pages per day   - 3.75 million
 transactions per second  - 14.5
 transactions per day   - 1.26 million
 
 25 users  - 30 connections in the pool
 
 pages per second- 26.4
 pages per day - 2.28 million
 transactions per second - 8.81
 transactions per day  - 761333
 
 25 users - 5 connections in the pool
 
 pages per second -  51.95
 pages per day  -  4.48 million
 transactions per second  - 17.32
 transactions per day- 1.49 million
 
 The test is simple. It uses the browser built into the e-test suite
 software
 and "automates" the login process of our site. I ran the test on a
 PIII650,
 with 512MB RAM. The database is running on a SUN E450 serve with 512MB
 RAM.
 The test simply sends a post submitted form with the login name and
 password
 to a controller servlet that then hits the database using a connection
 via
 the pool, and logs in the user. All logins were valid, I did not test
 invalid login names/passwords.
 
 Just thought I would share these numbers. Next week I will be 
 setting up
 a
 two-server farm, using the load-balancer software that Orion 
 includes in
 
 their download. Each server will be dual PIII550 with 512MB 
 RAM and SCSI
 III
 RAID hd setup (Actually, they are IBM NetFinitiy 4000R 
 units). The load
 balancer will run on a slow PII300 workstation with 128MB RAM (I hope
 this
 is good enough). They will be failed over and load-balanced, 
 and I will
 test
 the performance on those and post the results here.
 
 The only thing I am not sure of is if different testing software
 performs
 about the same..or are there dramatically different results.
 
 If anyone wants me to attempt to test their site, I'll give 
 it a go from
 
 here..but its over a T1 connection, where as my test is done 
 locally on
 a
 LAN, so I am sure the results are more skewed.
 
 
 
 
 




RE: Performance test...

2000-10-19 Thread Duffey, Kevin

Not sure of the URL, but its RSW software. It costs us something like $35K
for the software, including 7 licenses, so its definitely not cheap. But its
a great web-based testing tool. A lot of people are used to Silk or QA
Partner, but this one is extremely easy to use and learn. While it does
allow for written script testing, it uses a sort of macro record mode to
record every move you make in their internal browser. You can then set up a
databank (a text file) that is used against a load-test, so that it
simulates virtual users. I know we can simulat up to 100 virutal users with
our licenses, which is small potatoes compared to some users of this tool.
One of thier clients simulats 10,000 users. The software has "clients" that
can be run on many computers over a network so you can run it over night,
each computer simulating say 100 users, all hitting the same one site.

Anyways..this is sort of off topic..but if you have any questions, feel free
to email me.


 -Original Message-
 From: Santosh Kumar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 9:19 PM
 To: Orion-Interest
 Subject: Re: Performance test...
 
 
 That was a simply great thing to do. Where could i get hold 
 of this tool.
 
 Santosh
 - Original Message -
 From: Duffey, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Orion-Interest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 9:11 AM
 Subject: Performance test...
 
 
  Hi all,
 
  Well, using a pretty nifty (and very expensive) testing 
 tool, I was able
 to
  do some "minor" testing on a login process of our site. Using Orion,
 Oracle
  8i database, and e-load test suite, here are some numbers 
 that I got:
 
  25 users  - 15 connections in the pool
 
  pages per second  - 43
  pages per day   - 3.75 million
  transactions per second  - 14.5
  transactions per day   - 1.26 million
 
  25 users  - 30 connections in the pool
 
  pages per second- 26.4
  pages per day - 2.28 million
  transactions per second - 8.81
  transactions per day  - 761333
 
  25 users - 5 connections in the pool
 
  pages per second -  51.95
  pages per day  -  4.48 million
  transactions per second  - 17.32
  transactions per day- 1.49 million
 
  The test is simple. It uses the browser built into the e-test suite
 software
  and "automates" the login process of our site. I ran the test on a
 PIII650,
  with 512MB RAM. The database is running on a SUN E450 serve 
 with 512MB
 RAM.
  The test simply sends a post submitted form with the login name and
 password
  to a controller servlet that then hits the database using a 
 connection via
  the pool, and logs in the user. All logins were valid, I 
 did not test
  invalid login names/passwords.
 
  Just thought I would share these numbers. Next week I will 
 be setting up a
  two-server farm, using the load-balancer software that 
 Orion includes in
  their download. Each server will be dual PIII550 with 512MB 
 RAM and SCSI
 III
  RAID hd setup (Actually, they are IBM NetFinitiy 4000R 
 units). The load
  balancer will run on a slow PII300 workstation with 128MB 
 RAM (I hope this
  is good enough). They will be failed over and 
 load-balanced, and I will
 test
  the performance on those and post the results here.
 
  The only thing I am not sure of is if different testing 
 software performs
  about the same..or are there dramatically different results.
 
  If anyone wants me to attempt to test their site, I'll give 
 it a go from
  here..but its over a T1 connection, where as my test is 
 done locally on a
  LAN, so I am sure the results are more skewed.