Re: Verwirrende Navigationsansagen

[CP]

Der Note ist richtig. Die U-turn ist verantwortlich fuhr die erste 
rechts abbiegen Meldung.


-CP


Op 16-04-17 om 15:39 schreef Marcel Müller:

Alles was es dazu zu sagen gibt, ist bereits im Note vermerkt:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/960237

(I hope german is ok...)

Muss an den Kartendaten, oder an der App etwas geändert werden, damit 
hier sinnvolle Anweisungen entstehen?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Verwirrende Navigationsansagen

[Marcel Müller]

Alles was es dazu zu sagen gibt, ist bereits im Note vermerkt:

http://www.openstreetmap.org/note/960237

(I hope german is ok...)

Muss an den Kartendaten, oder an der App etwas geändert werden, damit hier 
sinnvolle Anweisungen entstehen?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bicycle profile, avoid unpaved, tracks

[Poutnik Fornntp]

I guess it is aiming toward osmandtrier
as I have said nothing like that.

I think Osmand routing has made a big step in 2.6 version.



On 16 April 2017 13:30:06 Paul Johnson  wrote:


OK, so the routing engine could use some optimization, but I don't see  how
that's a waste for those of us who do actually use the bicycle mode.

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Poutnik Fornntp 
wrote:


Neither I use OSMand bicycle routing,
as Brouter outperforms it even by features, aside of using mostly LocusMap.

But not all Osmand users are Brouter aware, and such implementation may
confuse them

On 16 April 2017 12:00:02 "'Osmandtrier' via Osmand" <
osmand@googlegroups.com> wrote:


In my opinion it is a waste of time correcting this routing file.

Why? I measured some things this morning.

Xperia Z1c

Osmandrouting  needed for a route linear distance 45 km  with default
settings

Spring 2015 30 sec.
Spring 2017 210 sec.

Using safety and flat 390 sec.

Brouter

Spring 30 sec regarding elevation
Spring 2017 15 sec. regarding elevation

Benchmark of a singlecore increased in this two years 40 percent. Based
on comparing S6 and S7.

Xperia Z1c is a little bit better than a S6.


Am Sonntag, 16. April 2017 10:48:19 UTC+2 schrieb Poutnik:


Hi,

It seems to me the routing.xml

from master Github branch
incorrectly considers in the bicycle profile all tracks as unpaved.

Many tracks are paved, what can be seen at tag surface=
or implied from the tag tracktype=grade1.

In fact, minor roads, paved tracks and cycleways,
form the backbone of the bicycle trekking network.

routing.xml quote
.
 










...

--
Poutnik ( The Wanderer )

My Brouter profiles https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Show Ref of motorway-exit by navigation

[Paul Johnson]

On Sun, Apr 9, 2017 at 10:52 AM, 'jan99' via Osmand  wrote:

> Hi!
>
> i look to junction:ref and when i und erstand correct it would be a
> poposual in 2012 with no success
>

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/compare/highway=motorway_junction/junction:ref
 junction:ref is gaining traction as it is a more precise method.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bicycle profile, avoid unpaved, tracks

[Paul Johnson]

OK, so the routing engine could use some optimization, but I don't see  how
that's a waste for those of us who do actually use the bicycle mode.

On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:08 AM, Poutnik Fornntp 
wrote:

> Neither I use OSMand bicycle routing,
> as Brouter outperforms it even by features, aside of using mostly LocusMap.
>
> But not all Osmand users are Brouter aware, and such implementation may
> confuse them
>
> On 16 April 2017 12:00:02 "'Osmandtrier' via Osmand" <
> osmand@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>> In my opinion it is a waste of time correcting this routing file.
>>
>> Why? I measured some things this morning.
>>
>> Xperia Z1c
>>
>> Osmandrouting  needed for a route linear distance 45 km  with default
>> settings
>>
>> Spring 2015 30 sec.
>> Spring 2017 210 sec.
>>
>> Using safety and flat 390 sec.
>>
>> Brouter
>>
>> Spring 30 sec regarding elevation
>> Spring 2017 15 sec. regarding elevation
>>
>> Benchmark of a singlecore increased in this two years 40 percent. Based
>> on comparing S6 and S7.
>>
>> Xperia Z1c is a little bit better than a S6.
>>
>>
>> Am Sonntag, 16. April 2017 10:48:19 UTC+2 schrieb Poutnik:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It seems to me the routing.xml
>>> 
>>> from master Github branch
>>> incorrectly considers in the bicycle profile all tracks as unpaved.
>>>
>>> Many tracks are paved, what can be seen at tag surface=
>>> or implied from the tag tracktype=grade1.
>>>
>>> In fact, minor roads, paved tracks and cycleways,
>>> form the backbone of the bicycle trekking network.
>>>
>>> routing.xml quote
>>> .
>>>  
>>>
>>> >> v="steps"/>
>>> >> v="ferry"/>
>>> >> v="dismount"/>
>>> >> v="designated"/>
>>> 
>>> >> v="track"/>
>>> >> v="footway"/>
>>> >> v="path"/>
>>> 
>>> ...
>>>
>>> --
>>> Poutnik ( The Wanderer )
>>>
>>> My Brouter profiles https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Osmand" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Osmand" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Bicycle profile, avoid unpaved, tracks

['Osmandtrier' via Osmand]

In my opinion it is a waste of time correcting this routing file.

Why? I measured some things this morning.

Xperia Z1c

Osmandrouting  needed for a route linear distance 45 km  with default 
settings

Spring 2015 30 sec.
Spring 2017 210 sec.

Using safety and flat 390 sec.

Brouter 

Spring 30 sec regarding elevation
Spring 2017 15 sec. regarding elevation

Benchmark of a singlecore increased in this two years 40 percent. Based on 
comparing S6 and S7.

Xperia Z1c is a little bit better than a S6.


Am Sonntag, 16. April 2017 10:48:19 UTC+2 schrieb Poutnik:
>
> Hi,
>
> It seems to me the routing.xml 
> 
>   
> from master Github branch 
> incorrectly considers in the bicycle profile all tracks as unpaved. 
>
> Many tracks are paved, what can be seen at tag surface=
> or implied from the tag tracktype=grade1.
>
> In fact, minor roads, paved tracks and cycleways,
> form the backbone of the bicycle trekking network.
>
> routing.xml quote
> .
>   
>
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
> ...
>
> -- 
> Poutnik ( The Wanderer )
>
> My Brouter profiles https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Re: Feature request - Show elevation profile of planned route

[gergyverjux]

Implementation in 2.6 goes beyond my expectations :) - Congratulation! 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Bicycle profile, avoid unpaved, tracks

[Poutnik]

Hi,

It seems to me the routing.xml

 
from master Github branch
incorrectly considers in the bicycle profile all tracks as unpaved.

Many tracks are paved, what can be seen at tag surface=
or implied from the tag tracktype=grade1.

In fact, minor roads, paved tracks and cycleways,
form the backbone of the bicycle trekking network.

routing.xml quote
.
 










...

-- 
Poutnik ( The Wanderer )

My Brouter profiles 
https://github.com/poutnikl/Brouter-profiles/wiki

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Osmand" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.