Export/upload GPX to openstreetmaps?
I made the video, and at least on 3.4.5, I see the export option and the procedure still works: My Places > Tracks > (individual) GPX menu > Export Unless something changed between these last two versions, I'm not sure why you're not seeing the option. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/fb878840-4fad-42b5-abea-24eb275720d7%40googlegroups.com.
Re: Traffic lights and routing on dual carriaged intersections
Curtis Brown writes: > I am genuinely curious to know from OsmAnd developers what their point of > view is. Does OsmAnd's routing prefer traffic_lights moved out of > intersecting nodes of dual-carriaged intersections, or does its routing > treat a cluster of traffic_light'd nodes as a single weight? I don't know, but you should understand that it's not really ok to adjust tagging based on what osmand does. My understanding of traffic light tagging is that there should be highway=traffic_signals at road junctions, such that any traversal of the intersection that encounters a signal in reality will traverse one in the representation. And, that paths through in the representation that hit multiple signals should not be penalized more than hitting one. That's partially because when there are multiple signals they are coordinated. The simplest case to illustrate this is a dual carriageway with a single carrriageway at right angles, with a light. There should be a highway=traffic_signals at each of the two junctions. But, on turning left (assuming US drive-on-right), one will not be controlled by or delayed by the other one, because if you have a left green arrow, the other one is ok. It seems obvious that a router should behave reasonably with any tagging scheme that has significant use, or it's broken. Now, if there is a consensus among 80% of the routers out there, that's sort of a de facto tagging semantics definition. But you can't (properly) just adjust to what osmand wants. Keep in mind that there is a lot of wiki fiddling, so that what's in the wiki may represent a paper exercise by someone separate from how the tags are actually used. The proper forum for arguing about how signals should be tagged is tagg...@openstreetmap.org. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/rmi5znpaczu.fsf%40s1.lexort.com.
Traffic lights and routing on dual carriaged intersections
Hi everyone, I want to ask about traffic lights in dual-carriaged intersections. Sometimes the intersections have traffic_lights on the intersecting nodes where the ways cross, and sometimes the lights are outside of the intersecting nodes. Here are two examples of intersections and the different ways traffic_lights are placed: lights on nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/35.13084/-106.58631 lights off nodes: https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/31.76873/-106.31877 I have been moving traffic lights out out of these intersections, largely for the reason brought up here: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/osmand/jHjZ_zGF_Vg I would see that if a user needs to make a left turn, through an intersection with lights on intersecting nodes, the router would penalize the path heavily for having to route through three traffic lights in a row. I have been told that if the intersection has lights in the intersecting nodes, that is sufficient for mapping and should not change. The OSM Wiki page seems to state that "there is no well established convention on how this problem should be ideally solved". https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Tag_all_incoming_ways I am genuinely curious to know from OsmAnd developers what their point of view is. Does OsmAnd's routing prefer traffic_lights moved out of intersecting nodes of dual-carriaged intersections, or does its routing treat a cluster of traffic_light'd nodes as a single weight? Thank you in advance for helping me understand. -curtis -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/7c555f7d-c940-4fb1-90e5-448ca9af5716%40googlegroups.com.
Re: Keyboard(soft) when entering coordinates
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 05:18:53AM -0700, Helmut Jarausch wrote: I often paste a coordinates pair into the Lat as well as the Lon field when searching for a place by its coordinates - so I have to edit these after pasting. The soft keyboard which pops up doesn't have cursor keys. Is this configurable? If you are on Android: 1) Install F-Droid: https://f-droid.org/ 2) Install "Hacker's Keyboard" from F-Droid: https://f-droid.org/en/packages/org.pocketworkstation.pckeyboard/ 3) Either set "Hacker's Keyboard" as default (what I did), or use the keyboard selector to pick "Hacker's Keyboard" when you want cursor keys. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/20190725165402.GN1375%40d820.dp100.com.
Keyboard(soft) when entering coordinates
I often paste a coordinates pair into the Lat as well as the Lon field when searching for a place by its coordinates - so I have to edit these after pasting. The soft keyboard which pops up doesn't have cursor keys. Is this configurable? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Osmand" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to osmand+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/osmand/cf567221-0620-4379-a8ac-78bd1a081f83%40googlegroups.com.
