Yes we benchmarked v5 and v4 in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/issues/2211
found some regressions and considerably improved v5 in https://github.com/Project-OSRM/osrm-backend/pull/2241 Are you running the v5 release (and not a RC)? What's your specific use-case? If you enable steps and alternatives the response is larger than in v4 and especially assembling all the GeoJSON objects / variants has some allocation issues. If that's the case, try the Polyline format. Daniel J H On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 12:43 AM, James Grant <ja...@grantzone.net> wrote: > Hi there. > > Has anyone done any comparisons between version 4 and 5 of OSRM speed wise > when looking at the C++ examples (the simpleclient.cpp and example.cpp)? > > I've now built version 5 and the example.cpp but on first appearances, it > is slower than version 4. I will have to recompile the simpleclient.cpp > with the same parameters as I've currently got to directly compare speed. > > Regards > > _______________________________________________ > OSRM-talk mailing list > OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk > >
_______________________________________________ OSRM-talk mailing list OSRM-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osrm-talk
