Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH OVS 1/1] tc flower: reorder tunnel encap/decap actions
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:08:42PM +, John Hurley wrote: > The tc_flower conversion struct does not consider the order of actions. > If an OvS rule matches on a tunnel (decap) and outputs to a new tunnel, > the netlink conversion to TC will add the set tunnel key action before the > unset, leading to an incorrect TC rule. This patch reorders the netlink > generation to ensure a decap is done before an encap if both exist. > > Signed-off-by: John Hurley> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman Thanks John, I have applied to master and branch-2.9. It looks like the fix is also needed for branch-2.8 but does not apply cleanly there. Please consider posting a backport to that branch. ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH OVS 1/1] tc flower: reorder tunnel encap/decap actions
2018/01/23 19:02 "Ben Pfaff": Simon, do you want to apply this? I see that you reviewed it. Sure, will do. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:08:42PM +, John Hurley wrote: > The tc_flower conversion struct does not consider the order of actions. > If an OvS rule matches on a tunnel (decap) and outputs to a new tunnel, > the netlink conversion to TC will add the set tunnel key action before the > unset, leading to an incorrect TC rule. This patch reorders the netlink > generation to ensure a decap is done before an encap if both exist. > > Signed-off-by: John Hurley > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > --- > lib/tc.c | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/tc.c b/lib/tc.c > index bfe20ce..914465a 100644 > --- a/lib/tc.c > +++ b/lib/tc.c > @@ -1379,6 +1379,11 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct tc_flower *flower) > nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > } > } > +if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { > +act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > +nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); > +nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > +} > if (flower->set.set) { > act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_set(request, flower->set.id, > @@ -1389,11 +1394,6 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct tc_flower *flower) >flower->set.tp_dst); > nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > } > -if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { > -act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > -nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); > -nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > -} > if (flower->vlan_pop) { > act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > nl_msg_put_act_pop_vlan(request); > -- > 1.9.1 > > ___ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH OVS 1/1] tc flower: reorder tunnel encap/decap actions
Simon, do you want to apply this? I see that you reviewed it. On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 02:08:42PM +, John Hurley wrote: > The tc_flower conversion struct does not consider the order of actions. > If an OvS rule matches on a tunnel (decap) and outputs to a new tunnel, > the netlink conversion to TC will add the set tunnel key action before the > unset, leading to an incorrect TC rule. This patch reorders the netlink > generation to ensure a decap is done before an encap if both exist. > > Signed-off-by: John Hurley> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman > --- > lib/tc.c | 10 +- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/tc.c b/lib/tc.c > index bfe20ce..914465a 100644 > --- a/lib/tc.c > +++ b/lib/tc.c > @@ -1379,6 +1379,11 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct > tc_flower *flower) > nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > } > } > +if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { > +act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > +nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); > +nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > +} > if (flower->set.set) { > act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_set(request, flower->set.id, > @@ -1389,11 +1394,6 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct > tc_flower *flower) >flower->set.tp_dst); > nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > } > -if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { > -act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > -nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); > -nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); > -} > if (flower->vlan_pop) { > act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); > nl_msg_put_act_pop_vlan(request); > -- > 1.9.1 > > ___ > dev mailing list > d...@openvswitch.org > https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev
[ovs-dev] [PATCH OVS 1/1] tc flower: reorder tunnel encap/decap actions
The tc_flower conversion struct does not consider the order of actions. If an OvS rule matches on a tunnel (decap) and outputs to a new tunnel, the netlink conversion to TC will add the set tunnel key action before the unset, leading to an incorrect TC rule. This patch reorders the netlink generation to ensure a decap is done before an encap if both exist. Signed-off-by: John HurleyReviewed-by: Simon Horman --- lib/tc.c | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/tc.c b/lib/tc.c index bfe20ce..914465a 100644 --- a/lib/tc.c +++ b/lib/tc.c @@ -1379,6 +1379,11 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct tc_flower *flower) nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); } } +if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { +act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); +nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); +nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); +} if (flower->set.set) { act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_set(request, flower->set.id, @@ -1389,11 +1394,6 @@ nl_msg_put_flower_acts(struct ofpbuf *request, struct tc_flower *flower) flower->set.tp_dst); nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); } -if (flower->tunnel.tunnel) { -act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); -nl_msg_put_act_tunnel_key_release(request); -nl_msg_end_nested(request, act_offset); -} if (flower->vlan_pop) { act_offset = nl_msg_start_nested(request, act_index++); nl_msg_put_act_pop_vlan(request); -- 1.9.1 ___ dev mailing list d...@openvswitch.org https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev