On 10/18/2017 05:01 PM, antonio.fische...@intel.com wrote:
> For code readability purposes mp_size is renamed as n_mbufs
> in dpdk_mp structure.
> This parameter is passed to rte mempool creation functions
> and is meant to contain the number of elements inside
> the requested mempool.
>
> CC: Ciara Loftus
> CC: Kevin Traynor
> CC: Aaron Conole
> Acked-by: Mark Kavanagh
> Signed-off-by: Antonio Fischetti
> ---
LGTM.
Acked-by: Kevin Traynor
> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 20 ++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> index a3b4638..0057e6b 100644
> --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.c
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ struct dpdk_mp {
> int mtu;
> int socket_id;
> char if_name[IFNAMSIZ];
> -unsigned mp_size;
> +unsigned n_mbufs; /* Number of mbufs inside the mempool. */
> struct ovs_list list_node OVS_GUARDED_BY(dpdk_mp_mutex);
> };
>
> @@ -500,11 +500,11 @@ dpdk_mp_name(struct dpdk_mp *dmp)
> uint32_t h = hash_string(dmp->if_name, 0);
> char *mp_name = xcalloc(RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE, sizeof *mp_name);
> int ret = snprintf(mp_name, RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE, "ovs_%x_%d_%d_%u",
> - h, dmp->socket_id, dmp->mtu, dmp->mp_size);
> + h, dmp->socket_id, dmp->mtu, dmp->n_mbufs);
> if (ret < 0 || ret >= RTE_MEMPOOL_NAMESIZE) {
> VLOG_DBG("Failed to generate a mempool name for \"%s\". "
> "Hash:0x%x, mtu:%d, mbufs:%u, %s",
> -dmp->if_name, h, dmp->mtu, dmp->mp_size, ovs_strerror(ret));
> +dmp->if_name, h, dmp->mtu, dmp->n_mbufs, ovs_strerror(ret));
> return NULL;
> }
> return mp_name;
> @@ -523,13 +523,13 @@ dpdk_mp_create(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu, bool
> *mp_exists)
> ovs_strzcpy(dmp->if_name, dev->up.name, IFNAMSIZ);
>
> /*
> - * XXX: rough estimation of memory required for port:
> + * XXX: rough estimation of number of mbufs required for this port:
> *
> * +
> * +
> * +
> */
> -dmp->mp_size = dev->requested_n_rxq * dev->requested_rxq_size
> +dmp->n_mbufs = dev->requested_n_rxq * dev->requested_rxq_size
> + dev->requested_n_txq * dev->requested_txq_size
> + MIN(RTE_MAX_LCORE, dev->requested_n_rxq) * NETDEV_MAX_BURST
> + MIN_NB_MBUF;
> @@ -543,11 +543,11 @@ dpdk_mp_create(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu, bool
> *mp_exists)
>
> VLOG_DBG("Requesting a mempool of %u mbufs for netdev %s "
> "with %d Rx and %d Tx queues, socket id:%d.",
> - dmp->mp_size, dev->up.name,
> + dmp->n_mbufs, dev->up.name,
> dev->requested_n_rxq, dev->requested_n_txq,
> dev->requested_socket_id);
>
> -dmp->mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(mp_name, dmp->mp_size,
> +dmp->mp = rte_pktmbuf_pool_create(mp_name, dmp->n_mbufs,
>MP_CACHE_SZ,
>sizeof (struct dp_packet)
> - sizeof (struct rte_mbuf),
> @@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ dpdk_mp_create(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu, bool
> *mp_exists)
>dmp->socket_id);
> if (dmp->mp) {
> VLOG_DBG("Allocated \"%s\" mempool with %u mbufs", mp_name,
> - dmp->mp_size);
> + dmp->n_mbufs);
> /* rte_pktmbuf_pool_create has done some initialization of the
> * rte_mbuf part of each dp_packet. Some OvS specific fields
> * of the packet still need to be initialized by
> @@ -574,14 +574,14 @@ dpdk_mp_create(struct netdev_dpdk *dev, int mtu, bool
> *mp_exists)
> *mp_exists = true;
> } else {
> VLOG_ERR("Failed mempool \"%s\" create request of %u mbufs",
> - mp_name, dmp->mp_size);
> + mp_name, dmp->n_mbufs);
> }
> free(mp_name);
> if (dmp->mp) {
> return dmp;
> }
> } while (!(*mp_exists) &&
> -(rte_errno == ENOMEM && (dmp->mp_size /= 2) >= MIN_NB_MBUF));
> +(rte_errno == ENOMEM && (dmp->n_mbufs /= 2) >= MIN_NB_MBUF));
>
> rte_free(dmp);
> return NULL;
>
___
dev mailing list
d...@openvswitch.org
https://mail.openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/ovs-dev