RE: 64 bit wcf service library

2011-06-09 Thread Peter Maddin
Ok Thanks

 

It is strongly named (Strong Name = True)

 

I noticed that it has a /Force option

 


/Force

Forces an update even if the assembly is strong-named.

Important noteImportant

If you update a strong-named assembly, you must sign it again before
executing its code.

 

But I don't think I could sign it again

 

Regards Peter

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Joseph Clark
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 1:04 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: 64 bit wcf service library

 

Failing that, you could try using Corflags to set the assembly to be 64-bit
compatible: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms164699.aspx

This has a number of caveats though, most notably the fact that you won't be
able to do this if the 3rd party assembly is strong-named.



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Peter Maddin petermad...@iinet.net.au
wrote:

Thanks

 

I am referencing a third party logging assembly. I suspect that it is 32 bit
and that is my problem.

I have asked the vendor if they can provide a 64 bit release.

 

Regards Peter

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Stephen Liedig
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 12:28 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: 64 bit wcf service library

 

Hi Peter,

 

Typically, any cpu will run apps on the platform onto which they are
deployed, so that should be fine. does your service have another references
(third party) which may not be installed on the server? If so make sure they
are also installed or they are compatible with x64.

 

HTH,

 

Steve

On 9 June 2011 11:15, Peter Maddin petermad...@iinet.net.au wrote:

I have written a fairly simple wcf service library.

 

This will be hosted in a virtual instance of windows server 2008 r2,
presumably running IIS 7.5 or better.

The server will have 6 cores and 36 GB of memory.

It will run 3 virtual web servers each will be bound to 2 cores and have 1/3
of the memory allocated.

 

The system administrator has requested that the web service be 64 bit.

 

The WCF service library is set with a Platform Target of 'Any CPU.'

If I set this to x64, did  clean and rebuild, it does this ok.

 

The IIS web site chucks a fit however and gives me this error

 

Error  2  Could not load file or assembly
'PathWestDirectServiceLibrary' or one of its dependencies. An attempt was
made to load a program with an incorrect format.

 

I removed the web site and created it anew and added my wcf service library
but it still does not like an assembly that targets x64.

If I change it back to AnyCPU its happy with the format.

Looks like I am stuck with it being set to AnyCPU.

 

I am developing on Windows 7 64 bit.

 

Is what I am doing just not possible. Any reason why?

 

Regards Peter Maddin
Applications Development Officer
PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA
Phone : +618 6396 4285
Mobile: 0414 240 307 
E-Mail : petermad...@iinet.net.au; peter.mad...@health.wa.gov.au
The contents of this e-mail transmission outside of the WAGHS network are
intended solely for the named recipient's), may be confidential, and may be
privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure in the public interest.
The use, reproduction, disclosure or distribution of the contents of this
e-mail transmission by any person other than the named recipient(s) is
prohibited. If you are not a named recipient please notify the sender
immediately.

 

 

 

 

image001.gif

RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts

2011-06-09 Thread Peter Maddin
For what’s is worth I had a similar problem with sending data via FTP using
a FTP control.

The firewall would drop packets if it did not like the negotiated data port
.

 

When this happened the application (this happened when the command line FTP
in a windows shell was used) would hang.

No time out or exception.

 

I had to use WireShark to observe the FTP communication dialog.

As the negotiated ports vary, most of the time it would work fine but every
now and then this would happen.

 

The Firewall did log the fact that it was dropping packets but the
administrator did not think it important enough to let me know ( I am only
user among many).

 

If you are using a desktop application one can kill it.

If it is a service that operates continuously then it’s a real headache.

I had to write another service that monitored this service and kill it if
was hung. 

The operating system would then start a new instance.

 

Regards Peter

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Lyons
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 1:46 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts

 

We think we have narrowed it down to a firewall issue and are getting the
vendor involved. From what we could see we were randomly getting a bunch of
packets which seem to be being mysteriously dropped when transversing the
trust/untrust zones of the firewall, nothing in the logs about it though.
Only way we figured it out was via Wireshark at the start of this week;
fiddler offered a hint via recreating SSL connections randomly. 99% sure
it’s the firewall but there’s still a little room for it to be something
else.

 

Thanks guys for your help, definitely using the failed request tracing on a
permanent basis from now on.

 

-

Michael

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Paul Glavich
Sent: Tuesday, 7 June 2011 1:17 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts

 

Sorry for late response. I hardly get onto this list anymore due to time
constraints.

 

It won’t be easy, but perhaps grap Wireshark/Ethereal and monitor the
traffic looking for TCP/IP packets getting dropped, if using SSL, excessive
SSL negotiation, certificate revocation paths taking a long time and things
like that. Have seen similar issues where the TCP packets were getting
dropped/retried due to (if I remember correctly as it has been a while) bad
TCP settings 9something to do with the header, framesize I think) on an
internal firewall. That particular problem took ages to find though.

 

 

-  Glav

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Michael Lyons
Sent: Tuesday, 31 May 2011 3:09 PM
To: 'ozDotNet'
Subject: RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts

 

No maximums have been set, only minimums. IIS VM has 2 cores and 1Ghz
reserved for it with a maximum of about 4Ghz.

 

I’ve had failed request tracing on for anything that takes longer than 5
seconds and so far it has caught only one instance out of a number of times
I’ve seen it happen. Total time for the failed instance was just over 5
seconds.

Strangest thing though was the duration for the ManagedPipelineHandler it
has “NO_END”. The HttpRedirectionModule started before it, so I assume it
ran a response redirect and aborted the thread causing the NO_END

 

I’ve also checked that garbage collection isn’t interfering and it’s
definitely not an issue. 

 

---

Michael

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of djones...@gmail.com
Sent: Monday, 30 May 2011 4:00 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Website request slow performance / timeouts

 

Hi

Recently, they moved my production website and database on to virtual
machines. 

We experianced slow downs, timeouts on the website and blocking table locks
on the database. 

The only thing was that each Morning, the first person to connect
recalculates the cache for everyone else ( batch job before start of day ). 

Before the migration, the page took 22 seconds to load and pegged out all 8
cpu's on the db machine.

After migration, it timed out after 15 min, using 2 cpu cores and 25% cpu
capacity. 

The team that did the move took the average processor usage and set that as
the max available cpu usage on the db and websites. 

It's fixed now.

Davy

When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. I feel
much the same way about xml

  _  

From: Michael Lyons maill...@ittworx.com 

Sender: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 

Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 14:23:51 +1000

To: 'ozDotNet'ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com

ReplyTo: ozDotNet ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com 

Subject: RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts

 

Noonie,

 

No impersonation and connection pooling is on. 

 

Thanks for the suggestions was worth a double check.

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 

Re: Website request slow performance / timeouts

2011-06-09 Thread Joseph Cooney
Related fun: black hole routers http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314825

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Peter Maddin petermad...@iinet.net.auwrote:

 For what’s is worth I had a similar problem with sending data via FTP using
 a FTP control.

 The firewall would drop packets if it did not like the negotiated data port
 .



 When this happened the application (this happened when the command line FTP
 in a windows shell was used) would hang.

 No time out or exception.



 I had to use WireShark to observe the FTP communication dialog.

 As the negotiated ports vary, most of the time it would work fine but every
 now and then this would happen.



 The Firewall did log the fact that it was dropping packets but the
 administrator did not think it important enough to let me know ( I am only
 user among many).



 If you are using a desktop application one can kill it.

 If it is a service that operates continuously then it’s a real headache.

 I had to write another service that monitored this service and kill it if
 was hung.

 The operating system would then start a new instance.



 Regards Peter

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Lyons
 *Sent:* Thursday, 9 June 2011 1:46 PM

 *To:* 'ozDotNet'
 *Subject:* RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts



 We think we have narrowed it down to a firewall issue and are getting the
 vendor involved. From what we could see we were randomly getting a bunch of
 packets which seem to be being mysteriously dropped when transversing the
 trust/untrust zones of the firewall, nothing in the logs about it though.
 Only way we figured it out was via Wireshark at the start of this week;
 fiddler offered a hint via recreating SSL connections randomly. 99% sure
 it’s the firewall but there’s still a little room for it to be something
 else.



 Thanks guys for your help, definitely using the failed request tracing on a
 permanent basis from now on.



 -

 Michael



 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Paul Glavich
 *Sent:* Tuesday, 7 June 2011 1:17 PM
 *To:* 'ozDotNet'
 *Subject:* RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts



 Sorry for late response. I hardly get onto this list anymore due to time
 constraints.



 It won’t be easy, but perhaps grap Wireshark/Ethereal and monitor the
 traffic looking for TCP/IP packets getting dropped, if using SSL, excessive
 SSL negotiation, certificate revocation paths taking a long time and things
 like that. Have seen similar issues where the TCP packets were getting
 dropped/retried due to (if I remember correctly as it has been a while) bad
 TCP settings 9something to do with the header, framesize I think) on an
 internal firewall. That particular problem took ages to find though.





 -  Glav



 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Michael Lyons
 *Sent:* Tuesday, 31 May 2011 3:09 PM
 *To:* 'ozDotNet'
 *Subject:* RE: Website request slow performance / timeouts



 No maximums have been set, only minimums. IIS VM has 2 cores and 1Ghz
 reserved for it with a maximum of about 4Ghz.



 I’ve had failed request tracing on for anything that takes longer than 5
 seconds and so far it has caught only one instance out of a number of times
 I’ve seen it happen. Total time for the failed instance was just over 5
 seconds.

 Strangest thing though was the duration for the ManagedPipelineHandler it
 has “NO_END”. The HttpRedirectionModule started before it, so I assume it
 ran a response redirect and aborted the thread causing the NO_END



 I’ve also checked that garbage collection isn’t interfering and it’s
 definitely not an issue.



 ---

 Michael



 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *djones...@gmail.com
 *Sent:* Monday, 30 May 2011 4:00 PM
 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Website request slow performance / timeouts



 Hi

 Recently, they moved my production website and database on to virtual
 machines.

 We experianced slow downs, timeouts on the website and blocking table locks
 on the database.

 The only thing was that each Morning, the first person to connect
 recalculates the cache for everyone else ( batch job before start of day ).

 Before the migration, the page took 22 seconds to load and pegged out all 8
 cpu's on the db machine.

 After migration, it timed out after 15 min, using 2 cpu cores and 25% cpu
 capacity.

 The team that did the move took the average processor usage and set that as
 the max available cpu usage on the db and websites.

 It's fixed now.

 Davy

 When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. I feel
 much the same way about xml
 --

 *From: *Michael Lyons maill...@ittworx.com

 *Sender: *ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com

 *Date: *Mon, 30 May 2011 14:23:51 +1000

 *To: *'ozDotNet'ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com


RE: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Ben.Robbins
I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win Server 
2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.

Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that 
will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but can 
be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a couple of 
things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no affiliation 
with them).

http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_Gen2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t

There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy 
Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading): 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

Ben


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine 
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

System Requirements


 *   Supported Operating Systems:Windows Server 2008 R2

Additionally you will need:

 *   Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled.
 *   Drive Formatting: NTFS
 *   Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable
 *   RAM: 8 GB or more recommended
 *   Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB

This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made 
available from Microsoft like the 2010 Information Worker Demonstration and 
Evaluation Virtual Machine goog_1420228367 
(RTM)http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en

I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for 
money.

Thanks,
Tejas

This email is intended for the named recipient only.  The information it 
contains may be confidential or commercially sensitive.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of this email, 
disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. 
 If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender 
immediately and delete the message from your computer.


Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Tejas Goradia
Hi Ben,

Thanks for the info. Would you suggest building a desktop instead? I'm happy
to invest in a laptop but these days no amount of RAM is good enough.

Tejas.



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 PM, ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:

  I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win
 Server 2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.

 Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that
 will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but
 can be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a
 couple of things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no
 affiliation with them).


 http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_Gen2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t

 There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy
 Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading):
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

 Ben

  --
 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tejas Goradia
 *Sent:* Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
 (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

  System Requirements
 --

- *Supported Operating Systems:*Windows Server 2008 R2


 Additionally you will need:

- Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled.
- Drive Formatting: NTFS
- Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable
- RAM: 8 GB or more recommended
- Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB


 This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made
 available from Microsoft like the *2010 Information Worker Demonstration
 and Evaluation Virtual Machine * 
 http://goog_1420228367(RTM)http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en

 I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for
 money.

 Thanks,
 Tejas

 This email is intended for the named recipient only.  The information it 
 contains may be confidential or commercially sensitive.  If you are not the 
 intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of this 
 email, disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in 
 reliance on it.  If you have received this email in error, please contact the 
 sender immediately and delete the message from your computer.




RE: [OT] ying phones outright

2011-06-09 Thread Richard Jones
Steve,

 

I bought Samsung Focus unlocked from mobiCity. My experience was good.
Address: http://www.mobicity.com.au/

 

 

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Stephen Liedig
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 2:32 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: [OT] ying phones outright

 

Hello,

 

Does anyone know a good place (either in Australia or in the USA) where one
can buy Windows Phone 7 phones outright. Not sure if I need sim free or
unlocked or what?

 

Any recommendations would be appreciated.

 

Cheers,

 

Steve



RE: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Ken Schaefer
I think this really depends on what you want to run. With an 8GB laptop and a 
couple of SSDs, you can run 4-5 VMs without too many issues – even I/O 
intensive ones like SCOM or Exchange. But this would mainly be for testing 
things on an ad hoc basis

If you’re looking to have a permanent lab running, and actually build up data 
in databases, then you’ll probably need a desktop machine. Most mid-high end 
ones will go to 16GB RAM, and the workstation class ones will give you 24+ GB

That all said, the more VMs you run, the more I/O throughput you need. So, get 
SSDs. Trying to run 10 VMs off 2 regular disks (for example) will just be 
painful.

Cheers
Ken

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 6:21 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine 
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the info. Would you suggest building a desktop instead? I'm happy to 
invest in a laptop but these days no amount of RAM is good enough.

Tejas.


On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 PM, 
ben.robb...@jlta.com.aumailto:ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:
I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win Server 
2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.

Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that 
will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but can 
be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a couple of 
things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no affiliation 
with them).

http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_Gen2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t

There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy 
Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading): 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

Ben


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine 
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.
System Requirements


  *   Supported Operating Systems:Windows Server 2008 R2

Additionally you will need:

  *   Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled.
  *   Drive Formatting: NTFS
  *   Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable
  *   RAM: 8 GB or more recommended
  *   Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB

This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made 
available from Microsoft like the 2010 Information Worker Demonstration and 
Evaluation Virtual Machine http://goog_1420228367 
(RTM)http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en

I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for 
money.

Thanks,
Tejas



Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Stuart Kinnear
If you buy a laptop double check that it supports 64 bit virtualisation. I
am miffed that a HP DV7 I bought does not and so I can only do 32 bit
virtualisation even though the processor is 64 bit !.

If you don't need portability, stick to a desktop assembly, go to MSY and
roll out your own (they will build as well). Much better bang for the buck.

Regards, Stuart


On 9 June 2011 21:03, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:

  I think this really depends on what you want to run. With an 8GB laptop
 and a couple of SSDs, you can run 4-5 VMs without too many issues – even I/O
 intensive ones like SCOM or Exchange. But this would mainly be for testing
 things on an ad hoc basis



 If you’re looking to have a permanent lab running, and actually build up
 data in databases, then you’ll probably need a desktop machine. Most
 mid-high end ones will go to 16GB RAM, and the workstation class ones will
 give you 24+ GB



 That all said, the more VMs you run, the more I/O throughput you need. So,
 get SSDs. Trying to run 10 VMs off 2 regular disks (for example) will just
 be painful.



 Cheers

 Ken



 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tejas Goradia
 *Sent:* Thursday, 9 June 2011 6:21 PM
 *To:* ozDotNet
 *Subject:* Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
 (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.



 Hi Ben,

 Thanks for the info. Would you suggest building a desktop instead? I'm
 happy to invest in a laptop but these days no amount of RAM is good enough.

 Tejas.


  On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 PM, ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:

 I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win Server
 2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.



 Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that
 will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but
 can be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a
 couple of things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no
 affiliation with them).




 http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_Gen2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t



 There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy
 Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading):
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge



 Ben


  --

 *From:* ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:
 ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] *On Behalf Of *Tejas Goradia
 *Sent:* Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
 *To:* ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
 *Subject:* Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
 (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.
  System Requirements
 --

- *Supported Operating Systems:*Windows Server 2008 R2


 Additionally you will need:

- Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled.
- Drive Formatting: NTFS
- Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable
- RAM: 8 GB or more recommended
- Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB


 This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made
 available from Microsoft like the *2010 Information Worker Demonstration
 and Evaluation Virtual Machine * 
 http://goog_1420228367(RTM)http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en

 I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for
 money.

 Thanks,
 Tejas






-- 
-
Stuart Kinnear
Mobile: 040 704 5686.   Office: 03 9589 6502

SK Pro-Active! Pty Ltd
acn. 81 072 778 262
PO Box 6117 Cromer, Vic 3193. Australia

Business software developers.
SQL Server, Visual Basic, C# , Asp.Net, Microsoft Office.
-


RE: [OT] ying phones outright

2011-06-09 Thread Keith Peck
I've found these guys to be good in the past
http://www.uniquemobiles.com.au/

They will have a bricks and mortar store in Brisbane opening in July sometime 
too.


Keith...



NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking any action in 
reliance on, this communication by persons or entities other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
communication please delete and destroy all copies and telephone SMS Management 
 Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views expressed in this 
Communication are those of the individual sender, except where the sender 
specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management  Technology. Except 
as required by law, SMS Management  Technology does not represent, warrant 
and/or guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained 
nor that the communication is free from errors, virus, interception or 
interference.


Re: [OT] ying phones outright

2011-06-09 Thread Stephen Liedig
Guys, thanks for your suggestions! Much appreciated.

Will take a look at these and see what they have.

Cheers,

Steve



On 10 June 2011 07:56, Keith Peck kp...@smsmt.com wrote:

  I've found these guys to be good in the past
 http://www.uniquemobiles.com.au/

 They will have a bricks and mortar store in Brisbane opening in July
 sometime too.


 *Keith...
 *


 --
 NOTICE - This communication is intended only for the person or entity to
 which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
 material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
 taking any action in reliance on, this communication by persons or entities
 other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you are not the intended
 recipient of this communication please delete and destroy all copies and
 telephone SMS Management  Technology on 1300 842 767 immediately. Any views
 expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except
 where the sender specifically states them to be the views of SMS Management
  Technology. Except as required by law, SMS Management  Technology does
 not represent, warrant and/or guarantee that the integrity of this
 communication has been maintained nor that the communication is free from
 errors, virus, interception or interference.



RE: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Ben.Robbins
Sorry Tejas

There's been so many threads about laptops recently I just assumed that this 
was another one! I'd definitely get a desktop unless you need the portability. 
If you are up for building a machine yourself (rather than buying one) then IMO 
you can't go past the Intel 2600k CPU (~$320) with an overclocking friendly 
motherboard (e.g. ASUS or Gigabyte) and just whack 16GB into it and be done 
with it. I've got mine running 24/7 at 4.2 GHz on the stock fan and heat sink 
and it is blazingly fast. However, as Ken pointed out you really want to ensure 
you have enough I/O throughput so get SSDs for it. If you build something 
yourself it shouldn't be too expensive at all.

Regards,
Ben


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 6:21 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine 
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

Hi Ben,

Thanks for the info. Would you suggest building a desktop instead? I'm happy to 
invest in a laptop but these days no amount of RAM is good enough.

Tejas.



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 PM, 
ben.robb...@jlta.com.aumailto:ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:
I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win Server 
2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.

Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that 
will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but can 
be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a couple of 
things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no affiliation 
with them).

http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_Gen2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t

There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy 
Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading): 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

Ben


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com 
[mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On 
Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.commailto:ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine 
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

System Requirements


 *   Supported Operating Systems:Windows Server 2008 R2

Additionally you will need:

 *   Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled.
 *   Drive Formatting: NTFS
 *   Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable
 *   RAM: 8 GB or more recommended
 *   Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB

This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made 
available from Microsoft like the 2010 Information Worker Demonstration and 
Evaluation Virtual Machine http://goog_1420228367 
(RTM)http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en

I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for 
money.

Thanks,
Tejas

This email is intended for the named recipient only.  The information it 
contains may be confidential or commercially sensitive.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of this email, 
disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. 
 If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender 
immediately and delete the message from your computer.



This email is intended for the named recipient only.  The information it 
contains may be confidential or commercially sensitive.  If you are not the 
intended recipient you must not reproduce or distribute any part of this email, 
disclose its contents to any other party, or take any action in reliance on it. 
 If you have received this email in error, please contact the sender 
immediately and delete the message from your computer.


[OT] Looking for a Permanent Talented .Net Developer (VB.Net or C#)

2011-06-09 Thread Greg Harris
Hi All,

We are Looking for a Permanent Talented .Net Developer (VB.Net or C#)
About us:

· Sydney based international software house specialising in
financial software in business for over 15 years experiencing rapid market
driven growth

· International offices in North America and Europe

· Existing team of 8 highly talented developers

· Great environment to learn / improve best practice software
development, with test driven development, continuous integration, agile
practices and scrum project management

· Pay above market salaries to attract awesome people
Our requirements for our new team member are:

More than 24 months relevant commercial experience with strong knowledge and
experience with:

· .Net Development (VB.Net or C#)

· Deep understanding of Object Oriented Design

· Agile / test driven development

· Win forms development

· Relational database design / development with SQL Server

· Financial software or financial modelling experience will be
highly regarded

We can only consider permanent Australian permanent residents who can
interview and work full time in our Sydney office.

This is a great opportunity to work with the best in the industry, to take
this to the next level, please send me a copy of your CV for our
consideration.

No agencies please.

All the best

Greg Harris

harris.gre...@gmail.com


RE: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Greg Low (GregLow.com)
Hi Stuart,

 

Have you checked with them about bios upgrades? We got a bunch of Dell
machines a while back that had the same limitation but after a bios upgrade,
all good.

 

Regards,

 

Greg

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Stuart Kinnear
Sent: Friday, 10 June 2011 8:33 AM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

 

If you buy a laptop double check that it supports 64 bit virtualisation. I
am miffed that a HP DV7 I bought does not and so I can only do 32 bit
virtualisation even though the processor is 64 bit !. 

If you don't need portability, stick to a desktop assembly, go to MSY and
roll out your own (they will build as well). Much better bang for the buck.

Regards, Stuart



On 9 June 2011 21:03, Ken Schaefer k...@adopenstatic.com wrote:

I think this really depends on what you want to run. With an 8GB laptop and
a couple of SSDs, you can run 4-5 VMs without too many issues - even I/O
intensive ones like SCOM or Exchange. But this would mainly be for testing
things on an ad hoc basis

 

If you're looking to have a permanent lab running, and actually build up
data in databases, then you'll probably need a desktop machine. Most
mid-high end ones will go to 16GB RAM, and the workstation class ones will
give you 24+ GB

 

That all said, the more VMs you run, the more I/O throughput you need. So,
get SSDs. Trying to run 10 VMs off 2 regular disks (for example) will just
be painful.

 

Cheers

Ken

 

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 6:21 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

 

Hi Ben, 

Thanks for the info. Would you suggest building a desktop instead? I'm happy
to invest in a laptop but these days no amount of RAM is good enough. 

Tejas.



On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 7:29 PM, ben.robb...@jlta.com.au wrote:

I'm not sure if any laptops exist that have the option of having Win Server
2008 R2 installed. If they do they are likely pretty expensive.

 

Here's a reasonable Acer laptop for $1,050 (after cash back from Acer) that
will meet your specs once you add another 4GB of RAM (comes with 1x 4GB but
can be upgraded to 2x 4GB) and install your OS of choice. I've bought a
couple of things from MWave before and had no problems with them (I have no
affiliation with them).

 

http://www.mwave.com.au/sku-31010931-Acer_AS5750G_2634G64Mn_Notebook_Intel_G
en2_Core_i7_2630QM_Processor_%282_0GHz_up_t

 

There are faster processors but this is pretty good (the entry-level Sandy
Bridge mobile CPU with 4 cores and hyper threading):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Bridge

 

Ben

 


  _  


From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com]
On Behalf Of Tejas Goradia
Sent: Thursday, 9 June 2011 5:14 PM
To: ozdotnet@ozdotnet.com
Subject: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine
(preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.


System Requirements

  _  


*   Supported Operating Systems:Windows Server 2008 R2 


Additionally you will need: 

*   Windows Server 2008 R2 with the Hyper-V role enabled. 
*   Drive Formatting: NTFS 
*   Processor: Intel VT or AMD-V capable 
*   RAM: 8 GB or more recommended 
*   Hard disk space required for install: 50 GB


This machine is going to be dedicated for running Virtual Machines made
available from Microsoft like the  http://goog_1420228367 2010 Information
Worker Demonstration and Evaluation Virtual Machine (RTM)
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/en/details.aspx?FamilyID=751fa0d1-356c-4
002-9c60-d539896c66cedisplaylang=en 

I naturally don't want to spend a fortune so please suggest good value for
money. 

Thanks,
Tejas

 




-- 

-
Stuart Kinnear
Mobile: 040 704 5686.   Office: 03 9589 6502

SK Pro-Active! Pty Ltd
acn. 81 072 778 262
PO Box 6117 Cromer, Vic 3193. Australia

Business software developers.
SQL Server, Visual Basic, C# , Asp.Net, Microsoft Office.

-



Re: Calling out to all you geeks to help me buy\build a machine (preferably laptop) that can support following System Requirements.

2011-06-09 Thread Craig van Nieuwkerk

 Have you checked with them about bios upgrades? We got a bunch of Dell
 machines a while back that had the same limitation but after a bios upgrade,
 all good.


Yes, on my desktop HP it was turned off by default in the bios and I
had to turn it on.

Craig.