Re: [OT] Java threatened?

2018-08-01 Thread Nathan Schultz
When it comes to mobile development, having two or more code-bases is
extremely costly. So it's unsurprising that many businesses are considering
their options right now.

I do see Dart (via Flutter) and Kotlin in competition. Dart is instantly
familiar to a C# developer and backed by Google. So personally I'm
predicting Dart / Flutter to do really well. I'd put Kotlin as the
dark-horse at this stage.
There are other options too - such as Haxe - but I just don't see it
getting the commercial backing.


On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 at 18:13, David Connors  wrote:

> Should have said "I know the tldr" not "I don't the tldr"
>
> On Tue., 31 Jul. 2018, 8:12 pm David Connors,  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue., 31 Jul. 2018, 5:58 pm Nick Randolph, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Android might well be the most widely adopted OS on Earth but
>>> https://medium.com/@drinfo/fuck-you-android-framework-ddbb02c4ae48
>>>
>> That guy is clearly pretty unhappy/unhinged. I don't the tldr of this
>> list is that it is developer focused but as a user though it is pretty hard
>> to argue with what a vanilla Android device like a pixel is like to use.
>>
>>> w.r.t. Kotlin – as an app developer I would skip it (mostly) and focus
>>> on Flutter. I say mostly because for the platform specific components,
>>> you’ll need to know it. For anyone interested in Sydney there is a meetup
>>> next Tuesday (https://www.meetup.com/gdgsydney/events/252175587/).
>>>
>> They're not the same thing. Flutter is a cross platform app framework and
>> kotlin is a language to augment/interop with/replace Java.
>>
>> In general, my view on cross platform is that it is a race to a lowest
>> common denominator of sorts.
>>
>> If I had to write an app and I had all the monies I would go native every
>> time. If I didn't have all the monies I would use something cross platform.
>> I struggle to understand why companies like Facebook stuff about with cross
>> platform frameworks for apps when they have unlimited money and relatively
>> simple apps to write.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Connors
>> da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn
>>  | +61 417 189 363
>>
> --
> David Connors
> da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn
>  | +61 417 189 363
>


Re: [OT] Java threatened?

2018-07-31 Thread David Connors
On Tue., 31 Jul. 2018, 5:58 pm Nick Randolph,  wrote:

> Android might well be the most widely adopted OS on Earth but
> https://medium.com/@drinfo/fuck-you-android-framework-ddbb02c4ae48
>
That guy is clearly pretty unhappy/unhinged. I don't the tldr of this list
is that it is developer focused but as a user though it is pretty hard to
argue with what a vanilla Android device like a pixel is like to use.

> w.r.t. Kotlin – as an app developer I would skip it (mostly) and focus on
> Flutter. I say mostly because for the platform specific components, you’ll
> need to know it. For anyone interested in Sydney there is a meetup next
> Tuesday (https://www.meetup.com/gdgsydney/events/252175587/).
>
They're not the same thing. Flutter is a cross platform app framework and
kotlin is a language to augment/interop with/replace Java.

In general, my view on cross platform is that it is a race to a lowest
common denominator of sorts.

If I had to write an app and I had all the monies I would go native every
time. If I didn't have all the monies I would use something cross platform.
I struggle to understand why companies like Facebook stuff about with cross
platform frameworks for apps when they have unlimited money and relatively
simple apps to write.

David


-- 
David Connors
da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61
417 189 363


Re: [OT] Java threatened?

2018-07-31 Thread David Connors
Should have said "I know the tldr" not "I don't the tldr"

On Tue., 31 Jul. 2018, 8:12 pm David Connors,  wrote:

>
>
> On Tue., 31 Jul. 2018, 5:58 pm Nick Randolph, 
> wrote:
>
>> Android might well be the most widely adopted OS on Earth but
>> https://medium.com/@drinfo/fuck-you-android-framework-ddbb02c4ae48
>>
> That guy is clearly pretty unhappy/unhinged. I don't the tldr of this list
> is that it is developer focused but as a user though it is pretty hard to
> argue with what a vanilla Android device like a pixel is like to use.
>
>> w.r.t. Kotlin – as an app developer I would skip it (mostly) and focus on
>> Flutter. I say mostly because for the platform specific components, you’ll
>> need to know it. For anyone interested in Sydney there is a meetup next
>> Tuesday (https://www.meetup.com/gdgsydney/events/252175587/).
>>
> They're not the same thing. Flutter is a cross platform app framework and
> kotlin is a language to augment/interop with/replace Java.
>
> In general, my view on cross platform is that it is a race to a lowest
> common denominator of sorts.
>
> If I had to write an app and I had all the monies I would go native every
> time. If I didn't have all the monies I would use something cross platform.
> I struggle to understand why companies like Facebook stuff about with cross
> platform frameworks for apps when they have unlimited money and relatively
> simple apps to write.
>
> David
>
>
> --
> David Connors
> da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn
>  | +61 417 189 363
>
-- 
David Connors
da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61
417 189 363


RE: [OT] Java threatened?

2018-07-31 Thread Nick Randolph
David

Android might well be the most widely adopted OS on Earth but 
https://medium.com/@drinfo/fuck-you-android-framework-ddbb02c4ae48

w.r.t. Kotlin – as an app developer I would skip it (mostly) and focus on 
Flutter. I say mostly because for the platform specific components, you’ll need 
to know it. For anyone interested in Sydney there is a meetup next Tuesday 
(https://www.meetup.com/gdgsydney/events/252175587/).

Nick Randolph | Built to Roam Pty Ltd | Co-Founder, Technical Lead | +61 412 
413 425 | www.builttoroam.com<https://www.builttoroam.com/>
| The information contained in this email is confidential. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you may not disclose or use the information in this email 
in any way. Built to Roam Pty Ltd does not guarantee the integrity of any 
emails or attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own 
and may not reflect the views or opinions of Built to Roam Pty Ltd.

From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com  On Behalf 
Of David Connors
Sent: Monday, 30 July 2018 7:46 PM
To: ozDotNet 
Subject: Re: [OT] Java threatened?


On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 16:58 Greg Keogh 
mailto:gfke...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Folks, thanks to a passing mention in a YouTube video I discovered there is a 
new language named Kotlin. Strange it hadn't popped-up for me in technical 
articles before, as I think it's been quite mature for at least a year now. The 
first thing that strikes is the amazing similarity to C#, and they even 
acknowledge this in places on the official site. The most startling thing 
through, is how it's being marketed as a better Java. This 
page<https://kotlinlang.org/docs/reference/comparison-to-java.html> summarises 
the general superiority of Kotlin over Java. So … after 20 years, will Java 
become an evolutionary dead-end?

There is a lot to like about Kotlin and you're right about it being C#-ish 
looking version of Java.

The language was developed by JetBrains. JetBrains built the IntelliJ which is 
the basis for Android Studio. Google announced last year that Kotlin is a first 
class language for Android https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8ALcQiuPWs.

I don't know what the Enterprise story is for Kotlin however for development on 
the most widely adopted operating system on Earth; I'd say Java's days as a 
primary language are numbered.

 David.

--
David Connors
da...@connors.com<mailto:da...@connors.com> | @davidconnors | 
https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61 417 189 363


Re: [OT] Java threatened?

2018-07-30 Thread David Connors
On Mon, 30 Jul 2018 at 16:58 Greg Keogh  wrote:

> Folks, thanks to a passing mention in a YouTube video I discovered there
> is a new language named Kotlin. Strange it hadn't popped-up for me in
> technical articles before, as I think it's been quite mature for at least a
> year now. The first thing that strikes is the amazing similarity to C#, and
> they even acknowledge this in places on the official site. The most
> startling thing through, is how it's being marketed as a better Java. This
> page 
> summarises the general superiority of Kotlin over Java. So … after 20
> years, will Java become an evolutionary dead-end?
>

There is a lot to like about Kotlin and you're right about it being C#-ish
looking version of Java.

The language was developed by JetBrains. JetBrains built the IntelliJ which
is the basis for Android Studio. Google announced last year that Kotlin is
a first class language for Android
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8ALcQiuPWs.

I don't know what the Enterprise story is for Kotlin however for
development on the most widely adopted operating system on Earth; I'd say
Java's days as a primary language are numbered.

 David.

-- 
David Connors
da...@connors.com | @davidconnors | https://t.me/davidconnors | LinkedIn | +61
417 189 363


[OT] Java threatened?

2018-07-29 Thread Greg Keogh
Folks, thanks to a passing mention in a YouTube video I discovered there is
a new language named Kotlin. Strange it hadn't popped-up for me in
technical articles before, as I think it's been quite mature for at least a
year now. The first thing that strikes is the amazing similarity to C#, and
they even acknowledge this in places on the official site. The most
startling thing through, is how it's being marketed as a better Java. This
page 
summarises the general superiority of Kotlin over Java. So … after 20
years, will Java become an evolutionary dead-end?

*Greg K*