It's not just Qld, NSW and the HCCC are also doing a 'great' job of witch
hunting. I think it's just we are easier targets, don't have the AMA
laywers to defend us and don't have the AMA to settle out of court. Some of
you may vaugley remember my call for assistance for a collegue being hunted
down, case went before the NRB in Mar, still no word on the outcome. It's
difficult to work out why this is happening but when we look broadly at how
our society is acting, no one has to take any responsibility, it's always
someone elses 'duty of care' to ensure the best thing is done and if we are
not happy we have the right to complain. Just my thoughts
Christine
At 10:41 6/07/99 +1000, Kathleen Fahy wrote:
Dear Marina,
This is yucky. I never hear of witch hunts to track down medicos who are
derelict, negligent or abusive to women. Who is behind this? Is it the QNC
or are they responding to a complaint. Who is making the complaint? Aren't
complaints made against obstetricians or are they just kept quiet?
I don't expect you to have all the answers but I do want to know why this is
happening.
Kathleen Fahy
-Original Message-
From: HomeMidwifery Association [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 1999 1:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QLD midwives
Hello there all,
Here in sunny, forward thinking QLD (cough, splutter!), there is news of yet
another midwife going before the tribunal (QNC) in relation to a birth at
which she assisted many years ago.
The primary care midwife at the birth has already been before the tribunal
and retired rather than be subjected to restricted practice.
feeling very frustrated,
Marina
Original Message Follows
From: CATHY AND NIGEL BOCK AND DUNCAN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Kathleen Fahy [EMAIL PROTECTED],oz midwifery
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: direct entry
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 07:25:46 -0700 (PDT)
I think the real trial in our sites has to be a Queensland Midwives
Council and all the rest will follow. It is a terrible thing to have
ones profession governed by another largely unrelated and disinterested
profession. A future for the ACMI if only it knew!
nigel again.
--- Kathleen Fahy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a nice talk with Nicky Leap about the
possibility of developing direct
entry midwifery courses around Australia.
In Queensland, who can become a midwife is
controlled by the Nursing Act
by-law.
Entry to midwifery courses is restricted to
registered nurses. This is
section 23 Nursing By-law 1993.
By-laws can be changed by the QNC council after
consultation; including with
workforce planning and with the government.
I discussed this with Jim O'Dempsey (executive
officer) of QNC. He suggests
that he believes that no state will go it alone and
that this is a national
issue. He believes that no state will go it alone
and if they are
considering offering direct entry then they will
discuss it with other
states through the ANCI.
Do you know what controls entry to midwifery
education in your state?
Dr. Kathleen Fahy
Associate Professor
Midwifery Co-ordinator
University Southern Queensland
07 46312377
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe
or unsubscribe.
===
From Cathy Bock and Nigel Duncan.
at
BIRTHING HANDS (Homebirth, ante/post natal care and hospital support)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.