Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Ceri Katrina
not sure of the title, but an awesome video. Babies are so clever!!!
We watched it in the early days of our middy training and it was a real eye opener! Very inspiring

Katrina


On 25/04/2006, at 1:37 PM, Jo Watson wrote:

I don't know what it's called, but the one where the freshly newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches itself to the breast without any help is awesome. Made me cry!

Hopefully someone else knows the name of it?

Jo

On 25/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:

Can anyone recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum which I liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other good ones to chase up? Thanks

-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or unsubscribe.

RE: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Julie Clarke








Could it be Breastfeeding: Babies
Choice 



http://www.acegraphics.com.au/product/video/vt038.html













From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ceri  Katrina
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 5:36
PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos





not sure of the title,
but an awesome video. Babies are so clever!!!
We watched it in the early days of our middy training and it was a real eye
opener! Very inspiring

Katrina


On 25/04/2006, at 1:37 PM, Jo Watson wrote:

I don't know what it's
called, but the one where the freshly newborn baby crawls up the mother's
abdomen and attaches itself to the breast without any help is awesome. Made me
cry!

Hopefully someone else knows the name of it?

Jo

On 25/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:

Can anyone
recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum which I
liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other good ones
to chase up? Thanks

-- This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or
unsubscribe.








Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Helen and Graham



Or is it Kangaroo Care

Helen

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Julie 
  Clarke 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:07 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] BF 
videos
  
  
  Could it be 
  “Breastfeeding: Babies Choice” 
  
  http://www.acegraphics.com.au/product/video/vt038.html
  
  
  
  
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ceri  
  KatrinaSent: Tuesday, 25 
  April 2006 5:36 PMTo: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF 
  videos
  
  not sure of the title, but an awesome 
  video. Babies are so clever!!!We watched it in the early days of our middy 
  training and it was a real eye opener! Very 
  inspiringKatrinaOn 25/04/2006, at 1:37 PM, Jo Watson 
  wrote:
  I don't know what it's called, but the 
  one where the freshly newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches 
  itself to the breast without any help is awesome. Made me 
  cry!Hopefully someone else knows the name of it?JoOn 
  25/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:
  Can 
  anyone recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum 
  which I liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other 
  good ones to chase up? Thanks-- This mailing 
  list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or 
  unsubscribe.__ NOD32 1.1505 
  (20060425) Information __This message was checked by NOD32 
  antivirus system.http://www.eset.com


RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Ken Ward
Got onto 'kellymom'. They are suggesting you wake baby 2/24 during the day
and 4/24 at night.  This does not sit well with me. Babies need a minium of
6 feeds in 24hrs, and can feed hourly if they want, but I don't believe
waking them is such a good idea, unless there is a reason such as poor
weight gain, jaundice, lack of wet nappies.  Kellymom also states babies
loose 7% of birth weight. They can loose double this, and one should look at
output and baby's behaviour and mum's supply before jumping in. I didn't
bother further with this site.  Maureen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 3:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


Could it be that you came down with both mastitis and some other infection,
which your son caught?
www.kellymom.com is a great site on breastfeeding, if you want to research
further.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

My episodes of mastitis got less frequent after the first 3 months but I
probably averaged at least one mastitis every 6 months for the entire time I
was feeding (2.5yrs). Though my later mastitis were generally breast injury
induced rather than infection and easily treated with homeopathics.

At 12:36 PM +1000 25/4/06, Nicole Carver wrote:
Hi,
Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The only
exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is very
red, not your typical mastitis. It is very painful and you feel quite ill. I
have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by something
else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that stage, I
would imagine.
When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept moving. Babies are best
for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice berg. A little blood
does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is no harm done.
Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 24 hours or
so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of abscess
formation.
Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach.
However, I suppose they are also protecting them to some extent.
Regards,
Nicole.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharon
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

where i work we encourage women to express on the side that they are
infected and continue feeding on the other side until the infection clears,
the infection should be treated by antibiotics and if severe admission to
hospital for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in it we discourage
any breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express all feeds until
the infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she feels better but
ensure that the breast is always empty after feeding.
regards sharon

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Megan  Larry
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Can a mother pass on her infecton to her breastfeeding child when she has
mastitis?

Its just that I had what to me was obvious mastitis on Sat, quite a decent
case of it, very sore breast, redness, fever, vomiting, quite ill. Still
recovering on Monday when my breastfeeding 22 mth old developed a fever and
vomiting. This morning he is quite recovered but no doubt will need a very
quiet day still.

So, is this a coincidence, or can the child become infected too? We were
both rundown form a busy few weeks, so the rest was well needed, just wanted
it without the misery.

Thanks in advance

Megan


--
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Ken Ward



It is 
beautiful. Such a pity it doesn't happen in reality. We cannot leave things 
alone, and must try and hurry the process. I have seen many midwives and mums 
wanting to 'get the baby feeding' even 'enlightened' ones. 


  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Ceri  
  KatrinaSent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 5:36 PMTo: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF 
  videosnot sure of the title, but an awesome video. Babies 
  are so clever!!!We watched it in the early days of our middy training and 
  it was a real eye opener! Very inspiringKatrinaOn 
  25/04/2006, at 1:37 PM, Jo Watson wrote:
  I don't know what it's called, but the one where the freshly 
newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches itself to the 
breast without any help is awesome. Made me cry!Hopefully someone 
else knows the name of it?JoOn 25/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, 
Kristin Beckedahl wrote:
Can 
  anyone recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum 
  which I liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any 
  other good ones to chase up? Thanks-- This 
  mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or 
  unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] group B strep

2006-04-25 Thread Kristin Beckedahl
Thanks Mary, I'll look into that :)

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Vedrana Valčić
Could you mail me the link to the article, please? I'm surprised that such 
advice didn't come with all the extra info you just provided. I didn't know 
about the 7% and 14% birth weight loss, never researched it.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Got onto 'kellymom'. They are suggesting you wake baby 2/24 during the day
and 4/24 at night.  This does not sit well with me. Babies need a minium of
6 feeds in 24hrs, and can feed hourly if they want, but I don't believe
waking them is such a good idea, unless there is a reason such as poor
weight gain, jaundice, lack of wet nappies.  Kellymom also states babies
loose 7% of birth weight. They can loose double this, and one should look at
output and baby's behaviour and mum's supply before jumping in. I didn't
bother further with this site.  Maureen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 3:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


Could it be that you came down with both mastitis and some other infection,
which your son caught?
www.kellymom.com is a great site on breastfeeding, if you want to research
further.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

My episodes of mastitis got less frequent after the first 3 months but I
probably averaged at least one mastitis every 6 months for the entire time I
was feeding (2.5yrs). Though my later mastitis were generally breast injury
induced rather than infection and easily treated with homeopathics.

At 12:36 PM +1000 25/4/06, Nicole Carver wrote:
Hi,
Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The only
exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is very
red, not your typical mastitis. It is very painful and you feel quite ill. I
have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by something
else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that stage, I
would imagine.
When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept moving. Babies are best
for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice berg. A little blood
does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is no harm done.
Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 24 hours or
so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of abscess
formation.
Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach.
However, I suppose they are also protecting them to some extent.
Regards,
Nicole.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharon
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

where i work we encourage women to express on the side that they are
infected and continue feeding on the other side until the infection clears,
the infection should be treated by antibiotics and if severe admission to
hospital for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in it we discourage
any breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express all feeds until
the infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she feels better but
ensure that the breast is always empty after feeding.
regards sharon

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Megan  Larry
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Can a mother pass on her infecton to her breastfeeding child when she has
mastitis?

Its just that I had what to me was obvious mastitis on Sat, quite a decent
case of it, very sore breast, redness, fever, vomiting, quite ill. Still
recovering on Monday when my breastfeeding 22 mth old developed a fever and
vomiting. This morning he is quite recovered but no doubt will need a very
quiet day still.

So, is this a coincidence, or can the child become infected too? We were
both rundown form a busy few weeks, so the rest was well needed, just wanted
it without the misery.

Thanks in advance

Megan


--
Jo Bourne
Virtual Artists Pty Ltd
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Diane Gardner



One I have is called "Delivery Self Attachment". It 
shows a baby born without drugs self attaching to the breast and also one that 
was from a medicated birth. It is so sad to watch as the baby is disoriented and 
cannot find it's way to the breast even when the mother trys to 
help.

Only goes for 6 mins though.

regards
Di Gardner

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jo Watson 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:37 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] BF 
videos
  I don't know what it's called, but the one where the freshly 
  newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches itself to the breast 
  without any help is awesome. Made me cry!
  
  Hopefully someone else knows the name of it?
  
  Jo
  
  
  On 25/04/2006, at 9:59 AM, Kristin Beckedahl wrote:
  

Can anyone 
recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum which I 
liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other good 
ones to chase up? Thanks-- This mailing list is 
sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or 
  unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Megan Larry
Thanks for the replies so far,

I have been breastfeeding for 8 years straight with 4 children. The last 2
children were/are demand fed. No rules! 
I have never had mastitis until with this child, once a year ago and then
just now. I have had a number of blocked ducts over the years, but never has
it gone to the next level. 

I really just want to know if children can become ill from a mother who has
mastitis? 
My little bloke made a full recovery by late morning, so he was only unwell
for 24 hrs. Normally he takes a couple days to recover as well.

It has just had me intrigued, and I lean towards the comments that  'They'
say it can't, but common sense infers that it is possible and/or  had both
mastitis and some other infection, which your son caught.

Any further thoughts,

Thanks again

Megan







--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Diane Gardner



It took 20 mins to 50 mins for the babies to crawl 
up and be sucking beautifully.

It was also interesting that babies who were 
removed from the mother's abdomen, bathed, measured and then put back did self 
attach but half of them had a faulty sucking pattern.

Gosh when I think of the babies from the days gone 
by that were born from choloformed mums ...sheesh I can't bear to 
think.

regards
Di Gardner

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Mary 
  Murphy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:58 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] BF 
videos
  
  
  Jo, how long does it 
  take the baby to find the breast and begin feeding? 
  MM
  
  
  
  
  
  I don't know what it's called, but the one where the 
  freshly newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches itself to the 
  breast without any help is awesome. Made me cry!
  
  


Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread diane



Hi Kristen,
I like the ABA/ Sue Cox ones too. There are two, 
Getting it Right, and the First Week. The First week looks at BF and normal 
urine and stool . Getting it right is a fantastic, easy to follow, step by step 
instructional video, I like it better than Follow me Mum.
Cheers,
Di

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kristin 
  Beckedahl 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 11:59 
  AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] BF videos
  
  
  Can anyone 
  recommend a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum which I 
  liked very much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other good 
  ones to chase up? Thanks-- This mailing list is 
  sponsored by ACE Graphics. Visit to subscribe or 
  unsubscribe. 


Re: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Jo Watson
From memory about 30 min or so, but can't be sure.  Definitely less than an hour.JoOn 25/04/2006, at 11:58 AM, Mary Murphy wrote:Jo, how long does it take the baby to find the breast and begin feeding?  MM I don't know what it's called, but the one where the freshly newborn baby crawls up the mother's abdomen and attaches itself to the breast without any help is awesome. Made me cry! 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread diane
Title: Mastitis question



I would second Nicole's advice regarding to 
continue feeding. I

t is inflamation, leading to infection of the 
breast tissue, not the milk. The bub is by far the best expresser!! Some babies 
will refuse the breast with mastitis, this is because the milk becomes more 
salty, as the pressure at the inflamation causes some salts to move into the 
milk. Sue Cox, in her book, Breastfeeding with confidence, recommends increasing 
the dietary garlic as this masks the saltiness and some studies have shown a 
preference for strongly flavoured milk, I imagine the anti bacterial properties 
would also be beneficial.Rest is vital, Mum and babe should take the phone 
off the hook, lock the door and both snuggle in bed until better, apply cold 
compresses to the inflamed area and ibuprofen can be used to reduce the 
inflamation.

Triggers can be being generally run down, pressure 
on the breast from tight clothes, bras etc, a change in feeding patterns, nipple 
damage. Many of which can occur at any time during lactation.
Di (IBCLC)

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Nicole 
  Carver 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:36 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis 
  question
  
  Hi,
  Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The 
  only exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is 
  very red, not your typical mastitis. It is verypainful and you feel 
  quite ill. I have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by 
  something else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that 
  stage, I would imagine.When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept 
  moving. Babies are best for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice 
  berg. A little blood does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is 
  no harm done. Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 
  24 hours or so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of 
  abscess formation.
  Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach. 
  However, I suppose they are also protecting them to some 
  extent.
  Regards,Nicole.
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of 
sharonSent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PMTo: 
ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis 
question
where i work we encourage women to express on 
the side that they are infected and continue feeding on the other side until 
the infection clears, the infection should be treated by antibiotics and if 
severe admission to hospital for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in 
it we discourage any breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express 
all feeds until the infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she 
feels better but ensure that the breast is always empty after 
feeding.
regards sharon

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Megan  
  Larry 
  To: ozmidwifery 
  Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 
  AM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis 
  question
  
  Can a mother pass on her infecton to her 
  breastfeeding child when she has mastitis? 
  Its just that I had what to me was obvious 
  mastitis on Sat, quite a decent case of it, very sore breast, redness, 
  fever, vomiting, quite ill. Still recovering on Monday when my 
  breastfeeding 22 mth old developed a fever and vomiting. This morning he 
  is quite recovered but no doubt will need a very quiet day 
  still.
  So, is this a coincidence, or can the child 
  become infected too? We were both rundown form a busy few weeks, so the 
  rest was well needed, just wanted it without the misery.
  Thanks in advance 
  Megan 



RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Ken Ward
It is at the kellymom site. I was wandering around it, found the b/f bit,
clicked onto the normal course of b/f then onto nursing your newborn. Have
just had another quick look, and other articles seem ok.  It is commonly
accepted in Australia that babies can loose up to 10%, some literature says
15% of birth weight in the first couple of days. This is due to the fluid on
board at birth and small amounts of colrustrum available. I have noticed
that some units are very conservative and comp babies if weight loss is
close to 10%, but to me this is unnecessary if all other factors are ok and
only undermines mum's confidence. I agree that some babies need be woken,
(my last would have starved herself, going up to 14 hrs one night when a
week old), but babies should be treated as individuals, some want frequent
snacks, others like a good feast now and again.  as long as mum's happy,
baby's happy and output good, who cares?  Maureen.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 6:28 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


Could you mail me the link to the article, please? I'm surprised that such
advice didn't come with all the extra info you just provided. I didn't know
about the 7% and 14% birth weight loss, never researched it.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ken Ward
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:12 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

Got onto 'kellymom'. They are suggesting you wake baby 2/24 during the day
and 4/24 at night.  This does not sit well with me. Babies need a minium of
6 feeds in 24hrs, and can feed hourly if they want, but I don't believe
waking them is such a good idea, unless there is a reason such as poor
weight gain, jaundice, lack of wet nappies.  Kellymom also states babies
loose 7% of birth weight. They can loose double this, and one should look at
output and baby's behaviour and mum's supply before jumping in. I didn't
bother further with this site.  Maureen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Vedrana Valčić
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 3:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


Could it be that you came down with both mastitis and some other infection,
which your son caught?
www.kellymom.com is a great site on breastfeeding, if you want to research
further.

Vedrana

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jo Bourne
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 4:57 AM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

My episodes of mastitis got less frequent after the first 3 months but I
probably averaged at least one mastitis every 6 months for the entire time I
was feeding (2.5yrs). Though my later mastitis were generally breast injury
induced rather than infection and easily treated with homeopathics.

At 12:36 PM +1000 25/4/06, Nicole Carver wrote:
Hi,
Normally you should breastfeed from both breasts with mastitis. The only
exception, and I may stand corrected, is strep infection. The breast is very
red, not your typical mastitis. It is very painful and you feel quite ill. I
have not seen mastitis at 22 months. It might be precipitated by something
else, as usually the feeding would be fairly trouble free at that stage, I
would imagine.
When a woman has mastitis the milk needs to be kept moving. Babies are best
for that! Expressing is really just the tip of the ice berg. A little blood
does not hurt. If the baby vomits a little blood there is no harm done.
Obviously if there is a lot it would be best to discontinue for 24 hours or
so. The breast must be emptied though, or you run the risk of abscess
formation.
Sometimes the antibiotics taken by mum will upset the babies stomach.
However, I suppose they are also protecting them to some extent.
Regards,
Nicole.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of sharon
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 12:24 PM
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

where i work we encourage women to express on the side that they are
infected and continue feeding on the other side until the infection clears,
the infection should be treated by antibiotics and if severe admission to
hospital for iv antibugs. if the breastmilk has blood in it we discourage
any breastfeeding whatsoever and get the mother to express all feeds until
the infection passes she then can resume b/feeding when she feels better but
ensure that the breast is always empty after feeding.
regards sharon

- Original Message -
From: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Megan  Larry
To: mailto:ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auozmidwifery
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis 

Re: [ozmidwifery] Article FYI new vaccination

2006-04-25 Thread Mike Lindsay Kennedy
I have moms who brestfeed while their babies are being vacinated,
facilitating bonding and very effectivly distracting the babies. I
have to ask the question. How does getting one of the diseases we
vacinate against contribute to bonding and breastfeeding.

rgds mike

On 4/25/06, Megan  Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Is this really the best thing we could be doing for our precious little
 babies when they are first born?
 This is more than a pro/anti vaccination debate. Anything that interferes
 with early bonding, breatfeeding etc has to be questioned.

 Research could save newborns
 From: http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/
 By Clare Masters
  April 25, 2006
 NEWBORN babies could soon be vaccinated at birth against bacterial diseases
 after scientists discovered how to boost a baby's immune system, guarding
 them against possible fatal infections.

 Dr John Smythe, a neo-natologist at the Royal Hospital for Women at
 Randwick, Sydney, yesterday hailed the finding, which would close the
 current two-month window before a baby is immunised against the infections.

 Babies are already immunised against hepatitis B at birth and given a
 vitamin K shot but the new findings will allow newborns to be protected
 against a host of other infections.

 It's exciting because their bodies don't take up immunisations for tetanus,
 as an example, at that age, he said.
 Most adults and children can repel contagious bugs with a group of receptors
 called TLRs that sit on the surface of white-blood cells – the body's
 defence system.

 These recognise bacteria and viruses and trigger immune cells to attack
 them.

 But newborns' immune systems have not developed this network, making them
 vulnerable to conditions like tetanus, diphtheria and whooping cough.

 By studying white blood cells from the newborns' cord blood, scientists from
 the Children's Hospital Boston found a way to boost a particular TLR and
 strengthen the infant's immune system.

 The researchers believe their findings could be used for a vaccination given
 at birth, closing off the current two-month window.

 From a global health perspective, if you can give a vaccine at birth, a
 much higher percentage of the population can be covered, researcher Ofer
 Levy said. He said this particular vaccination could also be given to babies
 as treatment for infections or as a preventive measure against a disease or
 bio-terrorist threat.

 Dr Smythe said newborns, particularly premature babies, were vulnerable to
 bacteria and viruses.
 Their immune system isn't as efficient when they encounter an infection,
 he told The Daily Telegraph.
 There isn't a huge amount at the moment that we can do.
 The period before they are vaccinated is a vulnerable one and this is quite
 a breakthrough. He said a newborn's entire system was immature and unable
 to cope with some bugs such as meningitis and whooping cough.


--
My photos online @ http://community.webshots.com/user/mike1962nz
My Group online @ http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PSP_for_Photographers
New Photo site@
Mike - http://mikelinz.dotphoto.com
Lindsay - Http://likeminz.dotphoto.com

Life is a sexually transmitted condition with 100% mortality and birth is
as safe as it gets. Unknown
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Scott Trudi Kluge
Megan..
I usually lurk here but just wanted to tell of my experience...

I have had one bout of mastitis with symptoms just as you
describe. flu-like fever, nausea, vomiting, dizziness.
VERY painful reddened breast, quick onset...
with the added thick (arghh), blood tinged pale green milk
(sorry for graphic description)... I kept feeding my then 10 mth
old, expressing and enlisting the help of her older brother who
is always very keen to help out when needed I ended up
getting AB's because this just seemed a little too severe and
the milk was a difficult consistency to express.. I recovered very
quickly 1-2 days and the children experienced no adverse
effects.. (I didn't show them the milk :-)

I know of a woman recently who had a nasty salmonella infection
at time of birthing and baby ended up with it too (don't know
much about the case but should find out) I don't know
if this was whilst inutero or through breastfeeding or by other
means, such as, simply contact with infected person.

I'm sure you have explored all possible scenarios. :-)
You sound like you got hit by the express version of the mastitis
bus like me and that these symptoms were due to this event
rather than another concurrent illness.
Your dear boy might have simply got an upset tummy from your
altered milkor he did what kids tend to do from time to time
and that is suffer a quick 24 hr virus unrelated  to you.

I would assume that feeding throughout 'simple' illnesses would be
fine with no adverse effects to baby, I haven't heard of any mother /
baby separation (aka quarantine) incidences

This is a very interesting question and it would be interesting to hear
what the LC's recommend in regards to continued breastfeeding with
various maternal (local  systemic) infections.

back to my lurking.

Trudi



interesting question
- Original Message - 
From: Megan  Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question


 Thanks for the replies so far,

 I have been breastfeeding for 8 years straight with 4 children. The last 2
 children were/are demand fed. No rules!
 I have never had mastitis until with this child, once a year ago and then
 just now. I have had a number of blocked ducts over the years, but never
has
 it gone to the next level.

 I really just want to know if children can become ill from a mother who
has
 mastitis?
 My little bloke made a full recovery by late morning, so he was only
unwell
 for 24 hrs. Normally he takes a couple days to recover as well.

 It has just had me intrigued, and I lean towards the comments that 
'They'
 say it can't, but common sense infers that it is possible and/or  had
both
 mastitis and some other infection, which your son caught.

 Any further thoughts,

 Thanks again

 Megan







 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] BF videos

2006-04-25 Thread Alan








I like Getting it right by Sue Cox. Most
mums find it easy to follow.











From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Kristin Beckedahl
Sent: Tuesday, 25 April 2006 12:00
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Subject: [ozmidwifery] BF videos







Can anyone recommend
a really good BF video..?? I have only seen Follow Me Mum which I liked very
much (altho the bub was not newborn?). Are there any other good ones to chase
up? Thanks








--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit  to subscribe or unsubscribe.

Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Jo Watson
I started doing a Lactation Advisor course at the end of my pregnancy  
last year, and I remember that with mastitis, no matter what is  
coming out (blood or pus or whatever) the baby should still be  
breastfeeding directly.  They are better than any breast pump around,  
and the milk will contain extra immunities to whatever infection is  
in it.  So, while the baby may get a touch of something, he will also  
get extra antibodies against the infection.


Jo


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question

2006-04-25 Thread Barbara Glare Chris Bright

Hi, Trudi,

Most *bugs* aren't necessarily passed to the baby through the milk - if they 
are passed to the baby it's through the normal contact mothers have with 
their babies, regardless of how they are fed.  The mother's body begins to 
make antibodies which are passed through the milk to protect the baby to 
some extent from what the mum has.
It can be tough caring for a baby when you are sick, but even tougher when 
you are not breastfeeding.  So I don't know of any situation where ceasing 
to breastfeed would be a good option


Barb
- Original Message - 
From: Scott  Trudi Kluge [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 10:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question



Megan..
I usually lurk here but just wanted to tell of my experience...

I have had one bout of mastitis with symptoms just as you
describe. flu-like fever, nausea, vomiting, dizziness.
VERY painful reddened breast, quick onset...
with the added thick (arghh), blood tinged pale green milk
(sorry for graphic description)... I kept feeding my then 10 mth
old, expressing and enlisting the help of her older brother who
is always very keen to help out when needed I ended up
getting AB's because this just seemed a little too severe and
the milk was a difficult consistency to express.. I recovered very
quickly 1-2 days and the children experienced no adverse
effects.. (I didn't show them the milk :-)

I know of a woman recently who had a nasty salmonella infection
at time of birthing and baby ended up with it too (don't know
much about the case but should find out) I don't know
if this was whilst inutero or through breastfeeding or by other
means, such as, simply contact with infected person.

I'm sure you have explored all possible scenarios. :-)
You sound like you got hit by the express version of the mastitis
bus like me and that these symptoms were due to this event
rather than another concurrent illness.
Your dear boy might have simply got an upset tummy from your
altered milkor he did what kids tend to do from time to time
and that is suffer a quick 24 hr virus unrelated  to you.

I would assume that feeding throughout 'simple' illnesses would be
fine with no adverse effects to baby, I haven't heard of any mother /
baby separation (aka quarantine) incidences

This is a very interesting question and it would be interesting to hear
what the LC's recommend in regards to continued breastfeeding with
various maternal (local  systemic) infections.

back to my lurking.

Trudi



interesting question
- Original Message - 
From: Megan  Larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 6:17 PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] Mastitis question



Thanks for the replies so far,

I have been breastfeeding for 8 years straight with 4 children. The last 
2

children were/are demand fed. No rules!
I have never had mastitis until with this child, once a year ago and then
just now. I have had a number of blocked ducts over the years, but never

has

it gone to the next level.

I really just want to know if children can become ill from a mother who

has

mastitis?
My little bloke made a full recovery by late morning, so he was only

unwell

for 24 hrs. Normally he takes a couple days to recover as well.

It has just had me intrigued, and I lean towards the comments that 

'They'

say it can't, but common sense infers that it is possible and/or  had

both

mastitis and some other infection, which your son caught.

Any further thoughts,

Thanks again

Megan







--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.





--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] need some references

2006-04-25 Thread Sonja Barry



Jo,
Idon't know if Camden will open for births 
again. However, we continue to keep it on the agenda and our main focus 
for looking after "low risk" women so that our statistics support births coming 
home.I may know more at the end of the week as the Health Minister for NSW, John 
Hatzistergos will be coming to launch the Camden caseload model.
I have had some wonderful support regarding the 
home birth, however, the woman's husband and mother are adament that she birth 
in hospital. Got to be careful what you say on here, as you just don't 
know who is lurking.
Sonja

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  jo 
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 1:41 
PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] need some 
  references
  
  
  HI 
  Sonja,
  
  Is it likely that 
  Camden will 
  reopen for births or will the caseload midwives continue to travel to 
  Campbelltown with their clients?
  
  Hope you found 
  someone to support the woman wanting a hb – or are you doing 
  it??
  
  Take 
  care
  
  Jo Hunter 
  x
  
  
  
  
  
  From: owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  [mailto:owner-ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au] On Behalf Of Sonja  
  BarrySent: Wednesday, 19 
  April 2006 7:57 AMTo: 
  ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.auSubject: Re: [ozmidwifery] need some 
  references
  
  
  I can supply you with some for a 
  "caseload" model if you are interested. We have just started with 
  caseload at Camden and is so far going well. More 
  flexible for midwives and women enjoy having their own 
  midwife.
  
  Sonja
  

- Original Message - 


From: Debbie 


To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 


Sent: 
Tuesday, April 18, 2006 3:28 PM

Subject: 
[ozmidwifery] need some references



Hi all, Am in the midst of an 
assignment which entails developing a proposal for team midwifery in my 
rural unit here at Orange. I need some more references to 
support this alternative model of care from a traditional medical model. In 
anticipation, 
Debbie


Re: [ozmidwifery] Options for twins

2006-04-25 Thread Sonja Barry



Have you given her a copy of Justine Caines' 
article "High Risk birth - Defined by Whom?" found in Birth Matters 
vol10.1. 
Sonja

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Lesleycs 
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:42 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Options for 
  twins
  
  Dear list,
  
  I hope you can suggest a few options fora friend's daughter who is 
  pregnant with twins and looking forwomen-friendly care. Her 
  holisticbackground combined withinitial visits toGP 
  andobstetricianhasleft her disturbed, defiant,and 
  waryofgetting caught up in the system. But she is unsure of 
  her options. 
  
  I've given her some generalinformation about multiples (from 
  'Midwifery Matters', UK Midwifery archives, this list, AIMS, 'Birth 
  Matters',details of MIPP etc.) together with some very-much-needed 
  positive twin birth stories - all of which has affirmed her strong desire 
  tokeep this pregnancy and birth normal. 
  
  She lives in outer S.E. suburbs of Melbourne. Isopen to 
  independent midwifery care, although money is an issue. Also no private 
  health insurance. She's feels limited in her options and pushed to 
  obstetric care by default, and is askingfornames of women-friendly 
  practitioners. (Heard there was someone out Warrigal way?) 
  
  What are her options? As 'high risk' does shequalify for any 
  midwifery care programs? Are there any decent public shared 
  careoptions in the area?And if she ispushed to find the 
  money forprivate care how wouldthe cost ofindependent 
  midwifery carecompare with an obstetrician? 
  
  Any suggestions most welcome at this stage.
  
  Many thanks,
  Lesley


Re: [ozmidwifery] Misoprostol aka Cytotec

2006-04-25 Thread Janet Fraser
Does anyone have any more news on this? Is it being used in Australia?
J
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.