Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth

2007-01-01 Thread Justine Caines
Dear Sue

Ah! Wipe that smirk off your face!!!

My big plan does not involve me being pregnant!!!

Many congrats on finishing the Bmid, after 23 years of an apprenticeship
eh!!

JC
xx


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] For Sue

2007-01-01 Thread Susan Cudlipp
Don't know if you mean me Amy, I work at Swans but have not worked in the 
valley centre, nor recently restorative (thankfully!)  However there are 2 or 3 
other Sue's at Swans though they do not s*bscr*be to this list.
Where do you normally work?
Sue
  - Original Message - 
  From: adamnamy 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Saturday, December 30, 2006 3:56 PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] For Sue


  Hi Sue,

   

  Now I have to ask.are you the Sue at swans who I know from a few shifts we 
did together at the swan valley centre and recently on restorative?  

   

  It is a very small world indeed and that would make me smile if it were so, 
after the whinge I had about my most recent birth experience to you a couple of 
weeks ago (if my guess is right).

   

   

   

  Amy

   

   



--


  Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 9/12/2006 
3:41 PM


Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth

2007-01-01 Thread Susan Cudlipp
Lynne, could you please send me one too?
Thanks
Sue
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  - Original Message - 
  From: Lynne Staff 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Monday, January 01, 2007 8:57 AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth


  Hi Helen
  When I get to work tomorrow, I will send you the reference list from my 
recently updated (Oct 2006) warm water immersion in labour and birth learning 
package for midwives. This may be helpful - re publishing our figures - this is 
a goal for 2007!
  Warm regards, and a happy and fruitful 2007!
- Original Message - 
From: Helen and Graham 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth


Hi Lynne

Can you point me to some research that I can use to support the safety of 
waterbirth.  I have just read the following reference in the SA Women's and 
Children's Waterbirth Policy as sent in by Fiona to Ozmid as follows:

There is no evidence that perinatal mortality and morbidity, including 
admissions to
special care nurseries for babies born into a warm water environment, is 
significantly

different to babies born out of water (Geissbuehler et al 2004; Gilbert  
Tookey

1999).

but wondered whether you had any other references to call on.  



Also wondering if you had thought about publishing Selangor's own findings? 
 It would be a great contribution to hospitals trying to weigh up the risk 
benefits of waterbirth.  There still seems to be such fear surrounding the 
whole issue in the majority of the hospital system that it would be great to 
have some positive local experiences/research to quote.  

Thanks in advance.

Helen





  - Original Message - 
  From: Lynne Staff 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 10:04 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth


  Hi Mary
  At Selangor we - midwives, obstetricians and paediatricians - have 
'officially' supported women for waterbirth since Feb 1998. Our rate is 35% of 
vaginal births and over 1600 babies have been waterborn since we opened. We 
will continue to do so as it has benefits for women, their babies and is safe. 
  Regards, Lynne


  - Original Message - 
From: Mary Murphy 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 12:50 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth


Hi everyone, I know this question has been asked before, but I can't 
remember the answer.  Do we have any maternity units, birth centres etc who 
officially do waterbirth?  I know homebirthers do, but I want to know about 
institutions.  Thanks, MM



  __ NOD32 1933 (20061221) Information __

  This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
  http://www.eset.com



--


  Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.15.15/581 - Release Date: 9/12/2006 
3:41 PM


Re: [ozmidwifery] waterbirth

2007-01-01 Thread Gail McKenzie
Pardon my ignorance, but where is Selangor?  I too would be interested in 
published outcomes


Luv,  Gail

_
Advertisement: Mobiles, computers, handsets, iPODs and more! 
http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Etradingpost%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fsearch%2Fcat%5FPhones%5Fns%5FTrue%5Foff%5F0%5Fsect%5FAutomotive%5Fsort%5FotRZSQ1BJDZfdRZSQSearchDisplayPriorityIndAVSCotRZSQ1BJDZfdRZSQFirstPublished%5Fsqt%5F2%5Fsrch%5Fmobile%2Bphones%5Fsrchtype%5Fint%5Fstate%5F9%5Fstpg%5F1%5Fsubs%5FUsed%2BCars%5F%3Freferrer%3Dplacement13_t=759568604_r=Email_Tagline1_m=EXT


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] synto AFTER 3rd stage?

2007-01-01 Thread Angela Thompson

Hey Carolyn,

That's exactly what i was asking. Many thanks for taking the time to respond
- really appreciate the physiological explanation/logic.
Best wishes
Angela


On 12/29/06, Heartlogic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Hello Angela,

From my perspective, it would seem that an exogenous oxytocic mediated
third stage, with its forceful, prolonged contraction would be more likely
to force fetal blood into the maternal system. That contraction, coupled
with pulling and tugging, removing placental bits from the endometrium by
applied tension (aka controlled cord traction) would be more likely to
provide opportunities for micro tears in the delicate chorionic villi walls,
lending itself to transplacental transfer of blood cells. The intelligent
way the woman's endogenous oxytocin's pulsatile nature provides gentle and
yet effective uterine contractions, allowing the placenta to come off the
wall of the uterus like a sticky note off a piece of paper and drop into the
lower segment, whilst clamping the uterine wall blood vessels has a
different 'energetic' feel to it all.  Given that at the sub atomic level we
are all energy, that differet 'feel' may well be very important.  BTW, that
pressure of the placenta in the lower segment provides the pelvic and bowel
sensations to let the woman know it is time to give birth to her placenta.

I would suggest therefore, that physiological 'management' is the optimal
form of third stage 'care' for women with rhesus positive and rhesus
negative blood groups.  Funny how often physiology wins out over
intervention.  Hmm.

Is that what you are meaning by your question Angela?

warmly, Carolyn





- Original Message -

*From:* Angela Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
*To:* ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au
 *Sent:* Friday, December 29, 2006 11:45 AM
*Subject:* Re: [ozmidwifery] synto AFTER 3rd stage?


Carolyn,

Would you have any feedback on managed 3rd stage for rhesus negative
women?

Thanks
Angela


On 12/24/06, Heartlogic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Great question Kristin.

 If a woman who has given birth to her baby is in her 'tend and befriend'
 neural network regulatory process aka parasympathetic aspect of her
 autonomic nervous system, then her endogenous oxytocin will be high,
 therefore doing what endogenous oxytocin does - contract her uterus,
 stimulate lactogenesis, generate sensations of loving her baby, stimulate
 all sorts of yummy, healthy physiological effects, which in turn creates
 more of the same. BTW, that is the state we are all meant to be in - our
 physiology works for health and harmony in that 'state'.

 If however, she is frightened, cold, disrupted, interfered with or her
 baby is taken away from her for whatever reason, including weighing,
 measuring etc, therefore her autonomic nervous system switches into the
 'flight, fight or freeze' state, then she may be much more likely to bleed
 and therefore 'need' exogenous oxytocin.

 Fascinating how we create what we are always trying to prevent/control
 :-)

 Something that is not well enough known is that when we give exogenous
 oxytocics aka syntocinon, then that synthetic hormone does not cross the
 blood brain barrier and therefore does not act like a behavioural hormone,
 meaning it does not help mothers fall in love with their babies and it does
 switch off the woman's own oxytocin supply, which complicates the falling in
 love issue.  So giving exogenous oxytocin interrrupts bonding and even
 distorts it. That's a big responsibility and we are seeing the effects of
 our (medically dominated and controlled/interrupted birthing process)
 meddlesome ways in our society's ills right now.

 I for one, would not advocate giving syntocinon after the placenta was
 born for 'insurance' reasons.

 It is really time that we all started looking at what makes our
 physiology work best, instead of the Newtonian way of always trying to
 control 'risk'.  That is shutting the door after the horse has bolted way of
 doing things.  We have to reduced risk by optimising conditions before we
 get to the risky state. We are busy creating risk by frightening women. We
 have to start asking 'what helps women feel confident?'  'what helps women
 feel safe in their own skins?'  ' what can we do to make the birth
 environment one which enhances women's sense of self and internal
 security?'   what helps women feel relaxed and calm?'  What do we need to
 do to help women stay in their parasympathetic aspect of their autonomic
 nervous system?

 At Belmont, we are seeing the effects of facilitating, supporting and
 respecting the normal parasympathetic way of being - healthy happy babies
 and mothers, well bonded.  Labour goes better and faster, perineums are
 stretchier, love is more likely and deep, connection between
 mother/baby/family is facilitated, breastfeeding goes better, babies are
 healthy and happy and smiling from birth - we know they smile in the womb,
 but we can't see that til they're born.

 love,