Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-18 Thread Marcia



I have been watching this discussion re mec liquor 
and perineal suction. Anne, could you please give reference to your research 
that does not support this practice?
thank you.
marcia

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Anne Clarke 
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:50 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  
  Dear Katrina,
  
  It seems that almost everyone does suction at the 
  peri with mec. liq. but the resarch does not support this routine 
  procedure.
  
  Regards,
  Anne Clarke
  Brisbane
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Ceri 
 Katrina 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:23 
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
oil
Hi AnneAre these articles on Cochrane? I had a lady the 
other day I was supporting and helping birth, and there was mec liquor, 
thin, but wen to thick right at the end, and the midwife I was working with 
suctioned at the peri, I had no idea it was not the thing to 
doThanksKatrinaOn 16/02/2005, at 3:13 PM, Anne Clarke 
wrote:
Mec. liq. is not the end 
  of the world, especially if the mother is overdue and there is no signs of 
  fetal distress. Depending on your workplace the mother needs to 
  negotiatefor intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (if you have 
  to do it at all) and no suction of the baby at birth as the evidence does 
  not support this procedure if done purelyto reduce mec. 
  aspriation. If a baby is going to have mec. aspiration suctioning of 
  the oro-nasal pharynx is not going to help and doesn't reduce the risk.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-18 Thread Tania Smallwood





Sorry for butting in, but just found this quickly in my saved file, thought 
it might clarify current findings...

Tania

Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained 
neonatesbefore delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised 
controlledrial . ARTICLEThe Lancet, Volume 364, Issue 9434, 14 
August 2004, Pages 597-602Nestor E Vain, Edgardo G Szyld, Luis M Prudent, 
Thomas E Wiswell, Adriana MAguilar and Norma I 
VivasAbstractBackgroundMeconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) is 
a life-threatening respiratorydisorder in infants born through 
meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF).Although anecdotal data concerning 
the efficacy of intrapartum oropharyngealand nasopharyngeal suctioning of 
MSAF are conflicting, the procedure iswidely used. We aimed to assess the 
effectiveness of intrapartum suctioningfor the prevention of 
MAS.MethodsWe designed a randomised controlled trial in 11 hospitals 
in Argentina andone in the USA. 2514 patients with MSAF of any consistency, 
gestational ageat least 37 weeks, and cephalic presentation were randomly 
assigned tosuctioning of the oropharynx and nasopharynx (including the 
hypopharynx)before delivery of the shoulders (n=1263), or no suctioning 
before delivery(n=1251). Postnatal delivery-room management followed 
Neonatal ResuscitationProgram guidelines. The primary outcome was incidence 
of MAS. Cliniciansdiagnosing the syndrome and designating other study 
outcomes were masked togroup assignment. An informed consent waiver was 
used. Analysis was byintention to treat.Findings18 infants in 
the suction group and 15 in the no suction group did not meetentry criteria 
after random assignment. 87 in the suction group were notsuctioned, and 26 
in the no suction group were suctioned. No significantdifference between 
treatment groups was seen in the incidence of MAS (52[4%] suction vs 47 [4%] 
no suction; relative risk 0·9, 95% CI 0·6-1·3), needfor mechanical 
ventilation for MAS (24 [2%] vs 18 [1%]; 0·8, 0·4-1·4),mortality (9 [1%] vs 
4 [0·3%]; 0·4, 0·1-1·5), or in the duration ofventilation, oxygen treatment, 
and hospital care.InterpretationRoutine intrapartum oropharyngeal 
and nasopharyngeal suctioning ofterm-gestation infants born through MSAF 
does not prevent MAS. Considerationshould be given to revision of present 
recommendations

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Marcia 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:08 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  
  I have been watching this discussion re mec 
  liquor and perineal suction. Anne, could you please give reference to your 
  research that does not support this practice?
  thank you.
  marcia
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Anne 
Clarke 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:50 
AM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
oil

Dear Katrina,

It seems that almost everyone does suction at 
the peri with mec. liq. but the resarch does not support this routine 
procedure.

Regards,
Anne Clarke
Brisbane

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ceri 
   Katrina 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 
  3:23 PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  Hi AnneAre these articles on Cochrane? I had a lady the 
  other day I was supporting and helping birth, and there was mec liquor, 
  thin, but wen to thick right at the end, and the midwife I was working 
  with suctioned at the peri, I had no idea it was not the thing to 
  doThanksKatrinaOn 16/02/2005, at 3:13 PM, Anne Clarke 
  wrote:
  Mec. liq. is not the 
end of the world, especially if the mother is overdue and there is no 
signs of fetal distress. Depending on your workplace the mother 
needs to negotiatefor intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (if 
you have to do it at all) and no suction of the baby at birth as the 
evidence does not support this procedure if done purelyto reduce 
mec. aspriation. If a baby is going to have mec. aspiration 
suctioning of the oro-nasal pharynx is not going to help and doesn't 
reduce the 
  risk.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-18 Thread Jenny Cameron



Meconium stained liquor rarely causes a 
problem. Thick or particulate meconium can cause MAS. Until there is clearer 
research evidence I will be suctioning on the peri for thick mec. The issue is 
that if the baby in utero has been asphyxiated and passes meconium and then 
gasps, which he is likely to do if the asphyxia is severe. He may inhale mec at 
that point and nothing we do at or post birth will retrieve that meconium. 
Thethorny issue is whether the baby passed the mec as a result 
ofpathological hypoxaemia or did he open his bowels because he 
ismature and has a ready response to low oxygen levels however slight and 
transient.Cord compression is common in all pregnancies and as the 
baby nears term the liquor production decreases slowly making cord compression 
more likely. A 42 weeker will pass mec very readily and a high % have MSL at the 
onset of labour. A quick check with a CTG is required. No evidence of 
hypoxaemia...fine, off with the monitor and on with the labour. Thanks for the 
reference. ECPC addresses this topic but it is about due for a new edition. 
Cheers
jenny
Jennifer Cameron FRCNA FACMProMid 
Professional Midwifery Education Service0419 528 717

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Tania Smallwood 
  
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 12:25 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  
  
  
  Sorry for butting in, but just found this quickly in my saved file, 
  thought it might clarify current findings...
  
  Tania
  
  Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal suctioning of meconium-stained 
  neonatesbefore delivery of their shoulders: multicentre, randomised 
  controlledrial . ARTICLEThe Lancet, Volume 364, Issue 9434, 14 
  August 2004, Pages 597-602Nestor E Vain, Edgardo G Szyld, Luis M Prudent, 
  Thomas E Wiswell, Adriana MAguilar and Norma I 
  VivasAbstractBackgroundMeconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) 
  is a life-threatening respiratorydisorder in infants born through 
  meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF).Although anecdotal data concerning 
  the efficacy of intrapartum oropharyngealand nasopharyngeal suctioning of 
  MSAF are conflicting, the procedure iswidely used. We aimed to assess the 
  effectiveness of intrapartum suctioningfor the prevention of 
  MAS.MethodsWe designed a randomised controlled trial in 11 
  hospitals in Argentina andone in the USA. 2514 patients with MSAF of any 
  consistency, gestational ageat least 37 weeks, and cephalic presentation 
  were randomly assigned tosuctioning of the oropharynx and nasopharynx 
  (including the hypopharynx)before delivery of the shoulders (n=1263), or 
  no suctioning before delivery(n=1251). Postnatal delivery-room management 
  followed Neonatal ResuscitationProgram guidelines. The primary outcome was 
  incidence of MAS. Cliniciansdiagnosing the syndrome and designating other 
  study outcomes were masked togroup assignment. An informed consent waiver 
  was used. Analysis was byintention to treat.Findings18 infants 
  in the suction group and 15 in the no suction group did not meetentry 
  criteria after random assignment. 87 in the suction group were 
  notsuctioned, and 26 in the no suction group were suctioned. No 
  significantdifference between treatment groups was seen in the incidence 
  of MAS (52[4%] suction vs 47 [4%] no suction; relative risk 0·9, 95% CI 
  0·6-1·3), needfor mechanical ventilation for MAS (24 [2%] vs 18 [1%]; 0·8, 
  0·4-1·4),mortality (9 [1%] vs 4 [0·3%]; 0·4, 0·1-1·5), or in the duration 
  ofventilation, oxygen treatment, and hospital 
  care.InterpretationRoutine intrapartum oropharyngeal and 
  nasopharyngeal suctioning ofterm-gestation infants born through MSAF does 
  not prevent MAS. Considerationshould be given to revision of present 
  recommendations
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Marcia 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Saturday, February 19, 2005 1:08 
PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
oil

I have been watching this discussion re mec 
liquor and perineal suction. Anne, could you please give reference to your 
research that does not support this practice?
thank you.
marcia

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Anne 
  Clarke 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 9:50 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  
  Dear Katrina,
  
  It seems that almost everyone does suction at 
  the peri with mec. liq. but the resarch does not support this routine 
  procedure.
  
  Regards,
  Anne Clarke
  Brisbane
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Ceri  Katrina 
To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 

Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 
3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
oil
Hi AnneAre these articles on Cochrane? I

Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-17 Thread Anne Clarke



Dear Katrina,

It seems that almost everyone does suction at the 
peri with mec. liq. but the resarch does not support this routine 
procedure.

Regards,
Anne Clarke
Brisbane

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Ceri 
   Katrina 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 3:23 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor 
  oil
  Hi AnneAre these articles on Cochrane? I had a lady the 
  other day I was supporting and helping birth, and there was mec liquor, thin, 
  but wen to thick right at the end, and the midwife I was working with 
  suctioned at the peri, I had no idea it was not the thing to 
  doThanksKatrinaOn 16/02/2005, at 3:13 PM, Anne Clarke 
  wrote:
  Mec. liq. is not the end of 
the world, especially if the mother is overdue and there is no signs of 
fetal distress. Depending on your workplace the mother needs to 
negotiatefor intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (if you have to 
do it at all) and no suction of the baby at birth as the evidence does not 
support this procedure if done purelyto reduce mec. aspriation. 
If a baby is going to have mec. aspiration suctioning of the oro-nasal 
pharynx is not going to help and doesn't reduce the risk.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-16 Thread Ceri Katrina
Hi Anne
Are these articles on Cochrane? I had a lady the other day I was supporting and helping birth, and there was mec liquor, thin, but wen to thick right at the end, and the midwife I was working with suctioned at the peri, I had no idea it was not the thing to do

Thanks
Katrina
On 16/02/2005, at 3:13 PM, Anne Clarke wrote:

Mec. liq. is not the end of the world, especially if the mother is overdue and there is no signs of fetal distress.  Depending on your workplace the mother needs to negotiate for intermittent electronic fetal monitoring (if you have to do it at all) and no suction of the baby at birth as the evidence does not support this procedure if done purely to reduce mec. aspriation.  If a baby is going to have mec. aspiration suctioning of the oro-nasal pharynx is not going to help and doesn't reduce the risk.
 

[ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-15 Thread Michelle Windsor
Hi,

Just wondering if anyone has any info on side effects of women taking castor oil (in relation to the baby) to try and induce labour. A few of the midwives I work with have noticed that there seems to be a connection with taking castor oil and having mec liquor, ? it is affecting the baby as well.

Thanks in advance
Michelle 
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.

Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-15 Thread Judy Chapman
Hi Michelle,
Can't access stuff on my computer to help you as it is dead but there is a research out there somewhere which showed that there is more mec lic in women who have had castor oil than those who did not. Foetal outcomes were as good as the no oil group I think. Can't remember the specific conclucions drawn but not terribly negative. 
Cheers
Judy
Michelle Windsor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

Just wondering if anyone has any info on side effects of women taking castor oil (in relation to the baby) to try and induce labour. A few of the midwives I work with have noticed that there seems to be a connection with taking castor oil and having mec liquor, ? it is affecting the baby as well.

Thanks in advance
Michelle 


Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.

Re: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil

2005-02-15 Thread Anne Clarke



Dear Michelle,

There is NO evidence that taking castor oil for 
induction increases the risk ofmec. liq. What is probably more 
likely is that since the mother is overdue the incidence of mec. liq. increases 
after 7-10+ days anyway rather than the taking of the castor 
oil.

Mec. liq. is not the end of the world, especially 
if the mother is overdue and there is no signs of fetal distress. 
Depending on your workplace the mother needs to negotiatefor intermittent 
electronic fetal monitoring (if you have to do it at all) and no suction of the 
baby at birth as the evidence does not support this procedure if done 
purelyto reduce mec. aspriation. If a baby is going to have mec. 
aspiration suctioning of the oro-nasal pharynx is not going to help and doesn't 
reduce the risk.

Hope this helps,
Anne Clarke
Brisbane

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Michelle Windsor 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 10:33 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] Castor oil
  
  Hi,
  
  Just wondering if anyone has any info on side effects of women taking 
  castor oil (in relation to the baby) to try and induce labour. A few of 
  the midwives I work with have noticed that there seems to be a connection with 
  taking castor oil and having mec liquor, ? it is affecting the baby as 
  well.
  
  Thanks in advance
  Michelle 
  
  
  Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.