[ozmidwifery] Postnatal observations

2004-12-06 Thread cummins



Dear List

Sorry to go back over old ground (message sent by 
Mel Dunstan 17/11/04), but I really need your help in a Obs V Midwives battle 
against doing postnatal observations. About 4 years ago we ceased doing 
postnatal observations on all 'normal birth' postnatal women. Our 
postnatal unit hasrun perfectly since this time without incident relating 
to the postnatal care of wellbeing of the women we care for. We use a 
pathway for signing off the education and the wellbeing of mother and 
child.

Recently we have had a visiting registrar who 
required postnatal observations on women. This request has gone to our DON 
whodemanded that our practice be immediately updated and 
that we do at least one set of obs per day on every woman.
In our unit,we do not gain a numerical value from 
any machine, however, we ask the woman how she is feeling, we observe behaviour, 
we listen to the woman, we educate and spend time with mother and baby,we 
are 'with woman'!! and if there is anything deviating from the 
normal then we investigate further, often by doing observations, however, if 
there is no indication to do the observations, then I do not believe that they 
need to be done. 
Four years ago, our unit progressed from being task 
orientated and medicalised, to caring for the individual and empowering the 
woman to care for herself. A woman with child is not a medical emergency 
and removing routine observations is normalising this situation.
I have no doubt the woman I cared for last night 
(day3, engorged breasts, tears, etc) would have an elevated temp, high heart 
rate and probably an elevated BP but I was already dealing with the problems and 
a set of obs would have proven NOTHING.

I am so very angry and frustrated that I am now 
faced with a situation where I need to find some recent evidence based practice 
to support the fact that we do not do routine observations. We are having 
to re-invent a wheel that has been rolling perfectly well for so many years 
(until it ran over an obstetric nail).

If there is anyone out there who can help, please 
alert me to web sites, publications, anything!!

Thanks in advance

Felicity


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal observations

2004-12-06 Thread Jen Semple
Enkin et al. in A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy
 Childbirth state:

Routine [postnatal] Observations: Making  recording
regular measurements of Temp, pulse, bp, fundal
height,  lochia   the various wounds that a woman may
sustain during  birth, is still common practice in the
days following birth.  The intensity of this screening
activity varies arbitrarily and depnds more on the
hospital in which a mother happens to give birth, and
on the legnth of time she spends in it, than on her
individual needs.  While it is prudent to observe
women in this way when they are known to be at
increased risk of either infection or hemorrhage, it
is difficult to justifythis as a routine for all
women.  Chapter 45, p.432

This book is available online, free, in PDF format
from www.maternitywise.org/guide

Also, have a look at WHO: Care in Normal Labour 
Birth online
http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/MSM_96_24/MSM_96_24_table_of_contents.en.html

Has the OB that wants the change provided any evidence
to support his/her demands?

Jen

 --- cummins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 
 Dear List
 
 Sorry to go back over old ground (message sent by
 Mel Dunstan 17/11/04), but I really need your help
 in a Obs V Midwives battle against doing postnatal
 observations.  About 4 years ago we ceased doing
 postnatal observations on all 'normal birth'
 postnatal women.  Our postnatal unit has run
 perfectly since this time without incident relating
 to the postnatal care of wellbeing of the women we
 care for.  We use a pathway for signing off the
 education and the wellbeing of mother and child.
 
 Recently we have had a visiting registrar who
 required postnatal observations on women.  This
 request has gone to our DON who demanded that our
 practice be immediately updated and that we do at
 least one set of obs per day on every woman.
 In our unit,we do not gain a numerical value from
 any machine, however, we ask the woman how she is
 feeling, we observe behaviour, we listen to the
 woman, we educate and spend time with mother and
 baby, we are 'with woman'!! and if there is anything
 deviating from the normal then we investigate
 further, often by doing observations, however, if
 there is no indication to do the observations, then
 I do not believe that they need to be done.  
 Four years ago, our unit progressed from being task
 orientated and medicalised, to caring for the
 individual and empowering the woman to care for
 herself.  A woman with child is not a medical
 emergency and removing routine observations is
 normalising this situation.
 I have no doubt the woman I cared for last night
 (day3, engorged breasts, tears, etc) would have an
 elevated temp, high heart rate and probably an
 elevated BP but I was already dealing with the
 problems and a set of obs would have proven NOTHING.
 
 
 I am so very angry and frustrated that I am now
 faced with a situation where I need to find some
 recent evidence based practice to support the fact
 that we do not do routine observations.  We are
 having to re-invent a wheel that has been rolling
 perfectly well for so many years (until it ran over
 an obstetric nail).
 
 If there is anyone out there who can help, please
 alert me to web sites, publications, anything!!
 
 Thanks in advance
 
 Felicity 

Find local movie times and trailers on Yahoo! Movies.
http://au.movies.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal observations

2004-12-06 Thread cummins
Dear Jen

No, the Ob has not provided anything, only that this was the practice at the
tertiary hospital from where she came from, so it MUST be right!  And where
I work, in the eyes of management, Obs are right until proven wrong and
Midwives wrong until accepted after lots of fighting.

Felicity

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal observations

2004-12-06 Thread Ceri Katrina
Hi Felicity
Try this one..

x-tad-biggerGilmour, C.  Twining, S. (2002). Postnatal care in hospitals: Ritual, routine, or individualised. Australian Journal of Midwifery 15, (2)11-15.

Katrina  :-)

(I had this for an assignment for uni and found it quite good)

/x-tad-bigger
On 07/12/2004, at 11:53 AM, cummins wrote:

Dear Jen

No, the Ob has not provided anything, only that this was the practice at the
tertiary hospital from where she came from, so it MUST be right!  And where
I work, in the eyes of management, Obs are right until proven wrong and
Midwives wrong until accepted after lots of fighting.

Felicity

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au> to subscribe or unsubscribe.



[ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations

2004-11-16 Thread Melanie Jane Dunstan
Hello Everyone
Wondering If I can tap into your minds of wisdom.
We are currently fighting with a registrar at work regarding post natal 
observations. At present if a woman has had a normal vaginal birth with no 
complications either antenatally or during the birth we do not routinely 
take BP, P or Temps.

The registrar does not quite like this idea and is trying to change our 
practice as she feels that things might be missed and that birth has a huge 
impact on a woman's health.

We have argued the point that these women are well women and that if they 
feel unwell we would then take observations.

I guess I am wondering what the practice elsewhere is and if there is any 
evidence to support our practice

Thanks
Melanie Dunstan 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations

2004-11-16 Thread shaz42
Iam currently on the postnatal ward at the wch in adelaide and the postnatal
obs they do there are 4/24 for the first 24 hours then bd  then daily of tpr
and bp followed by ususal postnatal checks of the woman. you can find the
protocol under the s a governements protocol.
- Original Message - 
From: Melanie Jane Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations


 Hello Everyone

 Wondering If I can tap into your minds of wisdom.

 We are currently fighting with a registrar at work regarding post natal
 observations. At present if a woman has had a normal vaginal birth with no
 complications either antenatally or during the birth we do not routinely
 take BP, P or Temps.

 The registrar does not quite like this idea and is trying to change our
 practice as she feels that things might be missed and that birth has a
huge
 impact on a woman's health.

 We have argued the point that these women are well women and that if they
 feel unwell we would then take observations.

 I guess I am wondering what the practice elsewhere is and if there is any
 evidence to support our practice

 Thanks

 Melanie Dunstan


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations

2004-11-16 Thread Tania Laurie
I'm a BMid student at UniSA so I don't have any practice info to give you
but I do know that routine measurement of temp, pulse, BP and fundal height
are in table 5 of  'A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth' -
meaning it is a form of care unlikely to be beneficial.

Tania


- Original Message - 
From: Melanie Jane Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations


 Hello Everyone

 Wondering If I can tap into your minds of wisdom.

 We are currently fighting with a registrar at work regarding post natal
 observations. At present if a woman has had a normal vaginal birth with no
 complications either antenatally or during the birth we do not routinely
 take BP, P or Temps.

 The registrar does not quite like this idea and is trying to change our
 practice as she feels that things might be missed and that birth has a
huge
 impact on a woman's health.

 We have argued the point that these women are well women and that if they
 feel unwell we would then take observations.

 I guess I am wondering what the practice elsewhere is and if there is any
 evidence to support our practice

 Thanks

 Melanie Dunstan


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


RE: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations

2004-11-16 Thread B G
Are these healthy women actually woken up for obs during the night! That
is ridiculous. 

We do daily T, P and only do the BP if elevated antenatally or in Birth
Suite and then it may only be daily. If she required IOL for BP then she
may be on TDS BP never at night. After the first 24 hours of a LSCS same
obs. As for fundal heights we teach the women to monitor themselves and
we record it daily, PV loss they tell us. If the woman expresses concern
such as a sore peri we ask if they want us to look at it, if they do
fine if they don't then that is fine too. After all these women are
going home so soon they should know when they are well or unwell if they
are empowered with some knowledge before they leave. Birth is not an
illness!
Cheers Barb

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shaz42
Sent: Wednesday, 17 November 2004 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations


Iam currently on the postnatal ward at the wch in adelaide and the
postnatal obs they do there are 4/24 for the first 24 hours then bd
then daily of tpr and bp followed by ususal postnatal checks of the
woman. you can find the protocol under the s a governements protocol.
- Original Message - 
From: Melanie Jane Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:02 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations


 Hello Everyone

 Wondering If I can tap into your minds of wisdom.

 We are currently fighting with a registrar at work regarding post 
 natal observations. At present if a woman has had a normal vaginal 
 birth with no complications either antenatally or during the birth we 
 do not routinely take BP, P or Temps.

 The registrar does not quite like this idea and is trying to change 
 our practice as she feels that things might be missed and that birth 
 has a
huge
 impact on a woman's health.

 We have argued the point that these women are well women and that if 
 they feel unwell we would then take observations.

 I guess I am wondering what the practice elsewhere is and if there is 
 any evidence to support our practice

 Thanks

 Melanie Dunstan


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.784 / Virus Database: 530 - Release Date: 10/27/2004
 

--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


Re: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations

2004-11-16 Thread Nicole Carver
Hi Melanie,
At my workplace we do temperature and pulse twice a day, BP only if they
have a history of hypertension in their pregnancy. I don't know if it is
evidence based.
Nicole C

- Original Message - 
From: Melanie Jane Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 4:32 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] Postnatal Observations


 Hello Everyone

 Wondering If I can tap into your minds of wisdom.

 We are currently fighting with a registrar at work regarding post natal
 observations. At present if a woman has had a normal vaginal birth with no
 complications either antenatally or during the birth we do not routinely
 take BP, P or Temps.

 The registrar does not quite like this idea and is trying to change our
 practice as she feels that things might be missed and that birth has a
huge
 impact on a woman's health.

 We have argued the point that these women are well women and that if they
 feel unwell we would then take observations.

 I guess I am wondering what the practice elsewhere is and if there is any
 evidence to support our practice

 Thanks

 Melanie Dunstan


 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.