RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on Website

2006-08-31 Thread robertaquinn
I disagree strongly with this section of the RWH website (below). I think many 
women who birth without pain relief are dismissed as having been lucky to 
have had an easy labour. Women who birth naturally are often not credited 
with managing their own pain and are not recognised as having informed 
themselves to labour in less pain-causing ways in the first place. It's as if 
pain is something that can be objectively measured and only managed with 
medical intervention.

 - Original Message -
 and
 if they manage to achieve delivery without any form of pain relief, they
 receive some mythical 'badge of honour'.
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.


[ozmidwifery] RE: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on Website

2006-08-30 Thread Kelly @ BellyBelly








Gosh it gets worse



The
options available for pain relief during labour have increased dramatically
since that time but it has only been in the second half of this century that
they have been made readily available for women. The reality is that about 2 thirds
of normal, healthy pregnant women suffer severe or intolerable pain during
labour, and only about 2% of women are fortunate enough to describe little or
no discomfort. However, despite this many women are still made to feel guilty
or inadequate if they ask for pain relief, and if they manage to achieve
delivery without any form of pain relief, they receive some mythical 'badge of
honour'. In no other situation would anyone deliberately allow someone to
suffer so severely for so long without attempting to relieve their pain. It is,
of course, always the expectant mother's decision as to whether she will have
anything during labour, but this can only be done in an informed fashion if she
has been told her options and the pros and cons of each before she goes into labour.





Best Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Creator, BellyBelly.com.au 
Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
BellyBelly Birth Support
- http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support











From: Kelly @
BellyBelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006
9:44 PM
To: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'
Subject: RWH - Pain Relief Comment
on Website





I found this on the RWH website  in the section about
the cons of epidurals:



6. Some people believe that epidurals may increase
the duration of labour, or increase the likelihood of needing forceps or a
Caesarean section. The evidence for or against this belief is very
controversial. It is almost impossible to do unbiased studies to confirm or
deny this belief. Women who have excessive pain and ask for an epidural may be
the ones with bigger babies or smaller pelvises and thus be more likely to need
forceps or a Caesarean section anyway. In addition, even if labour is
prolonged, is it better to have a 9 hour labour in agony, or a 13 hour labour
in relative comfort (as long as the baby and mother are monitored and both are
well)? I would suspect the latter.



In conclusion I think it is important to stress that
no-one can predict how they will feel during labour, and some labours are far
more painful than others. Women who ask for pain relief during labour should
not be made to feel guilty or inadequate, as if they have failed, but rather
reassured and given the pain relief they require. The attitude of '...no,
you'll be fine...let's hold of for a few more hours and see how you go...' is
no longer appropriate unless the baby is about to pop out any second.



Eck. Love their choice of wording too.



http://www.rwh.org.au/rwhanaes/whatis.cfm?doc_id=2392

Best
Regards,

Kelly Zantey
Creator, BellyBelly.com.au 
Gentle Solutions From Conception to Parenthood
BellyBelly Birth Support
- http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support










Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on Website

2006-08-30 Thread Janet Fraser



Given that they have a 1 in 3 c-sec 
rate and have got rid of their BC while pretending to "extend it's ethos" 
throughout the new buildings, what part of this surprises you, Kelly? The only 
thing I love about RWH is how unashamedly they promote this rubbish and how 
conveniently they put protocols and stats on their website so you can show 
consumers why not to go there.
I can barely read their crap, it 
makes me inarticulate with rage.
J

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Kelly @ 
  BellyBelly 
  To: ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au 
  
  Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 9:50 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] RE: RWH - Pain 
  Relief Comment on Website
  
  
  Gosh it gets 
  worse…
  
  “The options available for pain 
  relief during labour have increased dramatically since that time but it has 
  only been in the second half of this century that they have been made readily 
  available for women. The reality is that about 2 thirds of normal, healthy 
  pregnant women suffer severe or intolerable pain during labour, and only about 
  2% of women are fortunate enough to describe little or no discomfort. However, 
  despite this many women are still made to feel guilty or inadequate if they 
  ask for pain relief, and if they manage to achieve delivery without any form 
  of pain relief, they receive some mythical 'badge of honour'. In no other 
  situation would anyone deliberately allow someone to suffer so severely for so 
  long without attempting to relieve their pain. It is, of course, always the 
  expectant mother's decision as to whether she will have anything during 
  labour, but this can only be done in an informed fashion if she has been told 
  her options and the pros and cons of each before she goes into 
  labour.”
  
  
  Best 
  Regards,Kelly 
  ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au Gentle Solutions 
  From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - 
  http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  
  
  
  
  From: Kelly @ 
  BellyBelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 9:44 
  PMTo: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'Subject: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on 
  Website
  
  I found this on the RWH website – 
  in the section about the con’s of epidurals:
  
  “6. Some people believe that 
  epidurals may increase the duration of labour, or increase the likelihood of 
  needing forceps or a Caesarean section. The evidence for or against this 
  belief is very controversial. It is almost impossible to do unbiased studies 
  to confirm or deny this belief. Women who have excessive pain and ask for an 
  epidural may be the ones with bigger babies or smaller pelvises and thus be 
  more likely to need forceps or a Caesarean section anyway. In addition, even 
  if labour is prolonged, is it better to have a 9 hour labour in agony, or a 13 
  hour labour in relative comfort (as long as the baby and mother are monitored 
  and both are well)? I would suspect the latter.
  
  In conclusion I think it is 
  important to stress that no-one can predict how they will feel during labour, 
  and some labours are far more painful than others. Women who ask for pain 
  relief during labour should not be made to feel guilty or inadequate, as if 
  they have failed, but rather reassured and given the pain relief they require. 
  The attitude of '...no, you'll be fine...let's hold of for a few more hours 
  and see how you go...' is no longer appropriate unless the baby is about to 
  pop out any second.”
  
  Eck. Love their choice of wording 
  too.
  
  http://www.rwh.org.au/rwhanaes/whatis.cfm?doc_id=2392
  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, 
  BellyBelly.com.au 
  Gentle 
  Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth 
  Support - 
  http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support
  


Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on Website

2006-08-30 Thread Michelle Windsor
This reminds me of what a woman was told in private antenatal classes that rating pain from 1 to 10 with 10 the worst pain you can imagine, then labour will probably sit at about 20. How's thatfor getting the adrenaline going and inhibiting endorphins! No wonder some of these women walk in at 1cm wanting an epidural.Michelle"Kelly @ BellyBelly" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Gosh it gets worse…“The options available for pain relief during labour have increased dramatically since that time but it has only been in the second half of this century that they have been made readily available for women. The reality is that about 2 thirds of normal, healthy pregnant women suffer severe or intolerable pain during labour, and only about 2% of women are fortunate
 enough to describe little or no discomfort. However, despite this many women are still made to feel guilty or inadequate if they ask for pain relief, and if they manage to achieve delivery without any form of pain relief, they receive some mythical 'badge of honour'. In no other situation would anyone deliberately allow someone to suffer so severely for so long without attempting to relieve their pain. It is, of course, always the expectant mother's decision as to whether she will have anything during labour, but this can only be done in an informed fashion if she has been told her options and the pros and cons of each before she goes into labour.”  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au Gentle Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth Support - http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support  From: Kelly @ BellyBelly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 30 August 2006 9:44 PMTo: 'ozmidwifery@acegraphics.com.au'Subject: RWH - Pain Relief Comment on WebsiteI found this on the RWH website – in the section about the con’s of epidurals:“6. Some people believe that epidurals may increase the duration of labour, or increase the likelihood of needing forceps or a Caesarean section. The evidence for or against this belief is very controversial. It is almost impossible to do unbiased studies to confirm or deny this belief. Women who have excessive pain and ask for an epidural may be the ones with bigger babies or smaller pelvises and thus be more likely to need forceps or a Caesarean section anyway. In addition, even if labour is prolonged, is it better to have a 9 hour labour in agony, or a 13 hour labour in relative comfort (as long as the baby and mother are monitored and both are well)? I would suspect the latter.In conclusion I think it is important to stress that no-one can predict how they will feel during labour, and some labours are far more painful than others. Women who ask for pain relief during labour should not be made to feel guilty or inadequate, as if they have failed, but rather reassured and given the pain relief they require. The attitude of '...no, you'll be fine...let's hold of for a few more hours and see how you go...' is no longer appropriate unless the baby is about to pop out any second.”Eck. Love their choice of wording too.http://www.rwh.org.au/rwhanaes/whatis.cfm?doc_id=2392  Best Regards,Kelly ZanteyCreator, BellyBelly.com.au Gentle Solutions From Conception to ParenthoodBellyBelly Birth Support -
 http://www.bellybelly.com.au/birth-support   
		Do you Yahoo!?  
 
Take part in Total Girl’s Ultimate Slumber Party and help break a world record