Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: language

2002-09-21 Thread Rowena Woolnough



Dear Carolyn,
Tried to open the site you sent me 
for the article on language but only got a site trying to promote and sell 
something. Not sure if I was doing something wrong or what. Really 
want to reasd the article sp could you guide me to it again.
Thanks
Rowena

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Heartlogic 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 11:52 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: language 
  
  
  Hey Rowena and Veronica, you 
  two are amazing! So wonderful to see such courage and willingness to 
  learn, explore and stand up for women's psychological and emotional 
  space! I agree, it is daunting to post to the list. I always 
  wonder how what I say will be interpreted. Woman friendly language 
  is a challenge. For the more senior midwives from the old school (and 
  I'm one of them) it is a big deal to shift from saying 'deliver' and 
  'delivery' to "helping/assisting" and "birth", To change our language is a 
  paradigm and power shift as well as a shift in terminology and we all know 
  what creatures of habit we humans are! Doesn't it also show you 
  Veronica, how arrogant we humans can become when we don't think we need to 
  read and update ourselves on what's going on in the big wide world? The 
  fact that three out of the four said 
  what's that? about VBAC says 
  something. And thelaughing indicates their discomfortat not 
  knowing. The important thing in life is to be a continual learner, to 
  always know there is more to learn and each woman teaches us something 
  different, something new. Our colleagues do too, each one teaches us 
  something, even if it is how not to be :-) 
  
  
  It's interesting how people 
  dismiss the idea of language being important, but whole worlds of ideology, 
  philosphy and ethics are bound in words...
  
  Some ideas on language, for 
  example...
  
  Calling women 'girls' 
  diminishes women, think about the stereotype of what a 'girl' is, and you get 
  the idea.
  
  Calling women 'ladies' 
  - ladies wear pearls and twinsets and sit with their legs together, 
  don't yell and are polite at all times. Ladies can't give birth. Birth 
  is wild and naked and raw, it is on the sexual continuum and is out of control 
  :-) not ladylike at all.( Wild gutsy ) Women give birth. 
  
  
  Saying "I had a delivery or I 
  had a birth or I had three babies last night etc" is power based 
  language...who has the power here? WHO gave birth??
  
  I could go on... I have some 
  great references for you if you want, I wrote a paper on language and I can 
  email it to you, let me know your email address and I will send it. 
  
  
  Thank you both for 
  contributing and letting us know what you are learning/experiencing and being 
  willing to ride the waves of a changing system. We need 
  you.
  
  warmly, Carolyn 
  Hastie
  
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Veronica 
HerbertSent: Sunday, 15 September 2002 10:53 PMTo: 
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: 
language 
Dear Carol, 
Thank you so much. What you say is so true. I 
have a great passion for midwifery and I learn a lot from the discussions on 
here. My lecturers at my Uni are always making sure we are using 'womanly 
language' and we are always getting picked up on what we say (isn't that right Kerry!!!). But, when we go into 
our clinical setting it is a different matter. The other day at 
handover I said a woman had had a "VBAC" instead of "Trial of scar". 
And3 of the4 midwives said "What do you mean?, what is that?" 
and I tried to explain thattrial of scarwas disempowering to 
women and that it was setting them up for failure. The 4th midwife who knew 
what it meant said "It's one of those new words they learn out at Uni"and 
they basically laughed at me. It does take alot of courage to stand up 
and voice your opinion or even try to explain something when you are still 
learning and don't have a big knowledge base.For me, I only did my 
graduate year of nursing last year, I started Midwifery in February and I 
will be finished (hopefully) somewhere around the end of October. I 
have had 8 months of learning a whole new profession. 

from Veronica Herbert
(Midwifery Student, University of Ballarat).

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Carol Thorogood 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  
  Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 7:33 
  PM
  Subject: [ozmidwifery] RE: language 
  
  Dear allI know how important it is to use 'womanly 
  language' and how using terms such as deliveries and LUSCs to describe 
  women can be disempowering. But, please can I also suggest that when we 
  'correct' others' mistakes especially 

RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: language

2002-09-21 Thread Heartlogic



Hi Rowena, can you please send 
me your email address again and I'll send the articleto you. I am sending 
it by attachment, it is not on a site. My email address is 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

I can't access your email 
address from the list, warmly, Carolyn 

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowena 
  WoolnoughSent: Sunday, 22 September 2002 2:49 PMTo: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: 
  language 
  Dear Carolyn,
  Tried to open the site you sent me 
  for the article on language but only got a site trying to promote and sell 
  something. Not sure if I was doing something wrong or what. Really 
  want to reasd the article sp could you guide me to it again.
  Thanks
  Rowena
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Heartlogic 
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 11:52 
PM
Subject: RE: [ozmidwifery] RE: language 


Hey Rowena and Veronica, 
you two are amazing! So wonderful to see such courage and willingness 
to learn, explore and stand up for women's psychological and emotional 
space! I agree, it is daunting to post to the list. I always 
wonder how what I say will be interpreted. Woman friendly 
language is a challenge. For the more senior midwives from the old 
school (and I'm one of them) it is a big deal to shift from saying 'deliver' 
and 'delivery' to "helping/assisting" and "birth", To change our language is 
a paradigm and power shift as well as a shift in terminology and we all know 
what creatures of habit we humans are! Doesn't it also show you 
Veronica, how arrogant we humans can become when we don't think we need to 
read and update ourselves on what's going on in the big wide world? 
The fact that three out of the four said 
what's that? about VBAC 
says something. And thelaughing indicates their 
discomfortat not knowing. The important thing in life is to be a 
continual learner, to always know there is more to learn and each woman 
teaches us something different, something new. Our colleagues do too, 
each one teaches us something, even if it is how not to be 
:-) 

It's interesting how people 
dismiss the idea of language being important, but whole worlds of ideology, 
philosphy and ethics are bound in words...

Some ideas on language, for 
example...

Calling women 'girls' 
diminishes women, think about the stereotype of what a 'girl' is, and you 
get the idea.

Calling women 
'ladies' - ladies wear pearls and twinsets and sit with their 
legs together, don't yell and are polite at all times. Ladies can't give 
birth. Birth is wild and naked and raw, it is on the sexual continuum 
and is out of control :-) not ladylike at all.( Wild gutsy 
) Women give birth. 

Saying "I had a delivery or 
I had a birth or I had three babies last night etc" is power based 
language...who has the power here? WHO gave birth??

I could go on... I have 
some great references for you if you want, I wrote a paper on language and I 
can email it to you, let me know your email address and I will send it. 


Thank you both for 
contributing and letting us know what you are learning/experiencing and 
being willing to ride the waves of a changing system. We need 
you.

warmly, Carolyn 
Hastie

  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Veronica 
  HerbertSent: Sunday, 15 September 2002 10:53 PMTo: 
      [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: 
  language 
  Dear Carol, 
  Thank you so much. What you say is so true. 
  I have a great passion for midwifery and I learn a lot from the 
  discussions on here. My lecturers at my Uni are always making sure we are 
  using 'womanly language' and we are always getting picked up on what we 
  say (isn't that right Kerry!!!). But, 
  when we go into our clinical setting it is a different matter. The 
  other day at handover I said a woman had had a "VBAC" instead of "Trial of 
  scar". And3 of the4 midwives said "What do you mean?, 
  what is that?" and I tried to explain thattrial of scarwas 
  disempowering to women and that it was setting them up for failure. The 
  4th midwife who knew what it meant said "It's one of those new words they 
  learn out at Uni"and they basically laughed at me. It does take alot 
  of courage to stand up and voice your opinion or even try to explain 
  something when you are still learning and don't have a big knowledge 
  base.For me, I only did my graduate year of nursing last year, I 
  started Midwifery in February and I will be finished (hopefully) somew

Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: language

2002-09-20 Thread Ann green

Dear List,
What I read many years ago was that it was a pig
castrator that did the c/section .He was successful
because he knew the importace of sterilising
instruments.(long before drs. knew this)Ann --- Jo 
Dean Bainbridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  you
would be amazed how many midwives do not know
 the tern vbac.  Many still
 call it 'trail of scar'.  The power of the word is
 truly astounding.  We
 have many women who still believe that once a
 section always a cs, that was
 disproven in 1913.  I read once that one of the
 first recorded cs was in 16
 something and it was done by the farmer.  His wife
 went on to have four more
 babies.  I am not sure of the truth, but it was on a
 web site called the
 history of obstetrics.  BUT it makes for an
 interesting point if it is
 true...vbac was safe  400 years ago, but not
 toady.
 Jo Bainbridge
 founding member CARES SA
 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 phone: 08 8388 6918
 birth with trust, faith  love...
 - Original Message -
 From: Ann green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 12:31 PM
 Subject: Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: language
 
 
  Dear List,
  VBAC was a term used in the early 1980's .That is
 22
  years.So that is not that new unless the persons
  concerned where trained pre-1980!If someone has
 not
  done any updating since 1980 I am concerned as a
 consumer.Ann---
 
  __
  Do You Yahoo!?
  Everything you'll ever need on one web page
  from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
  http://uk.my.yahoo.com
  --
  This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
  Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe
 or unsubscribe.
 
 
 --
 This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
 Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe
 or unsubscribe. 

__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
--
This mailing list is sponsored by ACE Graphics.
Visit http://www.acegraphics.com.au to subscribe or unsubscribe.



Re: [ozmidwifery] RE: language

2002-09-16 Thread Andrea Quanchi
Don't worry Veronica this just shows their ignorance but be proud of yourself because  there are three more people who know what it means and they will think about it every time they choose to say TOS or will eventually start saying VBAC.  Even though people make disparaging remarks or pull faces when you correct them keep at it that's what I do.  For example every time I here someone use a term I don't agree with I just say the woman friendly one I prefer and nothing else. It doesn't hold up the converstaion but gets the point across just the same. Eventually most people  change the words because they to want to but the old ones are so embedded it takes a long time to suppress them. Those 'midwives' who truly don't care will never change and if they take a dislike to you then its good you know who they are as you don't want to be learning what they have to teach anyway. Think of it as a warning system.

Andrea Quanchi  
On Sunday, September 15, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Veronica Herbert wrote:

Dear Carol,
Thank you so much.  What you say is so true.  I have a great passion for midwifery and I learn a lot from the discussions on here. My lecturers at my Uni are always making sure we are using 'womanly language' and we are always getting picked up on what we say (isn't that right Kerry!!!).  But, when we go into our clinical setting it is a different matter.  The other day at handover I said a woman had had a "VBAC" instead of "Trial of scar".  And 3 of the 4 midwives said "What do you mean?, what is that?" and I tried to explain that trial of scar was disempowering to women and that it was setting them up for failure. The 4th midwife who knew what it meant said "It's one of those new words they learn out at Uni"and they basically laughed at me.  It does take alot of courage to stand up and voice your opinion or even try to explain something when you are still learning and don't have a big knowledge base. For me, I only did my graduate year of nursing last year, I started Midwifery in February and I will be finished (hopefully) somewhere around the end of October.  I have had 8 months of learning a whole new profession. 
 
from Veronica Herbert
(Midwifery Student, University of Ballarat).

- Original Message -
From: Carol Thorogood
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 15, 2002 7:33 PM
Subject: [ozmidwifery] RE: language

Dear all
I know how important it is to use 'womanly language' and how using terms such as deliveries and LUSCs to describe women can be disempowering. But, please can I also suggest that when we 'correct' others' mistakes especially if they are inadvertently made by midwifery students that we do it gently and don't disempower them!  I am thrilled to bits when midwifery students  take part in discussions 'cause it takes lots of courage to come on line and voice their opinions.  So please  for those who haven't yet had the opportunity to learn woman-friendly language allthe time can we demystify it for them in respectful ways? Perhaps a private e-mail saying why it's not a good idea to use the phrase conducting deliveries or whatever is a more constructive way to make the point rather than a public rebuke which probably inhibits other students from having a say in case they 'offend' someone. If the students don't speak then we can not learn from them or be moved by their passion for midwifery.

Carol (who is always slipping up).





Carol Thorogood

Visiting Midwifery Scholar
School of Nursing and Midwifery
Flinders University, Adelaide, 5001

Telephone: 08 8201 3924
Fax:   08 8201 3410