[Bug 711893] Review Request: rubygem-dnsruby - Ruby DNS(SEC) implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711893 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 03:17:45 EDT --- rubygem-dnsruby-1.52-3.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739997] Review Request: undertaker - Find always-on and always-off conditional C code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739997 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 03:21:47 EDT --- undertaker-1.2-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554464] Review Request: python-pebl - Python Environment for Bayesian Learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 03:24:13 EDT --- python-pebl-1.0.2-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pebl-1.0.2-7.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 554464] Review Request: python-pebl - Python Environment for Bayesian Learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=554464 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704112] Review Request: recutils - A set of tools to access GNU recfile databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704112 --- Comment #7 from Daiki Ueno du...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 03:26:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) recutils-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/librec.so.0.0.0 _exit@GLIBC_2.2.5 [...] Can these be corrected? If so, is it upstreamable? I think some of them could be easily corrected and upstreamable, but not entirely, for some reason: - some exit() call are in the code generated by flex - other exit() calls are in libgnu (gnulib), maintained in a separate upstream project For the time being I addressed the easy part only. Will ask the upstream later. recutils-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Not much to include here. I merged -libs subpackage into the base package, so this warning should be removed now. Spec URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/recutils/recutils.spec SRPM URL: http://ueno.fedorapeople.org/recutils/recutils-1.3-4.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730314] Review Request: jboss-invocation - JBoss Invocation API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730314 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||akurt...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 04:21:47 EDT --- Still blocked by Legal for some reason? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 04:22:22 EDT --- Thanks for review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xnio Short Description: JBoss XNIO Owners:goldmann -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 04:30:56 EDT --- Looks ok now, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736516] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736516 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2011-10-18 04:38:50 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 04:38:50 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=267863 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736516] Review Request: xml-security - Implementation of W3C security standards for XML
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736516 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #20 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 04:52:41 EDT --- Orion, still interested? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: PDFCrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gre...@freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Gregor Tätzner gre...@freenet.de 2011-10-18 06:21:07 EDT --- I think the removal of the deprecated rpm tags was a mistake because your package should work on EPEL, too (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL) please format the bindir macro in %files and use name macro also you should include changelog in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 06:41:51 EDT --- Thank you! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-mg Short Description: Minimalist way to build and publish gems using Rake. Also build tarballs Owners: mcpierce Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: mcpierce -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 648099] Review Request: ghc-http-enumerator - Haskell http-enumerator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648099 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||746942 Bug 648099 depends on bug 740283, which changed state. Bug 740283 Summary: Review Request: ghc-attoparsec-enumerator - Haskell attoparsec to enumerator library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740283 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 736577] Review Request: ghc-snap-core - Snap web framework core library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736577 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||746942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630300] Review Request: ghc-wai-extra - Provides some basic WAI handlers and middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630300 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||746942 Bug 630300 depends on bug 736602, which changed state. Bug 736602 Summary: Review Request: ghc-wai - Web Application Interface library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736602 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 630303] Review Request: yesod - Creation of type-safe, RESTful web applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630303 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||746942 Bug 630303 depends on bug 648250, which changed state. Bug 648250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xss-sanitize - Sanitize untrusted HTML to prevent XSS attacks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648250 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746942] Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator - Enumeratees for conversion of builders to bytestrings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746942 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-haskell-list@redhat. ||com Blocks||736577(ghc-snap-core), ||630300(ghc-wai-extra), ||630303(yesod), ||648099(ghc-http-enumerator) Status Whiteboard||Ready -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746942] New: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator - Enumeratees for conversion of builders to bytestrings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator - Enumeratees for conversion of builders to bytestrings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746942 Summary: Review Request: ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator - Enumeratees for conversion of builders to bytestrings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator/ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator/ghc-blaze-builder-enumerator-0.2.0.2-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Integration of the builders from the blaze-builder package with the enumerator package. It provides infrastructure and enumeratees for incrementally executing builders and pass the filled chunks to a bytestring iteratee. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3439434 This is needed by snap-core-0.5.5 and wai-extra (and also http-enumerator and hence yesod). http://packdeps.haskellers.com/reverse/blaze-builder-enumerator -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739856] Review Request: opendbx - abstraction library for database access in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856 Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739856] Review Request: opendbx - abstraction library for database access in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856 --- Comment #20 from Martin Preisler mprei...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 07:04:38 EDT --- I have dropped % from the changelog. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: opendbx Short Description: Lightweight but extensible database access library written in C Owners: mpreisle Branches: f16 el6 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031
--- Comment #4 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 07:58:23 EDT ---
Works good on an F16 system. It was failing on my f15 box since rubygem-rdoc
is not available there. Does 'rubygem-rdoc' need to be a BuildRequires?
No since rubygem-rdoc is just needed to build the sources and the BuildRequires
are used to specify the dependencies required to build the package given the
sources.
Some additional comments from a rubygem review that vondruck performed
previously ...
* Please execute test suite if available upstream.
A bit tricky in our case since the test suite contains the tests for
rubygem-aeolus-image and rubygem-aeolus-cli (seperate packages).
This is not a blocker correct?
* I would suggest to move following files into -doc subpackage:
%{geminstdir}/Gemfile
%{geminstdir}/Rakefile
%doc %{geminstdir}/minitest
%doc %{geminstdir}/test
%doc %{geminstdir}/spec
%doc %{geminstdir}/%{gemname}.gemspec
%doc %{geminstdir}/CHANGELOG.md
%doc %{geminstdir}/Guardfile
Again this is a suggestion and isn't a blocker correct? (any more blockers for
approval?). Either way is correct according to the guidelines (%doc macro or
doc subpackage) and this can easily be done at any point in the future.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728460] Review Request: xnio - JBoss XNIO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728460 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 08:13:03 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 08:13:33 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 08:14:33 EDT --- Awesome, thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: findthatword Short Description: A word search maker Owners: limb Branches: f16 f15 EL-6 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 08:15:36 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739856] Review Request: opendbx - abstraction library for database access in C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739856 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 08:14:17 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 James Laska jla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from James Laska jla...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 08:29:41 EDT --- Correct, just suggestions carried forward from another rubygem review request. Completely up to you to implement. For now though ... I approve this package and assert that it meets the Fedora packaging guidelines. Enjoy! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728956] Review Request: php-virt-control - PHP-based virtual machine controller tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) --- Comment #24 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 08:42:50 EDT --- Ok, after thinking about this and having the facts already mentioned I don't like the idea of renaming upstream however it should be fine both parties to change the Fedora name to web-virt-control so I have to ask you whether is that fine with you. Thanks, Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728956] Review Request: php-virt-control - PHP-based virtual machine controller tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(tm...@redhat.com) | --- Comment #25 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 08:53:05 EDT --- I do not think it makes sense to rename the Fedora package if upstream stays at the php-virt-control name. Strictly said the name as it is does not break the Fedora naming guidelines so there is no requirement for it to be changed to pass the Fedora review. It was just my suggestion to you to rename it upstream to fulfil the wish of the PHP upstream and to make the name more descriptive. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 09:03:30 EDT --- rubygem-mg-0.0.8-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mg-0.0.8-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728956] Review Request: php-virt-control - PHP-based virtual machine controller tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 --- Comment #26 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 09:00:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) I do not think it makes sense to rename the Fedora package if upstream stays at the php-virt-control name. Strictly said the name as it is does not break the Fedora naming guidelines so there is no requirement for it to be changed to pass the Fedora review. It was just my suggestion to you to rename it upstream to fulfil the wish of the PHP upstream and to make the name more descriptive. Tom, I know you mean it good way but considering the fact I did buy a domain on my own expenses (although hosted on Daniel's server) rendering the project my 'spare time' project I don't like the renaming. The situation would be different if I didn't have the domain bought for 5 years yet however the situation is different with me having it already bought. So is that ok to review it now or what should I do? The reason why I don't like the idea of renaming the project is already mentioned and I don't want to buy a new domain just because of the name change as the DNS record matches exactly the upstream project name. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728956] Review Request: php-virt-control - PHP-based virtual machine controller tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 --- Comment #27 from Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 09:07:01 EDT --- Yeah, the name is not blocking the review. You can keep the name as is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 704112] Review Request: recutils - A set of tools to access GNU recfile databases
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704112 Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 09:08:22 EDT --- Ok. I was going to question the utility of merging -libs in, but the size difference is negligible. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 728956] Review Request: php-virt-control - PHP-based virtual machine controller tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728956 --- Comment #28 from Michal Novotny minov...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 09:10:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) Yeah, the name is not blocking the review. You can keep the name as is. That's fine so I'll wait until somebody does the review. I see you're busy but it's OK for me to wait since I'm pretty busy these days as well. Michal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 --- Comment #6 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 09:13:01 EDT --- Thank you greatly! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-aeolus-cli Short Description: Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite Owners: mmorsi mtaylor Branches: f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] New: Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976 Summary: Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: matt_dom...@dell.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://domsch.com/fedora/python-passlib/python-passlib.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/fedora/python-passlib/python-passlib-1.5.3-1.src.rpm Description: Passlib is a password hashing library for Python 2 3, which provides cross-platform implementations of over 20 password hashing algorithms, as well as a framework for managing existing password hashes. It's designed to be useful for a wide range of tasks, from verifying a hash found in /etc/shadow, to providing full-strength password hashing for multi-user application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 588428] Review Request: rubygem-addressable - Improved URI/URL handling
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588428 --- Comment #7 from Mo Morsi mmo...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 09:28:55 EDT --- ping? Am getting regular broken dependencies emails regarding rubygem-webmock. Again appreciate the submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 09:42:26 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). mtaylor is not a valid FAS account, correct account may be added in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 09:48:53 EDT --- findthatword-0.1-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findthatword-0.1-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 09:49:09 EDT --- findthatword-0.1-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findthatword-0.1-2.el5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 09:49:01 EDT --- findthatword-0.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findthatword-0.1-2.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746520] Review Request: findthatword - A word search maker
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746520 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 09:49:16 EDT --- findthatword-0.1-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findthatword-0.1-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976 --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com 2011-10-18 10:14:17 EDT --- domsch.com is horked, so I put them at http://mdomsch.fedorapeople.org/python-passlib/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 10:21:06 EDT --- rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.1.0-5.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.1.0-5.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746031] Review Request: rubygem-aeolus-cli - Command-line interface for working with the Aeolus cloud suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746031 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Tomas Radej tra...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2011-10-18 10:32:49 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745296] Review Request: drupal7-context - Allows you to manage contextual conditions and reactions of your site
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745296 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745305] Review Request: drupal7-entity - Extends the entity API to provide a unified way to deal with entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745305 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745314] Review Request: drupal7-i18n - modules to extend Drupal core multilingual capabilities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745314 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745311] Review Request: drupal7-fivestar - The Fivestar voting module adds a clean attractive voting widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745311 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745295] Review Request: drupal7-chosen - Uses the Chosen jQuery plugin to make your elements more user-friendly
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745295 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745306] Review Request: drupal7-eva - Eva allows the output of a View to be attached to content of entities
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745306 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745308] Review Request: drupal7-field_permissions - A replacement for the Content Permissions module shipped with CCK
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745308 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745291] Review Request: drupal7-active_tags - adds a taxonomy widget with a new jQuery enabled tag entry widget
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745291 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745309] Review Request: drupal7-votingapi - Drupal Standardized API and schema for storing, retrieving, and tabulating votes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745309 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745313] Review Request: drupal7-variable - Variable module provides a registry for meta-data about Drupal variables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745313 Peter Borsa peter.bo...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976 --- Comment #2 from Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu 2011-10-18 10:57:24 EDT --- The spec file is missing a BuildRequires of python-setuptools. With that change it does build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747008] New: Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747008 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-advanced_help - Allows module developers to store their help outside the module system in html Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-advanced_help.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm Description: The advanced help module allows module developers to store their help outside the module system, in pure .html files. The files can be easily translated simply by copying them into the right translations directory. The entire system can appear in a pop-up or not as the module prefers. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal7-advanced_help.spec ../SRPMS/drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.noarch.rpm drupal7-advanced_help.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml drupal7-advanced_help.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml drupal7-advanced_help.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml drupal7-advanced_help.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US html - HTML, ht ml, ht-ml 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3440261 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3440261 build (dist-f15, drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3440261 build (dist-f15, drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm): free - open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440262 buildArch (drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3440262 buildArch (drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440262 buildArch (drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3440261 build (dist-f15, drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3440261 build (dist-f15, drupal7-advanced_help-1.0-0.1.beta1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712567] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance - the ambiance gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712567 --- Comment #11 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-10-18 11:06:10 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976 --- Comment #3 from Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu 2011-10-18 11:06:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.princeton.edu/~knight/fedora/python-passlib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.princeton.edu/~knight/fedora/python-passlib-1.5.3-1.src.rpm rpmlint output: http://www.princeton.edu/~knight/fedora/rpmlint.txt Only change was the addition of the BuildRequires and rerunning rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712567] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance - the ambiance gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712567 Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Tim Lauridsen t...@rasmil.dk 2011-10-18 11:10:36 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance Short Description: ambiance theme for gnome-shell Owners: timlau Branches: f15 f16 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 702987] Review Request: stdair - C++ Standard Airline IT Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=702987 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 11:15:12 EDT --- stdair-0.43.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stdair-0.43.1-1.el6 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747018] New: Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747018 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-calendar - This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-calendar.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module will display any Views date field in calendar formats, including CCK date fields, Event module event fields, node created or updated dates, etc. Switch between year, month, and day views. Back and next navigation is provided for all views. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal7-calendar.spec ../SRPMS/drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3440310 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3440310 build (dist-f15, drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm): free 3440310 build (dist-f15, drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm): free - open (ppc12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440313 buildArch (drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440313 buildArch (drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3440310 build (dist-f15, drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm): open (ppc12.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3440310 build (dist-f15, drupal7-calendar-3.0-0.1.alpha1.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 712567] Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-ambiance - the ambiance gnome-shell theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712567 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:18:01 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 529441] Review Request: pdfbox - Java PDF library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=529441 --- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com 2011-10-18 11:44:16 EDT --- Somewhat, just very low priority. If someone else wants to take this on I'd be more than happy. I have an initial pcfi package here: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pcfi.spec http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/pcfi-2010.08.09-1.fc15.src.rpm Not sure what state it is in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:55:48 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:58:51 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226157] Merge Review: module-init-tools
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226157 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:58:36 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:58:18 EDT --- I still see 2.x. Any ETA? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226342] Merge Review: python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226342 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 11:55:29 EDT --- Where are we on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747035] New: Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747035 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-views_bulk_operations - This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-views_bulk_operations.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module augments Views by allowing bulk operations to be executed on the nodes displayed by a view. It does so by showing a check box in front of each node, and adding a select box containing operations that can be applied on the selected nodes. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal7-views_bulk_operations.spec ../SRPMS/drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3440660 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3440660 build (dist-f15, drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm): free 3440660 build (dist-f15, drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm): free - open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440729 buildArch (drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free 3440729 buildArch (drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): free - open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440729 buildArch (drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-06.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3440660 build (dist-f15, drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-13.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3440660 build (dist-f15, drupal7-views_bulk_operations-3.0-0.1.beta3.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mar...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 12:00:52 EDT
---
Robert's version looks good to me. rpmlint passes, packaging looks sane.
Licensing is correct. Installs fine and sample code from docs on website works.
I'd like to see these 3 minor things fixed up before or after importing:
1. Let's do what the comment says:
# Remove CFLAGS=... for noarch packages (unneeded)
2. Don't need 'rm -rf %{buildroot}' in %install:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
3. Don't need to define %{python_sitelib} anymore:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Macros
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747043] New: Review Request: drupal7-entity - This module extends the entity API of Drupal core
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drupal7-entity - This module extends the entity API of Drupal core https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747043 Summary: Review Request: drupal7-entity - This module extends the entity API of Drupal core Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: peter.bo...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-entity.spec SRPM URL: http://asrob.fedorapeople.org/SOURCES/drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm Description: This module extends the entity API of Drupal core in order to provide a unified way to deal with entities and their properties. Additionally, it provides an entity CRUD controller, which helps simplifying the creation of new entity types. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint drupal7-entity.spec ../SRPMS/drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.noarch.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji output: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3440890 Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)... 3440890 build (dist-f15, drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm): free 3440890 build (dist-f15, drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm): free - open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440891 buildArch (drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) 3440891 buildArch (drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm, noarch): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed 3440890 build (dist-f15, drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm): open (x86-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) - closed 0 free 0 open 2 done 0 failed 3440890 build (dist-f15, drupal7-entity-1.0-0.1.beta10.fc15.src.rpm) completed successfully -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225626] Merge Review: brltty
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225626 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 12:09:32 EDT --- Oh. It's orphaned. And out of date. I'll look into taking it, updating, fixing, and closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225615] Merge Review: binutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225615 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-10-18 12:22:56 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: PDFCrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com 2011-10-18 12:32:43 EDT --- No. There is no requirement that packages should work on EPEL and EPEL spec can be different from the Fedora spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #22 from Elio Maldonado Batiz emald...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 12:44:42 EDT --- The upstream NSS team togther with the Mozilla team has been extremely busy with the NSS 3.13 update and I have opted not to press this at this time. This will takes the approval of both NSS and Mozilla developers and issuing notififications in the development lists. I added some comments to the bug with links to Fedora and Debian guidelines to support your request. Will add some more before I bring if up with them. NSS has cannot do anything unless it gets the buy in from the Mozilla team. NSS makes some strong commitments for binary compatibility that a change like this one could break. Having an additional bug against the Mozilla applications would help move this forward as it will get more attention. The Mozilla applications interact with NSS via xulrunner which is part of the Personal Security Manager component, aka PSM. Could I bother you with logging a paralell bug with PSM and relate the two bugs? Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747050] New: Review Request: python-postman - cli for working with Amazon SES
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-postman - cli for working with Amazon SES https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747050 Summary: Review Request: python-postman - cli for working with Amazon SES Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: brett.le...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://wakko666.fedorapeople.org/python-postman/postman.spec SRPM URL: http://wakko666.fedorapeople.org/python-postman/python-postman-0.5.2-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: I've packaged up 'postman', which is a simple CLI interface to Amazon's Simple Email Service. It is designed to help facilitate relaying emails through SES. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dw...@infradead.org Component|Package Review |0x Flag|fedora-review? |needinfo?(dougsland@redhat. ||com) --- Comment #8 from Federico Simoncelli fsimo...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 12:56:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/fsimonce/vdsm/vdsm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/fsimonce/vdsm/vdsm-4.9.0-1.gitb60414c0.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747051] New: Review Request: transmission-remote-gtk - GTK remote control for the Transmission BitTorrent client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: transmission-remote-gtk - GTK remote control for the Transmission BitTorrent client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747051 Summary: Review Request: transmission-remote-gtk - GTK remote control for the Transmission BitTorrent client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kumarpraveen.nit...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/transmission-remote-gtk/transmission-remote-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://kumarpraveen.fedorapeople.org/transmission-remote-gtk/transmission-remote-gtk-0.7-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: transmission-remote-gtk is a GTK client for remote management of the Transmission BitTorrent client, using its HTTP RPC protocol. Koji Build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3440978 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737550] Review Request: rubygem-mg - Minimal gem
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737550 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-18 13:05:34 EDT --- rubygem-mg-0.0.8-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mg-0.0.8-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|dw...@infradead.org | Component|0x |Package Review AssignedTo|dougsl...@redhat.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746976] Review Request: python-passlib - Comprehensive password hashing framework supporting over 20 schemes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746976 --- Comment #5 from Robert Knight kni...@princeton.edu 2011-10-18 13:36:37 EDT --- Corrected at the URL's in Comment 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dougsl...@redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(dougsland@redhat. | |com)| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #9 from Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com 2011-10-18 13:56:59 EDT --- Howdy Frederico, In a glance to your last SPEC modifications, I'm ok with your work now. Since you got your sponsorship from rjones, now you should ask him to formally review this work and approve it, before you can go on and ask for a Fedora SCM repository for this project. Happy Packaging! --aquini -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #10 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 14:01:37 EDT --- Hello Frederico, From my side, your package is APPROVED as well. However, as Rafael said above, now you should request a formal review from Richard Jones, after that you should go and request the Fedora SCM by raising the fedora-cvs? flag. Good work! Cheers Douglas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #11 from Douglas Schilling Landgraf dougsl...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 14:06:22 EDT --- Sorry, I meant Federico, instead of Frederico. Thanks Douglas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 Rafael Aquini aqu...@linux.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|dougsl...@redhat.com|rjo...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 700959] Review Request: TOPCOM - Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700959 --- Comment #1 from Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com 2011-10-18 14:10:40 EDT --- I have updated to version 0.17.1 and improved the man pages in a few ways. New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/TOPCOM/TOPCOM.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/TOPCOM/TOPCOM-0.17.1-1.fc15.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 745510] Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745510 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2011-10-18 14:16:20 EDT --- There's a few problems with the spec file. - '%define' should be '%global' throughout. - What was the reason for Conflicts: selinux-policy-targeted ...? Could it not be: Requires: selinux-policy-targeted = ... instead? - What's wrong with just dropping a new file into /etc/sudoers.d/? Anything in this directory is included, and it avoids the ugly %post script rewrite of sudoers. - Why is /etc/pki/vdsm/keys/libvirt_password not just a regular %config file in the %files section? In general anything that would reduce or eliminate those huge %pre/%post/%preun/%postun scripts would be a welcome change and will improve your life because you'll get fewer bug reports from unexpected user customizations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747080] New: Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080 Summary: Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juankpr...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Spec URL: http://public.juankprada.com/smb4k.spec SRPM URL: http://public.juankprada.com/smb4k-0.10.10-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Smb4K is an SMB/CIFS share browser for KDE. It uses the Samba software suite to access the SMB/CIFS shares of the local network neighborhood. Its purpose is to provide a program that's easy to use and has as many features as possible. Also, This is my first package and I would like someone to sponsor me to maintain this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747080] Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080 --- Comment #1 from Juan Camilo Prada Ojeda juankpr...@gmail.com 2011-10-18 14:18:54 EDT --- Created attachment 528860 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=528860 Sudo patch for smb4k Forgot to mention, this package includes a patch fo work around an issue with sudoers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747080] Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 747080] Review Request: smb4k - The SMB/CIFS Share Browser for KDE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747080 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997(kde-reviews) Alias||smb4k -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
