[Bug 798074] Review Request: z80dasm - Z80 Disassembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798074 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:06:19 EDT --- z80dasm-1.1.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800738] Review Request: avro - Apache Avro is a data serialization system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800738 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:04:23 EDT --- avro-1.6.2-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 791363] Review Request: perl-XML-DTDParser - Quick and dirty DTD parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791363 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:06:02 EDT --- perl-XML-DTDParser-2.01-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802037] Review Request: php-pecl-amqp - Communicate with any AMQP compliant server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802037 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:05:07 EDT --- php-pecl-amqp-1.0.1-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730234] Review Request: jboss-ejb-3.1-api - EJB 3.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730234 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:05:14 EDT --- jboss-ejb-3.1-api-1.0.2-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 684006] Review Request: perl-XML-Rules - API layer for XML::Parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684006 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:05:22 EDT --- perl-XML-Rules-1.10-7.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802929] Review Request: jboss-iiop-client - JBoss IIOP Client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802929 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:03:48 EDT --- jboss-iiop-client-1.0.0-2.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798254] Review Request: perl-Config-Validator - Schema based configuration validation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798254 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:06:31 EDT --- perl-Config-Validator-0.3-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798014] Review Request: trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin - Advanced workflow operations Trac plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798014 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:05:41 EDT --- trac-advancedticketworkflow-plugin-0.11-1.20120227svn9962.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803376] Review Request: weld-parent - Parent POM for Weld
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803376 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:04:40 EDT --- Package weld-parent-17-2.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing weld-parent-17-2.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4215/weld-parent-17-2.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 773011] Review Request: api-sanity-checker - An automatic generator of basic unit tests for a shared C/C++ library.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=773011 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:02:29 EDT --- Package api-sanity-checker-1.12.9-3.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing api-sanity-checker-1.12.9-3.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4183/api-sanity-checker-1.12.9-3.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 797945] Review Request: trac-sumfields-plugin - Sums specified fields in custom queries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=797945 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:03:28 EDT --- Package trac-sumfields-plugin-1.0.1-1.20120227svn10482.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing trac-sumfields-plugin-1.0.1-1.20120227svn10482.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4194/trac-sumfields-plugin-1.0.1-1.20120227svn10482.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 801092] Review Request: sumwars - a hack and slash role playing game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=801092 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 02:09:38 EDT --- sumwars-0.5.6-5.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804185] Review Request: python-django-tastypie - A flexible and capable API layer for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804185 Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2012-03-20 02:46:00 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-django-tastypie Short Description: A flexible and capable API layer for Django Owners: bkabrda cquad Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Vladimir Kostadinov vladimir.kostadi...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 03:12:58 EDT --- Great, thanks! *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670915] Review Request: aprsg - Amateur Radio APRS Gateway
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670915 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Elwell andrew.elw...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 03:56:33 EDT --- Thanks for feedback - will throw out an update in the next 48h or so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 791323] Review Request: jboss-remoting-jmx - JMX via JBoss Remoting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791323 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 04:04:49 EDT --- jboss-remoting-jmx-1.0.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-remoting-jmx-1.0.2-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 791323] Review Request: jboss-remoting-jmx - JMX via JBoss Remoting
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791323 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 04:02:50 EDT --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api Short Description: Interceptors 1.1 API Owners:goldmann Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 737293] Review Request: python-django - A high-level Python Web framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737293 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-03-20 04:24:41 --- Comment #31 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2012-03-20 04:24:41 EDT --- imported and built for devel. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #32 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 04:47:02 EDT --- Some minor problems: rpmlint ./adobe-source-libraries.spec ./adobe-source-libraries.spec:123: W: macro-in-%changelog %exclude) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Use '%%exclude' or 'exclude macro' in changelog. I would probably remove the 'doxyfile' from docs. I think it make only sense to pack doc/examples, doc/html, doc/templates, the other dirs are empty (contained the *.dox before) or are helpers for build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802161] Review Request: mingw-w64-tools - Supplementary tools which are part of the mingw-w64 toolchain
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802161 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802161] Review Request: mingw-w64-tools - Supplementary tools which are part of the mingw-w64 toolchain
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802161 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 04:58:49 EDT --- mingw-gdb-7.4-1.fc17, mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-4.fc17, mingw-enchant-1.6.0-5.fc17, mingw-hunspell-1.3.2-6.fc17, mingw-libxslt-1.1.26-9.fc17, mingw-gtk2-2.24.10-5.fc17, mingw-pango-1.29.5-4.fc17, mingw-glib-networking-2.31.16-3.fc17, mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-5.fc17, mingw-libidn-1.14-13.fc17, mingw-cairo-1.10.2-12.fc17, mingw-gdk-pixbuf-2.25.2-5.fc17, mingw-atkmm-2.22.6-3.fc17, mingw-gnutls-2.12.14-7.fc17, mingw-libtiff-3.9.5-7.fc17, mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.2.trunk.20120124.fc17, mingw-libsoup-2.37.90-3.fc17, mingw-fontconfig-2.8.0-7.fc17, mingw-jasper-1.900.1-19.fc17, mingw-libgcrypt-1.5.0-1.fc17, mingw-glibmm24-2.31.2-5.fc17, mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-6.fc17, mingw-atk-2.3.93-2.fc17, mingw-dbus-1.4.16-1.fc17, mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-8.fc17, mingw-sqlite-3.7.9-5.fc17, mingw-p11-kit-0.10-4.fc17, mingw-libgpg-error-1.10-1.fc17, mingw-glib2-2.31.20-2.fc17, mingw-libxml2-2.7.8-7.fc17, mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-5.fc17, mingw-openssl-1.0.0d-6.fc17, mingw-libpng-1.5.7-4.fc17, mingw-readline-5.2-12.fc17, mingw-freetype-2.4.8-5.fc17, mingw-gettext-0.18.1.1-8.fc17, mingw-zlib-1.2.5-10.fc17, mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-7.fc17, mingw-termcap-1.3.1-13.fc17, mingw-pixman-0.24.4-3.fc17, mingw-libsigc++20-2.2.10-6.fc17, mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.2.rc2.fc17, mingw-expat-2.0.1-12.fc17, mingw-bzip2-1.0.5-13.fc17, mingw-filesystem-95-8.fc17, mingw-libogg-1.1.4-7.fc17, mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-2.fc17, mingw-boost-1.48.0-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-4172/mingw-gtk3-3.3.16-2.fc17,mingw-boost-1.48.0-7.fc17,mingw-gdb-7.4-1.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-plugins-base-0.10.35-4.fc17,mingw-enchant-1.6.0-5.fc17,mingw-hunspell-1.3.2-6.fc17,mingw-libxslt-1.1.26-9.fc17,mingw-gtk2-2.24.10-5.fc17,mingw-pango-1.29.5-4.fc17,mingw-glib-networking-2.31.16-3.fc17,mingw-icu-4.8.1.1-5.fc17,mingw-libidn-1.14-13.fc17,mingw-cairo-1.10.2-12.fc17,mingw-gdk-pixbuf-2.25.2-5.fc17,mingw-atkmm-2.22.6-3.fc17,mingw-gnutls-2.12.14-7.fc17,mingw-libtiff-3.9.5-7.fc17,mingw-w64-tools-2.0.999-0.2.trunk.20120124.fc17,mingw-libsoup-2.37.90-3.fc17,mingw-fontconfig-2.8.0-7.fc17,mingw-jasper-1.900.1-19.fc17,mingw-libgcrypt-1.5.0-1.fc17,mingw-glibmm24-2.31.2-5.fc17,mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-6.fc17,mingw-atk-2.3.93-2.fc17,mingw-dbus-1.4.16-1.fc17,mingw-libjpeg-turbo-1.1.1-8.fc17,mingw-sqlite-3.7.9-5.fc17,mingw-p11-kit-0.10-4.fc17,mingw-libgpg-error-1.10-1.fc17,mingw-glib2-2.31.20-2.fc17,mingw-libxml2-2.7.8-7.fc17,mingw-libv! orbis-1.3.2-5.fc17,mingw-openssl-1.0.0d-6.fc17,mingw-libpng-1.5.7-4.fc17,mingw-readline-5.2-12.fc17,mingw-freetype-2.4.8-5.fc17,mingw-gettext-0.18.1.1-8.fc17,mingw-zlib-1.2.5-10.fc17,mingw-win-iconv-0.0.3-7.fc17,mingw-termcap-1.3.1-13.fc17,mingw-pixman-0.24.4-3.fc17,mingw-libsigc++20-2.2.10-6.fc17,mingw-libffi-3.0.11-0.2.rc2.fc17,mingw-expat-2.0.1-12.fc17,mingw-bzip2-1.0.5-13.fc17,mingw-filesystem-95-8.fc17,mingw-libogg-1.1.4-7.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746215] Review Request: perl-RT-Authen-ExternalAuth - RT Authentication using External Sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746215 --- Comment #6 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2012-03-20 05:18:30 EDT --- Hi Gabriel, sorry for late response. I will post SCM admin request today, and put you there as co-maintainer. Also update package to current 0.10 release. Would that be OK? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #33 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 05:45:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) ./adobe-source-libraries.spec:123: W: macro-in-%changelog %exclude) Fixed. And this time, I run rpmlint myself before submitting. I would probably remove the 'doxyfile' from docs. Yes, of course. Fixed I think it make only sense to pack doc/examples, doc/html, doc/templates, the other dirs are empty (contained the *.dox before) or are helpers for build process. Indeed, the html docs seems to work anyway(!) Fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #34 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 06:24:18 EDT --- Giving fedora review + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787713] Review request: free-solid - A 3D collision detection C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713 --- Comment #15 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2012-03-20 06:46:10 EDT --- Created attachment 571351 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=571351 Patch to cleanup configure.in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 787713] Review request: free-solid - A 3D collision detection C++ library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787713 Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #14 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2012-03-20 06:44:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Yes, libtool is installed, but ac_aux_dir seemingly becomes '../' on my system, while it is './' in the Mock build. I don't know a lot about m4, sadly. The cause is a combination of this package's configure.in exploiting bugs in the ancient versions of the autotools the original upstream author had used and incompatibilities of this package's configuration with libtool-2. I am going to attach a patch, which should fix this issue. Further remarks: - Upstream *.zip is called FreeSOLID = According to Fedora's package conventions, this package should be called FreeSOLID and not free-solid. - Similar wrt. the *.pc. I don't see any reason why this addition should be called free-solid.pc and not be called FreeSOLID.pc. - Why is freesolid-config removed? It's upstream's nomial config tool other packages could be relying upon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803350] Review Request: python-django-simple-captcha - Django application to add captcha images to any Django form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803350 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 06:55:36 EDT --- I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #35 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 07:07:11 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: adobe-source-libraries Short Description: General Purpose Addon C++ libs for Boost and STL Owners: leamas Branches: f15 f16 f17 rawhide InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 803350] Review Request: python-django-simple-captcha - Django application to add captcha images to any Django form
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=803350 --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 07:17:30 EDT --- - The package should probably have Requires: python-django, I guess it is not usable without it. - Another thing that puzzles me is that the locale files don't actually get installed into BUILDROOT. You should probably copy them there by hand or ask upstream if it's intentional. If the locale files get copied, you can use the macro to find them like this: %find_lang django (because locales are named django.mo). Other than that, the package looks good, so please solve these two minorities and it can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798998] Review Request: libcdr - a library for import of Corel Draw drawings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschwe...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 07:19:41 EDT --- * Release 0.0.5 fixes the licensing issues and explicitly acknowledges the tri-license in the README even. * New file src/lib/CDRColorProfiles.h uses the compatible zlib/libpng no acknowledgement license. * Please add V=1 to the Make invocation for more verbose build output. * The pkgconfig file is worse in release 0.0.5. It explicitly adds a dependency on libraries that are linked with libcdr already. In 0.0.5 it has added a dependency on lcms2 and zlib in Requires and/or Libs. Whereas libwpd* and libwpg headers are included from within libcdr headers at least (and the pkgconfig dependency can help with getting their custom include path right), relinking with lcms2 and zlib would not be necessary. * APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804980] New: Review Request: python-dingus - A record-then-assert mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-dingus - A record-then-assert mocking library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804980 Summary: Review Request: python-dingus - A record-then-assert mocking library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bkab...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/dingus/python-dingus.spec SRPM URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/dingus/python-dingus-0.3.4-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3912858 Description: A dingus is sort of like a mock object. The main difference is that you don't set up expectations ahead of time. You just run your code, using a dingus in place of another object or class, and it will record what happens to it. Then, once your code has been exercised, you can make assertions about what it did to the dingus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804980] Review Request: python-dingus - A record-then-assert mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804980 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@matthias-runge.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804980] Review Request: python-dingus - A record-then-assert mocking library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804980 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de 2012-03-20 07:28:39 EDT --- Taking this one -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 07:53:23 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #36 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 07:54:34 EDT --- Invalid branch requested, rawhide==devel and is automatically provided. Summary and SCM request package name differ, please fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804185] Review Request: python-django-tastypie - A flexible and capable API layer for Django
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804185 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 07:55:35 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798998] Review Request: libcdr - a library for import of Corel Draw drawings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 07:57:48 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libcdr Short Description: A library for import of Corel Draw drawings Owners: dtardon Branches: InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802549] Review Request: axis2 - Java-based Web Services / SOAP / WSDL engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802549 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 07:59:10 EDT --- I am taking this for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802549] Review Request: axis2 - Java-based Web Services / SOAP / WSDL engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802549
Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-20
08:14:44 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
Output of rpmlint of the source package:
$ rpmlint axis2-1.6.1-2.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
Output of rpmlint of the binary packages:
$ rpmlint axis2-1.6.1-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
axis2-javadoc-1.6.1-2.fc18.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913021
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: ASL 2.0
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: d0c09bf4b535e1b4ce22cc8cffe9a4d0
MD5SUM upstream package: d0c09bf4b535e1b4ce22cc8cffe9a4d0
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[-] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[!] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913021
=== Issues ===
1. There is no comment on why the tests are skipped.
=== Final Notes ===
I am approving, as #1 is really minor and I trust you will add that comment
before doing the first commit.
*** APPROVED ***
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #37 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 08:12:03 EDT --- Sorry, this is not completely clear to me... New Package SCM Request === Package Name: adobe-source-libraries Short Description: General purpose C++ libraries Owners: leamas Branches: f15 f16 f17 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: Adobe Source Libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #38 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 08:14:09 EDT --- Should set fedora-cvs flag as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Adobe |Review Request: |Source Libraries - General |adobe-source-libraries - |Purpose Addon for Boost and |General Purpose Addon for |STL |Boost and STL --- Comment #39 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2012-03-20 08:25:43 EDT --- Summary must match the package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #40 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 08:29:05 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 730306] Review Request: jboss-interceptors-1.1-api - Interceptors 1.1 API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730306 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 08:33:52 EDT --- jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.2-0.1.20120319git49a904.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jboss-interceptors-1.1-api-1.0.2-0.1.20120319git49a904.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 798998] Review Request: libcdr - a library for import of Corel Draw drawings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798998 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 08:51:14 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805013] New: Review Request: ecasound - Music application for multitrack audio editing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ecasound - Music application for multitrack audio editing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805013 Summary: Review Request: ecasound - Music application for multitrack audio editing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: callka...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Ecasound is a software package designed for multitrack audio processing. It can be used for simple tasks like audio playback, recording and format conversions, as well as for multitrack effect processing, mixing, recording and signal recycling. Ecasound supports a wide range of audio inputs, outputs and effect algorithms. Effects and audio objects can be combined in various ways, and their parameters can be controlled by operator objects like oscillators and MIDI-CCs. A versatile console mode user-interface is included in the package. Here is the spec and the srpm files Spec file: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/ecasound/ecasound.spec SRPM file: http://callkalpa.fedorapeople.org/ecasound/ecasound-2.8.1-1.fc16.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch --- Comment #7 from Ulrich Schwickerath ulrich.schwicker...@cern.ch 2012-03-20 08:58:51 EDT --- Hi, would it be possible to have this package for el6 as well ? It is required by rubygem-xmlparser Thanks a lot! Ulrich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800930] Review Request: redeclipse - Multiplayer FPS game based on Cube2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800930 --- Comment #34 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:10:31 EDT --- So, the rule is this: * If something is not used, but it is licensed so that it is redistributable without restrictions, it should be deleted in %prep, but can stay in the tarball. However, you are welcome to remove it from the tarball if you are already generating a modified tarball to make the SRPM smaller. * Items under licenses which are not redistributable without restrictions must not be included in the Sources. As to your question about cruft, I think it would be nice to scrape off as much as you can, but I will not block on review for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805015] New: Review Request: jboss-jts - Distributed Transaction Manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jboss-jts - Distributed Transaction Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805015 Summary: Review Request: jboss-jts - Distributed Transaction Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: juan.hernan...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 652183 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jts/4.16.2-2/jboss-jts.spec SRPM URL: http://jhernand.fedorapeople.org/rpms/jboss-jts/4.16.2-2/jboss-jts-4.16.2-2.fc18.src.rpm Description: A set of JBoss modules that fully supports ACID transactions spread across multiple resource managers and application servers. It implements a Distributed Transaction Manager (DTM) with support for two-phase commit (2PC) across XA resource managers, JBoss server instances, and CORBA OTS resources. JBossJTS implements the Java Transaction Service (JTS) and CORBA Transaction Service (OTS) specifications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790512] Review Request: jboss-ejb-client - JBoss EJB client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790512
Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-20
09:18:18 EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[?] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint jboss-ejb-client-1.0.2-1.fc18.src.rpm
jboss-ejb-client.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
jboss-ejb-client.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-ejb-client-1.0.2.Final.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These warnings are acceptable.
Can't evaluate the binary RPMs as the package doesn't build.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[!] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
The package doesn't build, apparently it is missing BuildRequires:
maven-injection-plugin.
See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913192
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: LGPLv2+
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
[-] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
Checking with a recursive diff of the sources.
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[-] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[-] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[x] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[!] Latest version is packaged.
In Mar 8 2012 a new tag 1.0.5.Final was created in the repository. Is there any
readon not to use this version?
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913192
=== Issues ===
1. In Mar 8 2012 a new tag 1.0.5.Final was created in the upstream repository.
Is there any readon not to use this
[Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 09:24:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) would it be possible to have this package for el6 as well ? I Currently I don't have any intention of maintaining packages on EPEL. If you want this package on EPEL, please feel free to become the maintainer on EPEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804824] Review Request: jboss-jsp-2.2-api - The JSP API used for the JBOSS project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804824
--- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:25:49
EDT ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
? = Not evaluated
=== REQUIRED ITEMS ===
[x] Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint SPECS/jboss-jsp-2.2-api.spec
SPECS/jboss-jsp-2.2-api.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1.Final.tar.xz
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1.Final.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.noarch: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
jboss-jsp-2.2-api.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/jboss-jsp-2.2-api-1.0.1/LICENSE
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
Upstream was contacted about the FSF address.
[x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines[1].
[x] Spec file name must match the base package name, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines[2].
[x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms.
[x] Buildroot definition is not present
[x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other
legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines[3,4].
[!] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
License type: CDDL or GPLv2 with exceptions
See #3.
[!] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
See #5.
[x] All independent sub-packages have license of their own
[x] Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
MD5SUM this package: a6a1e75dabe717ed931bfb39506cdad7
MD5SUM upstream package: a6a1e75dabe717ed931bfb39506cdad7
[x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines[5].
[x] Package must own all directories that it creates or must require other
packages for directories it uses.
[x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x] File sections do not contain %defattr(-,root,root,-) unless changed with
good reason
[x] Permissions on files are set properly.
[x] Package does NOT have a %clean section which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). (not needed anymore)
[x] Package consistently uses macros (no %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixing)
[x] Package contains code, or permissable content.
[x] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present.
[-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI
application.
[x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x] Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x] Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlinks)
[x] Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
[x] Javadoc subpackages have Require: jpackage-utils
[-] Package uses %global not %define
[x] If package uses tarball from VCS include comment how to re-create that
tarball (svn export URL, git clone URL, ...)
[-] If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[x] Jar files are installed to %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar (see [6] for details)
[x] If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even when
building with ant
[x] pom files has correct add_maven_depmap
=== Maven ===
[x] Use %{_mavenpomdir} macro for placing pom files instead of
%{_datadir}/maven2/poms
[-] If package uses -Dmaven.test.skip=true explain why it was needed in a
comment
[-] If package uses custom depmap -Dmaven.local.depmap.file=* explain why
it's needed in a comment
[x] Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x] Packages DOES NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on
jpackage-utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
=== Other suggestions ===
[x] If possible use upstream build method (maven/ant/javac)
[x] Avoid having BuildRequires on exact NVR unless necessary
[x] Package has BuildArch: noarch (if possible)
[x] Latest version is packaged.
[x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Tested on:
local, F17
=== Issues ===
1.
[Bug 802549] Review Request: axis2 - Java-based Web Services / SOAP / WSDL engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802549 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 09:25:23 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: axis2 Short Description: Java-based Web Services / SOAP / WSDL engine Owners:arg Branches: f17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800264] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-DataAPI - Base implementations for modules to negotiate with Google Data APIs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800264 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||800265 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800265] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-Spreadsheets - Perl module for using Google Spreadsheets API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800265 Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com Depends on||800264 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2012-03-20 09:36:24 --- Comment #41 from Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 09:36:24 EDT --- f15,f16,f17 built OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 802549] Review Request: axis2 - Java-based Web Services / SOAP / WSDL engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=802549 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 09:37:25 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 09:39:07 EDT --- adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #10 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:39:40 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: resteasy Short Description: Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications Owners: vakwetu Branches: f17 InitialCC: goldmann, jhernand -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #42 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2012-03-20 09:37:43 EDT --- Hi Alex, congrats on getting asl into Fedora. Just a note regarding the changelog: there shouldn't be duplicate version-release entries listed. In Fedora, you must always increment the release when committing / building a package. If you are working on updates privately (while developing the changes), you could simply add the extra change comments to the one changelog entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 09:42:55 EDT --- adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784359] Review Request: qpid-gui-tools - GUI utilities for Red Hat MRG qpid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784359 --- Comment #19 from Nuno Santos nsan...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:45:46 EDT --- There had been no activity on the review for over 3 weeks after Ernie posted his last updates, so it was easy to conclude it was stalled/abandoned. It's true I am not a sponsor, but I've done a large number of reviews and packaging work, I believe my review stands and all that Ernie needs to do is find a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #44 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 09:41:50 EDT --- adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/adobe-source-libraries-1.0.43-7.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 790628] Review Request: adobe-source-libraries - General Purpose Addon for Boost and STL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=790628 --- Comment #46 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 09:45:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) Hi Alex, congrats on getting asl into Fedora. Just a note regarding the changelog: there shouldn't be duplicate version-release entries listed. In Fedora, you must always increment the release when committing / building a package. I also dislike it, but IMHO it should be OK if there was not no build: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Repeat_the_old_version_release_with_a_new_entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 09:55:36 EDT --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3913375 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] New: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 Summary: Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-parent.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-parent-2.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: Parent POM for Janino. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG), 805035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||805037 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784593] Review Request: ritopt - A Java library for parsing command-line options
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784593 Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||arobi...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|arobi...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Andrew Robinson arobi...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 10:00:20 EDT --- I'll review this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] New: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 Summary: Review Request: commons-compiler - Summary of the package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//commons-compiler.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//commons-compiler-2.6.1-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: This package declares interfaces for the implementation of an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IExpressionEvaluator, an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IScriptEvaluator, an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.IClassBodyEvaluator and an org.codehaus.commons.compiler.ISimpleCompiler. All of these adhere to the syntax of the Java programming language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566 Andy Grimm agr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183(FE-JAVASIG) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 --- Comment #2 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:11:25 EDT --- Created attachment 571417 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=571417 build.log from local mock build Here's the output of a local mock build (including janino-parent in the buildroot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 804659] Review Request: cdi-api - APIs for JSR-299: Contexts and Dependency Injection for Java EE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=804659 Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||juan.hernan...@redhat.com AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|juan.hernan...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Juan Hernández juan.hernan...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 10:08:07 EDT --- I am taking this for review. The requirements for the interceptors API has to be changed, as the name of that package is jboss-interceptors-1.1-api, not jboss-interceptors-api_1.1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784359] Review Request: qpid-gui-tools - GUI utilities for Red Hat MRG qpid
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784359 --- Comment #20 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:11:09 EDT --- @nuno: in the first place, it was not stalled since only sponsors can approve package reviews with FE-NEEDSPONSOR flag set. Extracted from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_new_contributor Once they've made those changes, you can approve the package and sponsor the user in the fedora account system A sponsor can't sponsor someone without having formally reviewed at least one package from the new packager (unless you take the co-maintainership path) No matter how thorough you review has been, until Eallen has been sponsored, you can't approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |commons-compiler - Summary |commons-compiler - |of the package |Interfaces for an embedded ||Java compiler --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:07:16 EDT --- Fixed Summary :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805047] New: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047 Summary: Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mefos...@gmail.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Spec URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino.spec SRPM URL: http://mef.fedorapeople.org//janino-2.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Janino is a super-small, super-fast Java compiler. Not only can it compile a set of source files to a set of class files like the JAVAC tool, but also can it compile a Java expression, block, class body or source file in memory, load the bytecode and execute it directly in the same JVM. Janino is not intended to be a development tool, but an embedded compiler for run-time compilation purposes, e.g. expression evaluators or server pages engines like JSP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||805047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||805047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805047] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||805035, 805037 Blocks||652183(FE-JAVASIG) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805047] Review Request: janino - An embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805047 --- Comment #1 from Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:17:11 EDT --- Created attachment 571421 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=571421 build.log from local mock build This package got retired from Fedora when I didn't have time to maintain it. I'd like to get it re-added. Here is a local mock build log (with commons-compiler and janino-parent added to the buildroot). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805035] Review Request: janino-parent - Parent POM for Janino
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805035 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||805037 Depends on|805037 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 805037] Review Request: commons-compiler - Interfaces for an embedded Java compiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=805037 Mary Ellen Foster mefos...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|805035 | Depends on||805035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794985] Review Request: perl-Data-AMF - Serialize/deserialize Adobe's AMF (ActionMessageFormat) data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794985 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:36:16 EDT --- perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Ade Lee a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:40:41 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:37:55 EDT --- Please include a valid SCM request: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 795566] Review Request: woden - Web Service Description Language (WSDL) validating parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795566 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:40:02 EDT --- woden-1.0-0.1.M9.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woden-1.0-0.1.M9.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794985] Review Request: perl-Data-AMF - Serialize/deserialize Adobe's AMF (ActionMessageFormat) data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794985 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:37:31 EDT --- perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-AMF-0.09-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:41:37 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 794988] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP - Blowfish encryption algorithm implemented purely in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794988 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-20 10:42:46 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Blowfish_PP-1.12-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 Ade Lee a...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #12 from Ade Lee a...@redhat.com 2012-03-20 10:47:14 EDT --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: resteasy Short Description: Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications Owners: vakwetu Branches: f17 InitialCC: goldmann jhernand -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 800720] Review Request: resteasy - Framework for RESTful Web services and Java applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800720 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com 2012-03-20 10:52:12 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799810] Review Request: python-picloud - PiCloud client-side Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799810 Christoph Wickert cwick...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||cwick...@fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cwick...@fedoraproject.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
