[Bug 829015] Review Request: python-nose-cover3 - Coverage 3.x support for Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- I'll take this one for review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832178] Review Request: python-django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832178 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bkab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bkab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- I'll take this one for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 823337] Review Request: rubygem-mixlib-shellout - mixin for running external commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823337
--- Comment #9 from Jonas Courteau r...@courteau.org ---
Ah, I didn't know it was okay to patch stuff in %check. I've made the
recommended changes:
- now extracting and patching tests in %check
- tests are extracted, patched, and run from .%{gem_instdir} instead of
buildroot.
- excluding %{gem_cache}
Updated SRPM -
http://rpms.courteau.org/fedora/rubygem-mixlib-shellout-1.0.0-3.fc17.src.rpm
Updated SPEC -
https://raw.github.com/jcourteau/rubygems-rpms/master/fc17/rubygem-mixlib-shellout/rubygem-mixlib-shellout.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829015] Review Request: python-nose-cover3 - Coverage 3.x support for Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- Everything works fine and the specfile is correct and clean. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- I am taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832178] Review Request: python-django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832178 Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Bohuslav Slavek Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com --- The only thing I would advise here is adding runtime dependency on Django (Requires: python-django), as the package needs Django to do something. Otherwise I see no problems = The package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[!]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[?]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[!]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0: felix-osgi-obr-resolver-%{namedversion}.tar.xz (felix-
osgi-obr-resolver-%{namedversion}.tar.xz) Patch0: 0001-Use-felix-
directly.patch (0001-Use-felix-directly.patch) Patch1:
0002-JDK7-support.patch (0002-JDK7-support.patch)
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define.
Java
[x]: MUST If source tarball includes bundled jar/class files these need to be
removed prior to building
[x]: MUST Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for pre-school children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Lukáš Tinkl lti...@redhat.com --- Remaining problem solved, good to go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Fixed both issues: Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/felix-osgi-obr-resolver/0.1.0-0.2.Beta1/felix-osgi-obr-resolver.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/felix-osgi-obr-resolver/0.1.0-0.2.Beta1/felix-osgi-obr-resolver-0.1.0-0.2.Beta1.fc17.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4173235 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832178] Review Request: python-django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832178 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de --- thank you for the review! I'll fix the requirement before submitting to scm. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-django-picklefield Short Description: Implementation of a pickled object field Owners: mrunge Branches: devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822046] Review Request: exfat - Free exFAT file system implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822046 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #6 from Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com --- any update on this spot? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822046] Review Request: exfat - Free exFAT file system implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822046 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|tcall...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829015] Review Request: python-nose-cover3 - Coverage 3.x support for Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de --- Thank you for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-nose-cover3 Short Description: Coverage 3.x support for Nose Owners: mrunge Branches: f17 devel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822046] Review Request: exfat - Free exFAT file system implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822046 Dan Mashal dan.mas...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |dan.mas...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 --- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4173268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- It's OK now. ** ** APPROVED ** ** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: felix-osgi-obr-resolver Short Description: Apache Felix Resolver Owners: goldmann Branches: f17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832953] New: Review Request: Syntastic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953 Bug ID: 832953 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: Syntastic Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: bioinfornat...@gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Dear, I have do a package for a great vim plugin named Syntastic SRPMS: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/syntastic-2.3.0-1.20120617git1e94b98.fc17.src.rpm SPEC: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/syntastic.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830159] Review Request: ghc-smallcheck - A testing library to verify properties of test cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159 Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan shakthim...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-smallcheck Short Description: A testing library to verify properties of test cases Owners: shakthimaan Branches: f16 f17 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Patryk Obara pob...@redhat.com --- *** APPROVED *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- I taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jbosgi-vfs Short Description: JBoss OSGi Virtual File System Owners: goldmann Branches: f17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832999] New: Review Request: colord-gtk - GTK support library for colord
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832999 Bug ID: 832999 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: colord-gtk - GTK support library for colord Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rhug...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/colord-gtk.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/colord-gtk-0.1.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4173465 Description: colord is a support library for colord and provides additional functionality that requires GTK+. Fedora Account System Username: rhughes $ rpmlint */colord-gtk* 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Note: colord-gtk.so used to be shipped in the main colord package, but this made it hard to rebuild a distro (e.g. for ARM) as there was a dependency loop of colord-GTK and GTK-colord. Now we can build in the order: colord, gtk, colord-gtk, gnome-color-manager, etc Please review. I don't think I need to provide any conflicts for previous versions of colord, as nothing requires colord-gtk that's been built for F18 or older (colord-gtk is pretty new). If you think it's safer to just add a Conflicts: colord = 0.1.22 then yell. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833004] New: Review Request: pyp2rpm - Convert Python packages to RPM SPECFILES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833004 Bug ID: 833004 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: pyp2rpm - Convert Python packages to RPM SPECFILES Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: bkab...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/pyp2rpm/pyp2rpm.spec SRPM URL: http://bkabrda.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/pyp2rpm/pyp2rpm-0.5.1-1.fc17.src.rpm Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4173552 Description: Convert Python packages to RPM SPECFILES. The packages can be downloaded from PyPI and the produced SPEC is in line with Fedora Packaging Guidelines. Users can provide their own templates for rendering the package metadata. Both the package source and metadata can be extracted from PyPI or from local filesystem (local file doesn't provide that much information though). Fedora Account System Username: bkabrda -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833004] Review Request: pyp2rpm - Convert Python packages to RPM SPECFILES
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833004 Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mru...@matthias-runge.de Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@matthias-runge.de Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de --- I'll do the review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint apache-commons-vfs-javadoc-2.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint apache-commons-vfs-2.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint apache-commons-vfs-examples-2.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint apache-commons-vfs-2.0-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[x]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[!]: SHOULD SourceX / PatchY prefixed with %{name}.
Note: Source0: http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/vfs/source/commons-
vfs-2.0-src.tar.gz (commons-vfs-2.0-src.tar.gz) Patch0: apache-commons-
vfs-2.0-fixbuild.patch (apache-commons-vfs-2.0-fixbuild.patch)
[x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: SHOULD %check is
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-vfs/1/apache-commons-vfs.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-vfs/1/apache-commons-vfs-2.0-2.fc16.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- It's good now. Thank you. Tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4173625 ** ** APPROVED ** ** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: apache-commons-vfs Short Description: Commons Virtual File System Owners: gil Branches: f17 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813832] Review Request: linuxdcpp - linux port of dc++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813832 Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Peter Hatina phat...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: linuxdcpp New Branches: f16 f17 Owners: phatina Unretire master, please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 813832] Review Request: linuxdcpp - linux port of dc++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=813832 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Unretired. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829015] Review Request: python-nose-cover3 - Coverage 3.x support for Nose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829015 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830159] Review Request: ghc-smallcheck - A testing library to verify properties of test cases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830159 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830221] Review Request: perl-Library-CallNumber-LC - Normalizes Library of Congress call numbers for sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832178] Review Request: python-django-picklefield - Implementation of a pickled object field
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832178 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830361] Review Request: juk - Music player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830361 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-06-18 09:23:28 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jbosgi-vfs-1.1.2-0.3.CR1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-vfs-1.1.2-0.3.CR1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829402] Review Request: jbosgi-vfs - JBoss OSGi Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829402 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com Assignee|pob...@redhat.com |mizde...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- I am reassigning this bug to myself. This is quire urgent rewiew so Marek asked me to take. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821712] Review Request: apache-commons-vfs - Commons Virtual File System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821712 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- apache-commons-vfs-2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apache-commons-vfs-2.0-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832420] Review Request: felix-osgi-obr-resolver - Apache Felix Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832420 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- felix-osgi-obr-resolver-0.1.0-0.2.Beta1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/felix-osgi-obr-resolver-0.1.0-0.2.Beta1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for preschool children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: pairs - |Review Request: pairs - |Memory and logic|Memory and logic |stimulation game for|stimulation game for |pre-school children |preschool children Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pairs Short Description: Memory and logic stimulation game for preschool children Owners: jreznik than ltinkl rdieter kkofler rnovacek Branches: f17 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829116] Review Request: ninja-build - A small build system with a focus on speed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829116 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Woehlke mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net --- Created attachment 592653 -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=592653action=edit patch to fix vim auto-syntax So, it's not too hard to fix the previous point; necessary vim commands attached. I put this in vimfiles/ftdetect, but not sure if that's the appropriate place (maybe it should be part of syntax/ninja.vim?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826979] Review Request: pairs - Memory and logic stimulation game for preschool children
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826979 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832953] Review Request: Syntastic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832953 --- Comment #1 from MERCIER Jonathan bioinfornat...@gmail.com --- update spec for easy subpackage maintenance: http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/syntastic-2.3.0-2.20120617git1e94b98.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125
--- Comment #2 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Pass
! = Fail
? = Not evaluated
Generic
[x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at
least one supported primary architecture.
[x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Buildroot is not present
Note: Unless packager wants to package for EPEL5 this is fine
[x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries.
[x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: Clean would be needed if support for EPEL is required
[x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: Note: defattr macros not found. They would be needed for EPEL5
[x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[!]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch.
[x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags.
[x]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf would be needed if support for EPEL5 is required
[x]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required.
[x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[-]: MUST License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: MUST Package installs properly.
[x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent.
rpmlint jbosgi-spi-javadoc-3.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
jbosgi-spi-javadoc.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Javadocs - Java
docs, Java-docs, Avocados
jbosgi-spi-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error
403: Forbidden
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint jbosgi-spi-3.0.1-1.fc18.src.rpm
jbosgi-spi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pakcage - package
jbosgi-spi.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
jbosgi-spi.src: W: invalid-url Source0: jbosgi-spi-3.0.1.Final.tar.xz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint jbosgi-spi-3.0.1-1.fc18.noarch.rpm
jbosgi-spi.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pakcage - package
jbosgi-spi.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.jboss.org/ HTTP Error 403:
Forbidden
jbosgi-spi.noarch: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
These warnings can be ignored.
[x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
Package has no sources or they are generated by developer
[x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one.
[x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8.
[-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[?]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a
separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to
include it.
[x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present.
[x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin,
/usr/sbin.
[x]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q
--requires).
[!]: SHOULD Package functions as described.
[!]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged.
[x]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from
upstream.
[x]: SHOULD Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- I incorporated the change, without bumping the release and overriding the previous packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com --- It's OK now. ** ** APPROVED ** ** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jbosgi-spi Short Description: JBossOSGi SPI Owners: goldmann Branches: f17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830277] Review Request: wmcoincoin - Funny dock-app for browsing and interact to XML board sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830277 --- Comment #10 from pierrejourda...@gmail.com --- I 'm changing some lines in my .spec file to follows the fedora package guidlines I'm removed the useless %post %postun %posttrans lines . I'am also changed the .desktop file removing the encoding line (because it's useless) . Section %changlog is upated . http://pierre80.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/wmcoincoin.spec SPEC file http://pierre80.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/wmcoincoin-2.5.1-5.f.fc17.src.rpm SRPM file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833115] New: Review Request: rawdog - RSS Aggregator Without Delusions of Grandeur
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833115 Bug ID: 833115 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: rawdog - RSS Aggregator Without Delusions of Grandeur Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: agro...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/new/rawdog.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~grover/new/rawdog-2.13-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Rawdog aggregates RSS feeds to generate an HTML page, commonly published as planets on the internet. An example (my personal planet) is http://planet.groveronline.com/ . Fedora Account System Username: grover Note on packaging: Rawdog includes feedparser (http://code.google.com/p/feedparser/) which is packaged in python-feedparser, unfortunately Rawdog uses a significantly modified version so I thought it best not to try to make it work with the upstream version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 Ross Delinger rossdy...@csh.rit.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ross Delinger rossdy...@csh.rit.edu --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-tahrir-api Short Description: API for interacting with tahrir databases Owners: rossdylan Branches: f17 el6 InitialCC: rossdylan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Luke, please take ownership of review BZs, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826955] Review Request: apache-commons-chain - An implementation of the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826955] Review Request: apache-commons-chain - An implementation of the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- apache-commons-chain-1.2-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/apache-commons-chain-1.2-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820344] Review Request: apache-commons-javaflow - Commons Javaflow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820344 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- tested on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4174731 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830125] Review Request: jbosgi-spi - JBossOSGi SPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- jbosgi-spi-3.0.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jbosgi-spi-3.0.1-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821284] Review Request: dbunit - DbUnit Framework - extension for JUnit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821284 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826955] Review Request: apache-commons-chain - An implementation of the GoF Chain of Responsibility pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826955 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827761] vdr-skinenigmang - A skin for VDR based on the Enigma text2skin add on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|ville.sky...@iki.fi |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from MartinKG mgans...@alice.de --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: vdr-skinenigmang Short Description: a skin for VDR based on the Enigma text2skin add on. Owners: martinkg Branches: f16 f17 f18 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833154] New: Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jeetools - Frameworks and tools for Eclipse, focused on the development of J2EE artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154 Bug ID: 833154 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jeetools - Frameworks and tools for Eclipse, focused on the development of J2EE artifacts Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: ger...@ryan.lt Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-wtp-jeetools/3.4.0/0.1.20120618cvs/eclipse-wtp-jeetools.spec SRPM URL: http://galileo.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-wtp-jeetools/3.4.0/0.1.20120618cvs/eclipse-wtp-jeetools-3.4.0-0.1.20120618cvs.fc17.src.rpm Description: The Java EE Tools Project is a set of Eclipse plugins that provides frameworks and tools focused on the development of J2EE artifacts. Fedora Account System Username: galileo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827761] vdr-skinenigmang - A skin for VDR based on the Enigma text2skin add on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761 MartinKG mgans...@alice.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833164] New: Review Request: python-pyudev-rpm - udev bindings for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833164 Bug ID: 833164 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-pyudev-rpm - udev bindings for python Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: clock...@redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~clockfort/python-pyudev-rpm/SPECS/python-pyudev.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~clockfort/python-pyudev-rpm/SRPMS/python-pyudev-0.15-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: udev bindings for python Fedora Account System Username: clockfort -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830221] Review Request: perl-Library-CallNumber-LC - Normalizes Library of Congress call numbers for sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830221] Review Request: perl-Library-CallNumber-LC - Normalizes Library of Congress call numbers for sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830221 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Library-CallNumber-LC-0.22-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Library-CallNumber-LC-0.22-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 831871] Review Request: openstack-swift-plugin-swift3 - The swift3 plugin for Openstack Swift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=831871 Pete Zaitcev zait...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-06-18 15:15:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827761] vdr-skinenigmang - A skin for VDR based on the Enigma text2skin add on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761 Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ville.sky...@iki.fi Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 827761] Review Request: vdr-skinenigmang - A skin for VDR based on the Enigma text2skin add on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827761 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|vdr-skinenigmang - A skin |Review Request: |for VDR based on the Enigma |vdr-skinenigmang - A skin |text2skin add on|for VDR based on the Enigma ||text2skin add on -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717748] Review Request: UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748 --- Comment #8 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com --- Updating this request with the latest LTTng-UST package. SPEC: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SPECS/lttng-ust.spec SRPMS: http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/SRPMS/lttng-ust-2.0.3-1.fc17.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717748] Review Request: LTTng-UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748 Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: UST - LTTng |Review Request: LTTng-UST - |Userspace Tracer|LTTng Userspace Tracer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] New: Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 Bug ID: 833204 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: rossdy...@csh.rit.edu Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~rossdylan/rpms/python-pyramid-tm/python-pyramid-tm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.csh.rit.edu/~rossdylan/rpms/python-pyramid-tm/python-pyramid-tm-0.4-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: A package which allows Pyramid requests to join the active transaction as provided by the python-transaction package. Fedora Account System Username: rossdylan -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833204] Review Request: python-pyramid-tm - Allows pyramid requests to join the active transaction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833204 Ross Delinger rossdy...@csh.rit.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |17 --- Comment #1 from Ross Delinger rossdy...@csh.rit.edu --- Successful Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4175173 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822182] Review Request: python-websockify - Python proxy for the websockets protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822182 Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||801685 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822187] Review Request: novnc - websockets based VNC client and simple server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822187 Pádraig Brady pbr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||801685 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833154] Review Request: eclipse-wtp-jeetools - Frameworks and tools for Eclipse, focused on the development of J2EE artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833154 --- Comment #1 from Gerard Ryan ger...@ryan.lt --- Note: the following additional license files exist: ./plugins/org.eclipse.jst.j2ee/license/berkeley_license.html ./plugins/org.eclipse.jst.jee/license/berkeley_license.html but I haven't been able to find any code licensed under anything besides the EPL. I don't know why these files are here, and I haven't included them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 832074] Review Request: python-tahrir-api - python module for commuicating with a tahrir database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832074 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-tahrir-api-0.1.3.1-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 833226] New: Review Request: python-pycparser - C parser and AST generator written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833226 Bug ID: 833226 QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org Severity: medium Version: rawhide Priority: medium CC: nott...@redhat.com, package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Summary: Review Request: python-pycparser - C parser and AST generator written in Python Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Linux Reporter: scottt...@gmail.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: All Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: Package Review Product: Fedora Spec URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/python-pycparser/python-pycparser.spec SRPM URL: http://scottt.tw/fedora/python-pycparser/python-pycparser-2.07-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: pycparser is a complete parser for the C language, written in pure Python. It is a module designed to be easily integrated into applications that need to parse C source code. Fedora Account System Username: scottt rpmlint output: rpmlint python-pycparser-2.07-1.fc18.src.rpm python-pycparser.src: W: strange-permission remove-relative-sys-path 0755L 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint python-pycparser-2.07-1.fc18.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Regarding the strange-permission warning, I think rpmlint is complaining about remove-relative-sys-path being listed a an source in the SRPM and having executable permissions. I wrote that script to cleanup the sample code in examples/ and the SPEC files runs it during %prep so I think this particular rpmlint warning should be ignored. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 820115] Review Request: leptonica - C library for efficient image processing and image analysis operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820115 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- I think those binaries really can't be packaged that way, without some kind of namespacing (name prefix or whatever). Some of the names are extremely generic and likely to cause conflicts. Others at least follow some naming scheme, but there I'm not sure those are useful to package at all, e.g. tests probably don't make sense to install. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717748] Review Request: LTTng-UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748
--- Comment #9 from Scott Tsai scottt...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Building on F17 fails for me with:
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-z,relro -o hello hello.o
tp.o ../../liblttng-ust/liblttng-ust.la -lurcu-bp -lurcu-bp -luuid -lpthread
-ldl
libtool: link: DIE_RPATH_DIE=/usr/lib64: gcc -Wall -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -o .libs/hello
hello.o tp.o ../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so -lurcu-bp -luuid
-lpthread -ldl
/usr/bin/ld: warning: liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0, needed by
../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so, not found (try using -rpath or
-rpath-link)
../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so: undefined reference to
`init_tracepoint'
../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so: undefined reference to
`__tracepoint_probe_register'
../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so: undefined reference to
`exit_tracepoint'
../../liblttng-ust/.libs/liblttng-ust.so: undefined reference to
`__tracepoint_probe_unregister'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [hello] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/home/scottt/work/lttng/fedora/lttng-ust-2.0.3/tests/hello'
Since:
1. ld is performing a non-shared, non relocatable link for .libs/hello
2. We patched libtool to get rid of RPATH
3. hello.o requires liblttng-ust.so which in turn requires
liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0
We need to either pass the directory containing liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so.0 as
-rpath-link or specify liblttng-ust-tracepoint.so as an input to ld.
The following snippet in lttnt-ust.spec would accomplish the later:
+# link all dependent libs
+#sed -i 's|^link_all_deplibs=no|link_all_deplibs=unknown|g' libtool
+
+make %{?_smp_mflags} V=1
%install
make DESTDIR=%buildroot install
Yannick, could you build actually build without a patch to this effect?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 826563] Review Request: Fuel Manager - keep track of your fuel mileage and consumption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=826563 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout n...@fedoraproject.org --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kc8hfi/fuelmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~kc8hfi/fuelmanager-0.3.6-5.fc15.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 810033] Review Request: python-virtualenvwrapper - Enhancements to virtualenv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810033 Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-virtualenvwrapper New Branches: f16 Owners: ralph InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717748] Review Request: LTTng-UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748 --- Comment #10 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com --- I was able to build it without the patch, but now I'm trying with koji and targeting F17 and it fail there. I'll investigate and post a new version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830750] Review Request: jbosgi-resolver1 - Standalone OSGi Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830750 Satya Komaragiri skoma...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||skoma...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|skoma...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 717748] Review Request: LTTng-UST - LTTng Userspace Tracer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748
--- Comment #11 from Yannick Brosseau yannick.bross...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #9)
(In reply to comment #8)
Building on F17 fails for me with:
+# link all dependent libs
+#sed -i 's|^link_all_deplibs=no|link_all_deplibs=unknown|g' libtool
+
+make %{?_smp_mflags} V=1
%install
make DESTDIR=%buildroot install
Yannick, could you build actually build without a patch to this effect?
I've updated the files, can you try again?
Now the package reinitialize the libtool script instead of doing a series of
sed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821267] Review Request: R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821267] Review Request: R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- R-BiocGenerics-0.2.0-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-BiocGenerics-0.2.0-2.fc16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821267] Review Request: R-BiocGenerics - Generic functions for Bioconductor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821267 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- R-BiocGenerics-0.2.0-2.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-BiocGenerics-0.2.0-2.fc17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
