[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ricky Elrod rel...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: ghc-optparse-applicative Short Description: Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options Owners: codeblock petersen Branches: f20 epel7 f19 InitialCC: haskell-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch - Astloch fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782 --- Comment #5 from Julien Enselme juj...@jujens.eu --- I modified the fontconfig file according to the template posted on the fonts mailing list. The links are the same. The package looks fine for me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 881590] Review Request: leveldbjni - A Java Native Interface to LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=881590 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- leveldbjni-1.8-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/leveldbjni-1.8-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Thanks for the review ! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-horde-content Short Description: Tagging application Owners: remi Branches: f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075806] Review Request: fcgiwrap - Simple FastCGI wrapper for CGI scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075806 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Justin Zhang from comment #6) Hi Christopher, It's not re-inventing the wheel. It's just trying to contribute to help move this issue forward. I think this is beneficial to the fedora project. Maybe let's contact Sebastian Dyroff to see if he can expedite the fix and if he would accept some of ideas of my implementation. Thanks! We have many bugs like this, not stalled tickets, but the reporter is busy or because of something else. Please don't ask me to do anything here anymore. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Good catch ! https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/14f2b9bd6182eb35e75497aa22b3b8c7571905eb Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/14f2b9bd6182eb35e75497aa22b3b8c7571905eb/php/horde/php-horde-imp/php-horde-imp.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-imp-6.1.7-2.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 --- Comment #29 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 999136] Review Request: python-backports-lzma - Backport of Python 3.3's lzma module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999136 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 999136] Review Request: python-backports-lzma - Backport of Python 3.3's lzma module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999136 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058198] Review Request: ghc-rfc5051 - Simple unicode collation as per RFC5051
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058198 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069451] Review Request: ghc-fsnotify - Cross platform library for file change notification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069451 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069451] Review Request: ghc-fsnotify - Cross platform library for file change notification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069451 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083234] Review Request: mariadb-galera - MariaDB with wsrep patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083234 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083234] Review Request: mariadb-galera - MariaDB with wsrep patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083234 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086444] Review Request: ghc-optparse-applicative - Utilities and combinators for parsing command line options
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086444 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089559] Review Request: tlp - Advanced power management tool for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089559 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089559] Review Request: tlp - Advanced power management tool for Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089559 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091361] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA - reCAPTCHA component for HTML::FormFu frame work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091361 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090802] Review Request: ghc-streaming-commons - Common lower-level functions for streaming data libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090802 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091361] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA - reCAPTCHA component for HTML::FormFu frame work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091361 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090802] Review Request: ghc-streaming-commons - Common lower-level functions for streaming data libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090802 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091616] Review Request: perl-MetaCPAN-Client - A comprehensive, DWIM-featured client to the MetaCPAN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091616 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091616] Review Request: perl-MetaCPAN-Client - A comprehensive, DWIM-featured client to the MetaCPAN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091616 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083232] Review Request: galera - Galera replication engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083232 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083232] Review Request: galera - Galera replication engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083232 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038238] Review Request: kcm-touchpad - KDE Systemsettings module for touchpads
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038238 Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hotmusic...@mail.bg --- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org --- *** Bug 1091760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091361] Review Request: perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-reCAPTCHA - reCAPTCHA component for HTML::FormFu frame work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091361 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-HTML-FormFu-Element-re ||CAPTCHA-1.00-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-04-28 08:31:01 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-content-2.0.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-horde-content-2.0.3-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-content-2.0.3-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-horde-content-2.0.3-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987717] Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - A wrapper for ATT's Graphviz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987717 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- What's the status of this? How is this different from perl-GraphViz (you my want to clarify that in %description). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-GraphViz New Branches: epel7 Owners: lkundrak InitialCC: perl-sig Fedora maintainer does not maintain EPEL packages and el6 maintainer is unresponsive to e-mail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083232] Review Request: galera - Galera replication engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083232 Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nonamed...@gmail.com|255...@mail.muni.cz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083232] Review Request: galera - Galera replication engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083232 --- Comment #14 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- Sorry, I had to be away for a while and couldn't take care of this review. My apologies. Glad to see everything has been taken care of. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083234] Review Request: mariadb-galera - MariaDB with wsrep patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083234 Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nonamed...@gmail.com|255...@mail.muni.cz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083234] Review Request: mariadb-galera - MariaDB with wsrep patches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083234 --- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- Sorry, I had to be away for a while and couldn't take care of this review. My apologies. Glad to see everything has been taken care of. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch - Astloch fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782 Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@frixxon.co.uk --- Comment #6 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk --- Just a few points: 1. The FontForge sources for these fonts are available from the Google font directory so, according to our packaging policy, these fonts SHOULD be built from source. 2. The word fracture in the description should be Fraktur. 3. Our fonts policy now says that fonts must include correct licensing fields in the metadata. In this case, you'll need to correct the metadata after building, using the ttname tool. 4. The fontconfig file isn't correct. You need to register both fonts with the generic name cursive using the basic-font-template.conf supplied with fontpackages-devel. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch - Astloch fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782 --- Comment #7 from Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk --- (In reply to Paul Flo Williams from comment #6) 3. Our fonts policy now says that fonts must include correct licensing fields in the metadata. In this case, you'll need to correct the metadata after building, using the ttname tool. Of course, if you build from source, you have the option of patching the SFD files before building, but UTF-7 dragons lurk there, so I'd still recommend you use ttname. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092000] New: Review Request: rubygem-jgrep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092000 Bug ID: 1092000 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jgrep Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/rubygem-jgrep.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/rubygem-jgrep-1.3.3-1.el7.src.rpm Description: JGrep is Ruby-based CLI tool and API for parsing and displaying JSON data using a logical expression syntax. It allows you to search a list of JSON documents and return specific documents or values based on logical truths. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048460] Review Request: hawaii-shell - Hawaii shell for desktop, netbook and tablet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048460 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-04-28 09:24:46 --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk --- Imported and built. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092000] Review Request: rubygem-jgrep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092000 Lukas Bezdicka 255...@mail.muni.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||255...@mail.muni.cz Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|255...@mail.muni.cz Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 235783] Review Request: perl-GraphViz - Interface to the GraphViz graphing tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235783 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091616] Review Request: perl-MetaCPAN-Client - A comprehensive, DWIM-featured client to the MetaCPAN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091616 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.0020 ||00-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-04-28 09:53:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. This was a license issue/update, not a bundled library issue/update. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. HTTPD config updated. No blockers. = APPROVED = -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-horde-imp Short Description: A web based webmail system Owners: remi Branches: f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092018] New: Review Request: rubygem-comp_tree - A simple framework for automatic parallelism
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092018 Bug ID: 1092018 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-comp_tree - A simple framework for automatic parallelism Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/rubygem-comp_tree.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/rubygem-comp_tree-1.1.3-1.el7.src.rpm Description: CompTree is a parallel computation tree structure based upon concepts from pure functional programming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092022] New: Review Request: rubygem-drake - A branch of Rake supporting automatic parallelizing of tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092022 Bug ID: 1092022 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-drake - A branch of Rake supporting automatic parallelizing of tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/rubygem-drake.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/rubygem-drake-0.9.2.0.3.1-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Drake is an auto-parallelizing branch of Rake, a Make-like program implemented in Ruby. Tasks and dependencies are specified in standard Ruby syntax. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092022] Review Request: rubygem-drake - A branch of Rake supporting automatic parallelizing of tasks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092022 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1092018 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092018 [Bug 1092018] Review Request: rubygem-comp_tree - A simple framework for automatic parallelism -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092018] Review Request: rubygem-comp_tree - A simple framework for automatic parallelism
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092018 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1092022 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092022 [Bug 1092022] Review Request: rubygem-drake - A branch of Rake supporting automatic parallelizing of tasks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1080583] Review Request: compat-qpid-cpp - Compatibility modules for Qpid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080583
--- Comment #2 from Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1)
These can be removed:
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
The order of the sections in the spec is somehwat untypical, but I don't
think there is any guideline for that.
The package fails to build:
/builddir/build/BUILD/qpid-0.24/cpp/src/qpid/ha/BrokerReplicator.cpp:351:6:
error: 'void
qpid::ha::{anonymous}::collectQueueReplicators(boost::shared_ptrqpid::
broker::Exchange, std::setboost::shared_ptrqpid::ha::QueueReplicator
)' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
void collectQueueReplicators(
^
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
Thank you for taking on the review and the feedback.
* I've removed the defattr lines
* I've removed the clean stanza
* I've rebased a few patches from upstream that removed the dead code
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6790196
Updated spec: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp.spec
Updated SRPM:
http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/compat-qpid-cpp-0.24-3.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 987717] Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - A wrapper for ATT's Graphviz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=987717 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #5) What's the status of this? How is this different from perl-GraphViz (you my want to clarify that in %description). Good catch. perl-G and perl-G2 are from the same author. perl-G is deprecated now: http://search.cpan.org/dist/GraphViz/ You can take a deep look: Interface to ATT's GraphViz. Deprecated. See GraphViz2 That's why I packaged perl-G2. Last year I was trying to package many dependencies, then back to G2 itself I couldn't find any free time. I will clean up my old reviews soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1081782] Review Request: astloch-fonts - Astloch fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1081782 Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: astloch - |Review Request: |Astloch fonts |astloch-fonts - Astloch ||fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] New: Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Bug ID: 1092057 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: l...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-kdar-factorlog/golang-github-kdar-factorlog.spec SRPM URL: http://lsm5.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-kdar-factorlog/SRPMS/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc21.src.rpm Description: FactorLog is a fast logging infrastructure for Go that provides numerous logging functions for whatever your style may be. It could easily be a replacement for Go's log in the standard library (though it doesn't support functions such as SetFlags()). Fedora Account System Username: lsm5 $ rpmlint golang-github-kdar-factorlog.spec SRPMS/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc21.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-devel-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc21.noarch.rpm golang-github-kdar-factorlog.spec:40: W: setup-not-quiet golang-github-kdar-factorlog.src:40: W: setup-not-quiet 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6790781 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mfoj...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Michal Fojtik mfoj...@redhat.com --- Review+ Licence is OK, the spec file looks sane. No problems found in version/naming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: golang-github-kdar-factorlog Short Description: Fast logging infrastructure for Go Owners: lsm5 Branches: f19 f20 el6 epel7 InitialCC: golang-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Lokesh Mandvekar l...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mfoj...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091375] Review Request: tmate - Instant terminal sharing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091375
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Hrozek jhro...@redhat.com ---
I reviewed the package on IRC and requested some changes:
* Source0 must point to the upstream tarball
* %makeinstall should not be used
* %make %{?_smp_mflags} should be used instead of -j%jobs magic
* BuildRequires gcc-c++ is not needed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] New: Review Request: JOrtho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 Bug ID: 1092096 Summary: Review Request: JOrtho - A spell checker for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: msima...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/JOrtho.spec SRPM URL: http://msimacek.fedorapeople.org/JOrtho-1.0-0.fc20.src.rpm Description: JOrtho is a spell checker for Java. The library works with any JTextComponent from the Swing framework and checks as you type. The dictionary is based on the free Wiktionary.org, and is applicable for multiple languages. You can select the spell checking language via a context menu. The features of JOrtho are the highlighting of potentially wrongly spelled words, a context menu with suggestions for correct forms of the word and a context menu with option to change the checking language. At the moment there are eight languages for spell checking available: English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, Russian, Polish, and Arabic. Fedora Account System Username: msimacek -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 923959] Review Request: JOrtho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923959 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-04-28 14:08:38 --- Comment #4 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1092096 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092096] Review Request: JOrtho - A spell checker for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092096 hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johannes.l...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from hannes johannes.l...@googlemail.com --- *** Bug 923959 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092057] Review Request: golang-github-kdar-factorlog - Fast logging infrastructure for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092057 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-kdar-factorlog-0-0.1.git814d8f7.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 976049] Review Request: irclib - Java implementation of the IRC protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=976049 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/irclib.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/irclib-1.10-1.fc19.src.rpm Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6791856 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092149] New: Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 Bug ID: 1092149 Summary: Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: bne...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/dib-utils-0.0.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Pieces of diskimage-builder that are useful standalone Fedora Account System Username: bnemec This package is intended to reflect an upcoming change in the upstream project (as seen in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/90281/ ), but because we need a split version of diskimage-builder for inclusion in the Fedora cloud image we don't have time to wait for the upstream change to go through. Adding this as a separate package now should address the immediate needs and allow for an easy transition to the new upstream repo when it becomes available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 Ben Nemec bne...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1086494 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086494 [Bug 1086494] os-refresh-config calls dib-run-parts, which is not installed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087046] Review Request: php-horde-content - Tagging application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087046 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- php-horde-content-2.0.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074969] Review Request: perl-Config-Generator - rpm containing global variables used by the Config::Generator modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074969 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Config-Generator-0.5-1 ||.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-04-28 16:37:09 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Config-Generator-0.5-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074969] Review Request: perl-Config-Generator - rpm containing global variables used by the Config::Generator modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074969 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Config-Generator-0.5-1 |perl-Config-Generator-0.5-1 |.el6|.el5 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Config-Generator-0.5-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 Steven Hardy sha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sha...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sha...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 --- Comment #12 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Are you OK with the new version? (FWIW, ARM support in Julia might well be ready for the next 0.3 version.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089500] Review Request: openlibm - High quality system independent, open source libm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089500 --- Comment #6 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- Any more comments on the new .spec file? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092176] New: Review Request: adwaita-icon-theme - Adwaita icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092176 Bug ID: 1092176 Summary: Review Request: adwaita-icon-theme - Adwaita icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kalevlem...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/adwaita-icon-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://kalev.fedorapeople.org/adwaita-icon-theme-3.13.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: In upstream, gnome-icon-theme and gnome-icon-theme-symbolic were merged together into a single icon theme, available under the adwaita-icon-theme name. Fedora Account System Username: kalev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092176] Review Request: adwaita-icon-theme - Adwaita icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092176
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||awill...@redhat.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|awill...@redhat.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com ---
Accepting for review. All MUST and SHOULD items at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines are 'good' or 'N/A'.
rpmlint output - only warning is:
adwaita-icon-theme-devel.noarch: W: no-documentation
it depends on the main package, so that's fine.
Package built correctly in Koji for Rawhide (scratch build test) with no
obvious issues in build.log, contents are as expected.
Package is approved.
(note for those playing along at home: though this is essentially intended to
replace gnome-icon-theme{-symbolic}, it's not a transparent replacement, the
theme name was actually changed, so it can't simply immediately
obsolete/provide those two; dependent packages need to be updated to use the
new theme name.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772243] Review Request: rds-tools - utilities for testing rds protocol networking
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772243 Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2014-04-28 18:52:32 --- Comment #11 from Doug Ledford dledf...@redhat.com --- Considering that upstream rds kernel support is totally broken, I don't really care much about this package. I generally recommend that rds support in the kernel be entirely disabled at this point. If that changes, I can issue a new review request against an updated version of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1092176] Review Request: adwaita-icon-theme - Adwaita icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092176 Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com --- Thanks for the review, Adam! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: adwaita-icon-theme Short Description: Adwaita icon theme Owners: kalev Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1071581] Review Request: python-wikitools - Python package for interacting with a MediaWiki wiki
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071581
--- Comment #4 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Hi Honza, here is a more detailed review. There are couple of issues. Please
see below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
GPL (v3 or later), Unknown or generated. 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mukundan/personal/pkgs/reviews/1071581-python-
wikitools/licensecheck.txt
--- No problems.
GPL (v3 or later)
-
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/api.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/category.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/page.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/pagelist.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/user.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/wiki.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/wikifile.py
Unknown or generated
wikitools-1.1.1/setup.py
wikitools-1.1.1/wikitools/__init__.py
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/wikitools
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/wikitools
--- please add the appropriate directory under %files.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 3 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pam-kwallet/pam-kwallet.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/pam-kwallet/pam-kwallet-0-0.2.20140428gitaf786456.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Apr 28 2014 Rex Dieter rdie...@fedoraproject.org 0-0.2.20140428gitaf786456 - 20140428 git snapshot -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083721] Review Request: rendercheck - Tool to verify correct operation of the XRENDER extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083721
--- Comment #2 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Sorry for the delayed review. Please see detailed review below.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
--- Source tarball has the file COPYING which is not included under %doc.
Please fix.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
MIT/X11 (BSD like), Unknown or generated. 14 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mukundan/personal/pkgs/reviews/1083721-rendercheck/licensecheck.txt
--- This seems fine to me.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
--- EL 5 support? If not, please consider modernizing the spec.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[?]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
--- s390 and s390x
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[?]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
--- perhaps modernize the spec?
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
[Bug 1089110] Review Request: nield - Network Interface Events Logging Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089110 --- Comment #12 from Tetsumune KISO t2m...@gmail.com --- Updated so as not to include kernel header files. Could you review them? Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nield/files/nield-0.5.1/fedora/nield.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/nield/files/nield-0.5.1/fedora/nield-0.5.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: The Network Interface Events Logging Daemon is a tool that receives notifications from the kernel through the netlink socket, and generates logs related to link state, neighbor cache (ARP,NDP), IP address (IPv4,IPv6), route, FIB rules, traffic control. Fedora Account System Username: t2mune And I ran licensecheck and rpmlint. netlink is not a spelling error. [t2mune@fedora20 ~]$ licensecheck nield-0.5.1/* nield-0.5.1/src/tcmsg_filter.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/debug.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/log.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/ndmsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/nlmsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/rtmsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/nield.h: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/nield.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/tcmsg_qdisc.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/frhdr.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/ifimsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/ifamsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/list.h: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/rtnetlink.h: GPL (v2 or later) nield-0.5.1/src/tcamsg.c: GPL (v2 or later) [t2mune@fedora20 ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/nield.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [t2mune@fedora20 ~]$ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/nield-0.5.1-1.fc20.src.rpm nield.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US netlink - net link, net-link, linnet 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083721] Review Request: rendercheck - Tool to verify correct operation of the XRENDER extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083721 --- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- koji scratch builds - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6792369 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079967] Review Request: fedwatch - Tool for watching fedmsg messages and running arbitrary scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079967
--- Comment #5 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Sorry for the delayed review.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
LGPL (v2.1 or later), Unknown or generated. 3 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mukundan/personal/pkgs/reviews/1079967-fedwatch/licensecheck.txt
--- No issues.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[ ]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python-
fedwatch
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6792368
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve
[Bug 1089110] Review Request: nield - Network Interface Events Logging Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089110 --- Comment #13 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com --- Read carefully: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Find which step you forgot to follow, then do it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091479] Review Request: pam-kwallet - PAM module for KWallet
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091479 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1092216 (F21Target-kde) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092216 [Bug 1092216] Fedora 21 Target KDE Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949038] Review Request: php-horde-horde - Horde Application Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949038 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-04-29 01:12:18 --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Build in rawhide + epel7 Will push all the horde applications at the same time (when all will be reviewed) in f20 / epel6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1087734] Review Request: php-horde-imp - A web based webmail system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087734 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-04-29 01:12:07 --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Build in rawhide + epel7 Will push all the horde applications at the same time (when all will be reviewed) in f20 / epel6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1075569] Review Request: ghc-ansi-wl-pprint - The Wadler/Leijen Pretty Printer for colored ANSI terminal output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1075569 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-ansi-wl-pprint-0.6.7.1- |ghc-ansi-wl-pprint-0.6.7.1- |1.fc20 |1.fc19 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-ansi-wl-pprint-0.6.7.1-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058669] Review Request: ghc-word8 - 8-bit character library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058669 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-word8-0.0.4-1.fc20 |ghc-word8-0.0.4-1.fc19 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-word8-0.0.4-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
