[Bug 1180794] Review Request: nodejs-isstream - Determine if an object is a Stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180794 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews), ||1178786 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178786 [Bug 1178786] nodejs-got-2.3.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180795] Review Request: nodejs-prepend-http - Prepend http:// to humanized URLs like todomvc.com and localhost
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180795 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews), ||1178786 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178786 [Bug 1178786] nodejs-got-2.3.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180793] Review Request: nodejs-infinity-agent - Creates HTTP/HTTPS Agent with Infinity maxSockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180793 Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews), ||1178786 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178786 [Bug 1178786] nodejs-got-2.3.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179804] Review Request: python-nine - Python 2 / 3 compatibility, like six, but favouring Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179804 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Review: + mock build is successful for f22 - rpmlint output on rpms gave python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring - favoring, flavoring python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https - HTTP python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi - typify python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth - writhe, writer, write python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh - worksheet python3-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase - co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring - favoring, flavoring python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https - HTTP python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi - typify python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth - writhe, writer, write python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh - worksheet python-nine.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase - co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) favouring - favoring, flavoring python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US https - HTTP python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pypi - typify python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US writeth - writhe, writer, write python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US worketh - worksheet python-nine.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codebase - co debase, co-debase, code base python-nine.x86_64: E: no-binary python-nine-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 18 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm tarball : fe1723ca5d3db5cb28a861dca9da1a4a0ce3614057fb07279ddb4905415d3aff upstream tarball : fe1723ca5d3db5cb28a861dca9da1a4a0ce3614057fb07279ddb4905415d3aff + License Public Domain is valid and included in LICENSE.rst file Suggestions: 1) This package is a noarch package please add BuildArch: noarch 2) Group tag is not needed even on EPEL6 so if you are not planning this package for el5, you can safely remove it though its not mandatory to remove. 3) as this is noarch package you can remove CFLAGS in %build Rest looks simple and fine :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166897] Review Request: mono-nat - Mono library for automatic port forwarding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/issues/7140 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180794] New: Review Request: nodejs-isstream - Determine if an object is a Stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180794 Bug ID: 1180794 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-isstream - Determine if an object is a Stream Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/nodejs-isstream.spec SRPM URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/nodejs-isstream-0.1.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Determine if an object is a Stream Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166897] Review Request: mono-nat - Mono library for automatic port forwarding (new github project name: Mono.NAT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: mono-nat - |Review Request: mono-nat - |Mono library for automatic |Mono library for automatic |port forwarding |port forwarding (new github ||project name: Mono.NAT) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180795] New: Review Request: nodejs-prepend-http - Prepend http:// to humanized URLs like todomvc.com and localhost
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180795 Bug ID: 1180795 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-prepend-http - Prepend http:// to humanized URLs like todomvc.com and localhost Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/nodejs-prepend-http.spec SRPM URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/nodejs-prepend-http-1.0.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Prepend http:// to humanized URLs like todomvc.com and localhost Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180793] New: Review Request: nodejs-infinity-agent - Creates HTTP/HTTPS Agent with Infinity maxSockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180793 Bug ID: 1180793 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-infinity-agent - Creates HTTP/HTTPS Agent with Infinity maxSockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pnem...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SPECS/nodejs-infinity-agent.spec SRPM URL: https://pnemade.fedorapeople.org/fedora-work/SRPMS/nodejs-infinity-agent-0.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Returns HTTP/HTTPS agent with maxSockets set to Infinity (based on URL or options). Fedora Account System Username: pnemade -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 806557] Review Request: python-django-followit - A django app that allows users to follow django model objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806557 Bug 806557 depends on bug 829706, which changed state. Bug 829706 Summary: python-django-followit : Duplicate Provides https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829706 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- OK, let's not waste this work. Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml.spec SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml-5.11.0-5.fc22.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8579886 version -6: add mono, java, r, ruby, octave subpackages. Make individual subpackages conditional (rpmbuild --without docs --without check ...). There's a slight problem with the java bindings: documentation is not installed, the examples are not installed, and the examples all use System.loadLibrary. To work under Linux, they should be converted to System.load [1]. I think it would be best to do this as an upstream patch, so I left it for later. Something like [2], but less ugly. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Packaging_JAR_files_that_use_JNI [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JavaSystemLoadExample -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166916] Review Request: fuzzynet - Fuzzy Logic Library for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|medium |low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166916] Review Request: fuzzynet - Fuzzy Logic Library for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Severity|low |medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174408] Review Request: libblockdev - A library for low-level manipulation with block devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174408 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libblockdev-0.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libblockdev-0.1-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180803] New: Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap - Angular-Bootstrap (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180803 Bug ID: 1180803 Summary: Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap - Angular-Bootstrap (XStatic packaging standard) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mru...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap.spec SRPM URL: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/python-XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap-0.11.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: JavaScript library packaged for setuptools (easy_install) / pip. This package is intended to be used by any project that needs these files. It intentionally does not provide any extra code except some metadata nor has any extra requirements. Fedora Account System Username: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174408] Review Request: libblockdev - A library for low-level manipulation with block devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174408 Vratislav Podzimek vpodz...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-01-10 08:45:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142497] Review Request: rubygem-opennebula - OpenNebula Client API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142497 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-opennebula-4.10.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175601] Review Request: rubygem-glu - Glu bindings for the opengl gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175601 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-01-10 12:04:24 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Built on F-22/F-21, push request on F-21, closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175602] Review Request: rubygem-glut - Glut bindings for the opengl gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175602 Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-01-10 12:04:41 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA mtas...@fedoraproject.org --- Built on F-22/F-21, push request on F-21, closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180803] Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Bootstrap - Angular-Bootstrap (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180803
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||karlthe...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
As usual with XStatic package, please ask upstream to keep the license file.
I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection since it complies
with guidelines. Please submit a SCM request.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/haikel/1180803-python-XStatic-Angular-
Bootstrap/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include
[Bug 1169498] Review Request: retext - Text editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169498 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com --- New version: Spec URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/retext.spec SRPM URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/retext-5.0.1-5.fc21.src.rpm - Replace qt-devel with qt5-qttools-devel to use the correct linguist toolchain - Use the %%license macro - Keep the tests enabled, but make them optional -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180814] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-simple-dock - Simple Dock for the Gnome Shell desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180814 Bug ID: 1180814 Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-simple-dock - Simple Dock for the Gnome Shell desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: williamjmore...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/gnome-shell-extension-simple-dock.spec SRPM URL: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/gnome-shell-extension-simple-dock-0.1-20141014git39b8503.fc21.1.src.rpm Description: Simple Dock for the Gnome Shell desktop Fedora Account System Username: williamjmorenor Please note than once installed this extensión you must log out your sesion and log in again to activate this plugin with gnome-tweak-tool, this is working good with fedora workstation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1100870] Review Request: perl-Parse-EDID - Extended display identification data parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100870 maria...@tuxette.fr maria...@tuxette.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-01-10 12:22:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142497] Review Request: rubygem-opennebula - OpenNebula Client API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142497 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-opennebula-4.10.1-1 ||.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-10 06:56:19 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- rubygem-opennebula-4.10.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1171553] Review Request: csvdiff - Generate a diff between two CSV files on the command-line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171553 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- csvdiff-0.1.0-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149407] Review Request: rOCCI-server - Ruby OCCI Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149407 Bug 1149407 depends on bug 1142497, which changed state. Bug 1142497 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-opennebula - OpenNebula Client API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142497 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #18 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Correct srpm URL: Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml.spec SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml-5.11.0-6.fc22.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8579886 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178191] Review Request: python-sane - Python SANE interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191 --- Comment #5 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com --- Would it help if I built a fixed pillow 2.6? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179947] Review Request: python-parsley - Parsing and pattern matching made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179947 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822730] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Tools for power savings based on battery/AC status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730 --- Comment #25 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com --- I found Fedora 20 documentation mention laptop-mode but in Fedora 21 documentation there is no mention of it: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Power_Management_Guide/Example_Laptop.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project that recreates the famous Command Conquer titles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177730] Review Request: php-patchwork-jsqueeze - Efficient JavaScript minification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177730 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177730] Review Request: php-patchwork-jsqueeze - Efficient JavaScript minification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177730 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179947] Review Request: python-parsley - Parsing and pattern matching made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179947 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151842] Review Request: apx - QIX clone, cut into and claim the square area
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151842 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(e...@mayorgalinux.co ||m) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822730] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Tools for power savings based on battery/AC status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730 --- Comment #24 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com --- This package has been dead in the water for really long time. Are laptop-tools tools compatible with systemd? Are there any tools for swithcing laptop performance in current Fedora 21? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822730] Review Request: laptop-mode-tools - Tools for power savings based on battery/AC status
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822730 --- Comment #26 from Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com --- Also after building latest laptop-package rpm there is an error conflict with filesystem package. rpmbuild -tb laptop-mode-tools_1.66.tar.gz sudo dnf install /home/valent/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/laptop-mode-tools-1.66-1.noarch.rpm Install 1 Package Total size: 110 k Installed size: 346 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/sbin from install of laptop-mode-tools-1.66-1.noarch conflicts with file from package filesystem-3.2-28.fc21.x86_64 Error Summary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166916] Review Request: fuzzynet - Fuzzy Logic Library for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916 --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- Now with all ExclusiveArchs. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585916 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166916] Review Request: fuzzynet - Fuzzy Logic Library for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/fuzzynet/fuzzynet.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/fuzzynet/fuzzynet-1.2.0-0.3.beta.fc21.src.rpm https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585865 Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166916] Review Request: fuzzynet - Fuzzy Logic Library for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166916 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585941 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179949] Review Request: python-txsocksx - Twisted client endpoints for SOCKS{4,4a,5}
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179949 --- Comment #3 from Robert Mayr robyd...@gmail.com --- Added a better check section and need python-twisted to build the package correctly. Please look at: Spec URL: https://robyduck.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/python-txsocksx.spec SRPM URL: https://robyduck.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-txsocksx-1.13.0.3-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151842] Review Request: apx - QIX clone, cut into and claim the square area
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151842 Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(e...@mayorgalinux.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Eduardo Mayorga e...@mayorgalinux.com --- Sorry for the delay, I was busy at work. I don't have any other remark. PACKAGE APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166897] Review Request: mono-nat - Mono library for automatic port forwarding (new github project name: Mono.NAT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585923 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179804] Review Request: python-nine - Python 2 / 3 compatibility, like six, but favouring Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179804 --- Comment #3 from Ralph Bean rb...@redhat.com --- Thanks Parag. :) Changes made here: Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/python-nine.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/python-nine-0.3.4-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1175270] Review Request: usbip - USB/IP user-space
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175270 Bug 1175270 depends on bug 1169478, which changed state. Bug 1169478 Summary: Feature request: USB-over-IP (CONFIG_USBIP_CORE) support in Linux kernel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169478 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166897] Review Request: mono-nat - Mono library for automatic port forwarding (new github project name: Mono.NAT)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166897 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- Release #7. (5 and 6 skipped due to build problems) Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/mono/mono-nat/mono-nat-1.1.0-7.fc21.src.rpm rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8585907 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179804] Review Request: python-nine - Python 2 / 3 compatibility, like six, but favouring Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179804 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159660] Review Request: WALinuxAgent - The Windows Azure Linux Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159660 --- Comment #9 from Scott K Logan log...@cottsay.net --- Okay, I believe that I have addressed all outstanding issues: - python-devel dependency changed to python2-devel - logrotate.d owned by WALinuxAgent - rhel = 7 uses systemd instead of sysV Spec URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/WALinuxAgent2/WALinuxAgent.spec SRPM URL: https://cottsay.fedorapeople.org/WALinuxAgent2/WALinuxAgent-2.0.11-2.fc22.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8586099 I tested the package on CentOS 7 without any problems. Thanks, --scott -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178191] Review Request: python-sane - Python SANE interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191
--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find COPYING in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--- This is already discussed. I am manually installing and checking this.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
--- This seems to be fine. Would be good to check anyway ..
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/mukundan/ownCloud/pkg_reviews/python-sane/python-
sane/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[?]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-
packages/__pycache__(python3-libs)
--- This seems to be fine.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 10 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package
[Bug 1178191] Review Request: python-sane - Python SANE interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191 --- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #5) Would it help if I built a fixed pillow 2.6? Thanks. It was my destruction of mock. Now all is well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178191] Review Request: python-sane - Python SANE interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178191 --- Comment #8 from Mukundan Ragavan nonamed...@gmail.com --- (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #7) Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. Note: Cannot find COPYING in rpm(s) See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text --- This is already discussed. I am manually installing and checking this. DEBUG util.py:366: Total size: 51 M DEBUG util.py:366: Downloading packages: DEBUG util.py:366: Running transaction check DEBUG util.py:366: Running transaction test DEBUG util.py:366: Transaction check error: DEBUG util.py:366:file /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__/sane.cpython-34.pyc conflicts between attempted installs of python3-sane-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 and python3-pillow-2.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:366:file /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__/sane.cpython-34.pyo conflicts between attempted installs of python3-sane-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 and python3-pillow-2.6.1-1.fc22.x86_64 But, using the source rpm provided in comment 3, fixed python-pillow was built. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8586125 python-sane can be installed. [root@localhost ~]# rpm -qa python*sane python*pillow | sort python3-pillow-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 python3-sane-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 python-pillow-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 python-sane-2.7.0-1.fc22.x86_64 rpmlint on installed package does not throw any errors. [root@localhost ~]# rpmlint python-sane 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
