[Bug 1153023] Review Request: jenkins-antisamy-markup-formatter-plugin - OWASP Markup Formatter Plugin for Jenkins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1153023 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||jenkins-antisamy-markup-for ||matter-plugin-1.2-1.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-05-15 03:30:45 --- Comment #6 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Built in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=636376 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221487] Review Request: pmd-build-tools - PMD Build Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221487 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it --- Please, regenerate src rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155051] Review Request: jenkins-ldap-plugin - Jenkins LDAP Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155051 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||jenkins-ldap-plugin-1.11-1. ||fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-05-15 03:26:53 --- Comment #4 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Built in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=636001 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221487] Review Request: pmd-build-tools - PMD Build Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221487 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221487] Review Request: pmd-build-tools - PMD Build Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221487 gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||BuildFails -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221904] New: Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta - Automatically include GitHub meta information in META.yml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221904 Bug ID: 1221904 Summary: Review Request: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta - Automatically include GitHub meta information in META.yml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: psab...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta.spec SRPM URL: https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.50-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Dist::Zilla::Plugin::GithubMeta is a Dist::Zilla plugin to include GitHub meta information in META.yml. It automatically detects if the distribution directory is under git version control and whether the origin is a GitHub repository and will set the repository and homepage meta in META.yml to the appropriate URLs for GitHub. Fedora Account System Username: psabata -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jan Synacek jsyna...@redhat.com --- Ok, I don't see any issues anymore. Approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033481] Review Request: perl-Test-Time - Overrides the time() and sleep() core functions for testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033481 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(bochecha@fedorapr | |oject.org) | Last Closed||2015-05-15 05:04:45 --- Comment #6 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- I'm not interested any more, no. Sorry for not letting you know earlier, I hope I didn't cause any work for you. :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033494] Review Request:perl-Cache-Memory-Simple - Yet another on memory cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033494 Bug 1033494 depends on bug 1033481, which changed state. Bug 1033481 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Time - Overrides the time() and sleep() core functions for testing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033481 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033494] Review Request:perl-Cache-Memory-Simple - Yet another on memory cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033494 Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(bochecha@fedorapr | |oject.org) | Last Closed||2015-05-15 05:04:21 --- Comment #4 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org --- I'm not interested any more, no. Sorry for not letting you know earlier, I hope I didn't cause any work for you. :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221204] Review Request: python-docker-scripts - Collection of scripts to help manage Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221204 --- Comment #3 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review! Spec URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/3/python-docker-scripts.spec SRPM URL: http://goldmann.fedorapeople.org/package_review/python-docker-scripts/3/python-docker-scripts-0.3.7-1.fc22.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9749133 Changes: - Upstream release 0.3.7 - Make sure the /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/docker_scripts is owned by this package Man page will be probably added later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: hpl Short Description: A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark Upstream URL: http://www.netlib.org/benchmark/hpl/ Owners: jskarvad Branches: f20 f21 f22 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155053] Review Request: jenkins-matrix-auth-plugin - Jenkins Matrix Authorization Strategy Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155053 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||jenkins-matrix-auth-plugin- ||1.2-1.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-05-15 03:28:52 --- Comment #4 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Built in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=635995 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221487] Review Request: pmd-build-tools - PMD Build Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221487
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
--- srpm/pmd-build-tools.spec2015-05-15 10:00:01.968386315 +0200
+++ srpm-unpacked/pmd-build-tools.spec2015-05-14 09:18:57.0 +0200
@@ -12,19 +12,6 @@
Source0:
https://github.com/pmd/build-tools/archive/%{commit}/pmd-build-tools-%{shortcommit}.tar.gz
Source1:LICENSE
-BuildRequires: maven-local
-BuildRequires: mvn(commons-io:commons-io)
-BuildRequires: mvn(junit:junit)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.ant:ant)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-compat)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-core)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-release-plugin)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin)
-BuildRequires:
mvn(org.apache.maven.plugin-testing:maven-plugin-testing-harness)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.apache.maven.plugin-tools:maven-plugin-annotations)
-BuildRequires: mvn(org.sonatype.oss:oss-parent:pom:)
-
%description
This small subproject regroups most of the stuff needed to build PMD.
As some Java code has been produced to reduce the use of scripts when
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fbb Short Description: Packet radio mailbox and utilities Upstream URL: https://sourceforge.net/projects/linfbb/ Owners: jskarvad Branches: f20 f21 f22 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] New: Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 Bug ID: 1221948 Summary: Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: amigad...@amigadave.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/xdg-app.spec SRPM URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/xdg-app-0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: xdg-app is a system for building, distributing and running sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. See https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps for more information. Fedora Account System Username: amigadave Koji scratch build for Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9750493 COPR: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/amigadave/xdg-app/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103414] Review Request: js-jquery-migrate - APIs and features removed from jQuery core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103414
--- Comment #9 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net ---
Sorry it took so long. Here are some issues found upon review.
1. %license is not used for marking license text file
2. qunit is bundled
3. (SHOULD item) tests are not being run
Fixing 1 and 2 would be enough for this to be APPROVED, but it's be much
appreciated if you took a stab at enabling the testsuite as well.
Full details below:
MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
rpmlint is clean
built packages:
[rathann@sakura ~/build/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result]$ rpmlint
js-jquery-migrate-1.2.1-5.fc23.*.rpm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
installed package:
Spawning container 0ea55ffe3e794d5d9661f659a90d59e5 on
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root.
Press ^] three times within 1s to kill container.
sh-4.3# rpmlint js-jquery-migrate
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
While I don't like triggers and having files generated at install time, the
actual method of using
this library recommended by upstream is including both jquery.js and
jquery-migrate.js, so what
you're doing is simply a convenience for package consumers, so I guess this
outweighs the issue
of not being able to easily verify the jquery+migrate{,.min}.js contents using
rpm -V.
MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
The source files don't have any license information, but the included
LICENSE-MIT is sufficient.
- Please ask upstream to include license information in the source files as
well.
MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %license.
- Please mark the LICENSE-MIT file with %license macro.
MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ spectool -g js-jquery-migrate.spec
Getting
https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate/archive/54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35/js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz
to ./js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz
% Total% Received % Xferd Average Speed TimeTime Time Current
Dload Upload Total SpentLeft Speed
100 1630 1630 0 36 0 --:--:-- 0:00:04 --:--:--38
100 52329 100 523290 0 7064 0 0:00:07 0:00:07 --:--:-- 24407
[rathann@sakura ~/build/SOURCES/js-jquery-migrate]$ sha256sum
js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz
js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz.orig
1b78a63145f11f2e946fb9dc36aa9b2a0d3e40aba558b89e24122f30b92e8625
js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz
1b78a63145f11f2e946fb9dc36aa9b2a0d3e40aba558b89e24122f30b92e8625
js-jquery-migrate-54ee1ae5928423a0e44ba1861112a746181fbc35.tar.gz.orig
MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
It's bundling qunit (https://qunitjs.com), even if it isn't used unless
enable_tests is set to 1.
- Please unbundle.
SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
Builds fine in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock.
SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A
package should not segfault instead of running, for example.
You should try to run the testsuite at build time. You have the following
comment in your spec:
# disabled due to missing dependencies (that likely won't run in koji anyway)
What is missing apart from qunit?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221469] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221469 --- Comment #6 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Fixed spec+srpm: Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jruby-maven-plugins.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/2/jruby-maven-plugins-1.0.10-2.fc23.src.rpm I removed bundled files and disabled rails3-maven-plugin. I don't expect it to be needed anytime soon in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 --- Comment #35 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221469] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221469 Michal Srb m...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Michal Srb m...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: jruby-maven-plugins Short Description: JRuby Maven plugins Upstream URL: https://github.com/torquebox/jruby-maven-plugins Owners: msrb mizdebsk msimacek Branches: f22 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- (In reply to Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz from comment #23) Can I mark now the fedora_cvs flag? Yes! See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors for more details. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||d...@der-flo.net
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Hi David!
I will do the review.
Please upload the latest spec and srpm for the review.
Diff spec file in url and in SRPM
-
--- /home/flo/review/1221948-xdg-app/srpm/xdg-app.spec2015-05-15
14:44:30.848836938 +0200
+++ /home/flo/review/1221948-xdg-app/srpm-unpacked/xdg-app.spec2015-05-15
11:58:13.0 +0200
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: xdg-app
Version:0.2
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Application deployment framework for desktop apps
@@ -10,6 +10,4 @@
# profile.d snippet, suggested by Alex.
Source1:xdg-app.sh
-#
https://github.com/alexlarsson/xdg-app/commit/a1892ee8b04c55cd96cfcc3bfb562d75683a46c4
-Patch0: xdg-app-0.2-fix-autoptr-old-glib.patch
BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gio-unix-2.0)
@@ -31,5 +29,4 @@
%prep
%setup -q
-%autosetup
@@ -61,7 +58,4 @@
%changelog
-* Fri May 15 2015 David King amigad...@amigadave.com - 0.2-2
-- Add upstream patch to build against older GLib
-
* Fri May 15 2015 David King amigad...@amigadave.com - 0.2-1
- Update to 0.2
There is one rpmlint-warning:
xdg-app.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/profile.d/xdg-app.sh
To fix this take a look at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#non-conffile-in-etc
Cheers,
Florian
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-05-15 09:03:07 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gtk-sharp3 Short Description: GTK+ 3 and GNOME 3 bindings for Mono Upstream URL: http://www.mono-project.com/GtkSharp Owners: elsupergomez mono-sig Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: elsupergomez -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #2 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- Spec URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/xdg-app.spec SRPM URL: https://amigadave.fedorapeople.org/xdg-app-0.2-2.fc23.src.rpm Description: xdg-app is a system for building, distributing and running sandboxed desktop applications on Linux. See https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/SandboxedApps for more information. Fedora Account System Username: amigadave Regarding the non-conffile-in-etc, the shell snippet is not a configuration file, so %config is not really appropriate. This seems to match what is done for other such snippets, such as vte-profile: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/vte291.git/tree/vte291.spec#n101 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #27 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gtk-sharp3 Short Description: GTK+ 3 and GNOME 3 bindings for Mono Upstream URL: http://www.mono-project.com/docs/gui/gtksharp/ Owners: elsupergomez mono-sig Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1182261] Review Request: libabigail - Tool for constructing, manipulating, serializing and de-serializing ABI-relevant artifacts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182261 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libabigail-1.0-0.1.20150422 |libabigail-1.0-0.1.20150422 |gita9582d8.el7 |gita9582d8.fc21 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- libabigail-1.0-0.1.20150422gita9582d8.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215261] Review Request: pytimeparse - Time expression parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215261 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196780] Review Request: xtuple-openrpt - reporting tool for xTuple / PostBooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196780 --- Comment #9 from Gil Moskowitz gmoskow...@xtuple.com --- More review changes have been merged: https://github.com/xtuple/openrpt/pull/50 Source code including these changes has been retagged v3.3.8+1 https://github.com/xtuple/openrpt/releases/tag/v3.3.8%2B1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1120982] Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982 --- Comment #7 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Ping2. The issues I highlighted don't require upstream cooperation to fix. You can easily do it yourself (include a doc file and set the license field correctly). Please fix them and I'll approve the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #4 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- (In reply to Florian der-flo Lehner from comment #3) Please replace: BuildRequires: /usr/bin/xsltproc with: BuildRequires: libxslt I do not think that would be a good change, as it is /usr/bin/xsltproc that is required for man page generation, so the path-based BuildRequires is better. Is there a URL/Comment you can referfing to for Source1? No, that was just on IRC. It could be part of xdg-app, so I filed a bug about it: https://github.com/alexlarsson/xdg-app/issues/74 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215261] Review Request: pytimeparse - Time expression parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215261 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-pytimeparse-1.1.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pytimeparse-1.1.4-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215728] Review Request: openstack-gnocchi - HTTP API to store metrics and index resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215728 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RELEASE_PENDING |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #26 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar --- (In reply to Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz from comment #25) New Package SCM Request === Package Name: gtk-sharp3 Short Description: GTK+ 3 and GNOME 3 bindings for Mono Upstream URL: http://www.mono-project.com/GtkSharp Upstream URL: http://www.mono-project.com/docs/gui/gtksharp/ Owners: elsupergomez mono-sig Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: elsupergomez -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - Remote display server for applications and desktops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc |js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc |21 |20 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215728] Review Request: openstack-gnocchi - HTTP API to store metrics and index resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215728 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openstack-gnocchi-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-gnocchi-1.0.0-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #23 from Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar --- Improve with suggestions. Spec URL: https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gtk-sharp3.spec SRPM URL: https://elsupergomez.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.fc21.src.rpm Can I mark now the fedora_cvs flag? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198312] Review Request: xpra - Remote display server for applications and desktops
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198312 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc |js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc |22 |21 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- js-web-socket-js-1.0.2-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215261] Review Request: pytimeparse - Time expression parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215261 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-pytimeparse-1.1.4-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-pytimeparse-1.1.4-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215728] Review Request: openstack-gnocchi - HTTP API to store metrics and index resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215728 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- openstack-gnocchi-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openstack-gnocchi-1.0.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: xdg-app Short Description: Application deployment framework for desktop apps Upstream URL: https://github.com/alexlarsson/xdg-app Owners: amigadave Branches: f21 f22 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221469] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221469 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221469] Review Request: jruby-maven-plugins - JRuby Maven plugins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221469 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222012] New: Review Request: librvngabw - an AbiWord document generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222012 Bug ID: 1222012 Summary: Review Request: librvngabw - an AbiWord document generator library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dtar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/librvngabw.spec SRPM URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/librvngabw-0.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: librvngabw is a library for generating AbiWord documents. It is directly pluggable into import filters based on librevenge. Fedora Account System Username: dtardon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #3 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net --- Hi David! Please replace: BuildRequires: /usr/bin/xsltproc with: BuildRequires: libxslt Is there a URL/Comment you can referfing to for Source1? Everything else seems to be fine, so far. Cheers, Florian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ipaddress-1.0.7-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819 --- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- burp-1.4.36-6.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/burp-1.4.36-6.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221742] Review Request: python-ipaddress - Port of the python 3.3+ ipaddress module to 2.6+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221742 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1213111] Review Request: docker-compose - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111
Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #4 from Marek Goldmann mgold...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #7 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- burp-1.4.36-6.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/burp-1.4.36-6.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948
Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Hi David!
I think, your package is fine so far.
And I am looking forward using it :)
Cheers,
Flo
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: LGPL (v2 or later), GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or
generated, LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address), LGPL,
LGPL (with incorrect FSF address). 6 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1,
/etc/profile.d, /usr/share/dbus-1/services
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/bash-
completion(tig, cmake, bash-completion, rpmlint, yum, gvfs, glib2),
/usr/share/bash-completion/completions(tig, cmake, firewalld,
libappstream-glib, rpmlint, yum, bash-completion, gvfs, glib2)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from
[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819 --- Comment #46 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- burp-1.4.36-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/burp-1.4.36-6.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- burp-1.4.36-6.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/burp-1.4.36-6.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- xdg-app-0.2-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-app-0.2-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1203379] Review Request: cx18-firmware - Firmware for Conexant cx23418-based video capture devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203379 David Ward david.w...@ll.mit.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.w...@ll.mit.edu --- Comment #1 from David Ward david.w...@ll.mit.edu --- Can this be closed now that bug #1203385 has addressed this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- xdg-app-0.2-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdg-app-0.2-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1213111] Review Request: docker-compose - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111 --- Comment #6 from Michael Hampton er...@ioerror.us --- Spec URL: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2449/docker-compose.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7473/9757473/docker-compose-1.2.0-3.fc23.src.rpm Scratch builds: - F23: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9757473 - F22: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9757956 - F21: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9757962 - F20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9757970 F20 build failed because python-docker-py is missing on i386 (but present on x86_64). I'd like to fix this but won't be terribly concerned since F20 will be EOL very soon. This same package is also too old on F21; docker-compose 1.2 requires python-docker-py version 1.0.0 but F21 has 0.7.1. This causes docker-compose's --timeout option to fail with the exception AttributeError: 'Client' object has no attribute 'timeout'. This was the only testsuite failure I encountered. Atomic also uses the python-docker-py package, so it might not be safe to upgrade this. Looking forward, the upcoming 1.3 release of docker-compose will require python-dockerpty 0.3.3, but only 0.2.3 is currently in any version of Fedora. 1.2 also works with python-dockerpty 0.3.3. As docker-compose (formerly fig) is currently the only Fedora package using python-dockerpty, it should be safe to upgrade this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222012] Review Request: librvngabw - an AbiWord document generator library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222012 David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dtar...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com --- builds are available in copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dtardon/pending-review/build/92492/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819 --- Comment #45 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- burp-1.4.36-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/burp-1.4.36-6.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196782] Review Request: xtuple-csvimp - xTuple / PostBooks data import utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196782 --- Comment #5 from Gil Moskowitz gmoskow...@xtuple.com --- https://github.com/xtuple/csvimp/pull/20 addressing review comments has been merged https://github.com/xtuple/csvimp/releases/tag/v0.5.1%2B1 retags the release including linux distribution bundling changes, no code changes v0.5.1+1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 David King amigad...@amigadave.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||xdg-app-0.2-2.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-05-15 12:50:53 --- Comment #9 from David King amigad...@amigadave.com --- Now in Rawhide. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hpl-2.1-9.fc22.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hpl-2.1-9.fc22.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1213111] Review Request: docker-compose - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213111 --- Comment #5 from Michael Hampton er...@ioerror.us --- I'm not building Python 3 packages because upstream claims to not yet be Python 3 compatible (upstream bug: https://github.com/docker/compose/issues/219) I want to update all Fedora branches (f20, f21, f22, f23/rawhide) as the old version of fig no longer talks to the current version of docker, claiming an API incompatibility. Which is what started this whole odyssey in the first place. I've added a Release to Obsoletes: and I'm running a new build now to shake loose any last minute issues I might have missed or forgotten about. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hpl-2.1-9.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hpl-2.1-9.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gtk-sharp3-2.99.3-10.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- hpl-2.1-9.fc20.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hpl-2.1-9.fc20.1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 830869] Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 Jaroslav Škarvada jskar...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-05-15 14:43:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 830869, which changed state. Bug 830869 Summary: Review Request: hpl - A Portable Implementation of the High-Performance Linpack Benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830869 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1192059] Review Request: gtk-sharp3 - GTK 3 sharp for Mono
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192059 Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra DIaz claudiorodr...@pereyradiaz.com.ar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-05-15 14:47:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
