[Bug 1256097] Review Request: synapse - Semantic launcher written in Vala

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256097



--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng  ---
1. Drop %defattr(-,root,root,-)

2. Use %make_build to substitute `make %{?_smp_mflags}` if you want.

3. %{_mandir}/man1/synapse.1.gz

->

%{_mandir}/man1/synapse.1*

4. Source0:   
https://launchpad.net/synapse-project/0.3/0.2.99.1/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz

->

Source0:   
https://launchpad.net/synapse-project/0.3/%{version}/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1229349] Review Request: radcli - Radius client library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229349

Christopher Meng  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng  ---
(In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #7)
> > 1. If this is a fork, please fix missing license headers.
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here. I've added the headers into the license
> breakdown, if that's what you ask.

Non-blocker issue, I said you should add license header to each file of
sources.

PACKAGE APPROVED.

PS. Will any packages use this in the future?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1253244] Review Request: uClibc-ng - C library for embedded Linux

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244

Christopher Meng  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng  ---
(In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #5)
> > 2. I'm not sure if uclibc in Fedora is a package or just another c lib, if
> > just a package ,you still need to build it with %optflags
> > (UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS)
> Including %{optflags} would break busybox's goal to build smallest binary
> possible, I think. After all, that's the reason why busybox links with
> uClibc rather than glibc.

Ok,-fno-stack-protector -nostdinc, I understand.

> > 3. About these 2, should they be enabled?
> > 
> > Wide Character Support (UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR) [N/y/?] n
> > Locale Support (UCLIBC_HAS_LOCALE) [N/y/?] n
> Again, I'm not sure how this would affect busybox. I should consult it's
> maintainer.

I've read the wchar code from uclibc, it's broken. ;)

PACKAGE APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 715127] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715127

Christopher Meng  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||i...@cicku.me
 Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE



--- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1257410 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410

Christopher Meng  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||c...@oleastre.be



--- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng  ---
*** Bug 715127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257410] New: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410

Bug ID: 1257410
   Summary: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion
utilities
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: i...@cicku.me
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://cicku.me/abcMIDI.spec
SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/abcMIDI-2015.08.25-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: AbcMIDI is a set contains multiple converter and manipulation
programs for ABC music notation and MIDI files. These programs were developed
by James Allwright in the early 1990s and has been supported by Seymour Shlien
since 2003. The program contains many features, such as expansion of guitar
chords, drum accompaniment, and support for microtones.
Fedora Account System Username: cicku

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-rackspace-auth-openstack-1.3-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14372

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-rackspace-auth-openstack-1.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14371

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1249078] Review Request: supernova - Use novaclient with multiple OpenStack nova environments the easy way

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078



--- Comment #8 from Major Hayden  ---
Okay, I think I may have corralled all of the feedback into a new spec and
SRPM:

https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova-2.0.8-3.fc22.src.rpm
https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova.spec

COPR:

https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mhayden/supernova/build/111513/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 984560] Review Request: enki - Extensible text editor for programmers

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560

Kevin Kofler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
 Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
Summary|Review Request: Enki -  |Review Request: enki -
   |Extensible text editor for  |Extensible text editor for
   |programmers |programmers
  Alias||enki




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937
[Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868

Kevin Kofler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org
 Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
  Alias||python-qutepart




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937
[Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761



--- Comment #4 from William Moreno  ---
Package Review
==

Need Work:
==
1- You must use the %license macro in %%files for the license text.

2- Package must own all directories that it creates.
   Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/qt5

3- Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.

Can you repclace:
https://github.com/Aseman-Land/libqtelegram-aseman-edition/blob/master/util/cryptoutils.h

With: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/crypto-utils/

RPMLint:

W: summary-not-capitalized C libqtelegram 
Please update summary 

This depencies are needed?
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libssl.so.10
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libQt5Multimedia.so.5
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libGL.so.1
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6


Please fix this issues to check:

[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines

This package build fine in epel7 and suported Fedoras:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/

= MUST items =
C/C++:
PASS: Package does not contain kernel modules.
PASS: Package contains no static executables.
PASS: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
PASS: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
PASS: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
PASS: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
PASS: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
PASS: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
  other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
  Guidelines.
PASS: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
PASS: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
PASS: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
PASS: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
NA:   Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
PASS: Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
  names).
PASS: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
NA:   If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
  Provides are present.
PASS: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
NA:   Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
PASS: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
  Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
PASS: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
  one supported primary architecture.
PASS: Package installs properly.
PASS: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
PASS: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
PASS: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
PASS: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
  that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
PASS: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
PASS: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
  beginning of %install.
PASS: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
PASS: Dist tag is present.
PASS: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
PASS: Permissions on files are set properly.
PASS: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR= doesn't
  work.
PASS: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
PASS: Package does not use a name that already exists.
PASS: Package is not relocatable.
PASS: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
  provided in the spec URL.
PASS: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
PASS: File names are valid UTF-8.
PASS: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =
Generic:
PASS: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
  file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
PASS: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
PASS: Package functions as described.
PASS: Latest version is packaged.
PASS: Package does not include license text files separate from upstre

[Bug 1255505] Review Request: dnf-plugin-system-upgrade - DNF plugin to handle system upgrades

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505

Adam Williamson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|awill...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson  ---
Package Review
==

Notes:

* The license file is not included in the module packages, but they can be
installed without the main package.
* Creates a file in /usr/lib/systemd/system/system-update.target.wants , but
doesn't own it or depend on PackageKit (which owns it).
* Changelog is missing releases (it has '0.3.0', should have '0.3.0-1')
* Might be nice for [Unit] in the service file to include a Documentation=
line, per the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd
* The guidelines also say "Unit files should avoid using StandardOutput= or
StandardError=", but I'm gonna guess this is a special case?
* "Requires: python-%{name}" is not versioned - perhaps it ought to be?

A few changes required (see [!] items below and notes above), but mostly looks
good.

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners:
 /usr/lib/systemd/system/system-update.target.wants
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a sep

[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828



--- Comment #20 from bigswitch  ---
Reviewer comments about service files have been addressed.
Please use following links for further review.

Spec URL:
https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/24hmnr6ojdgwulgpqclcvlvp5qf8tdt3.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/tuxihmlq73d6b7ubdb9ub30w2ushliyh.rpm
Description: Big Switch Openstack Neutron driver
Fedora Account System Username: xinwu
mock build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10842833

spec file and service file is also available at
https://github.com/xinwu/python-networking-bigswitch

wget
https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/24hmnr6ojdgwulgpqclcvlvp5qf8tdt3.spec
-O python-networking-bigswitch.spec
wget
https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/tuxihmlq73d6b7ubdb9ub30w2ushliyh.rpm -O
python-networking-bigswitch-2015.1.36-1.el7.centos.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #6 from Guy Streeter  ---
I promise I'm not trying to be difficult. If that's the correct way to set it
up, I'll change it.

Perhaps there's something about the way packages are built in the distro I
don't understand. I assumed a src.rpm was submitted to the the build system. Is
that incorrect? Not being a maintainer, I haven't ever participated in that
process.

I've looked for information about how you get from source code to built package
in the repo, but I can't find it. If I knew that, I could make sure my source
is prepared for it. Do you have a link to that?

I'd be really happy to see something that says "this is how your source tree
should be laid out."

thanks,
--Guy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828

bigswitch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail.
   ||com)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #5 from Jiri Kastner  ---
hey man, do you want to get package reviewed? :)
one specfile means one review, less mess.
i'm not aware of any package maintained in way you want to go.
i would understand your attitude if resulting specfile would look like kernel
specfile, but that is exception.
with two specfiles and two srpms in case of abandoning python2 in future of
fedora means retiring packages.
i would also understand your attitude if you will have two separated
repositories, but you you have code in one repo.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828



--- Comment #19 from bigswitch  ---
Hi Haïkel,

I went over the following two bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242886
and found some minor discrepancies, but nothing major.

Some of the bugs from the list are approved, which probably should be crossed
or removed the list:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242896
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812

bigswitch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rhosp-bugs-internal@bigswit
   ||ch.com



--- Comment #2 from bigswitch  ---
Hi Chandan,

Latest version on pypi is 1.5.1. The spec file should be pointing to that
version, right?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1242886] Review Request: openstack-ironic-inspector - Hardware introspection service for OpenStack Ironic

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242886

bigswitch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rhosp-bugs-internal@bigswit
   ||ch.com



--- Comment #1 from bigswitch  ---
Hi Dmitry,

I see there's 'oslo.log' as requires on pypi, but its missing in the requires
section in the spec file. Is that intentional (some other oslo package includes
it)? Otherwise it should be added.

Everything else looks good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257342] New: Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342

Bug ID: 1257342
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library
for formatting and manipulating numbers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: t...@compton.nu
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-numeral.spec
SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-numeral-1.5.3-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh

Description:
A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1257342




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342
[Bug 1257342] Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for
formatting and manipulating numbers
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257342] Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1257338, 956806
   ||(nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of
a stream
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1257340




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340
[Bug 1257340] Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the
same line in the terminal
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257340] New: Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340

Bug ID: 1257340
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing
to the same line in the terminal
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: t...@compton.nu
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-single-line-log.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-single-line-log-1.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh

Description:
Node.js module that keeps writing to the same line in the console (or
a stream). Very useful when you write progress bars, or a status message
during longer operations. Supports multilines.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257340] Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1257338, 956806
   ||(nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338
[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of
a stream
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1114313, 956806
   ||(nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114313
[Bug 1114313] nodejs-tilelive-5.8.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257338] New: Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338

Bug ID: 1257338
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the
progress of a stream
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: t...@compton.nu
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-progress-stream.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-progress-stream-1.1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh

Description:
Read the progress of a stream. Supports speed and eta.

Gets the lengths of the stream automatically if you're using the request
or http module. You can also pass the length on initiation. Progress-stream
will also check to see if the stream already have a length property.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257336] Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257336

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1114313, 956806
   ||(nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114313
[Bug 1114313] nodejs-tilelive-5.8.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257336] New: Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257336

Bug ID: 1257336
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue
to execute async functions linear
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: t...@compton.nu
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-async-queue.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-async-queue-0.1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh

Description:
Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1213184] Review Request: grantlee-qt5 - Qt string template engine based on the Django template system

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213184

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Jan Grulich  ---
1) Typo in BuildRequires: qt5-tools-devel, should be qt5-qttools-devel
2) Use %license macro instead of %doc for the license file
3) Some python files are also under BSD license so maybe the license should be
LGPLv2+ and BSD

Otherwise looks good, all mentioned issues are not blockers and can be simply
fixed during import. Approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1219540] Review Request: ahc-tools - Tools for RDO-manager automatic health checks

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219540

John Trowbridge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||ahc-tools-0.2.0-1.fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1213184] Review Request: grantlee-qt5 - Qt string template engine based on the Django template system

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213184

Jan Grulich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jgrul...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257329] New: Review Request: openstack-ironic-python-agent - A python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare Metal servers.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257329

Bug ID: 1257329
   Summary: Review Request: openstack-ironic-python-agent - A
python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare
Metal servers.
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jtrow...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent.spec

SRPM URL:
https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.src.rpm

Description: A python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare Metal
servers.

Fedora Account System Username: trown

I was unable to build on koji[1], but it builds fine locally[2].

[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/388/10840388/build.log
[2]
https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256435] Review Request: metapixel - photomosaic generator

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435

Neil Horman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Neil Horman  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: metapixel
New Branches: master
Owners: nhorman

please unretire this package, I have fixes to allow it to build again.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256435] Review Request: metapixel - photomosaic generator

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435

Neil Horman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2015-08-26 15:39:23



--- Comment #3 from Neil Horman  ---
sorry about that, I didn't even think to check dist-git.  I'll just unretire
it.  Thanks

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1255505] Review Request: dnf-plugin-system-upgrade - DNF plugin to handle system upgrades

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505



--- Comment #4 from Will Woods  ---
For new packages, see:

  https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/wwoods/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade/builds/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100

Irina Boverman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. |
   |com)|



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100

Irina Boverman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1234208] Review Request: PyPDF2 - A Pure-Python library built as a PDF toolkit

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234208

Major Hayden  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||itsme_...@yahoo.com
  Flags||needinfo?(itsme_410@yahoo.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #14 from Major Hayden  ---
Ah, okay.  I certainly didn't intend to trample on your previous work -- only
to assist.  I gave you some other pointers (see comment 11) to improve the
package a bit and make it easier for someone who is a package sponsor to
review.

With that said, if you'd like me to own the package, I have no issues there. 
If you'd like to own it, I'll gladly step back and let you take it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1247328] Review Request: sshrc - Bring your .bashrc, .vimrc etc. with you when you ssh

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328



--- Comment #8 from William Moreno  ---
Package Review
==
Hi

Sorry for the late feedback, this is a simple package, the spec looks good,
but there is some things than can improve the user experience:

1- Can you add a manpage? You can install the maneditor package in Fedora
and write a manpage, even a minimal manpage can improve the user experience,
if you write a manpage please ask upstream to merge it.

2- This package provides 2 binaries, sshrc and moshrc, I am not sure about
whow users will find the second binari based in the name and description 
of the package, maybe if you write manpage for sshrc you can refer than 
moshrc it is avaible too, note than you will need a man page for each binari.

The missing manpage is not a bloquer, but I want to ask if you can work in it.

= MUST items =
Generic:
PASS: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
  other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
  Guidelines.
PASS: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
PASS: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
PASS: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
NA:   Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
NA:   Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
  names).
PASS: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
PASS: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
  Provides are present.
PASS: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
PASS: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
  (~1MB) or number of files.
PASS: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
PASS: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
  one supported primary architecture.
PASS: Package installs properly.
PASS: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
PASS: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
  license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
  license(s) for the package is included in %license.
PASS: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
PASS: Package must own all directories that it creates.
PASS: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
PASS: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
  that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
PASS: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
PASS: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
  beginning of %install.
PASS: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
PASS: Dist tag is present.
PASS: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
PASS: Permissions on files are set properly.
NA:   Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
  work.
PASS: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
PASS: Package does not use a name that already exists.
PASS: Package is not relocatable.
PASS: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
  provided in the spec URL.
PASS: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
  %{name}.spec.
PASS: File names are valid UTF-8.
PASS: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =
Generic:
NA:   If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
  file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
PASS: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
PASS: Latest version is packaged.
PASS: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
PASS: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
  justified.
PASS: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
  translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
PASS: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
  architectures.
NA:   %check is present and all tests pass.
PASS: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
  files.
PASS: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
PASS: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
PASS: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
PASS: Buildroot is not present
PASS: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
  $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
PASS: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /us

[Bug 1255179] Review Request: runc - CLI for running Open Containers

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255179

Nalin Dahyabhai  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #14 from Nalin Dahyabhai  ---
Jan is already in the packagers group, removing this from the list of
FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1255179] Review Request: runc - CLI for running Open Containers

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255179



--- Comment #13 from Nalin Dahyabhai  ---
Looks pretty good to me. Here's the checklist from fedora-review, with a few
items that I'd like to know more about (search for "[ ]" and "[!]"):

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

= MUST items =

C/C++:
[X]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[X]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
 Package license is ASL 2.0.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 No patches are applied, and the bundled license text is that of ASL 2.0, which
is in line with the opencontainers charter.
[X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
 Except for the debuginfo, of course.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Subdirectories under /usr/share/gocode that aren't owned by golang or the
opencontainer-specs package should be owned by this package so that its removal
doesn't leave empties around.
 Note: No known owner of
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/system,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/systemd,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/selinux,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/seccomp,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/stacktrace,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/label,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/netlink,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs/validate,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/nsenter,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/criurpc,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/xattr,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/user,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/integration,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners:
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/system,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs/validate,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/nsenter,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/systemd,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/selinux,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/label,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/netlink,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/criurpc,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/seccomp,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/xattr,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/stacktrace,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/integration,

/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/user,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
 Might want to add a comment about the -B flag here, for people like me who
didn't know that it tells the go linker to embed a build ID note in the binary.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC except

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100

Irina Boverman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1247177] Review Request: python-os-client-config - OpenStack Client Configuation Library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247177
Bug 1247177 depends on bug 1219807, which changed state.

Bug 1219807 Summary: Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for 
determining platform-specific directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1219807] Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for determining platform-specific directories

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||1.4.0-2.fc22
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-08-26 13:50:01



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257302] New: Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create a module not found error

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257302

Bug ID: 1257302
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create
a module not found error
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: t...@compton.nu
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/nodejs-module-not-found-error.spec
SRPM URL:
http://download.compton.nu/tmp/nodejs-module-not-found-error-1.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm
Fedora Account System Username: tomh

Description:
Create a module not found error.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1257302] Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create a module not found error

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257302

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
   ||1223413




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223413
[Bug 1223413] nodejs-proxyquire-1.7.1 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.1.4-2.fc21|0.1.4-2.fc22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1219807] Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for determining platform-specific directories

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-appdirs-1.4.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14193

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1180378] Review Request: rubygem-sigdump - ruby signal handler which dumps backtrace of running threads and number of allocated objects per class

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180378



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-sigdump-0.2.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-sigdump'. You can provide feedback
for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14171

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14191

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You
can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14206

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum
--enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can provide
feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14195

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You
can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14207

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14189

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Lukas Bezdicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-08-26 13:06:12



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246192] Review Request: python-pymod2pkg - python module to package map

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246192

Jakub Ruzicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|0.1.4-2.el7 |0.1.4-2.fc21



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc22 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14354

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc23 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14353

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc21 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14352

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #4 from Guy Streeter  ---
The combined specfile would have to be edited and checked in to build each of
the packages, one at a time. I don't see an advantage to that.

Keeping them separate will also allow fixes and updates to be made
independently for the two packages.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1219540] Review Request: ahc-tools - Tools for RDO-manager automatic health checks

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219540

John Trowbridge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-08-26 11:42:26



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #3 from Jiri Kastner  ---
tito - https://github.com/dgoodwin/tito

rpmbuild with -tX options works on tarball directly if spec file is in toplevel
directory

you can have one specfile and put all to it. and use 
%global with_python3 1
%if 0%{?with_python3}
...
%{__python3} setup.py build
...
%endif

see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Python3.4GuidlinesDraft

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100



--- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Looks unretired now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740



--- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Branch exists.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751



--- Comment #34 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828



--- Comment #18 from bigswitch  ---
Thanks a lot Ihar! I'll address the new review comments today. 
We don't have a Delorean pull request yet. We asked for it earlier last week
and got following reply from Haïkel. We don't totally understand the Red Hat
Legal part, but looks like getting this review done is the first step. Please
let us know if you have a different opinion :)
Quote from Haïkel
"We should move forward the fedora review for 2 reasons:
* we need to review all the packages before inclusion in delorean to avoid
broken packages like octavia
* if your goal is to be included in RHEL-OSP, it's faster that way as
packages that are not in Fedora requires licensing review from Red Hat Legal. I
plan to request an exception for RDO packages but until then, it's faster this
way."

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7779

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can
provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7782

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c
'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You
can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7784

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1244977] Review Request: libfabric -Open Fabric Interfaces

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244977



--- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski  ---
SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libfabric-1.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm

* Wed Aug 26 2015 Orion Poplawski  - 1.1.0-1
- Update to 1.1.0


I see no mention of hadoop.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256344] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-IfLOG - Load Log::Any only if "logging is enabled"

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256344

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740

Karel Volný  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #16 from Karel Volný  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: qmmp
New Branches: epel7
Owners: kvolny
InitialCC: nucleo

see bug #1242361

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751

Karel Volný  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #33 from Karel Volný  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: qmmp
New Branches: epel7
Owners: kvolny
InitialCC: nucleo

see bug #1242361

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Ralph Bean  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1245848
 Depends On|1245848 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245848
[Bug 1245848] python-alembic-0.8.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851

Chandan Kumar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #6 from Chandan Kumar  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-os-testr
Short Description:  A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack
projects
Upstream URL: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-editor
Owners: chandankumar
Branches: f22 f23
InitialCC: apevec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492



--- Comment #2 from Guy Streeter  ---
Jiri,
 Thank you for reviewing this package.

The source is used to build two separate packages, python-libnuma and
python3-libnuma. That's the reason there are 2 specfiles.

I don't know what tito is. Is that something I need?
Why does rmpbuild need the specfiles in the top-level directory?

The package is designed to build and install from setup.py for platforms that
don't use rpm. It seems like packaging-specific files should be in their own
directory. tuna, python-linux-procfs, and python-schedutils all have this
directory layout.

The top-level Makefile has a target to build rpms.

thanks again,
--Guy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Ralph Bean  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1245848 |
 Depends On||1245848




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245848
[Bug 1245848] python-alembic-0.8.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
As I have already had a brief look at this package and provided suggestions in
comment#1, I am going to accept this now.

Thanks for quick update :)

APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851



--- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar  ---
Here is the updated spec and srpms with fixes:

SPEC : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-testr.spec
SRPM:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-testr-0.3.0-1.fc22.src.rpm

Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10838865

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353



--- Comment #11 from Lukas Bezdicka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-editor 
Short Description: Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fmoo/python-editor
Owners: social apevec
Branches: f22 f23 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353

Lukas Bezdicka  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||soc...@v3.sk
  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #10 from Lukas Bezdicka  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-editor 
Short Description: Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
Upstream URL: https://github.com/fmoo/python-editor
Owners: social apevec social
Branches: f22 f23 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1256377] Review Request:java-mersenne-twister - Mersenne Twister random number generator in Java

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100

Irina Boverman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients

2015-08-26 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   >