[Bug 1256097] Review Request: synapse - Semantic launcher written in Vala
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256097
--- Comment #7 from Christopher Meng ---
1. Drop %defattr(-,root,root,-)
2. Use %make_build to substitute `make %{?_smp_mflags}` if you want.
3. %{_mandir}/man1/synapse.1.gz
->
%{_mandir}/man1/synapse.1*
4. Source0:
https://launchpad.net/synapse-project/0.3/0.2.99.1/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
->
Source0:
https://launchpad.net/synapse-project/0.3/%{version}/+download/%{name}-%{version}.tar.xz
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1229349] Review Request: radcli - Radius client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229349 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos from comment #7) > > 1. If this is a fork, please fix missing license headers. > > I'm not sure what you mean here. I've added the headers into the license > breakdown, if that's what you ask. Non-blocker issue, I said you should add license header to each file of sources. PACKAGE APPROVED. PS. Will any packages use this in the future? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1253244] Review Request: uClibc-ng - C library for embedded Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1253244
Christopher Meng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Christopher Meng ---
(In reply to Nikola Forró from comment #5)
> > 2. I'm not sure if uclibc in Fedora is a package or just another c lib, if
> > just a package ,you still need to build it with %optflags
> > (UCLIBC_EXTRA_CFLAGS)
> Including %{optflags} would break busybox's goal to build smallest binary
> possible, I think. After all, that's the reason why busybox links with
> uClibc rather than glibc.
Ok,-fno-stack-protector -nostdinc, I understand.
> > 3. About these 2, should they be enabled?
> >
> > Wide Character Support (UCLIBC_HAS_WCHAR) [N/y/?] n
> > Locale Support (UCLIBC_HAS_LOCALE) [N/y/?] n
> Again, I'm not sure how this would affect busybox. I should consult it's
> maintainer.
I've read the wchar code from uclibc, it's broken. ;)
PACKAGE APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 715127] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715127 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@cicku.me Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #25 from Christopher Meng --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1257410 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 Christopher Meng changed: What|Removed |Added CC||c...@oleastre.be --- Comment #1 from Christopher Meng --- *** Bug 715127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] New: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 Bug ID: 1257410 Summary: Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i...@cicku.me QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://cicku.me/abcMIDI.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/abcMIDI-2015.08.25-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: AbcMIDI is a set contains multiple converter and manipulation programs for ABC music notation and MIDI files. These programs were developed by James Allwright in the early 1990s and has been supported by Seymour Shlien since 2003. The program contains many features, such as expansion of guitar chords, drum accompaniment, and support for microtones. Fedora Account System Username: cicku -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-rackspace-auth-openstack-1.3-3.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14372 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-rackspace-auth-openstack-1.3-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14371 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1249078] Review Request: supernova - Use novaclient with multiple OpenStack nova environments the easy way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249078 --- Comment #8 from Major Hayden --- Okay, I think I may have corralled all of the feedback into a new spec and SRPM: https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova-2.0.8-3.fc22.src.rpm https://mhayden.fedorapeople.org/supernova-pkg-review/supernova.spec COPR: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mhayden/supernova/build/111513/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984560] Review Request: enki - Extensible text editor for programmers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Summary|Review Request: Enki - |Review Request: enki - |Extensible text editor for |Extensible text editor for |programmers |programmers Alias||enki Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tigcc.ticalc.org Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Alias||python-qutepart Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761
--- Comment #4 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
Need Work:
==
1- You must use the %license macro in %%files for the license text.
2- Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/include/qt5
3- Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
Can you repclace:
https://github.com/Aseman-Land/libqtelegram-aseman-edition/blob/master/util/cryptoutils.h
With: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/crypto-utils/
RPMLint:
W: summary-not-capitalized C libqtelegram
Please update summary
This depencies are needed?
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libssl.so.10
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libQt5Multimedia.so.5
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libGL.so.1
libqtelegram-ae.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libqtelegram-ae.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
Please fix this issues to check:
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
This package build fine in epel7 and suported Fedoras:
https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/
= MUST items =
C/C++:
PASS: Package does not contain kernel modules.
PASS: Package contains no static executables.
PASS: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
PASS: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
PASS: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
PASS: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
PASS: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
PASS: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
PASS: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
PASS: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
PASS: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
PASS: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
NA: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
PASS: Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
PASS: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
NA: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
PASS: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
NA: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
PASS: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
PASS: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
PASS: Package installs properly.
PASS: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
PASS: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
PASS: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
PASS: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
PASS: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
PASS: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
PASS: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
PASS: Dist tag is present.
PASS: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
PASS: Permissions on files are set properly.
PASS: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR= doesn't
work.
PASS: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
PASS: Package does not use a name that already exists.
PASS: Package is not relocatable.
PASS: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
PASS: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
PASS: File names are valid UTF-8.
PASS: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
PASS: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
PASS: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
PASS: Package functions as described.
PASS: Latest version is packaged.
PASS: Package does not include license text files separate from upstre
[Bug 1255505] Review Request: dnf-plugin-system-upgrade - DNF plugin to handle system upgrades
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505
Adam Williamson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|awill...@redhat.com
--- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson ---
Package Review
==
Notes:
* The license file is not included in the module packages, but they can be
installed without the main package.
* Creates a file in /usr/lib/systemd/system/system-update.target.wants , but
doesn't own it or depend on PackageKit (which owns it).
* Changelog is missing releases (it has '0.3.0', should have '0.3.0-1')
* Might be nice for [Unit] in the service file to include a Documentation=
line, per the guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd
* The guidelines also say "Unit files should avoid using StandardOutput= or
StandardError=", but I'm gonna guess this is a special case?
* "Requires: python-%{name}" is not versioned - perhaps it ought to be?
A few changes required (see [!] items below and notes above), but mostly looks
good.
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/lib/systemd/system/system-update.target.wants
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a sep
[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828 --- Comment #20 from bigswitch --- Reviewer comments about service files have been addressed. Please use following links for further review. Spec URL: https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/24hmnr6ojdgwulgpqclcvlvp5qf8tdt3.spec SRPM URL: https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/tuxihmlq73d6b7ubdb9ub30w2ushliyh.rpm Description: Big Switch Openstack Neutron driver Fedora Account System Username: xinwu mock build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10842833 spec file and service file is also available at https://github.com/xinwu/python-networking-bigswitch wget https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/24hmnr6ojdgwulgpqclcvlvp5qf8tdt3.spec -O python-networking-bigswitch.spec wget https://bigswitch.box.com/shared/static/tuxihmlq73d6b7ubdb9ub30w2ushliyh.rpm -O python-networking-bigswitch-2015.1.36-1.el7.centos.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 --- Comment #6 from Guy Streeter --- I promise I'm not trying to be difficult. If that's the correct way to set it up, I'll change it. Perhaps there's something about the way packages are built in the distro I don't understand. I assumed a src.rpm was submitted to the the build system. Is that incorrect? Not being a maintainer, I haven't ever participated in that process. I've looked for information about how you get from source code to built package in the repo, but I can't find it. If I knew that, I could make sure my source is prepared for it. Do you have a link to that? I'd be really happy to see something that says "this is how your source tree should be laid out." thanks, --Guy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828 bigswitch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 --- Comment #5 from Jiri Kastner --- hey man, do you want to get package reviewed? :) one specfile means one review, less mess. i'm not aware of any package maintained in way you want to go. i would understand your attitude if resulting specfile would look like kernel specfile, but that is exception. with two specfiles and two srpms in case of abandoning python2 in future of fedora means retiring packages. i would also understand your attitude if you will have two separated repositories, but you you have code in one repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828 --- Comment #19 from bigswitch --- Hi Haïkel, I went over the following two bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242886 and found some minor discrepancies, but nothing major. Some of the bugs from the list are approved, which probably should be crossed or removed the list: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242896 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812 bigswitch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rhosp-bugs-internal@bigswit ||ch.com --- Comment #2 from bigswitch --- Hi Chandan, Latest version on pypi is 1.5.1. The spec file should be pointing to that version, right? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1242886] Review Request: openstack-ironic-inspector - Hardware introspection service for OpenStack Ironic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242886 bigswitch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rhosp-bugs-internal@bigswit ||ch.com --- Comment #1 from bigswitch --- Hi Dmitry, I see there's 'oslo.log' as requires on pypi, but its missing in the requires section in the spec file. Is that intentional (some other oslo package includes it)? Otherwise it should be added. Everything else looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257342] New: Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342 Bug ID: 1257342 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-numeral.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-numeral-1.5.3-1.fc22.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1257342 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342 [Bug 1257342] Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257342] Review Request: nodejs-numeral - A javascript library for formatting and manipulating numbers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257342 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1257338, 956806 ||(nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 [Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1257340 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340 [Bug 1257340] Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257340] New: Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340 Bug ID: 1257340 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-single-line-log.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-single-line-log-1.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Node.js module that keeps writing to the same line in the console (or a stream). Very useful when you write progress bars, or a status message during longer operations. Supports multilines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257340] Review Request: nodejs-single-line-log - Keep writing to the same line in the terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257340 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1257338, 956806 ||(nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 [Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257338] Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1114313, 956806 ||(nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114313 [Bug 1114313] nodejs-tilelive-5.8.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257338] New: Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257338 Bug ID: 1257338 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-progress-stream - Read the progress of a stream Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-progress-stream.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-progress-stream-1.1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Read the progress of a stream. Supports speed and eta. Gets the lengths of the stream automatically if you're using the request or http module. You can also pass the length on initiation. Progress-stream will also check to see if the stream already have a length property. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257336] Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257336 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1114313, 956806 ||(nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114313 [Bug 1114313] nodejs-tilelive-5.8.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257336] New: Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257336 Bug ID: 1257336 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-async-queue - Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-async-queue.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/nodejs/nodejs-async-queue-0.1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Simple FIFO queue to execute async functions linear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1213184] Review Request: grantlee-qt5 - Qt string template engine based on the Django template system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213184 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jan Grulich --- 1) Typo in BuildRequires: qt5-tools-devel, should be qt5-qttools-devel 2) Use %license macro instead of %doc for the license file 3) Some python files are also under BSD license so maybe the license should be LGPLv2+ and BSD Otherwise looks good, all mentioned issues are not blockers and can be simply fixed during import. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1219540] Review Request: ahc-tools - Tools for RDO-manager automatic health checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219540 John Trowbridge changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||ahc-tools-0.2.0-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1213184] Review Request: grantlee-qt5 - Qt string template engine based on the Django template system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1213184 Jan Grulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jgrul...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jgrul...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257329] New: Review Request: openstack-ironic-python-agent - A python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare Metal servers.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257329 Bug ID: 1257329 Summary: Review Request: openstack-ironic-python-agent - A python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare Metal servers. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jtrow...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent.spec SRPM URL: https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.src.rpm Description: A python agent for provisioning and deprovisioning Bare Metal servers. Fedora Account System Username: trown I was unable to build on koji[1], but it builds fine locally[2]. [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/388/10840388/build.log [2] https://trown.fedorapeople.org/openstack-ironic-python-agent-0.1-0.1gite6439ca1d06a50e72b97975da9b3963ba04ba841.noarch.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256435] Review Request: metapixel - photomosaic generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Neil Horman --- Package Change Request == Package Name: metapixel New Branches: master Owners: nhorman please unretire this package, I have fixes to allow it to build again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256435] Review Request: metapixel - photomosaic generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256435 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-08-26 15:39:23 --- Comment #3 from Neil Horman --- sorry about that, I didn't even think to check dist-git. I'll just unretire it. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1255505] Review Request: dnf-plugin-system-upgrade - DNF plugin to handle system upgrades
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255505 --- Comment #4 from Will Woods --- For new packages, see: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/wwoods/dnf-plugin-system-upgrade/builds/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 Irina Boverman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(limburgher@gmail. | |com)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 Irina Boverman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1234208] Review Request: PyPDF2 - A Pure-Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234208 Major Hayden changed: What|Removed |Added CC||itsme_...@yahoo.com Flags||needinfo?(itsme_410@yahoo.c ||om) --- Comment #14 from Major Hayden --- Ah, okay. I certainly didn't intend to trample on your previous work -- only to assist. I gave you some other pointers (see comment 11) to improve the package a bit and make it easier for someone who is a package sponsor to review. With that said, if you'd like me to own the package, I have no issues there. If you'd like to own it, I'll gladly step back and let you take it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247328] Review Request: sshrc - Bring your .bashrc, .vimrc etc. with you when you ssh
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328
--- Comment #8 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
Hi
Sorry for the late feedback, this is a simple package, the spec looks good,
but there is some things than can improve the user experience:
1- Can you add a manpage? You can install the maneditor package in Fedora
and write a manpage, even a minimal manpage can improve the user experience,
if you write a manpage please ask upstream to merge it.
2- This package provides 2 binaries, sshrc and moshrc, I am not sure about
whow users will find the second binari based in the name and description
of the package, maybe if you write manpage for sshrc you can refer than
moshrc it is avaible too, note than you will need a man page for each binari.
The missing manpage is not a bloquer, but I want to ask if you can work in it.
= MUST items =
Generic:
PASS: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
PASS: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
PASS: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
PASS: Changelog in prescribed format.
PASS: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
NA: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
NA: Development files must be in a -devel package
PASS: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
PASS: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
PASS: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
PASS: Package does not generate any conflict.
PASS: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
PASS: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
PASS: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
PASS: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
PASS: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
PASS: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
PASS: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
PASS: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
PASS: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
PASS: Package installs properly.
PASS: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
PASS: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
PASS: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
PASS: Package must own all directories that it creates.
PASS: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
PASS: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
PASS: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
PASS: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
PASS: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
PASS: Dist tag is present.
PASS: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
PASS: Permissions on files are set properly.
NA: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
PASS: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
PASS: Package does not use a name that already exists.
PASS: Package is not relocatable.
PASS: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
PASS: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
PASS: File names are valid UTF-8.
PASS: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
NA: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
PASS: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
PASS: Latest version is packaged.
PASS: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
PASS: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
PASS: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
PASS: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
NA: %check is present and all tests pass.
PASS: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
PASS: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
PASS: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
PASS: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
PASS: Buildroot is not present
PASS: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
PASS: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /us
[Bug 1255179] Review Request: runc - CLI for running Open Containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255179 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #14 from Nalin Dahyabhai --- Jan is already in the packagers group, removing this from the list of FE-NEEDSPONSOR bugs. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1255179] Review Request: runc - CLI for running Open Containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255179 --- Comment #13 from Nalin Dahyabhai --- Looks pretty good to me. Here's the checklist from fedora-review, with a few items that I'd like to know more about (search for "[ ]" and "[!]"): Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [X]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [X]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. Package license is ASL 2.0. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. No patches are applied, and the bundled license text is that of ASL 2.0, which is in line with the opencontainers charter. [X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. Except for the debuginfo, of course. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Subdirectories under /usr/share/gocode that aren't owned by golang or the opencontainer-specs package should be owned by this package so that its removal doesn't leave empties around. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/system, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/systemd, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/selinux, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/seccomp, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/stacktrace, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/label, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/netlink, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs/validate, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/nsenter, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/criurpc, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/xattr, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/user, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/integration, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/system, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/utils, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs/validate, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/nsenter, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/systemd, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/selinux, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/label, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/netlink, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/criurpc, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/configs, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/seccomp, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/xattr, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/stacktrace, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/integration, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups/fs, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/user, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/cgroups, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/devices, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. Might want to add a comment about the -B flag here, for people like me who didn't know that it tells the go linker to embed a build ID note in the binary. [X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC except
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 Irina Boverman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247177] Review Request: python-os-client-config - OpenStack Client Configuation Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247177 Bug 1247177 depends on bug 1219807, which changed state. Bug 1219807 Summary: Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for determining platform-specific directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1219807] Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for determining platform-specific directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||1.4.0-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-08-26 13:50:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257302] New: Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create a module not found error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257302 Bug ID: 1257302 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create a module not found error Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: t...@compton.nu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/nodejs-module-not-found-error.spec SRPM URL: http://download.compton.nu/tmp/nodejs-module-not-found-error-1.0.1-1.fc22.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: tomh Description: Create a module not found error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257302] Review Request: nodejs-module-not-found-error - Create a module not found error
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257302 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews), ||1223413 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223413 [Bug 1223413] nodejs-proxyquire-1.7.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.4-2.fc21|0.1.4-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1219807] Review Request: python-appdirs - Python module for determining platform-specific directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219807 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-appdirs-1.4.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14193 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180378] Review Request: rubygem-sigdump - ruby signal handler which dumps backtrace of running threads and number of allocated objects per class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180378 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-sigdump-0.2.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-sigdump'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14171 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14191 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14206 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14195 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14189 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Lukas Bezdicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-08-26 13:06:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1246192] Review Request: python-pymod2pkg - python module to package map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246192 Jakub Ruzicka changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|0.1.4-2.el7 |0.1.4-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14354 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14353 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 949954] Review Request: anka-coder-fonts - A mono spaced, courier-width font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=949954 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- anka-coder-fonts-1.100-0.3.20130409hg4348cf4ec395.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14352 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 --- Comment #4 from Guy Streeter --- The combined specfile would have to be edited and checked in to build each of the packages, one at a time. I don't see an advantage to that. Keeping them separate will also allow fixes and updates to be made independently for the two packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1219540] Review Request: ahc-tools - Tools for RDO-manager automatic health checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219540 John Trowbridge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-08-26 11:42:26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492
--- Comment #3 from Jiri Kastner ---
tito - https://github.com/dgoodwin/tito
rpmbuild with -tX options works on tarball directly if spec file is in toplevel
directory
you can have one specfile and put all to it. and use
%global with_python3 1
%if 0%{?with_python3}
...
%{__python3} setup.py build
...
%endif
see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Python3.4GuidlinesDraft
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 --- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 --- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla --- Looks unretired now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 --- Comment #17 from Jon Ciesla --- Branch exists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 --- Comment #34 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254828] Review Request: python-networking-bigswitch - big switch neutron plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254828 --- Comment #18 from bigswitch --- Thanks a lot Ihar! I'll address the new review comments today. We don't have a Delorean pull request yet. We asked for it earlier last week and got following reply from Haïkel. We don't totally understand the Red Hat Legal part, but looks like getting this review done is the first step. Please let us know if you have a different opinion :) Quote from Haïkel "We should move forward the fedora review for 2 reasons: * we need to review all the packages before inclusion in delorean to avoid broken packages like octavia * if your goal is to be included in RHEL-OSP, it's faster that way as packages that are not in Fedora requires licensing review from Red Hat Legal. I plan to request an exception for RDO packages but until then, it's faster this way." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252918] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color - PHP library to manipulate various color representations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252918 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color-1.5.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-color'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7779 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251034] Review Request: php-zendframework-zendpdf - Zend Framework ZendPdf component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251034 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-zendframework-zendpdf-2.0.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-zendframework-zendpdf'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7782 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1252924] Review Request: php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode - PHP library to generate linear and bidimensional barcodes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252924 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode-1.4.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.\nIf you want to test the update, you can install it with \n su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-tecnickcom-tc-lib-barcode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7784 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244977] Review Request: libfabric -Open Fabric Interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244977 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/libfabric-1.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm * Wed Aug 26 2015 Orion Poplawski - 1.1.0-1 - Update to 1.1.0 I see no mention of hadoop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230872] Review Request: python-trollius-redis - Redis client for the Python event loop PEP3156 for Trollius.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230872 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-trollius-redis-0.1.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256344] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-IfLOG - Load Log::Any only if "logging is enabled"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256344 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 844740] Review Request: qmmp-plugin-pack - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 Karel Volný changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Karel Volný --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qmmp New Branches: epel7 Owners: kvolny InitialCC: nucleo see bug #1242361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 280751] Review Request: qmmp - Qt-based multimedia player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280751 Karel Volný changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Karel Volný --- Package Change Request == Package Name: qmmp New Branches: epel7 Owners: kvolny InitialCC: nucleo see bug #1242361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1245848 Depends On|1245848 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245848 [Bug 1245848] python-alembic-0.8.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851 Chandan Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Chandan Kumar --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-os-testr Short Description: A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects Upstream URL: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-editor Owners: chandankumar Branches: f22 f23 InitialCC: apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256492] Review Request: python-libnuma - Python bindings for the numactl library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256492 --- Comment #2 from Guy Streeter --- Jiri, Thank you for reviewing this package. The source is used to build two separate packages, python-libnuma and python3-libnuma. That's the reason there are 2 specfiles. I don't know what tito is. Is that something I need? Why does rmpbuild need the specfiles in the top-level directory? The package is designed to build and install from setup.py for platforms that don't use rpm. It seems like packaging-specific files should be in their own directory. tuna, python-linux-procfs, and python-schedutils all have this directory layout. The top-level Makefile has a target to build rpms. thanks again, --Guy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1245848 | Depends On||1245848 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245848 [Bug 1245848] python-alembic-0.8.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) --- As I have already had a brief look at this package and provided suggestions in comment#1, I am going to accept this now. Thanks for quick update :) APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1254851] Review Request: python-os-testr : A testr wrapper to provide functionality for OpenStack projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254851 --- Comment #4 from Chandan Kumar --- Here is the updated spec and srpms with fixes: SPEC : https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-testr.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-testr-0.3.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10838865 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 --- Comment #11 from Lukas Bezdicka --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-editor Short Description: Programmatically open an editor, capture the result. Upstream URL: https://github.com/fmoo/python-editor Owners: social apevec Branches: f22 f23 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256353] Review Request: python-editor - Programmatically open an editor, capture the result.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256353 Lukas Bezdicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||soc...@v3.sk Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Lukas Bezdicka --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-editor Short Description: Programmatically open an editor, capture the result. Upstream URL: https://github.com/fmoo/python-editor Owners: social apevec social Branches: f22 f23 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1256377] Review Request:java-mersenne-twister - Mersenne Twister random number generator in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256377 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1248100] Review Request: python-qpid - The Apache Qpid Python client library for AMQP.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100 Irina Boverman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1251834] Review Request: python-rackspace-auth-openstack - Rackspace authentication for openstack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1251834 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
