[Bug 1290924] Review Request: grive2 - Google Drive client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290924



--- Comment #6 from Christian Dersch  ---
Thank you very much!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292297] New: Review Request: nodejs-path-array - Treat your $PATH like a JavaScript Array

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292297

Bug ID: 1292297
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-path-array - Treat your $PATH
like a JavaScript Array
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-path-array/nodejs-path-array.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-path-array/nodejs-path-array-1.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Treat your $PATH like a JavaScript Array
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1271795] Review Request: nodejs-css-select - A CSS selector compiler/engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271795



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-css-select/nodejs-css-select.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-css-select/nodejs-css-select-1.1.0-3.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284942] Review Request: nodejs-lex-parser - A parser for lexical grammars used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284942] Review Request: nodejs-lex-parser - A parser for lexical grammars used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-lex-parser-0.1.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-daf60f2001

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292272] Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292272

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|Trivial |TrivialFailure



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-98f63a2e28

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284942] Review Request: nodejs-lex-parser - A parser for lexical grammars used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284942



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-lex-parser-0.1.4-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d100b82ad6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292297] Review Request: nodejs-path-array - Treat your $PATH like a JavaScript Array

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292297

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
 Depends On||1292237




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292237
[Bug 1292237] Review Request: nodejs-array-index - Invoke getter/setter
functions on array-like objects
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292237] Review Request: nodejs-array-index - Invoke getter/setter functions on array-like objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292237

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1292297




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292297
[Bug 1292297] Review Request: nodejs-path-array - Treat your $PATH like a
JavaScript Array
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jison-lex-0.3.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-9083816321

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jison-lex-0.3.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e8ff6cca2d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jison-lex-0.3.4-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c90201c019

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1284945] Review Request: nodejs-jison-lex - Lexical analyzer generator used by jison

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284945



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jison-lex-0.3.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2c1ba7bc38

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292295] New: Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if the platform is windows

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292295

Bug ID: 1292295
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if
the platform is windows
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-windows/nodejs-is-windows.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-windows/nodejs-is-windows-0.1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Returns true if the platform is windows
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292287] Review Request: nodejs-is-absolute - Returns true if a file path is absolute

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292287

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1292295




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292295
[Bug 1292295] Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if the
platform is windows
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292295] Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if the platform is windows

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292295

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews),
   ||1292287




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292287
[Bug 1292287] Review Request: nodejs-is-absolute - Returns true if a file
path is absolute
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-438fba6611

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-32416af0af

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278152] Review Request: nodejs-base64-url - Base64 utilities for url applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-base64-url'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2c20751943

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258222] Review Request: nodejs-fd - File descriptor manager for Node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-fd-0.0.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-fd'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fcc01e37e0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291076] Review Request: nodejs-dashdash - A light, featureful and explicit option parsing library for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-dashdash-1.10.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-dashdash'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-412f7b2fc8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1290231] Review Request: rubygem-nifti - A pure Ruby API to the NIfTI Neuroimaging Format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290231

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-nifti-0.0.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update rubygem-nifti'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9a13fa60b9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-graceful-readlink'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e7dda252ff

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-escape-string-regexp'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-437bbfd673

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1285471] Review Request: nodejs-spdx-exceptions - A list of SPDX standard license exceptions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285471



--- Comment #6 from Piotr Popieluch  ---
Jared,
it is your package... I've built it but (as nodejs-sig) don't have the
permissions to create an update.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208101] Review Request: libbson - Building, parsing, and iterating BSON documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101



--- Comment #20 from Remi Collet  ---
For your information:
- pecl/mongodb 1.0.x is compatible with version 1.2.x
- pecl/mongodb 1.1.x is compatible with version 1.3.x

So I'm fine with either 1.2 or 1.3 (of course, latest seems better)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1260254] Review Request: mongo-c-driver - High-performance MongoDB driver for C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1260254



--- Comment #4 from Remi Collet  ---
For your information:
- pecl/mongodb 1.0.x is compatible with version 1.2.x
- pecl/mongodb 1.1.x is compatible with version 1.3.x

So I'm fine with either 1.2 or 1.3 (of course, latest seems better)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE  |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287794] Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration management API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
archaius-0.4.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1287794] Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration management API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-12-16 08:23:03



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1289478] Review Request: hystrix - Library for Latency and Fault Tolerance in Distributed Systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289478
Bug 1289478 depends on bug 1287794, which changed state.

Bug 1287794 Summary: Review Request: archaius - Library for configuration 
management API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287794

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1281538] Review Request: umlgraph - Automated Drawing of UML Diagrams

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281538



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
umlgraph-5.7.2-12.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291949] Review Request: nodejs-defence - Extract fenced code from CommonMark documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291949



--- Comment #1 from Jared Smith  ---
Updated packaging:

Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-defence/nodejs-defence.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-defence/nodejs-defence-1.0.3-2.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291933] Review Request: nodejs-mdurl - URL utilities for markdown-it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291933



--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith  ---
I've have done a thorough analysis of the parse.js code, but based on the
README.md file, it seems that this is different enough from Node's 'url'
function that this is probably closer to the concept of a forked copylib than
it is a bundled library.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292136] Review Request: nodejs-defence-cli - Command-line tool for extracting fenced code from documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292136

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
 Depends On||1292124, 1291949




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291949
[Bug 1291949] Review Request: nodejs-defence - Extract fenced code from
CommonMark documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292124
[Bug 1292124] Review Request: nodejs-docopt - A command line option parser
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291459] Review Request: sysreporter - Basic system reporter with emailing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291459

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
sysreporter-3.0.0-0.1.alpha3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update sysreporter'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fdc485236d

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292124] Review Request: nodejs-docopt - A command line option parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292124

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1292136




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292136
[Bug 1292136] Review Request: nodejs-defence-cli - Command-line tool for
extracting fenced code from documents
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292136] New: Review Request: nodejs-defence-cli - Command-line tool for extracting fenced code from documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292136

Bug ID: 1292136
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-defence-cli - Command-line tool
for extracting fenced code from documents
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-defence-cli/nodejs-defence-cli.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-defence-cli/nodejs-defence-cli-1.0.4-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: A command-line tool for extracting fenced code from CommonMark
documents
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291400] Review Request: nodejs-inherit - Inheritance module for Node.js and browsers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291400

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-inherit-2.2.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-inherit'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-d52974f4af

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291949] Review Request: nodejs-defence - Extract fenced code from CommonMark documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291949

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1292136




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292136
[Bug 1292136] Review Request: nodejs-defence-cli - Command-line tool for
extracting fenced code from documents
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278150] Review Request: nodejs-rndm - Random string generator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278150

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-rndm-1.2.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-rndm'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5cc7bb191b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-escape-string-regexp'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7bf11a2625

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291076] Review Request: nodejs-dashdash - A light, featureful and explicit option parsing library for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291076

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-dashdash-1.10.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-dashdash'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-04da2c30bd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258222] Review Request: nodejs-fd - File descriptor manager for Node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258222



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-fd-0.0.2-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-fd'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-25950482e7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-is-builtin-module

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291060] Review Request: purple-telegram - adds support for Telegram to Pidgin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291060



--- Comment #4 from Jiri Eischmann  ---
(In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #3)
> > #Icons
> > %dir %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/
> > %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/telegram.png
> 
> The single %dir statement won't be enough as it doesn't cover the two dirs 
> %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin and  %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols.
> 
> You could include the full tree with this single line,
> 
>   %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/

Ok, I went for this option and updated the spec file. The new SRPM is here:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1309518/purple-telegram-1.2.2-3.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1197333] Review Request: polyglot-chess - Polyglot chess opening book program

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(sanjay.ankur@gmai
   ||l.com)



--- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner  ---
friendly ping?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292287] Review Request: nodejs-is-absolute - Returns true if a file path is absolute

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292287

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292293] New: Review Request: nodejs-is-relative - Returns `true` if the path appears to be relative

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292293

Bug ID: 1292293
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-relative - Returns `true` if
the path appears to be relative
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-relative/nodejs-is-relative.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-relative/nodejs-is-relative-0.2.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Returns `true` if the path appears to be relative
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270513] Review Request: newtonsoft-json - Popular high-performance JSON framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270513

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(claudiorodrigo@pe
   ||reyradiaz.com.ar)



--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner  ---
Honestly, I do not know how to proceed here. Claudio, could you request that
wished pkgconfig from upstream, it's the best we can do - we shouldn't rely on
downstream fiddling with that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292293] Review Request: nodejs-is-relative - Returns `true` if the path appears to be relative

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292293

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
 Depends On||1292292




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292292
[Bug 1292292] Review Request: nodejs-is-unc-path - Returns true if a
filepath is a windows UNC file path
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292292] New: Review Request: nodejs-is-unc-path - Returns true if a filepath is a windows UNC file path

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292292

Bug ID: 1292292
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-is-unc-path - Returns true if a
filepath is a windows UNC file path
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-unc-path/nodejs-is-unc-path.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-is-unc-path/nodejs-is-unc-path-0.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Returns true if a filepath is a windows UNC file path
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291459] Review Request: sysreporter - Basic system reporter with emailing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291459



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
sysreporter-3.0.0-0.4.alpha4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-13edaa9dc7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291459] Review Request: sysreporter - Basic system reporter with emailing

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291459



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
sysreporter-3.0.0-0.4.alpha4.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-af43634f50

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0.28-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1282640] Review Request: lastpass-cli - Command line interface to LastPass.com

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282640



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
lastpass-cli-0.7.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1288541] Review Request: perl-Code-TidyAll - Engine for tidyall, your all-in-one code tidier and validator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288541



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
Well, this one is big and the code fairly unreadable.
Apologies for the delay.

Anyhow, the provided separate SPEC file is for version 0.37 while the provided
SRPM is for 0.36.  The differences in upstream code are minimal; I'll be
reviewing 0.36 here.  Please, don't update the links.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176



--- Comment #9 from Piotr Kliczewski  ---
(In reply to Douglas Schilling Landgraf from comment #6)
> Hi Piotr,
> 
> I see you updated the package. Let's start with the below, please also
> consider the previous comments.
> 
> - Point the spec and srpm to a different url, so it can easily downloaded by
>   wget or similar tool. 
> 
> - Source0 is not correct, the last bits seems to be 1.1.6
>  
> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.6-snapshot/src/vdsm-jsonrpc-java/vdsm-
> jsonrpc-java-1.1.5.tar.gz
> 

Updated

> - Remove non needed BuildRoot tag
>   BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}
> -n)
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Java_review_template 
>   (Buildroot definition is not present)
> 

We have BuildRoot in line #52

> - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
>   Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/java/vdsm-jsonrpc-java
>   See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles
> 

Can you point me to the lines? I do not see it.

> - For subpackage that requires the main package, please use: 
>   https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package
> 

There are 3 packages:
- with code
- with java-doc
- with src

so I think there is no need to declare dependencies

> - This one below, is it really needed?
>   %if 0%{?_use_repolib:1}
>   rm -rf "%{buildroot}"
>   %endif
> 
> - some rpmlint issues:
>   vdsm-jsonrpc-java.src: W: summary-not-capitalized C oVirt JsonRpc java
> client (vdsm-jsonrpc-java)
>   vdsm-jsonrpc-java.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
> http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.6-snapshot/src/vdsm-jsonrpc-java/vdsm-
> jsonrpc-java-1.1.5.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found
> 

Fixed

> - Please consider run fedora-review tool with fedora-review-plugin-java
> plugin, it will help during your review.

New version uploaded.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278960] Review Request: nodejs-heap - Binary heap (priority queue) algorithms

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278960

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278960] Review Request: nodejs-heap - Binary heap (priority queue) algorithms

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278960



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-heap-0.2.6-4.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-af1fc59fb2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208911] Review Request: doublecmd - Twin-panel (commander-style) file manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208911

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2015-12-16 11:22:26



--- Comment #27 from Raphael Groner  ---
Sadly to say but there no senseful news to expect from upstream.
. Qt4 development has stopped, Qt4Pas is still in no good stable state at
upstream.
. Gtk2 is in maintainance mode mostly and can not be expected to get new
features.
. fpc (Free Pascal Compiler) still has severe issues with ARM support in
general.

Closing. Feel free to reopen or restart a new review request if you still think
doublecmd should be packaged officially.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292232] Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and accessors to another property

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1292233




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292233
[Bug 1292233] Review Request: nodejs-are-we-there-yet - Keep track of the
overall completion of many disparate processes
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292232] New: Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and accessors to another property

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232

Bug ID: 1292232
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods
and accessors to another property
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-delegates/nodejs-delegates.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-delegates/nodejs-delegates-1.0.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Delegate methods and accessors to another property
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292233] Review Request: nodejs-are-we-there-yet - Keep track of the overall completion of many disparate processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292233

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
 Depends On||1292232




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232
[Bug 1292232] Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and
accessors to another property
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292233] New: Review Request: nodejs-are-we-there-yet - Keep track of the overall completion of many disparate processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292233

Bug ID: 1292233
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-are-we-there-yet - Keep track
of the overall completion of many disparate processes
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-are-we-there-yet/nodejs-are-we-there-yet.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-are-we-there-yet/nodejs-are-we-there-yet-1.0.5-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Keep track of the overall completion of many disparate processes
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291921] Review Request: nodejs-replace-require-self - Require($THIS_PACKAGE) -> require('./')

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291921



--- Comment #3 from Jared Smith  ---
The required package nodejs-stream-replace is now in rawhide, so I think this
package review can move forward now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1285471] Review Request: nodejs-spdx-exceptions - A list of SPDX standard license exceptions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285471



--- Comment #7 from Jared Smith  ---
You're right -- I was going too fast, and didn't pay close enough attention. 
Sorry for the noise :-(

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1282893] Review Request: quantum-espresso - A suite for electronic-structure calculations and materials modeling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282893



--- Comment #8 from marcindulak  ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #2)
> Hm, what does this do?:
> 
> %if 0%{?el6}
> %global mpich mpich
> %global mpich_load %_mpich_load
> %global mpich_unload %_mpich_unload
> %else
> %global mpich mpich
> %global mpich_load %_mpich_load
> %global mpich_unload %_mpich_unload
> %endif
> 

this is a legacy part when there was mpich2 on el6 and mpich on Fedora.
I removed that global variables.

> 
> Requires are normally written with one =. I think == might be misinterpreted.

OK

> 
> You can replace the calls to `basename ${f}` with ${f%/*}, makes things
> slightly shorter and more readable.

let's keep the simple basename. I'm not a fan of shortcuts.

> 
> Please use pushd/popd instead of cd/cd -. This is recommended because the
> path is printed, which makes logs easier to understand.
> 

OK

> %defattr(-,root,root,-) is not needed.

i believe fedora-review complains if %defattr(-,root,root,-) is missing

> 
> Use %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc} and then you don't need
> conditionals in %files.
> 

this works for me when defining this global *after* the License field.
Apparently License is confused with license if global defined on the top of the
spec:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=12125886=build.log=-4000

> Can you comment on the reason for multiple source tarballs? Are they always
> released together?

I would like we clarify two things:

1. the source includes L. Peter Deutsch md5 implementation. I think gromacs RPM
also includes this md5 (src/external/tng_io/src/lib/md5.c) so we are fine?

2. quantum-espresso bundles a small part (a couple of files) belonging to
http://www.tddft.org/programs/octopus/wiki/index.php/Libxc
This is described in this commit message:
http://qe-forge.org/gf/project/q-e/scmsvn/?action=ScmCommitDetail_commit_id=16950

I have made an additional change: set ExclusiveArch due to openblas-devel.

Spec URL:
https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/quantum-espresso/r02/quantum-espresso.spec
SRPM URL:
https://marcindulak.fedorapeople.org/packages/quantum-espresso/r02/quantum-espresso-5.2.1-1.el6.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292269] Review Request: nodejs-gauge - A terminal based horizontal gauge

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292269

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)
 Depends On||1291539




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539
[Bug 1291539] Review Request: nodejs-has-unicode - Try to guess if your
terminal supports unicode
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292272] Review Request: nodm - A display manager automatically starting an X session

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292272

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278364] Review Request: python-whitenoise - Static file serving for Python web apps

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278364



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-whitenoise-2.0.6-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7b38c4dfd9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291558] Review Request: mariadb-java-client - MariaDB connector for java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291558

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||punto...@libero.it



--- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo  ---
To package should at least use the latest stable version of Fedora (F23)
see also
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group

Other tricks:

use
%pom_add_dep net.java.dev.jna:jna-platform:'${jna.version}' .
"true"

because also net.java.dev.jna:jna have the same purpose

remove preconfigured OSGi manifest file and generate OSGi manifest file with
maven-bundle-plugin instead of using maven-jar-plugin

rm src/main/resources/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF
%pom_remove_plugin :maven-jar-plugin
%pom_xpath_set "pom:packaging" bundle
%pom_add_plugin org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:2.5.4 . '
true

  
${project.groupId}
MariaDB JDBC Client
${project.version}.0
org.mariadb.jdbc.*

  !com.sun.jna.*,
  javax.net;resolution:=optional,
  javax.net.ssl;resolution:=optional,
  javax.sql;resolution:=optional,
  javax.transaction.xa;resolution:=optional

  


  
bundle-manifest
process-classes

  manifest

  
'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291539] Review Request: nodejs-has-unicode - Try to guess if your terminal supports unicode

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1292269




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292269
[Bug 1292269] Review Request: nodejs-gauge - A terminal based horizontal
gauge
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292274] Review Request: nodejs-iferr - Higher-order functions for easier error handling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292274

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292232] Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and accessors to another property

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Tom Hughes  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 7 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/tom/1292232
 -nodejs-delegates/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

= EXTRA items 

[Bug 1292274] New: Review Request: nodejs-iferr - Higher-order functions for easier error handling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292274

Bug ID: 1292274
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-iferr - Higher-order functions
for easier error handling
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-iferr/nodejs-iferr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-iferr/nodejs-iferr-0.1.5-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Higher-order functions for easier error handling
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292124] Review Request: nodejs-docopt - A command line option parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292124



--- Comment #2 from Tom Hughes  ---
Why the explicit require on nodejs when it already gets one on nodejs(engine)
automatically?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291007] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc - include a full table of contents in your Sphinx HTML sidebar

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007

William Moreno  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-review+
   |e+  |



--- Comment #11 from William Moreno  ---
Congratulations your package looks good and I have approved it and I will
sponsor you as a member of the Fedora Packagers group in FAS, you should
receive a mail about your new status in FAS and must must wait some time before
(some hours) to login in the PKGDB and request your new package to be included
in Fedora:

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/request/package/

Once your package is approved please include me as co maintainer.

Fedora provides a cool template for your user profile in:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_user

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291007] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc - include a full table of contents in your Sphinx HTML sidebar

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007

William Moreno  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora_requires_release_not
   |e?  |e+



--- Comment #10 from William Moreno  ---
PACKAGE APROVED
===
I run a new review of your package but there is not need to paste again the
full fedora-review template.

Python Reviewer checklist
-

Must: If you build for more than one python runtime you must use the
%python_provide macro. OK
Must: If you build for a single python runtime you must add %python_provide
python-$module so that the current default python is provided from the
unversioned python package. NA
Must: Python modules must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg
from upstream into the proper directory.OK
Must: Python modules must not download any dependencies during the build
process. OK
Must: When building a compat package, it must install using easy_install -m so
it won't conflict with the main package. NA
Must: When building multiple versions (for a compat package) one of the
packages must contain a default version that is usable via "import MODULE" with
no prior setup. NA
Should: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info. OK

You can build a manpage with sphinx and include it, in Fedora this is not
bloqqer but I will recomend you do so.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278364] Review Request: python-whitenoise - Static file serving for Python web apps

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278364



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-whitenoise-2.0.6-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-705afcd6ef

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292061] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Loop-Event - Bridge that allows POE to be driven by Event.pm

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292061

Bug ID: 1292061
   Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Loop-Event - Bridge that
allows POE to be driven by Event.pm
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-POE-Loop-Event.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora22/perl-POE-Loop-Event-1.305-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: POE::Loop::Event implements the interface documented in POE::Loop.
Therefore it has no documentation of its own. Please see POE::Loop for more
details.
Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12205793

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291921] Review Request: nodejs-replace-require-self - Require($THIS_PACKAGE) -> require('./')

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291921



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
New upstream version, complete with LICENSE file.

Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-replace-require-self/nodejs-replace-require-self.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-replace-require-self/nodejs-replace-require-self-1.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1273601] Review Request: python-qutepart - Code editor widget

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273601



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
enki-15.11.0-1.fc23, python-qutepart-2.2.2-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 855843] Review Request: mina-ftpserver - A 100% pure Java FTP server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855843



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
mina-ftpserver-1.0.6-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1282640] Review Request: lastpass-cli - Command line interface to LastPass.com

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282640

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-12-16 09:37:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-has-ansi-2.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-has-ansi'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7b54433d67

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-escape-string-regexp'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-81b421119e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278152] Review Request: nodejs-base64-url - Base64 utilities for url applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-base64-url'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dae06ead71

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-has-ansi-2.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-has-ansi'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-44b74270bc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1278152] Review Request: nodejs-base64-url - Base64 utilities for url applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278152



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-base64-url-1.2.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-base64-url'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-f3c9e87258

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-graceful-readlink'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-308795e585

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1291353] Review Request: nodejs-builtin-modules - List of the Node.js builtin modules

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291353



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-builtin-modules-1.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update nodejs-builtin-modules'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-3239c69aaf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292209] New: Review Request: python-nsdf - Support library for the Neuroscience Simulation Data Format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209

Bug ID: 1292209
   Summary: Review Request: python-nsdf - Support library for the
Neuroscience Simulation Data Format
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: zbys...@in.waw.pl
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-nsdf.spec
SRPM URL:
https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-nsdf-0.0-1.git2153112.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 

NSDF (Neuroscience Simulation Data Format) is a file format built on
top of HDF5 to store the results of computer simulation experiments.
%{name} provides a python module to read and write files in the NSDF
format.

Fedora Account System Username: zbyszek

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292209] Review Request: python-nsdf - Support library for the Neuroscience Simulation Data Format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292209



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
zbyszek's scratch build of python-nsdf-0.0-1.git2153112.fc24.src.rpm for f23
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12217713

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292237] Review Request: nodejs-array-index - Invoke getter/setter functions on array-like objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292237

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 759818] Review Request: buffer - General purpose buffer program

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=759818



--- Comment #26 from Bruno Cornec  ---
Done with https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6314

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review