[Bug 1279087] Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087 --- Comment #15 from Pravin Satpute--- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #14) > May I ask for what you need the requested builds? I see this package is approved in Fedora 25 release cycle, so good to have this available in upcoming release. >Are you generally > interested in help for mono packages? I could give you commit rights for > sharpfont (and other packages). If you're interested in becoming a > co-maintainer, please request so in PkgDB and I'll approve you. Sure, i will help to build for F25. :) Requested access. I am already proven packager, will do it soon. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1378014] Review Request: perl-IO-FDPass - Pass a file descriptor over a socket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378014 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- perl-IO-FDPass-1.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375993] Review Request: python-flufl-i18n - A high level API for Python internationalization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- conf.py should be deleted from site-packages too. + package name is OK + latest version + license is acceptable (LGPLv3+) + license is specified correctly + python packaging template is used + %python_provide is used + provides/requires are OK + builds and installs OK Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157298] Review Request: 'javax.resource' package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157298 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159691] Review Request: Database statement interceptor for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1150959] Review Request: CAROL - Common Architecture for RMI Objectweb Layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150959 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:44:29 --- Comment #3 from Dave Chen --- Thanks for the review, gil! Close the bug since there is no effort on this anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:43:25 --- Comment #2 from Dave Chen --- Thanks gil for the review, no one is working on this anymore, will close the request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1150959] Review Request: CAROL - Common Architecture for RMI Objectweb Layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150959 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo--- (In reply to Dave Chen from comment #3) > sorry, I have no banlance to pursue the merge of this package, will close > the reuqest, thanks for your attentions! No problems, and thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159691] Review Request: Database statement interceptor for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:50:06 --- Comment #2 from Dave Chen --- Thanks for the review, will close the request since no one is working on this anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159688] Review Request: monolog - API for monitoring and logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159688 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159688] Review Request: monolog - API for monitoring and logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159688 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:47:43 --- Comment #6 from Dave Chen --- Thanks gil for the review, no one is working on this anymore, will close the request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:47:02 --- Comment #2 from Dave Chen --- Thanks gil for the review, no one is working on this anymore, will close the request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376001] Review Request: python-flufl-lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- What kernel are you using? I have 4.8.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc25.x86_64 here, it might be related. The strange thing is that only python2 fails (python-2.7.12-6.fc25.x86_64). conf.py should be deleted from site-packages too. + package name is OK + latest version + license is acceptable (LGPLv3+) + license is specified correctly + python packaging template is used + %python_provide is used + provides/requires are OK + builds and installs OK Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction' s spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157298] Review Request: 'javax.resource' package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157298 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:41:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||dapellegr...@dow.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(dapellegrino@dow. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1082660] Review Request: mahout-collections - Primitive-type collections based on CERN' s Colt Java API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082660 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||alleinerw...@gmail.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(alleinerwolf@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1190746] Review Request: mycila-license-maven-plugin - Manage license header of your project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190746 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||zzamb...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(zzambers@redhat.c ||om) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction' s spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:39:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1018489] Review Request: griffon - A Grails-like Rich Application Platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018489 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||alleinerw...@gmail.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(alleinerwolf@gmai ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375999] Review Request: python-flufl-bounce - Email bounce detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform ( DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform ( DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:32:58 --- Comment #2 from Dave Chen --- Sorry, I have no balance to pursue the merge of this package, will close the request, thanks for your attention! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1155058] Review Request: jenkins-translation-plugin - Jenkins Translation Assistance Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155058 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(m...@redhat.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375999] Review Request: python-flufl-bounce - Email bounce detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999 --- Comment #6 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- I still see /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flufl/bounce/conf.py, /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flufl/bounce/conf.py, but OK. + package name is OK + latest version + license is acceptable (LGPLv3+) + license is specified correctly + python packaging template is used + %python_provide is used + provides/requires are OK + builds and installs OK Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1111373] Review Request: ant18 - ant version 1.8 for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=373 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron.knis...@gmail.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(aaron.knister@gma ||il.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1110070] Review Request: vert.x - A lightweight, high-performance, polyglot, event-driven application platform for JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1110070 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||l...@redhat.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags||needinfo?(l...@redhat.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1086608] Review Request: jna-posix - Java library for accessing common POSIX functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086608 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com, ||punto...@libero.it Flags|fedora-review? |needinfo?(m...@redhat.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159687] Review Request: This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:29:00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159703] Review Request: Java persistence API implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159703 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:27:30 --- Comment #4 from Dave Chen --- Sorry, I have no balance to pursue the merge of this package, will close the request, thanks for your attention! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159691] Review Request: Database statement interceptor for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159691 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162011] Review Request: qname - This is the javax.transaction' s spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162011 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159688] Review Request: monolog - API for monitoring and logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159688 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1150959] Review Request: CAROL - Common Architecture for RMI Objectweb Layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150959 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157302] Review Request: oldkilim - A generic configuration framework for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157302 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159217] Review Request: J2EE(tm) Connector Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159217 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157298] Review Request: 'javax.resource' package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157298 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159687] Review Request: This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:24:36 --- Comment #4 from Dave Chen --- Sorry, I have no balance to pursue the merge of this package, will close the request, thanks for your attention! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157295] Review Request: IRMI - Intercepting RMI implementation for the Java platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157295 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157295] Review Request: IRMI - Intercepting RMI implementation for the Java platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157295 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:22:21 --- Comment #4 from Dave Chen --- sorry, I have no balance to pursue the merge of this package, will close the request, thanks for your attentions! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 Dave Chenchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Flags|needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. | |com)| Last Closed||2016-10-09 21:18:00 --- Comment #3 from Dave Chen --- sorry, I have no banlance to pursue the merge of this package, will close the reuqest, thanks for your attentions! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1381029] Review Request: python-more-itertools - Python library for efficient use of itertools utility in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029 Ranjan Maitrachanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |more-itertools - Python |python-more-itertools - |library for efficient use |Python library for |of itertools utility in |efficient use of itertools |python |utility in python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382989] Review Request: mirrormanager2 - Mirror management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- Some notes: * The conditional on the python-sqlalchemy BuildRequires and Requires is redundant, as "0%{?rhel} == 6" implies both the variable's existence and the value must be "6". I suggest simplifying it to "%if 0%{?rhel} == 6". * The %python_sitelib macro definition is unnecessary and can be stripped. * Add "python-srpm-macros" and "python2-rpm-macros" as BuildRequires (for %{?rhel} builds only) so you can use the standard Fedora %py2_build, %py2_install, and %python2_sitelib macros. That brings it more in-line with current packaging practices. These macros are available for EL6+ through these packages. Fedora pulls them in through the python{2,3}-devel subpackage automatically. * Remove the "rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" command in %install, as it's not needed. * Using "%{buildroot}" is preferred over "$RPM_BUILD_ROOT". * If you're going to "Requires: %{name}-lib" be constrained by the same version, you might as well tighten it to %{version}-%{release}, to prevent issues when patches might affect that part. Also, using "==" there is misleading, as it's not a comparison, but an assignment. Use "=". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324784] Review Request: pseudo - Advanced tool for simulating superuser privileges
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324784 --- Comment #12 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski--- Spec URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pseudo/pseudo.spec SRPM URL: https://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/pseudo/pseudo-1.8.1-1.fc24.src.rpm * Sun Oct 09 2016 Dominik Mierzejewski 1.8.1-1 - update to 1.8.1 - use upstream release tarball - add missing NAME section to manpage (patch from Debian) - fix passing CFLAGS containing commas via --cflags - install missing pseudolog(1) manpage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382989] Review Request: mirrormanager2 - Mirror management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk--- Updated spec and srpm by just replacing systemd-devel with systemd. Rawhide scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16019711 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382987] Review Request: python-flask-admin - Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382987 Patrick Uiterwijkchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2016-10-09 16:04:57 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Uiterwijk --- This has been re-imported. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System--- zstd-1.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1378028] Review Request: perl-MCE-Shared - MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-10-09 14:51:06 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156 Bug 1380156 depends on bug 1380155, which changed state. Bug 1380155 Summary: Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/output with nice error messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1360255] Review Request: qt5-qtcharts - Qt Charts module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner--- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16016905 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-10-09 14:49:51 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc25, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-10-09 14:49:46 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.fc25, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382875] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewskichanged: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1382865 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382865 [Bug 1382865] manually specified Requires: perl(foo) are not printed by rpmbuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382989] Review Request: mirrormanager2 - Mirror management application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382989 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi--- For newer Fedora your BuildRequires: systemd-devel doesn't work... it should just be 'systemd' there. Can you adjust the spec for that? For some reason koji seems to pull it in, but local mock here doesn't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382987] Review Request: python-flask-admin - Simple and extensible admin interface framework for Flask
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382987 Kevin Fenzichanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === * There are some un-owned translation directories. * Can you check if the tests still cannot be run due to needing mongodb? * There's a fair bit of rpmlint complaints. Might be nice to fix the easy ones there (just chmod 644 on html files, etc). I don't see any other blockers, and you can fix those before import. This package is APPROVED. = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Cannot run licensecheck: Command 'licensecheck -r /var/lib/mock /fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/builddir/build/BUILD/flask-admin-1.4.2' returned non-zero exit status 25 [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/sr/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/ko/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_admin/translations/uk, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/fa/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/vi/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/ja/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/sk/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pa/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/en, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/el, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/zh_Hant_TW, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/af/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/vi, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/et, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/es, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/hu/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/fi, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/fa, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/no/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/fr, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/nl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/ro, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/zh_Hans_CN, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/el/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/ru, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/ca_ES, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/tr, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pt/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/ko, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/fr/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/zh_Hant_TW/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/de, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/da, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/en/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/cs/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/hu/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python3.5 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/zh_Hans_CN/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_admin/translations/ca_ES, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/pa, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pl, /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/ko/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7 /site-packages/flask_admin/translations/pt, /usr/lib/python3.5/site- packages/flask_admin/translations/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
[Bug 1279087] Review Request: sharpfont - Cross-platform FreeType bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279087 --- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner--- Pravin, thanks for your request. I just did not have the time to build for other Fedoras. Currently, I see a possible need only for upcoming OpenRA (bug #1159091) that is still incomplete and not yet defined to be fully available in any concrete Fedora version. May I ask for what you need the requested builds? Are you generally interested in help for mono packages? I could give you commit rights for sharpfont (and other packages). If you're interested in becoming a co-maintainer, please request so in PkgDB and I'll approve you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382681] Review Request: qt5-qtscxml - provides functionality to create state machines from SCXML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner--- You can use a build conditional for doc: %bcond_without docs ... %if %{with docs} %package doc ... %endif ... %build %if %{with docs} ... make %{?_smp_mflags} docs %endif ... %if %{with docs} %files doc ... %endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1162000] Review Request:jonathan-core - Distributed Object Platform ( DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162000 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159220] Review Request: A Java Open Transaction Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159220 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159223] Review Request: ow2-jta-1.1-spec - "ow2-jta-1.1-spec" spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159223 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1159687] Review Request: This is the javax.transaction's spec file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159687 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157295] Review Request: IRMI - Intercepting RMI implementation for the Java platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157295 gil cattaneochanged: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1360255] Review Request: qt5-qtcharts - Qt Charts module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255 --- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner--- You can use a build conditional for doc: %bcond_without docs ... %if %{with docs} %package doc ... %endif ... %build %if %{with docs} ... make %{?_smp_mflags} docs %endif ... %if %{with docs} %files doc ... %endif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1360255] Review Request: qt5-qtcharts - Qt Charts module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255 --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner--- Package Review (continued, rhbz does not allow me to put more than 65535 characters in one comment) = SHOULD items = Generic: [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. => See above about license for doc subpackage (GFDL). [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in qt5 -qtcharts-doc , qt5-qtcharts-debuginfo => OK, both packages are optional. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?]: %check is present and all tests pass. => There are tests. Maybe execute them? [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [!]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define docs 1 => Please fix. Also for (commented) prerelease. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. = EXTRA items = Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [!]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). => Please fix at least E: description-line-too-long and W: incoherent-version-in-changelog. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint --- Checking: qt5-qtcharts-5.7.0-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm qt5-qtcharts-devel-5.7.0-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm qt5-qtcharts-doc-5.7.0-2.fc26.noarch.rpm qt5-qtcharts-examples-5.7.0-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm qt5-qtcharts-debuginfo-5.7.0-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm qt5-qtcharts-5.7.0-2.fc26.src.rpm qt5-qtcharts.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C Qt Charts module provides a set of easy to use chart components. It uses the Qt Graphics View Framework, therefore charts can be easily qt5-qtcharts.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C integrated to modern user interfaces. Qt Charts can be used as QWidgets, QGraphicsWidget, or QML types. qt5-qtcharts.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.7.0-1 ['5.7.0-2.fc26', '5.7.0-2'] qt5-qtcharts.x86_64: W: no-documentation qt5-qtcharts-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib qt5-qtcharts-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/multiaxis/main.cpp qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/nesteddonuts/main.cpp qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartdrilldown/drilldownchart.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/chartinteractions/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/chartinteractions/chart.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/qmloscilloscope/main.cpp qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/stackedbarchartdrilldown/drilldownseries.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/scatterchart/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/zoomlinechart/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartdrilldown/drilldownslice.h qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/splinechart/main.cpp qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/qmlf1legends/main.cpp qt5-qtcharts-examples.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
[Bug 1360255] Review Request: qt5-qtcharts - Qt Charts module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360255 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner--- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/barmodelmapper/customtablemodel.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/barmodelmapper/tablewidget.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/boxplotchart/boxdatareader.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/callout/callout.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/callout/view.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/chartinteractions/chart.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/chartinteractions/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/chartthemes/themewidget.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/donutbreakdown/donutbreakdownchart.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/donutbreakdown/mainslice.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/dynamicspline/chart.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/legend/mainwidget.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/legendmarkers/mainwidget.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/modeldata/customtablemodel.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/modeldata/tablewidget.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/nesteddonuts/widget.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/openglseries/datasource.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartcustomization/brushtool.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartcustomization/customslice.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartcustomization/mainwidget.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartcustomization/pentool.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartdrilldown/drilldownchart.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/piechartdrilldown/drilldownslice.h qt5 -qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/polarchart/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/qmloscilloscope/datasource.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/scatterchart/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/scatterinteractions/chartview.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/stackedbarchartdrilldown/drilldownchart.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/stackedbarchartdrilldown/drilldownseries.h qt5-qtcharts-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/zoomlinechart/chart.h qt5-qtcharts- examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/charts/zoomlinechart/chartview.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages => Maybe move the sources of examples into a noarch subpackage or in devel. = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. => LGTM, common practice for qml extensions. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 1276 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora- review/1360255-qt5-qtcharts/licensecheck.txt => OK. Special Qt license header is not known to licensecheck. [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. => You say License: GFDL for doc subpackage but there's no license file. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/qt5 => %{_qt5_docdir} is owned by qt5-qtbase. => Add %dir %{_qt5_docdir} into doc subpackage (workaround due to noarch). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/qt5/examples(qt5 -qtdeclarative-examples, qt5-qtvirtualkeyboard-examples, qt5 -qtsensors-examples, qt5-qt3d-examples, qt5-qtsvg-examples, qt5 -qtmultimedia-examples, qt5-qtbase-examples,
[Bug 1382875] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875 --- Comment #7 from Jens Lody--- Another (important) point: psad needs a selinux-policy to work with selinux set to enforcing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382875] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875 --- Comment #6 from Jens Lody--- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #5) > > Not sure about the two strl*.c files with BSD3 license, but I guess they > > should be mentioned in license-tag > > Jens, please see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/ > FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_the_SRPM_or_the_binary_RPM.3F, and also the > discussion of the effective license there. GPL trumps BSD in this case. > Thanks for clarifying this ! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382681] Review Request: qt5-qtscxml - provides functionality to create state machines from SCXML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681 --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner--- Created attachment 1208608 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1208608=edit licensecheck.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375993] Review Request: python-flufl-i18n - A high level API for Python internationalization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993 --- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard--- Fixed, thanks again. Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.i18n/python-flufl-i18n.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.i18n/python-flufl-i18n-1.1.3-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376001] Review Request: python-flufl-lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001 --- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard--- I fixed those issues, thanks. I can't reproduce the test failure though. Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.lock/python-flufl-lock-2.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375962] Review Request: python-sphinx-intl - Sphinx utility that make it easy to translate and to apply translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962 --- Comment #6 from Julien Enselme--- > I have to say that I'm not a fan of macros that are only used one or a few > times, like %cmdname, %project_owner, etc. They make c unnecessarily hard, > and IMO decrease readability. And if you use this spec as a template for > another package, search-and-replace can be used to update all the names in > 3s. Anyway, just an opinion. I have no strong opinion on this. I initially wrote the spec without cmdname. I'll leave it as this for now. I may change my mind later. > %{_sbindir}/update-alternatives → /sbin has been in $PATH in Fedora for > years, so there's absolutely no need to specify the full path. Good to know. Corrected. > patterns are duplicated in %files Indeed, corrected. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375999] Review Request: python-flufl-bounce - Email bounce detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999 --- Comment #5 from Aurelien Bompard--- Thanks again for the review, I made those changes. Spec URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.bounce/python-flufl-bounce.spec SRPM URL: https://abompard.fedorapeople.org/reviews/flufl.bounce/python-flufl-bounce-2.3-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382681] Review Request: qt5-qtscxml - provides functionality to create state machines from SCXML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681 --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner--- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: qt5-qtscxml-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/scxml/calculator- widgets/mainwindow.h qt5-qtscxml-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/scxml /mediaplayer-qml-cppdatamodel/thedatamodel.h qt5-qtscxml-examples : /usr/lib64/qt5/examples/scxml/pinball/mainwindow.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages => I think %{_libdir}/qt5 is the wrong location to install examples with sources. Maybe move sources (incl. headers) of examples into devel? = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. => LGTM, common practice for qml extensions. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 741 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora- review/1382681-qt5-qtscxml/licensecheck.txt => No hit with suffixes .h or .cpp for execution of following commands: URL=https://www.qt.io/licensing grep -R -L $URL BUILD/qtscxml-opensource-src-5.7.0/src => Tests can be ignored. Please note BSD for some examples. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [?]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. => See licensecheck. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/doc/qt5, /usr/lib64/qt5/bin => /usr/share/doc/qt5 → qt5-qtbase, /usr/lib64/qt5/bin → qt5-qtbase-devel => Add %dir %{_qt5_docdir} to doc subpackage (as workaround due to noarch). Move %{_qt5_bindir}/qscxmlc into devel subpackage (depends on qt5-qtbase-devel). [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/qt5/examples(qt5 -qtdeclarative-examples, qt5-qtvirtualkeyboard-examples, qt5 -qtsensors-examples, qt5-qt3d-examples, qt5-qtsvg-examples, qt5 -qtmultimedia-examples, qt5-qtbase-examples, qt5-qttools-examples, qt5 -qtwebchannel-examples, qt5-qtserialbus-examples, qt5-qtxmlpatterns- examples, qt5-qtquickcontrols-examples, qt5-qtserialport-examples, qt5 -qtwebsockets-examples, qt5-qtscript-examples, qt5-qtwebengine- examples, qt5-qtenginio-examples, qt5-qtconnectivity-examples, qt5 -qtlocation-examples) => Looks as common practice. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package => See above about examples. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other
[Bug 1375993] Review Request: python-flufl-i18n - A high level API for Python internationalization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- Again, a bunch of sphinx files in site-packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375993] Review Request: python-flufl-i18n - A high level API for Python internationalization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375993 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-flufl.i18n - A high |python-flufl-i18n - A high |level API for Python|level API for Python |internationalization|internationalization -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376001] Review Request: python-flufl-lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-flufl.lock - |python-flufl-lock - |NFS-safe file locking with |NFS-safe file locking with |timeouts for POSIX systems |timeouts for POSIX systems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376001] Review Request: python-flufl.lock - NFS-safe file locking with timeouts for POSIX systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376001 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- + /usr/bin/python2 setup.py test running test running egg_info writing flufl.lock.egg-info/PKG-INFO writing namespace_packages to flufl.lock.egg-info/namespace_packages.txt writing top-level names to flufl.lock.egg-info/top_level.txt writing dependency_links to flufl.lock.egg-info/dependency_links.txt reading manifest file 'flufl.lock.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' reading manifest template 'MANIFEST.in' warning: no previously-included files found matching '.gitignore' writing manifest file 'flufl.lock.egg-info/SOURCES.txt' running build_ext test_retries (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests) ... FAIL test_retry_errno_api (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests) ... ok /home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/README.rst Doctest: README.rst ... ok /home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/docs/using.rst Doctest: using.rst ... ok == FAIL: test_retries (flufl.lock.tests.test_lockfile.ErrnoRetryTests) -- Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/zbyszek/rpmbuild/BUILD/flufl.lock-2.4.1/flufl/lock/tests/test_lockfile.py", line 103, in test_retries self.assertEqual(self._retry_count, 3) AssertionError: 0 != 3 -- Ran 4 tests in 28.614s FAILED (failures=1) This is in a local build on F25. Nevertheless, it builds find in F25, rawhide mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16015449, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16015457. rpmlint says: python2-flufl-lock.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US manpage -> manage, man page, man-page python3-flufl-lock.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US manpage -> manage, man page, man-page 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. "man page" is a better spelling. Similarly to python-flufl-bounce, there's a bunch of sphinx files in site-packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375999] Review Request: python-flufl-bounce - Email bounce detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-flufl.bounce - Email |python-flufl-bounce - Email |bounce detectors|bounce detectors -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382681] Review Request: qt5-qtscxml - provides functionality to create state machines from SCXML files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382681 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner--- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16015491 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375999] Review Request: python-flufl.bounce - Email bounce detectors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375999 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek--- (In reply to Aurelien Bompard from comment #2) > (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #1) > > In %files, please enumerate the items under %{pythonX_sitelib}/ explicitly. > > Something like > > %{python2_sitelib}/libname > > %{python2_sitelib}/libname-%{version}.egg-info > > Hmm, this does not look like what the template python file suggests: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file > Are you sure? What would be the reason to explicitely list them? Indeed. I'm a bit surprised that the template does not suggest that. I'll file a ticket for FPC later. The justification for the explicit patterns: 1. when reading the spec file (during review or at any later time), you don't need to *guess* what module name is provided 2. it catches some common errors: - for example, some packages by mistake install tests as a top level-module - some packages install multiple top-level modules unexpectedly - sometimes the python2 and python3 paths gets mixed up 3. those patterns don't require updating if done properly, but you'll get notified if something changes in the package. For an example, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962. It uses: %{python2_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}*-py%{python2_version}.egg-info/ %{python2_sitelib}/%{srcname}/ %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}*-py%{python3_version}.egg-info/ %{python3_sitelib}/%{srcname}/ Same as in the other package, you can replace the second and subsequent Summary texts with %{summary}, no need to repeat. /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flufl/bounce/NEWS.rst → this should be in %doc /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flufl/bounce/README.rst → this one is repeated from %doc /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/flufl/bounce/docs/using.rst → another candidate for %doc conf.py which is for sphinx gets installed as flufl.bounce.conf, you probably want to delete that to avoid confusion and spurious dependencies. In general, you should fix the installation to remove documentation and the related sphinx config from site-packages dirs. The package is essentially OK, but please submit another version, I'll do one more check of paths and provides/requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370239] Review Request: python-ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for Ansible Tower
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Alessandro Locati--- I've packaged version 3.0.1: - SPEC: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-ansible-tower-cli.spec - SRPM: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-ansible-tower-cli-3.0.1-1.fc24.src.rpm - PATCH: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/tower-cli-fix_py35_tests.patch The patch is a cherrypick of https://github.com/ansible/tower-cli/commit/3317c834a30bb4c616eedad82a28bcd1f95bbe66). This patch does solve the assert_called problem with python 3.5 tests and was created to further debug BUG #1379773. Since ATM that bug is still open, I've commented out the python3 tests. Can we go forward with the review please? As soon as that bug is fixed, I'll re-add python3 tests -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370239] Review Request: python-ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for Ansible Tower
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239 Fabio Alessandro Locatichanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1262470] Review Request: python-PyPDF2 - A pure Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 --- Comment #25 from Ranjan Maitra--- Thank you! I see that the problem is that there is no python3 for EPEL7. Surprisingly, python3-nose has built fine for EPEL7, as per bodhi. I have asked to be added/the python3 EPEL package to be built. I will keep looking at this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370449] Review Request: rtv - A simple terminal viewer for Reddit ( Reddit Terminal Viewer)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370449 Fabio Alessandro Locatichanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(germano.massullo@ ||gmail.com) --- Comment #2 from Fabio Alessandro Locati --- I've packaged a new version of this package (1.12.1) and added a comment to the patch. SRPM: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rtv-1.12.1-1.fc24.src.rpm SPEC: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rtv.spec PATCH: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rtv-1.12.1-mailcap_fix.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375962] Review Request: python-sphinx-intl - Sphinx utility that make it easy to translate and to apply translation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375962 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I have to say that I'm not a fan of macros that are only used one or a few times, like %cmdname, %project_owner, etc. They make c unnecessarily hard, and IMO decrease readability. And if you use this spec as a template for another package, search-and-replace can be used to update all the names in 3s. Anyway, just an opinion. %{_sbindir}/update-alternatives → /sbin has been in $PATH in Fedora for years, so there's absolutely no need to specify the full path. warning: File listed twice: /usr/bin/sphinx-intl-3 warning: File listed twice: /usr/bin/sphinx-intl-3.5 warning: File listed twice: /usr/bin/sphinx-intl-2 warning: File listed twice: /usr/bin/sphinx-intl-2.7 → patterns are duplicated in %files + package name is OK + license is acceptable for Fedora (BSD) + license is specified correctly + latest version + python packaging template is used + %python_provide is used + python3 is supported + executables in /bin are properly versioned and symlinked + builds and installs OK + provides/requires look sane Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1381307] Review Request: perl-BibTeX-Parser - Pure Perl BibTeX parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381307 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.69-1.fc25, perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.04-1.fc25, texlive-2016-7.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1381303] Review Request: perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode - Convert LaTeX commands to Unicode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381303 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- perl-BibTeX-Parser-0.69-1.fc25, perl-LaTeX-ToUnicode-0.04-1.fc25, texlive-2016-7.20160520.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-50a2bc7997 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382875] Review Request: psad - Port Scan Attack Detector (psad) watches for suspect traffic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382875 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- > Not sure about the two strl*.c files with BSD3 license, but I guess they > should be mentioned in license-tag Jens, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ?rd=Licensing/FAQ#Does_the_License:_tag_cover_the_SRPM_or_the_binary_RPM.3F, and also the discussion of the effective license there. GPL trumps BSD in this case. -- I mostly wanted to add a comment that the systemd units look fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1262470] Review Request: python-PyPDF2 - A pure Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- No, that error message appears all the time when initializing mock. Somebody should fix it, but it's unrelated. The real error is in mock_output.log: Getting requirements for python-PyPDF2-1.25.1-1.1.el7.src --> python-devel-2.7.5-39.el7_2.x86_64 --> python-nose-1.3.0-3.el7.noarch Error: No Package found for python3-devel Error: No Package found for python3-nose -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1381029] Review Request: more-itertools - Python library for efficient use of itertools utility in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381029 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- The package builds fine in F23 mock for me, and also now in koji scratch (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16005364). Yesterday there was some issue with F23 koji package set, maybe your build failure was caused by that. Review: + package name is OK + license is aceptable (MIT) + license is specified correctly + latest version + python packaging template is used + %python_provide is used + provides/requires look OK + builds and installs OK + %check passes Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1371502] Review Request: Siril - Astronomical image (pre-) processing program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371502 --- Comment #11 from Christian Dersch--- Yes, I'll take care of that, nice! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1379421] Review Request: python-psycogreen - Psycopg2 integration with co-routine libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379421 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-psycogreen-1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6cdd913969 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org