[Bug 1379709] Review Request: python-epi - Tool for looking at the entry point plugins on a system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-epi-0.1-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-20748567c3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386735] Review Request: php-fedora-autoloader - Fedora Autoloader

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.1.1-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1ade51bea8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386563] Review Request: python-ruamel-yaml - YAML 1.2 loader/ dumper package for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386563

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ruamel-yaml-0.12.14-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-60b89d72e3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383488] Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-61f3ad0b09

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383487] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-0.6.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e87d4446d2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386735] Review Request: php-fedora-autoloader - Fedora Autoloader

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1e758eff5c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383488] Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d0fc433219

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383487] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-0.6.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-99dfdc1040

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1370239] Review Request: python-ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for Ansible Tower

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2016-10-18 07:31:07 |2016-10-21 20:51:57



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ansible-tower-cli-3.0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382811] Un-Retirement Review: appmenu-qt5 - Support for global DBus-exported application menu in Qt5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382811



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
appmenu-qt5-0.3.0+16.10.20160628.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1330343] Review Request: iprange - Manage IP ranges

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330343

Michael Hampton  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
Last Closed||2016-10-21 17:27:40



--- Comment #5 from Michael Hampton  ---
Upstream did not seem very interested in resolving this conflict, and I no
longer have the time to deal with it. Someone else can try to pick this up in
the future, if there is interest.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1384242] Review Request: python-astropy-helpers - Utilities for building and installing Astropy and affiliated package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384242



--- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski  ---
(In reply to Dominika Krejčí from comment #3)
> Is there any special reason why do you use `%{pythonX_pkgversion}` macro? I
> think you could use just 3 or 2, e.g. `python3-devel`.

For EPEL support - see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts:Python3EPEL

> Could you also specify Python 2 Requires?
> python-devel -> python2-devel
> python-setuptools -> python2-setuptools
> pytest -> python2-pytest
> numpy -> python2-numpy
> python-shipnx -> python2-sphinx

Same reason - EPEL uses the old names.

> Could you be please more specific in the `%files` section and do not use
> just `%{pythonX_sitelib}/*`, but for example this?
> %{python3_sitelib}/*astropy_helpers*.egg-info/
> %{python3_sitelib}/astropy_helpers/

How about:

%{python3_sitelib}/astropy_helpers*

Spec URL: https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-astropy-helpers.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-astropy-helpers-1.2-2.el7.src.rpm

* Fri Oct 21 2016 Orion Poplawski  - 1.2-2
- Be more explicit in %%files

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
zstd-1.1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el6, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el6, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555



--- Comment #10 from Rich Mattes  ---
Thanks for the review Antonio!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1354018] Review Request: nodejs-utfx - A compact library to encode, decode and convert UTF8 / UTF16

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354018



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/nodejs-utfx

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/switcheroo-control

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/fcl

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716

Matthias Clasen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716



--- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen  ---
approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716



--- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen  ---
package name: ok
spec file name: ok
packaging guidelines: ok
license: ok
license field: ok
license file: ok
spec file language: ok
spec file legible: yes
upstream sources: ok
buildable: ok
excludearch: ok
build deps: ok
locale handling ok
shared libs: ok
system libs: ok
relocatable: no
directory ownership: ok
duplicate files: ok
permissions: ok
macro use: ok
permissible content: ok
large docs: ok
%doc content: ok
devel deps: ok
la files: ok
gui apps: ok
directory ownership: ok
utf8 filenames: ok

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716



--- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen  ---
rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint switcheroo-control-1.0-1.fc2*
switcheroo-control.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/dbus-1/system.d/net.hadess.SwitcherooControl.conf
switcheroo-control.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary switcheroo-control
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716

Matthias Clasen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||mcla...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mcla...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1370239] Review Request: python-ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for Ansible Tower

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ansible-tower-cli-3.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-9339f62e16

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1385534] Review Request: python-ruamel-ordereddict - Ordered dictionary with Key Insertion Order

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385534



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-ruamel-ordereddict-0.4.9-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7b4d4fb4c3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1385180] Review Request: purple-facebook - Facebook protocol plugin for purple2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385180



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
purple-facebook-0.0.0.20160409-0.4.git66ee773.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1c172d3506

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1384917] Review Request: python-pykwalify - Python lib/cli for JSON/ YAML schema validation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pykwalify-1.5.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-dcca303252

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383488] Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-9c85030072

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379709] Review Request: python-epi - Tool for looking at the entry point plugins on a system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-epi-0.1-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-175ef1a9e6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1358041] Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python3-scipy-0.18.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6fc54fb584

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1383487] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-0.6.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-81e88ac49e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386735] Review Request: php-fedora-autoloader - Fedora Autoloader

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-fedora-autoloader-0.1.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-0dbc1f0889

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357283] Review Request: obconf-qt - A configuration editor for the OpenBox window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357283



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
obconf-qt-0.11.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1379709] Review Request: python-epi - Tool for looking at the entry point plugins on a system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379709



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-epi-0.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387716] New: Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387716

Bug ID: 1387716
   Summary: Review Request: switcheroo-control - D-Bus service to
check the availability of dual-GPU
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: klem...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/switcheroo-control.spec
SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/switcheroo-control-1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
D-Bus service to check the availability of dual-GPU.

Fedora Account System Username: kalev

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16152842

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378999] Review Request: perl-Test-Mock-Guard - Simple mock test library using RAII

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378999



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
imapsync-1.727-1.el7, perl-JSON-WebToken-0.10-1.el7,
perl-Test-Mock-Guard-0.10-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378028] Review Request: perl-MCE-Shared - MCE extension for sharing data, supporting threads and processes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378028



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-MCE-Shared-1.805-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1378445] Review Request: kf5-kirigami - QtQuick plugins to build user interfaces based on the KDE UX guidelines

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378445



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kirigami-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 656938] Review Request: python-shapely - Geometric objects, predicates, and operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656938



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-shapely-1.5.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357064] Review Request: lumina-desktop - A lightweight, portable desktop environment

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357064



--- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System  ---
lumina-desktop-1.0.0-5.p2.Lbc08e90.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377444] Review Request: perl-JSON-WebToken - JSON Web Token (JWT) implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377444



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
imapsync-1.727-1.el7, perl-JSON-WebToken-0.10-1.el7,
perl-Test-Mock-Guard-0.10-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373218] Review Request: zstd - Zstd compression library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373218



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
zstd-1.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380671] Review Request: python-jcconv - JapaneseCharacterCONVerter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380671



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-jcconv-0.2.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1373782] Review Request: mingw-cmocka - MinGW Lightweight library to simplify and generalize unit tests for C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373782



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
mingw-cmocka-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380156] Review Request: php-webmozart-path-util - Cross-platform utilities for file paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380156



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1380155] Review Request: php-webmozart-assert - Assertions to validate method input/ output with nice error messages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380155



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-webmozart-assert-1.1.0-1.el7, php-webmozart-path-util-2.3.0-1.el7 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1358918] Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358918

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|rdie...@math.unl.edu|nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |



--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter  ---
sorry for the delay, I won't have time in the immediate future (removing myself
as reviewer to allow someone else to take it for now)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1358918] Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358918



--- Comment #7 from Raphael Groner  ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298011#c10

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1358918] Review Request: qtwebbrowser - QtWebEngine based browser for embedded touch devices

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358918



--- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner  ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1)
> DEBUG util.py:421:  No matching package to install: 'pkgconfig(Qt5WebEngine)'
> 
> … for epel7 and ppc64le (all Fedoras)
> 
> Maybe add ExcludeArch?

(In reply to Kevin Kofler from comment #2)
> You should copy the ExclusiveArch line from qt5-qtwebengine.

It's fixed for qt5-qtwebengine (see rhbz#1298011). I assume ExcludeArch is not
needed any more for qtwebbrowser, too.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386638] Review Request: eclipse-usage - Usage reporting plug-ins for Eclipse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386638

Mat Booth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-10-21 10:37:55



--- Comment #7 from Mat Booth  ---
It is now built for all requested branches.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1359914] Review Request: lollypop - Music player for GNOME

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359914
Bug 1359914 depends on bug 1381132, which changed state.

Bug 1381132 Summary: Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387669] Review Request: kio-gdrive - KDE Dolphin Google Drive access

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387669

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Version|25  |rawhide
 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR),
   ||656997 (kde-reviews)
 Depends On||1387323
Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: kio-gdrive
   | - |access
  Alias||kio-gdrive




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997
[Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387323
[Bug 1387323] Update to version 5.3.1 libkgapi
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381132] Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132

MartinKG  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2016-10-21 10:06:54



--- Comment #9 from MartinKG  ---
package has been built successfully on fc23, fc24, fc25 and rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387669] Review Request: - < KDE Dolphin Google Drive access>

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387669

Wolnei Junior  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|rawhide |25



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387669] New: Review Request: - < KDE Dolphin Google Drive access>

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387669

Bug ID: 1387669
   Summary: Review Request:  - 
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: e...@wolnei.com.br
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://wolnei.fedorapeople.org/rpm/kio-gdrive/kio-gdrive.spec
SRPM URL:
https://wolnei.fedorapeople.org/rpm/kio-gdrive/kio-gdrive-1.0.3-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Provides KIO Access to Google Drive using the gdrive:/// protocol.
Fedora Account System Username: wolnei

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande  ---
Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555



--- Comment #7 from Rich Mattes  ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #6)
> 
> - LICENSE file is not packed
>   Please, include the changelog file, too.

Good catch, I have included the changelog and license.

> - You don't need to indicate the commit; this is the
>   release 0.5.0
>   https://github.com/flexible-collision-library/fcl/releases/tag/0.5.0

Changed the Source0 to use the tag, as per the guidelines at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL?rd=Packaging/SourceURL#Git_Tags

> - Why is release number not the same? 
> 
> $ ll rpms-unpacked/fcl-0.5.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 sagitter sagitter 9443832 Oct 21 11:53 libfcl.so.0.5.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 sagitter sagitter  15 Oct 21 12:02 libfcl.so.7 ->
> libfcl.so.0.5.0
> 

It looks like upstream is bumping the ABI version (used in the soname) each
time they make an ABI breaking change, and somehow it got out of sync with the
minor version.  I don't think it's a big deal that they're out of sync; at
least they're setting a soversion and incrementing it when needed.

New packages:
Spec URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fcl/fcl.spec
SRPM URL: http://rmattes.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/fcl/fcl-0.5.0-2.fc24.src.rpm

rpmlint:
$ rpmlint ./fcl.spec ../RPMS/x86_64/fcl-*
fcl.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US normals -> normal,
normal's, formals
fcl.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libfcl.so.0.5.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
fcl-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
fcl-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16151741

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257



--- Comment #45 from Antonio Trande  ---
- Install missing header files

SPEC:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/sagitter/petsc/petsc.git/plain/petsc.spec?id=10472ac8bd2a12d68a92190acd6aa967e6a2ff11

SRPM:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/sagitter/petsc/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00467891-petsc/petsc-3.7.4-7.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381132] Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132



--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-wikipedia

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386638] Review Request: eclipse-usage - Usage reporting plug-ins for Eclipse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386638



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/eclipse-usage

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387538] Review Request: python-typing - Type Hints for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387538



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-typing

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381548] Review Request: mariadb-connector-odbc

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381548



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mariadb-connector-odbc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1385441] Review Request: rpmdeplint - Tool to find errors in RPM packages in the context of their dependency graph

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385441



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rpmdeplint

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1212909] New package request: clufter - Tool for transforming/ analyzing cluster configuration formats

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212909
Bug 1212909 depends on bug 1230908, which changed state.

Bug 1230908 Summary: pcs cluster cib-push doesn't allow to utilize XPath filter 
provided by underlying cibadmin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230908

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387634] New: Review Request: perl-Devel-Gladiator - Walk Perl' s arena

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387634

Bug ID: 1387634
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-Gladiator - Walk Perl's
arena
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Gladiator/perl-Devel-Gladiator.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Devel-Gladiator/perl-Devel-Gladiator-0.07-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description:
Devel::Gladiator iterates Perl's internal memory structures and can be used to
enumerate all the currently live SVs. This can be used to hunt leaks and to
profile memory usage.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387619] Review Request: perl-Test-Is - Skip test in a declarative way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387619

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1387626




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387626
[Bug 1387626] Review Request: perl-Term-Chrome - DSL for colors and other
terminal chrome
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387626] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Chrome - DSL for colors and other terminal chrome

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387626

Bug ID: 1387626
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Chrome - DSL for colors and
other terminal chrome
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-Chrome/perl-Term-Chrome.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Term-Chrome/perl-Term-Chrome-2.00-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description:
Term::Chrome is a domain-specific language (DSL) for terminal decoration
(colors and other attributes) in Perl.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387626] Review Request: perl-Term-Chrome - DSL for colors and other terminal chrome

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387626

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1387619




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387619
[Bug 1387619] Review Request: perl-Test-Is - Skip test in a declarative way
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387619] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Is - Skip test in a declarative way

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387619

Bug ID: 1387619
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Is - Skip test in a
declarative way
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Is/perl-Test-Is.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Test-Is/perl-Test-Is-20140823.1-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description:
This module is a simple way of following the specifications of the
environment variables available for Perl tests as defined as one of
the "Lancaster Consensus" at Perl QA Hackathon 2013. Those variables
(NONINTERACTIVE_TESTING, EXTENDED_TESTING) define which tests should
be skipped.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376511] Review Request: nexus - NeXus scientific data file format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511



--- Comment #5 from Stuart Campbell  ---
I've updated with in response to the comments.

SPEC URL: https://sic.fedorapeople.org/nexus/nexus.spec

SRPM URL: https://sic.fedorapeople.org/nexus/nexus-4.4.3-2.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1381132] Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132



--- Comment #7 from MartinKG  ---
Hi Dominika,
many thanks for your review !

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1384242] Review Request: python-astropy-helpers - Utilities for building and installing Astropy and affiliated package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384242



--- Comment #3 from Dominika Krejčí  ---
Is there any special reason why do you use `%{pythonX_pkgversion}` macro? I
think you could use just 3 or 2, e.g. `python3-devel`.

Could you also specify Python 2 Requires?
python-devel -> python2-devel
python-setuptools -> python2-setuptools
pytest -> python2-pytest
numpy -> python2-numpy
python-shipnx -> python2-sphinx

Could you be please more specific in the `%files` section and do not use just
`%{pythonX_sitelib}/*`, but for example this?
%{python3_sitelib}/*astropy_helpers*.egg-info/
%{python3_sitelib}/astropy_helpers/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387604] New: Review Request: perl-Filter-Encoding - Write your script in any encoding

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387604

Bug ID: 1387604
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Filter-Encoding - Write your
script in any encoding
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Filter-Encoding/perl-Filter-Encoding.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Filter-Encoding/perl-Filter-Encoding-0.01-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description:
This module allows your code to be written in any ASCII-based encoding.
Just pass the name of the encoding as an argument to use Filter::Encoding.
The source code will be decoded and treated as though it had been written
in UTF-8 with use utf8 in effect. That's all this module does.

Fedora Account System Username: ppisar

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1371158] Review Request: ebtree - Elastic binary tree library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok.
Source archive is original (SHA-256:
17f8a7a88758f5fe67c3e2f304f549b1543c3abfadf1d01053b280369238005f). Ok.
The patch is good.
Summary is Ok.

FIX: While the library is LGPLv2, the examples files have different license
(GPLv2+). You must add `License: LGPLv2 and GPLv2+' to the devel sub-package.

FIX: Add a full-stop symbol at the end of the descriptions.

FIX: Build-require `make' (ebtree.spec:41).
FIX: Build-require `coreutils' (ebtree.spec:42).
FIX: Build-require `gcc' (Makefile:13).

FIX: Do not package LICENSE file twice (both %doc and %license). Use only
%license.

FIX: Export LDFLAGS for make. The linker command must use distribution flags
from %{__global_ldflags} macro.

TODO: Execute tests from %check section. Upstream has tests. Actually it would
be great if the tests used the dynamic library so they checked the bits the RPM
package will deliver to users. They uses the static library now.

TODO: The library SONAME should be two-digit because this not an upstream
versioning. It also does not make sense to start with "6". You could start with
"0.1".
.

$ rpmlint ebtree.spec ../SRPMS/ebtree-6.0.8-1.fc26.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/ebtree-*
ebtree.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libebtree.so.6.0
ebtree.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libebtree.so.6.0
ebtree-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-dependency-on ebtree/ebtree-libs/libebtree
6.0.8
ebtree-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings.
FIX: You have to call ldconfig from post and postun scriptlets
.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/ebtree-6.0.8-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm 
lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot   16 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/lib64/libebtree.so.6 -> libebtree.so.6.0
-rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot19232 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/lib64/libebtree.so.6.0
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/doc/ebtree
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26436 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot12297 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/doc/ebtree/README
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot6 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree/VERSION
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/licenses/ebtree
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26436 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/licenses/ebtree/LICENSE

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/x86_64/ebtree-devel-6.0.8-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm 
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2954 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/compiler.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot15744 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/eb32tree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot18643 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/eb64tree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot10710 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebimtree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot10966 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebistree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26000 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebmbtree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 5520 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebpttree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot10802 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebsttree.h
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot31130 Jun 11  2012
/usr/include/ebtree.h
lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot   14 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/lib64/libebtree.so -> libebtree.so.6
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26436 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot12297 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/README
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot6 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/VERSION
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/examples
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4217 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/examples/reduce.c
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2529 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/doc/ebtree-devel/examples/squidgrep.c
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 11:24
/usr/share/licenses/ebtree-devel
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot26436 Jun 11  2012
/usr/share/licenses/ebtree-devel/LICENSE

I don't like the compiler.h directly in /usr/include. The file name does not
sound ebtree specific. I recommend to move the header files into a subdirectory
/usr/include/ebtree.

$ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/x86_64/ebtree-6.0.8-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm | sort -f
| uniq -c
  1 libc.so.6()(64bit)
  1 

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555



--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

=== Issues ===

- LICENSE file is not packed
  Please, include the changelog file, too.

- You don't need to indicate the commit; this is the
  release 0.5.0
  https://github.com/flexible-collision-library/fcl/releases/tag/0.5.0

- Why is release number not the same? 

$ ll rpms-unpacked/fcl-0.5.0-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm/usr/lib64
-rwxr-xr-x. 1 sagitter sagitter 9443832 Oct 21 11:53 libfcl.so.0.5.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 sagitter sagitter  15 Oct 21 12:02 libfcl.so.7 ->
libfcl.so.0.5.0


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 8
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/sagitter/1103555-fcl/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib64/cmake(cmake,
 pulseaudio-libs-devel, qt5-qtlocation, phonon-devel, qt5-qtbase, gtk-
 doc, jsoncpp-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and 

[Bug 1381132] Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132

Dominika Krejčí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Dominika Krejčí  ---
Hi Martin,
everything is ok. Package APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: 

[Bug 1381132] Review Request: python-wikipedia - Wikipedia API for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381132

Dominika Krejčí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dkre...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||anto.tra...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386638] Review Request: eclipse-usage - Usage reporting plug-ins for Eclipse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386638

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
Approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1385331] Review Request: hot-tux - Graphical CPU utilization monitoring utility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331



--- Comment #4 from jiri vanek  ---
> Incorrect version in %changelog.

fixed


(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #3)
> You should build-require `sed' (called from the spec file), `coreutils'
> (called from Makefile). And probably `pkgconfig' (called from Makefile).
> 
> You should also remove `-O2' and `-g' from CFLAGS in the Makefile as it
> undermines distribution specific setting.

Thanx!
fixed:

Spec URL: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/hot-tux/r2/hot-tux.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/hot-tux/r2/hot-tux-0.3.1-1.fc24.src.rpm

> 
> You should also provide AppData
>  because this is an
> graphical application.

Yup. And menu record. I have them in plan in upstream in longer time period.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387538] Review Request: python-typing - Type Hints for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387538

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

Suggestions:
1) Correct the changelog version from 3.5.2 to 3.5.2.2

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* PSF". 6 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/parag/1387538-python-typing/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-typing , python3-typing
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build 

[Bug 1367536] Rebase clufter component [RHEL 6.9]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367536

Jan Pokorný  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1387561




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387561
[Bug 1387561] NT escaping in shebang in easy_install
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386638] Review Request: eclipse-usage - Usage reporting plug-ins for Eclipse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386638



--- Comment #3 from Mat Booth  ---
(In reply to Alexander Kurtakov from comment #2)
> Issues:
> ===
> * License field  - I would prefer if you make smaller tarball with only the
> usage plugin sources as the alternative is to make the license field "Apache
> and LGPL and EPL ...". Such a change should simplify the spec file too.
> 


I trimmed the tarball, but still needed to change license to "EPL and ASL 2.0"
due to there being some apache code in the usage plugin.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1386638] Review Request: eclipse-usage - Usage reporting plug-ins for Eclipse

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386638



--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth  ---
Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-usage.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/eclipse-usage-4.4.1-2.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1371158] Review Request: ebtree - Elastic binary tree library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371158

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ppi...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1385331] Review Request: hot-tux - Graphical CPU utilization monitoring utility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385331

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ppi...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
You should build-require `sed' (called from the spec file), `coreutils' (called
from Makefile). And probably `pkgconfig' (called from Makefile).

You should also remove `-O2' and `-g' from CFLAGS in the Makefile as it
undermines distribution specific setting.

You should also provide AppData
 because this is an graphical
application.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387538] Review Request: python-typing - Type Hints for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387538

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1387538] New: Review Request: python-typing - Type Hints for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387538

Bug ID: 1387538
   Summary: Review Request: python-typing - Type Hints for Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: chku...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-typing.spec

SRPM URL:
https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-typing-3.5.2.2-1.fc24.src.rpm

Description: Typing Type Hints for PythonThis is a backport of the standard
library typing
module to Python versions older than 3.5.Typing defines a standard notation for
Python function and variable type annotations. The notation can be used for
documenting code in a concise, standard format, and it has been designed to
also be used by static and runtime type checkers, static analyzers, IDEs and
other

Fedora Account System Username: chandankumar

Successful Koji Build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16148022

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1382922] Review Request: perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded - Parser and builder for application/ x-www-form-urlencoded

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382922



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
URL and Source0 addresses are usable. Ok.
Source0 archive is original (SHA-256:
c87de2c895cf8a526bf5d3a231e6ca0e6d4cfdca72f8840b3fb039dbde478852). Ok.
The WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-arch.patch patch is good. Ok.
Summary verified from README.md. Ok.
Description verified from README.md. Ok.
License verified from lib/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded/PP.pm,
lib/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded.pm, README.md, and LICENSE. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.

FIX: Build-require `perl(File::Copy)' (Build.PL:54).
FIX: Build-require `perl(base)' (builder/MyBuilder.pm:5).
FIX: Build-require `perl(File::Path)' (builder/MyBuilder.pm:7).
FIX: Build-require `perl(bytes)' (lib/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded/PP.pm:109).

WWW::Form::UrlEncoded::XS is optional. Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded.spec
../SRPMS/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/doc/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1239 Nov 19  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded/Changes
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4408 Nov 19  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded/README.md
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/licenses/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot18418 Nov 19  2015
/usr/share/licenses/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3647 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/man/man3/WWW::Form::UrlEncoded.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2125 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/man/man3/WWW::Form::UrlEncoded::PP.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/WWW
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/WWW/Form
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 5091 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3942 Oct 21 10:23
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/WWW/Form/UrlEncoded/PP.pm
File permissions and layout is Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq
-c 
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0)
  1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.1
  1 perl(base)
  1 perl(bytes)
  1 perl(Exporter)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(warnings)
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires are Ok.

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq
-c 
  1 perl(WWW::Form::UrlEncoded) = 0.23
  1 perl(WWW::Form::UrlEncoded::PP)
  1 perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded = 0.23-1.fc26
Binary provides are Ok.

$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-WWW-Form-UrlEncoded-0.23-1.fc26.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

Package build in F26
(http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16148067). Ok.

Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.

Please correct all `FIX' items and provides an updated spec files.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364982] Review Request: nodejs-coffee-coverage - Istanbul and JSCoverage-style instrumentation for CoffeeScript files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364982

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364959] Review Request: nodejs-ware - Easily create your own middleware layer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364959

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364958] Review Request: nodejs-wrap-fn - Support sync, async, and generator functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364958

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364704] Review Request: nodejs-linkify-it - Links recognition library with FULL unicode support

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364704

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364699] Review Request: nodejs-linefix - Recursively repair line endings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364699

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364702] Review Request: nodejs-tlds - List of TLDs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364702

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364700] Review Request: nodejs-markdown-it-testgen - Tests generator for markdown-it markdown parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364700

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364697] Review Request: nodejs-leche - A JavaScript testing utility designed to work with Mocha and Sinon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364697

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364696] Review Request: nodejs-file-entry-cache - Super simple cache for file metadata

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364696

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1364701] Review Request: nodejs-uc-dot-micro - Micro subset of unicode data files for markdown-it projects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364701

Peter Robinson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1269538 (IoT)   |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538
[Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org