[Bug 1470842] Review Request: bazel - A fast, scalable, multi-language and extensible build system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470842



--- Comment #2 from Seth Jennings  ---
Thanks for the review!

The release tarballs (as opposed to the -dist.zip sources) have the correct
permissions on the files and don't include the bootstrap binaries.

The two binaries needed are protoc, provided by the protobuf-compiler package,
and a protoc-gen-grpc-java, which current isn't packaged.  It can be compile
from https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java.  However, that repo also has a
recommended "build from source" procedure that includes prebundled binaries.

Still trying to find a clean way to do this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1465885] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-golex - Lex/ Flex-like utility written in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465885

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||athoscribe...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|athoscribe...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
Hi Fabio, I am taking this one.

- The main package should ship the license file (and maybe the docs as well).

- calc/calc.y has a different license, but is not present in the binary
package. There is a license file for it in the sources, so no action should be
needed here.

- Since this is a binary program, you could consider either renaming the
package to golex, as indicated in the guidelines [1], or adding a Provides for
it (this is up to you though, just thought it was worth mentioning).

- Is there any reason for not building a debuginfo package? Note that there is
a --build option in gofed.

- rpmlint triggers:
  golang-github-cznic-golex.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/bin/golex
  (you probably want to chmod 0755 the binary file)

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go#Packaging_Binaries
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Go#Debuginfo

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

[Bug 1467322] Review Request: manifest-tool - A command line tool used for creating manifest list objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467322



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
manifest-tool-0.6.0-3.gita28af2b.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341



--- Comment #44 from VincentS  ---
Thanks for your help, here are new links.

Spec URL: https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/review/python-gamera.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dl.casperlefantom.net/pub/review/python-gamera-3.4.3-6.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1467132] Review Request: json-c12 - JSON implementation in C

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467132

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-07-23 14:49:45



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
json-c12-0.12.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1457949] Review Request: libdxflib - A C++ library for reading and writing DXF files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457949



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdxflib-3.17.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1473543] Review Request: python-ansicolors - ANSI colors support for python print output

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473543



--- Comment #4 from Nikola Forró  ---
Everything looks fine, just update summary and description as discussed and I
will set fedora-review+.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1473543] Review Request: python-ansicolors - ANSI colors support for python print output

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473543



--- Comment #3 from Nikola Forró  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-ansicolors , python3-ansicolors
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global 

[Bug 1421047] Review Request: deepin-tool-kit - Base development tool of all C++/ Qt Developer work on Deepin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421047



--- Comment #7 from sensor@gmail.com ---
SPEC: 
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/FZUG/repo/0debd1ed03ecd29c5f01b98d44da1b6916c6555a/rpms/deepin_project/deepin-tool-kit.spec

It's build pass and added the `%{?_qt5:Requires: %{_qt5}%{?_isa} =
%{_qt5_version}}` macro.   @Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1474033] Review Request: ucx - Communication library implementing high-performance messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033



--- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt  ---
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8693/20688693/build.log

Please look for ways to make build output verbose, so more of the
compiler/linker calls and options can be seen in the build.log. You may need to
disable .silent rules or execute Make with V=1, or enable other settings in the
build framework.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1474033] Review Request: ucx - Communication library implementing high-performance messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033



--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt  ---
> %global rel 1
> %global version 1.3.3274

Completely pointless definition and redefinition of macros for various reasons:

1) You define %rel only to use it once in the spec file.
2) You also use %release and not only %rel.
3) The "Release" tag implicitly defines %release, so both macros would be the
same.
4) The "Version" tag implicitly defines %version. You redefine %version.

Further, the dist tag is missing:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Simple_versioning


> %global __check_files %{nil}

Comment/rationale missing!


> %bcond_with valgrind

No-op due to nothing related within the spec file.


> Summary: Unified Communication X

That's only what the UCX acronym stands for. The %description could explain
that and expand on the summary, while the %summary could tell a bit more:

Summary: Communication framework for data centric and high-performance
applications


> Group: Development/Libraries

No. The group for system runtime library packages is "System
Environment/Libraries" for decades. On the contrary, "Development/Libraries" is
for -devel packages, for example.


> Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Referencing_Source


> ExclusiveArch: aarch64 ppc64le x86_64

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Architecture_Support


> Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig

Implicit and automatic with /sbin/ldconfig scriptlets for a *very* long time.


> %description
> %description devel

Odd that the -devel package contains the more detailed description. The base
package also contains more than libraries, lacking an explanation.


> %build
> ./contrib/configure-release \

That's a configure script for which you really want to use the %configure
macro. See "rpm -E %configure" on what it does.


> mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/
> echo %{_libdir} > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/ucx.conf

No, %_libdir is in the default search path list for runtime libs.


> %clean
> rm -rf %{buildroot}

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections


> %files
> %{_libdir}/lib*.so.*
> %{_bindir}/uc*
> %{_datadir}/ucx/perftest/*

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership


> %{_sysconfdir}/ld.so.conf.d/ucx.conf

Superfluous.


> %files devel
> %{_includedir}/uc*
> %{_libdir}/lib*.a

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries


> %changelog
> * Mon Jul 3 2017 Andrey Maslennikov  1.3
> - Fedora package created

Not matching %version.


Please take a look at the fedora-review tool. Point it at this ticket via
"fedora-review -b 1474033" and let it fetch the latest package files to help
you with lots of automated reviewing tests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 662270] Review Request: circuit_macros - A set of macros for drawing high-quality line diagram

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=662270

Till Maas  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||opensou...@till.name
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2017-07-23 09:06:56



--- Comment #3 from Till Maas  ---
The spec from comment:2 does not work anymore and the review request has been
blocking FE-DEADREVIEW for more than 18 months now. Therefore I close this
review request. Ben, if you still plan to get this package reviewed, please
open a new review request with working URLs for the spec and SRPM files.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1473314] Review Request: rclone - rsync for cloud storage

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473314



--- Comment #2 from Till Maas  ---
I believe I read somewhere that support for go on ppc64 was discontinued. You
should use

ExclusiveArch:  %{golang_arches}

in the spec to make sure that the package is only built for archs in Fedora
that contain golang.

Also it is better to use

%{_mandir}/man1/rclone.1*

to match the man page as it also allows to change the compression method for
the manpage.

Also it seems to me that the package bundles a lot of other go packages (in the
vendor directory of the source tarball). AFAIK Fedora currently requires the
packages to be de-bundled unless there is good reason not to do so. Since it is
quite a lot of packages, would you be willing to debundle them?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1473314] Review Request: rclone - rsync for cloud storage

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473314



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
rclone published a new release yesterday. I'm updating the spec accordingly.

Spec URL:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-2E1dURtQf5eFp0Y0pXenpZT3M/view?usp=sharing
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8484/20688484/rclone-1.37-1.fc27.src.rpm
Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20688479

Koji fails on arch ppc64, the log says it can't find golang >= 1.5, which is
weird since it was compiling it fine last week with golang 1.8.1. I don't know
why.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 827723] Review Request: gnuhealth - The free Health and Hospital Information System

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723



--- Comment #21 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
May be best to close this and open up a fresh review.

To everyone above - if you're interested in using the package on Fedora, please
consider packaging it up and helping with maintenance. 

Cheers!
Ankur

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1468665] Review Request: gsettings-qt - Qt/QML bindings for GSettings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468665

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsettings-qt-0-0.2.20170715bzr83.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e91c753f3a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377038] Review Request: sxhkd - Simple X hotkey daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377038



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
sxhkd-0.5.8-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9c4a3ece9c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1465884] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lex - Support for (f) lex-like tool on .l source files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465884



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-cznic-lex-0-0.1.20170112.git68050f5.fc26 has been pushed to the
Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2bc648fab9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1468768] Review Request: domoticz - Open source Home Automation System

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
domoticz-3.5877-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9f014592ce

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1474033] Review Request: ucx - Communication library implementing high-performance messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033

Andrey Maslennikov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://github.com/openucx/
   ||ucx
 CC||andre...@mellanox.com
 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1474033] New: Review Request: ucx - Communication library implementing high-performance messaging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474033

Bug ID: 1474033
   Summary: Review Request: ucx - Communication library
implementing high-performance messaging
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: andre...@mellanox.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/ccae11efb3a573d77633e60b485f1f221cdd7e10/ucx.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gist.github.com/amaslenn/3c847e0bdc063bcbb4b6507b5efbf6b9/raw/ccae11efb3a573d77633e60b485f1f221cdd7e10/ucx-1.3.3274-1.src.rpm

Description: UCX is a communication library implementing high-performance
messaging.
Requires either RDMA-capable device, Cray Gemini or Aries, for inter-node
communication.
Future versions will support also TCP for inter-node, to lift that hardware
dependency.
In addition, the library can be used for intra-node communication by leveraging
the following shared memory mechanisms: posix. sysv, cma, knem, xpmem.

Fedora Account System Username: andreyma
That is my first package, so I need a sponsor.

Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?state=all=andreyma=tree=all=-id

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1463353] Review Request: casync - Content Addressable Data Synchronizer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463353

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-07-23 05:04:29



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1468545] Review Request: rust-packaging - RPM macros for building Rust packages on various architectures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468545

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-07-23 04:48:39



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1467762] Review Request: btrbk - Tool for creating snapshots and remote backups of btrfs subvolumes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1467762

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-07-23 04:46:33



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1469009] Review Request: odcs - On Demand Compose Service

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469009

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-07-23 04:41:36



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 827723] Review Request: gnuhealth - The free Health and Hospital Information System

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=827723

Jun Aruga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jar...@redhat.com



--- Comment #20 from Jun Aruga  ---
How do we fix this?

Unfortunately, below links are "403 Forbidden".

> SPEC: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/gnuhealth.spec
> SRPM: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/gnuhealth-1.6.1-1.fc18.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1471885] Review Request: oci-umount - OCI umount hook for docker

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471885

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
> Docker rpm sadly has epoch. I do not think we can get rid of it.
When you are obsoleting something, doesn't matter which Epoch it has, you still
can obsolete it.

BTW, you should include Epoch in Obsoletes, otherwise it will not obsolete it.

this can be fixed during import, so APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1468665] Review Request: gsettings-qt - Qt/QML bindings for GSettings

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468665

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |gsettings-qt - QML bindings |gsettings-qt - Qt/QML
   |for GSettings   |bindings for GSettings



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1394193] Review Request: arduino-builder - A command line tool for compiling Arduino sketches

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394193



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
arduino-1.6.6-2.fc25, arduino-builder-1.0.5-6.fc25 has been pushed to the
Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c33ec5464a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377038] Review Request: sxhkd - Simple X hotkey daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377038



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
sxhkd-0.5.8-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0fe63e931c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1468768] Review Request: domoticz - Open source Home Automation System

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1468768

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
domoticz-3.5877-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c137106664

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1465885] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-golex - Lex/ Flex-like utility written in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465885
Bug 1465885 depends on bug 1465884, which changed state.

Bug 1465884 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lex - Support for 
(f)lex-like tool on .l source files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465884

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1465884] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-lex - Support for (f) lex-like tool on .l source files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465884

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-cznic-lex-0-0.1.20170112.git68050f5.fc25 has been pushed to the
Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-618a7ca4cb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377038] Review Request: sxhkd - Simple X hotkey daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377038

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
sxhkd-0.5.8-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-26bd56d311

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org