[Bug 1532500] New: Review Request: rust-proc-macro2 - Stable implementation of the upcoming new `proc_macro` API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532500

Bug ID: 1532500
   Summary: Review Request: rust-proc-macro2 - Stable
implementation of the upcoming new `proc_macro` API
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-proc-macro2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-proc-macro2-0.2.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
A stable implementation of the upcoming new `proc_macro` API. Comes with an
option, off by default, to also reimplement itself in terms of the upstream
unstable API.

This package contains library source intended for building other packages
which use proc-macro2 from crates.io.
Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1246192] Review Request: python-pymod2pkg - python module to package map

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246192



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pymod2pkg-0.11.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-ffa8ede1b6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1246192] Review Request: python-pymod2pkg - python module to package map

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246192

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532023] Review Request: ddupdate - A Dynamic DNS Updater

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532023



--- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas  ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #1)
> - Please, use %py3_build and py3_build macros in respective sections.
> 
> - Use %{_unitdir} always

Fixed, mostly by not using it whatsoever.

> - "%global debug_package %{nil}" is not needed when package is marked as
> "noarch"

Fixed 

> - Fix these SPEC/SRPM differences:

Fixed

spec https://leamas.fedorapeople.org/ddupdate/3/ddupdate.spec
srpm https://leamas.fedorapeople.org/ddupdate/3/ddupdate-0.1.0-3.fc26.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531907] Review Request: flameshot - Powerful and simple to use screenshot software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531907

Vitaly Zaitsev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 18:09:22



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955



--- Comment #5 from Alec Leamas  ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #4)

> It's a false problem. Those files are not involved during the compilation
> neither packed in the binary rpms.

Does this also apply to the bundled headers in include/seqan/stream? In any
case they should then be removed in %prep, right? [1]

> Many apps are released under BSD, others under LGPv3+ and GPLv3+. These
> licenses are compatible among them, therefore the resultant binary rpm can
> be licensed under a single collective license (GPLv3+).

I have no overall problem with that conclusion. However, a statement describing
the grounds for it is required  - that is, the actual license for the different
files. This is a bit convoluted as of now, but would become clearer after
removing unused stuff in %prep.

[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1481630] Review Request: VirtualBox-guest-additions - VirtualBox Guest Additions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630



--- Comment #47 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)  ---
Yep I would appreciate a lower case package name also. I find hard to remember
one or another package name often, so not to take the case into account. Using
lower case all along make things easier to remember.
(with Obsoletes/Provides in the current package case for compat anyway).

About obsoleting the kmod, I think the only good way would be to only use:
Obsoletes: akmods-VirtualBox < 5.1.31 #whatever version is introduced in fedora
(so without any provides on purpose, not to mess with VirtualBox HYP users).

That been said, I think there is few guest users (people with the virtualbox
guest package installed) compared with host one.
(at least I don't install guest drivers on my vbox guests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364



--- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
* Don't specify Group tag at all
* Use https for URL

> This is very curious rule... 
That's how 99% of packages are done, just listing all files is too verbose and
doesn't help anyone.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531951] Review Request: rust-traitobject - Unsafe helpers for working with raw trait objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531951

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 17:14:10



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531952] Review Request: rust-unsafe-any - Traits and implementations for unchecked downcasting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531952

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 17:14:05



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531952] Review Request: rust-unsafe-any - Traits and implementations for unchecked downcasting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531952
Bug 1531952 depends on bug 1531951, which changed state.

Bug 1531951 Summary: Review Request: rust-traitobject - Unsafe helpers for 
working with raw trait objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531951

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531954] Review Request: rust-siphasher - SipHash functions from rust-core < 1.13

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531954

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 17:14:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531907] Review Request: flameshot - Powerful and simple to use screenshot software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531907



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flameshot

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532042] Review Request: compton - Compositor for X11

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532042



--- Comment #2 from Abhiram K <4kuch...@gmail.com> ---
Made the necessary changes, please find the new links below:

Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/axeld/compton/fedora-27-x86_64/00697980-compton/compton.spec

SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/axeld/compton/fedora-27-x86_64/00697980-compton/compton-0.1_beta2-1.src.rpm

Please let me know if there are any further changes to be made.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364

Steve Dickson  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(fwei...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #6 from Steve Dickson  ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #1)
> > License:BSD-3-Clause
> License: BSD
License:BSD and LGPLv2

> 
> > Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
> How archive is obtained?
Source0:   
https://github.com/thkukuk/rpcsvc-proto/archive/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

> 
> > Group:  System/Libraries
> Group tag is deprecated
Group:  System Environment/Libraries

> 
> > make %{?_smp_mflags}
> %make_build
Done.

> 
> > make %{?_smp_mflags} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install
> %make_install
Done 

> 
> > %defattr(-,root,root)
> Deprecated
Removed.

> 
> > %changelog
> Changelog is missing
* Mon Jan  8 2018 Steve Dickson   1.3-1
- Initial commit

> 
> > BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
> Deprecated
Gone.

> 
> > Release:0
> Release:1%{?dist}
Done.

> 
> > %dir %{_includedir}/tirpc
> > %dir %{_includedir}/tirpc/rpcsvc
> > %{_includedir}/tirpc/rpcsvc/*
> %{_includedir}/tirpc/
This is very curious rule... 

First of all theses header files needed to stay
in /usr/include/rpcsvc since that is where they are
today. We move them to tirpc/rpcsvc or tirpc that
is going to break the API.

Doing the build/install from the upstream tarball these
header files are install in /usr/include/rpcsvc which
makes sense. Let me ask the maintainer why he is move
them.

Also these files are currently in glibc-headers...
Florian, are these files going to moved out of that package? 


http://people.redhat.com/steved/rpcsvc-proto has been updated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532042] Review Request: compton - Compositor for X11

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532042

Iwicki Artur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fed...@svgames.pl



--- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur  ---
>Release: 0
The "Release:" tag should start at 1.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Simple_versioning

>Group: System/X11/Utilities
The "Group:" tag is not used in Fedora.
>BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
The "BuildRoot:" tag should not be used in Fedora.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags_and_Sections

>Source0: https://github.com/chjj/compton/archive/v0.1_beta2.tar.gz
You can use the %{version} macro inside the URL so you don't have to edit it
when a new version comes out.

>%__make
>make DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install
Why the mix of macro and "raw" make calls?

>%doc README.md LICENSE
The LICENSE file should be marked as %license, not %doc.

>%{_mandir}/man1/compton.1.gz
>%{_mandir}/man1/compton-trans.1.gz
You should not assume gzip compression will be used for manpages. Instead, use
a wildcard that can match both compressed and non-compressed files.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Manpages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1523909] Review Request: kernel-tools - Assortment of tools for the Linux kernel

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1523909

Laura Abbott  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 15:40:26



--- Comment #11 from Laura Abbott  ---
Built successfully this morning

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525694] Review Request: golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson - Go package to interact with arbitrary JSON

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525694

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson-0.5.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-36d1d53225

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-pecl-couchbase2-2.4.3-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8cf2fc3188

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1508078] Review Request: golang-github-flynn-json5 - Go JSON5 decoder package based on encoding/ json

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508078

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-flynn-json5-0-0.1.20160717git7620272.fc27 has been pushed to the
Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-931a8db3b9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520581] Review Request: perl-Authen-Passphrase - Hashed passwords/ passphrases as objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520581



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Authen-Passphrase-0.008-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-00bb7c3794

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1519607] Review Request: gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface - GAP interface to nauty and Traces

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519607

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
gap-pkg-nautytracesinterface-0.2-1.20171120git5f16120.fc27 has been pushed to
the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e77c76c909

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526847] Review Request: python-softlayer - SoftLayer API Python Client and library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526847

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-softlayer-5.3.2-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4ea3d2a1d2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531907] Review Request: flameshot - Powerful and simple to use screenshot software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531907

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Ok, package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531907] Review Request: flameshot - Powerful and simple to use screenshot software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531907



--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev  ---
> Apache 2.0 is not a valid license shorthand, it should be "ASL 2.0"

Fixed.

> You need to add "Free Art" to the license field too.

Added.

> You need to add a comment before the license field explaining the license 
> breakdown

Added.

> Consider adding an Appdata file

Pull request sent: https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot/pull/68

> Note: No known owner of /usr/share/flameshot

Fixed.

Spec URL: https://github.com/EasyCoding/flameshot/raw/master/flameshot.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.easycoding.org/files/fedora/flameshot-0.5.0-2.fc27.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1249211] Review Request: cndoom - Conservative Doom engine for speedrunning competition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249211



--- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson  ---
Er, possibly, let's leave it open for a bit and I'll see if I get a minute to
get around to it. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364

Florian Weimer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1531540




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531540
[Bug 1531540] glibc: Remove Sun RPC interfaces
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364



--- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #4)
> Provides: rpcgen
> 
> should be good enough because the package has never been part of a release. 
> I will simply drop the glibc-rpcgen subpackage once this is in.
> 
> Obsoletes: glibc-rpcgen

Non-versioned obsoletes are bad and prohibited, you need to add version to it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364



--- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer  ---
Provides: rpcgen

should be good enough because the package has never been part of a release.  I
will simply drop the glibc-rpcgen subpackage once this is in.

Obsoletes: glibc-rpcgen

would be okay as well.

Note that the license should be “BSD and LGPLv2+”, as the sources were
initially copied from glibc and not the original Sun sources.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364



--- Comment #3 from Steve Dickson  ---
(In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #2)
> > Provides:   glibc-devel:%{_bindir}/rpcgen
> This won't work. You should coordinate adding Obsoletes with glibc
> maintainers so this package gets pulled in automatically.

I have been... Please see 
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531540#c7

For now nfs-utils will have a dependency on a new glibc-rpcgen 
subpackage to pull in rpcgen... once this package is ready
I'm planing on just switch the dependency...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
> Provides:   glibc-devel:%{_bindir}/rpcgen
This won't work. You should coordinate adding Obsoletes with glibc maintainers
so this package gets pulled in automatically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ignate...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
> License:BSD-3-Clause
License: BSD

> Source: %{name}-%{version}.tar.bz2
How archive is obtained?

> Group:  System/Libraries
Group tag is deprecated

> make %{?_smp_mflags}
%make_build

> make %{?_smp_mflags} DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install
%make_install

> %defattr(-,root,root)
Deprecated

> %dir %{_includedir}/tirpc
> %dir %{_includedir}/tirpc/rpcsvc
> %{_includedir}/tirpc/rpcsvc/*
%{_includedir}/tirpc/

> %changelog
Changelog is missing

> BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-build
Deprecated

> Release:0
Release:1%{?dist}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532364] New: Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364

Bug ID: 1532364
   Summary: Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ste...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/steved/rpcsvc-proto/rpcsvc-proto.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/steved/rpcsvc-proto/rpcsvc-proto-1.3-0.src.rpm
Description: 
The rpcsvc-proto package includes several rpcsvc header files
and RPC protocol definitions from SunRPC sources (as shipped with
glibc).

Fedora Account System Username: steved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520582] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N - Internationalization Plugin for Mojolicious

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520582



--- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
>TODO: Filter the less specific 'perl(I18N::LangTags)' dependency without the 
>version.

I'm not entirely sure how to do that. Using %global __requires_exclude ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531907] Review Request: flameshot - Powerful and simple to use screenshot software

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531907

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Simply use:

Source0: %{url}/archive/v%{version}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

 - Apache 2.0 is not a valid license shorthand, it should be "ASL 2.0"

 - You need to add "Free Art" to the license field too.

 - You need to add a comment before the license field explaining the license
breakdown, like https://github.com/lupoDharkael/flameshot#license

 - Consider adding an Appdata file. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData

 - You should own the following directories:

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/flameshot,
 /usr/share/flameshot/translations


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
 (BSD like)", "GPL (v3 or later) LGPL", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL
 (v3)", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 139 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/flameshot/review-flameshot/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/flameshot,
 /usr/share/flameshot/translations
[-]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/flameshot,
 /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/flameshot/translations,
 /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces, /usr/share/dbus-1/services
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
 desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package 

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-pecl-couchbase2-2.4.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce6a8b5cf0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520581] Review Request: perl-Authen-Passphrase - Hashed passwords/ passphrases as objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520581

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Authen-Passphrase-0.008-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7f9b99ce4a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1267468] Review Request: rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter - Uploads Ruby test coverage data to Code Climate

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267468

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #11 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Group: is not needed anymore

 - The package fails to install:

DEBUG util.py:479:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:479:   Problem 1: conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:479:- nothing provides rubygem(simplecov) <= 0.13 needed by
rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter-1.0.8-1.fc28.noarch
DEBUG util.py:479:   Problem 2: package
rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter-doc-1.0.8-1.fc28.noarch requires
rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter = 1.0.8-1.fc28, but none of the providers can
be installed
DEBUG util.py:479:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:479:- nothing provides rubygem(simplecov) <= 0.13 needed by
rubygem-codeclimate-test-reporter-1.0.8-1.fc28.noarch
DEBUG util.py:617:  Child return code was: 1


It seems the version of simplecov in Koji is indeed 0.13.0, but the dependency
resolution fails with "<= 0.13". You should relax the dependency in the gemspec
to be 0.13.0.

I've successfully used the following patch to do it:

diff -up ./codeclimate-test-reporter.gemspec.fix_require
./codeclimate-test-reporter.gemspec
--- ./codeclimate-test-reporter.gemspec.fix_require2018-01-08
17:47:53.0 +0100
+++ ./codeclimate-test-reporter.gemspec2018-01-08 17:48:48.523257739 +0100
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Gem::Specification.new do |s|
 s.specification_version = 4

 if Gem::Version.new(Gem::VERSION) >= Gem::Version.new('1.2.0') then
-  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q.freeze, ["<= 0.13"])
+  s.add_runtime_dependency(%q.freeze, ["<= 0.13.0"])
   s.add_development_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 0"])
   s.add_development_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 0"])
   s.add_development_dependency(%q.freeze, [">= 0"])





Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
 upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
 licenses manually.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
 /usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: 

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 11:05:54



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531582] Review Request: perl-Attean - Semantic web framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531582



--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar  ---
I upgraded the package.

Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Attean/perl-Attean.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Attean/perl-Attean-0.018-1.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531567] Review Request: golang-github-cloudfoundry-copilot - Golang devel package for code.cloudfoundry.org /copilot

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531567

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - The release tag should include the commit date in case of a snapshot
release:

%global commitdate 20180105

   And:

Release:0.1.%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}


  Also in the %changelog:

* Fri Jan 05 2018 Jonh Wendell  -
0-0.1.20180105git4c84c2c

 - I would recommend you to do anything to enable the tests, including
packaging the missing packages. If you need any help to package
gopkg.in/validator.v2, just ask (tip: run gofed on
https://github.com/go-validator/validator then switch %global import_path to
gopkg.in/validator.v2).


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 27
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/golang-github-cloudfoundry-copilot/review-
 golang-github-cloudfoundry-copilot/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/gocode/src/code.cloudfoundry.org
[-]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
 /usr/share/gocode/src/code.cloudfoundry.org, /usr/share/gocode
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a 

[Bug 1528781] Review Request: mpfr - multiple-precision floating-point computations [needs sponsor]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528781



--- Comment #6 from James Paul Turner  ---
See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/mpfr-4.0.0
and
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7247

I looked at how the Ruby_2.5 folks were handling things, and they seemed to
have a nice plan. The packages can be rebuilt and tested in a separate Koji
tag, such that, if there are any problems, the tag can simply be deleted
without merging.

I will test and take care of the possible reintroduction of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515958 once we have the tag.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520582] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N - Internationalization Plugin for Mojolicious

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520582

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar  ---
> Fix: Build-require 'perl(utf8)' (t/i18n.t:3).
Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm 
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script/app_i18n_mail.pl
/usr/bin/env perl
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm |sort -f |
uniq -c
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.1)
  1 perl(constant)
  1 perl(I18N::LangTags)
  1 perl(I18N::LangTags) >= 0.35
  1 perl(I18N::LangTags::Detect)
  1 perl(Mojo::Base)
  1 perl(Mojo::URL)
  1 perl(Mojolicious) >= 5
  1 perl(Mojolicious::Plugin)
  1 perl(strict)
  1 perl(warnings)
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires are Ok.

TODO: Filter the less specific 'perl(I18N::LangTags)' dependency without the
version. It only pollutes the repository database.

$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

Package builds in F28
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24076144). Ok.

Please consider fixing the 'TODO' item before building this package.
Resolution: Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532106] Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to dbus-python types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 09:50:25



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179
Bug 1532179 depends on bug 1532106, which changed state.

Bug 1532106 Summary: Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to 
dbus-python types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 09:50:30



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164
Bug 1532164 depends on bug 1532179, which changed state.

Bug 1532179 Summary: Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python 
Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525694] Review Request: golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson - Go package to interact with arbitrary JSON

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525694



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson-0.5.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-36d1d53225

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525694] Review Request: golang-github-bitly-go-simplejson - Go package to interact with arbitrary JSON

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525694

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532106] Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to dbus-python types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106
Bug 1532106 depends on bug 1532084, which changed state.

Bug 1532084 Summary: Review Request: python-dbus-signature-pyparsing - A parser 
for a dbus signature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532084

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532084] Review Request: python-dbus-signature-pyparsing - A parser for a dbus signature

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532084

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 09:20:50



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531950] Review Request: rust-modifier - Fluid chaining APIs for both mutable ownership types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531950

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 09:13:27



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 09:12:29



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164
Bug 1532164 depends on bug 1532171, which changed state.

Bug 1532171 Summary: Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for 
Generating D-Bus Client Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531582] Review Request: perl-Attean - Semantic web framework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531582

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
FIX: Please update the module to the latest version 0.18.
FIX: Either unbundle the ./inc files and build-require the Module::Install*
 modules whose functions are called from Makefile.PL or build-require
 dependencies of the bundled code.

Please correct all 'FIX' issues and provide new spec file.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dbus-client-gen

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-pecl-couchbase2-2.4.3-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce6a8b5cf0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-pecl-couchbase2-2.4.3-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8cf2fc3188

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ilya.grad...@gmail.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1508078] Review Request: golang-github-flynn-json5 - Go JSON5 decoder package based on encoding/ json

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508078

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1508078] Review Request: golang-github-flynn-json5 - Go JSON5 decoder package based on encoding/ json

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508078



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-flynn-json5-0-0.1.20160717git7620272.fc27 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-931a8db3b9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532084] Review Request: python-dbus-signature-pyparsing - A parser for a dbus signature

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532084
Bug 1532084 depends on bug 1532094, which changed state.

Bug 1532094 Summary: Review Request: python-hs-dbus-signature - Hypothesis 
strategy that generates arbitrary d-bus signatures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532094

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532094] Review Request: python-hs-dbus-signature - Hypothesis strategy that generates arbitrary d-bus signatures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532094

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 08:48:17



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955



--- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #3)
> At a glance, here are bundling issues. The library
> util/py_lib/seqan/dox/tpl/lib includes several bundled libraries whih needs
> to be dealt with. In particular, shouldn't the bundled font be unbundled
> even under current, somewhat relaxed rules?

It's a false problem. Those files are not involved during the compilation
neither packed in the binary rpms.

> 
> Also the license situation is somewhat more complicated than what could be
> expressed in a few comments. I suggest that you run fedora-review and use
> the license-check.txt file created, review it and use it as license
> clarification.
> 
> This is just some initial findings.  seqan2 is quite a large package, and I
> expect there is more. Please take a stab at this for now.

Many apps are released under BSD, others under LGPv3+ and GPLv3+. These
licenses are compatible among them, therefore the resultant binary rpm can be
licensed under a single collective license (GPLv3+).


Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/seqan2.spec
SRPM URL: 
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/seqan2-2.3.2-3.20180103git8a875d.fc27.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/stratis-cli

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dbus-python-client-gen

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-pecl-couchbase2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520582] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N - Internationalization Plugin for Mojolicious

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520582



--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/a73a5ca/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/ravada/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00697655-perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.src.rpm

SPEC diff:
https://github.com/eclipseo/packaging/commit/a73a5cad5715dad010a92b15595f47eb3f7a5302#diff-9eb67f5852192db7534e4ad68539130a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532106] Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to dbus-python types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-into-dbus-python

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520581] Review Request: perl-Authen-Passphrase - Hashed passwords/ passphrases as objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520581



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Authen-Passphrase-0.008-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7f9b99ce4a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1526768] Review Request: clickhouse - a distributed column-oriented DBMS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526768

Roman Tsisyk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(michael@cullen-on
   ||line.com)



--- Comment #6 from Roman Tsisyk  ---
Updated to 1.1.54330

Spec URL:
https://gist.github.com/rtsisyk/1a45e69293f3e2c91126fe04a8374af8/raw/26e1b13080ea89eec86437a142aaaf80e8425da1/clickhouse.spec
SRPM URL:
https://gist.github.com/rtsisyk/1a45e69293f3e2c91126fe04a8374af8/raw/26e1b13080ea89eec86437a142aaaf80e8425da1/clickhouse-1.1.54330-1.fc28.src.rpm
Koji URL: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24073176

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1187084] Review Request: electrum - a lightweight Bitcoin client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084



--- Comment #34 from Jonny Heggheim  ---
It would be great if someone could test
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4978426286

This is a urgent security update.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520581] Review Request: perl-Authen-Passphrase - Hashed passwords/ passphrases as objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520581

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520581] Review Request: perl-Authen-Passphrase - Hashed passwords/ passphrases as objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520581



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Authen-Passphrase-0.008-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-00bb7c3794

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532094] Review Request: python-hs-dbus-signature - Hypothesis strategy that generates arbitrary d-bus signatures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532094



--- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-hs-dbus-signature

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531952] Review Request: rust-unsafe-any - Traits and implementations for unchecked downcasting

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531952



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-unsafe-any

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531951] Review Request: rust-traitobject - Unsafe helpers for working with raw trait objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531951



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-traitobject

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531954] Review Request: rust-siphasher - SipHash functions from rust-core < 1.13

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531954



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-siphasher

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531950] Review Request: rust-modifier - Fluid chaining APIs for both mutable ownership types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531950



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-modifier

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532207] Review Request: smc-tools - Shared Memory Communication Tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532207

Hanns-Joachim Uhl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugpr...@us.ibm.com,
   ||hannsj_...@de.ibm.com
External Bug ID||IBM Linux Technology Center
   ||163196



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532207] Review Request: smc-tools - Shared Memory Communication Tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532207

Dan Horák  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1504556



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532207] New: Review Request: smc-tools - Shared Memory Communication Tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532207

Bug ID: 1532207
   Summary: Review Request: smc-tools - Shared Memory
Communication Tools
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: d...@danny.cz
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/smc-tools.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/smc-tools-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
The Shared Memory Communication Tools (smc-tools) package enables usage of SMC
sockets in Linux.


Fedora Account System Username: sharkcz

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24072434

rpmlint output:
smc-tools.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/ld_pre_smc.so
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

The library is only meant for LD_PRELOAD use-case, not as a linked library, so
lack of soname should be OK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164



--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina  ---
Package looks good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilya.grad...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ilya.grad...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179



--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina  ---
Package looks good.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilya.grad...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ilya.grad...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171



--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* MPL (v2.0)". 13 files
 have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/ilgrad/Desktop/1532171-python-dbus-client-gen/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[-]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be 

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1532164




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164
[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for
interacting with the Stratis daemon
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532164] Review Request: stratis-cli - Command-line tool for interacting with the Stratis daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532164

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1532179




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179
[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python
Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532171] Review Request: python-dbus-client-gen - Library for Generating D-Bus Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532171

Ilya Gradina  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ilya.grad...@gmail.com
 QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |ilya.grad...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1532106




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106
[Bug 1532106] Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to
dbus-python types
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532106] Review Request: python-into-dbus-python - Transformer to dbus-python types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532106

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1532179




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179
[Bug 1532179] Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python
Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532179] New: Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532179

Bug ID: 1532179
   Summary: Review Request: python-dbus-python-client-gen - Python
Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-dbus-python-client-gen.spec
SRPM URL:
https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-dbus-python-client-gen-0.5-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description: Python Library for Generating dbus-python Client Code.
Fedora Account System Username:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1520582] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N - Internationalization Plugin for Mojolicious

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520582



--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar  ---
> TODO: The description text is missing a full stop before "It" word.
Ok.

> FIX: The License tag is wrong. lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm and README.pod
> states "Artistic 2.0". The specification at Build.PL:7 is probably a mistake.
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(constant)' (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:153).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(I18N::LangTags::Detect)' 
> (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:6).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(Mojo::Base)' (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:2).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(Mojo::URL)' (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:4).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(Mojolicious::Plugin)' 
> (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:2)'.
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(base)' (t/i18n.t:16).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(lib)' (t/i18n.t:2).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(Locale::Maketext)' (t/i18n.t:16).
Ok.

> FIX: Build-require 'perl(Mojolicious::Lite)' (t/i18n.t:29).
Ok.

> TODO: You should run-require 'perl(Mojolicious) >= 5' for the same reason as 
> you build-require it.
Ok.

Fix: Build-require 'perl(utf8)' (t/i18n.t:3).

All tests pass. Ok.

$ rpmlint perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N.spec
../SRPMS/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.src.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm 
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script/app_i18n_mail.pl
/usr/bin/env perl
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint is Ok.

$ rpm -q -lv -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm 
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jan  8 10:29
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  965 Aug 11  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/Changes
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 11  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  586 Aug 11  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script/App.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot  446 Aug 11  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script/app_i18n_mail.pl
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot   98 Aug 11  2015
/usr/share/doc/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N/script/test.mail.ep
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3254 Jan  8 10:29
/usr/share/man/man3/Mojolicious::Plugin::I18N.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jan  8 10:29
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Jan  8 10:29
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 8488 Jan  8 10:29
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm
File permissions and layout are Ok.

$ rpm -q --requires -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm | sort -f |
uniq -c
  1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.1)
  1 perl(constant)
  1 perl(I18N::LangTags)
  1 perl(I18N::LangTags::Detect)
  1 perl(Mojo::Base)
  1 perl(Mojo::URL)
  1 perl(Mojolicious) >= 5
  1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
  1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
  1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
FIX: Run-require 'perl(Mojolicious::Plugin)'
(lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:2).
FIX: Run-require 'perl(strict)' (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:143).
FIX: Run-require 'perl(warnings)' (lib/Mojolicious/Plugin/I18N.pm:144).
FIX: Constrain 'perl(I18N::LangTags)' run-time dependency with '>= 0.35'
(META.json:36).

$ rpm -q --provides -p
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm | sort -f |
uniq -c
  1 perl(Mojolicious::Plugin::I18N) = 1.6
  1 perl(Mojolicious::Plugin::I18N::_Handler)
  1 perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N = 1.6-1.fc28
Binary provides are Ok.

$ resolvedeps rawhide
../RPMS/noarch/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-I18N-1.6-1.fc28.noarch.rpm 
Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok.

The package builds in F28
(https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24071493). Ok.

Please correct all 'FIX' items and provide a new spec file.
Resolution: Package NOT approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1528315] Review Request: pgaudit - PostgreSQL auditing plugin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528315

cap.filip@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-08 04:36:38



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531464] Review Request: php-pecl-couchbase2 - Couchbase Server PHP extension

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531464

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Remi Collet  ---
Thanks for the quick review

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/3840
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/3841
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/3842

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org