date:20180126

[Bug 1476458] Review Request: paho-c - MQTT client library in C

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476458



--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System  ---
paho-c-1.2.0-10.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9bab306e7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1476458] Review Request: paho-c - MQTT client library in C

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476458



--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System  ---
paho-c-1.2.0-10.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c6252bfaca

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539209] New: Review Request: ddgr - DuckDuckGo from the terminal

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539209

Bug ID: 1539209
Summary: Review Request: ddgr - DuckDuckGo from the terminal
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/b23e0cc/ddgr.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/ddgr/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00706144-ddgr/ddgr-1.2-1.fc28.src.rpm

Description:
ddgr is a cmdline utility to search DuckDuckGo from the terminal.
While googler is highly popular among cmdline users, in many forums the need
of a similar utility for privacy-aware DuckDuckGo came up. DuckDuckGo Bangs
are super-cool too! So here's ddgr for you!

Unlike the web interface, you can specify the number of search results you
would like to see per page. It's more convenient than skimming through
30-odd search results per page. The default interface is carefully
designed to use minimum space without sacrificing readability.

ddgr isn't affiliated to DuckDuckGo in any way.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1506428] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search - Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428



--- Comment #9 from Andrew Toskin  ---
THANK YOU. That step was not mentioned in the wiki page about splitting
packages, and it didn't occur to me to treat the newly split packages so much
like creating whole new packages from scratch.

However, now I have a new problem: fedrepo-req reports "Error: The Bugzilla
bug's review was approved over 60 days ago"

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534446] Review Request: timeshift - System restore tool for Linux

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c4a955e60b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534446] Review Request: timeshift - System restore tool for Linux

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d465f39a50

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534446] Review Request: timeshift - System restore tool for Linux

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
timeshift-18.1.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e8ccaa9e31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534446] Review Request: timeshift - System restore tool for Linux

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539189] Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY interface for Go

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539189

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1539190




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539190
[Bug 1539190] Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-terminal - Vt10x
terminal emulation backend
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539190] Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-terminal - Vt10x terminal emulation backend

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539190

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1539189




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539189
[Bug 1539189] Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY interface
for Go
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539190] New: Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-terminal - Vt10x terminal emulation backend

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539190

Bug ID: 1539190
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-terminal -
Vt10x terminal emulation backend
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/c26bae0/golang-github-zyedidia-terminal.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/micro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00706124-golang-github-zyedidia-terminal/golang-github-zyedidia-terminal-0-0.1.20180126git1760577.fc28.src.rpm

Description:
Package terminal is a vt10x terminal emulation backend, influenced largely 
by st, rxvt, xterm, and iTerm as reference. Use it for terminal muxing, 
a terminal emulation frontend, or wherever else you need terminal emulation.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539189] New: Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY interface for Go

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539189

Bug ID: 1539189
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-zyedidia-pty - PTY
interface for Go
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/c26bae0/golang-github-zyedidia-pty.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/micro/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00706111-golang-github-zyedidia-pty/golang-github-zyedidia-pty-0-0.1.20180126git3036466.fc28.src.rpm

Description: Pty is a Go package for using unix pseudo-terminals.

Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538309] Review Request: python-google-auth - library for server-to-server authentication mechanisms to access Google APIs.

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538309

Alfredo Moralejo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||python-google-auth-1.3.0-1.
   ||fc28



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538309] Review Request: python-google-auth - library for server-to-server authentication mechanisms to access Google APIs.

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538309



--- Comment #4 from Alfredo Moralejo  ---
Initial import done and built python-google-auth-1.3.0-1.fc28 in
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1021030

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1525570] Review Request: pew - Tool to manage multiple virtualenvs written in pure python

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1525570

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
pew-1.1.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5ecbcbff22

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539161] Review Request: moby-engine - The open-source application container engine

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161

Lokesh Mandvekar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||bbre...@redhat.com,
   ||dwa...@redhat.com,
   ||jho...@redhat.com,
   ||j...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fkluk...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539161] New: Review Request: moby-engine - The open-source application container engine

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161

Bug ID: 1539161
   Summary: Review Request: moby-engine - The open-source
application container engine
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: l...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://pagure.io/moby-engine/raw/master/f/moby-engine.spec
SRPM URL:
https://pagure.io/moby-engine/blob/master/f/SRPMS/moby-engine-17.03.2-1.gitf5ec1e2.fc27.src.rpm

Description: Docker is an open source project to build, ship and run any
application as a
lightweight container.

Docker containers are both hardware-agnostic and platform-agnostic. This means
they can run anywhere, from your laptop to the largest EC2 compute instance and
everything in between - and they don't require you to use a particular
language, framework or packaging system. That makes them great building blocks
for deploying and scaling web apps, databases, and backend services without
depending on a particular stack or provider.


koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24472934

Fedora Account System Username: lsm5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539134] New: Review Request: bouncycastle1.58 - Bouncy Castle Cryptography APIs for Java

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539134

Bug ID: 1539134
   Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle1.58 - Bouncy Castle
Cryptography APIs for Java
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mattias.ell...@physics.uu.se
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://grid.tsl.uu.se/review/bouncycastle1.58.spec
SRPM URL: http://grid.tsl.uu.se/review/bouncycastle1.58-1.58-1.el6.src.rpm

Description:
The Bouncy Castle Java APIs for CMS, PKCS, EAC, TSP, CMP, CRMF, OCSP, and
certificate generation. This jar contains APIs for JDK 1.5 to JDK 1.8. The
APIs can be used in conjunction with a JCE/JCA provider such as the one
provided with the Bouncy Castle Cryptography APIs.

Fedora Account System Username: ellert

This is a compat package intended for EPEL 6.
Use flags "-D EPEL6 -m epel-6-x86_64" for fedora-review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538219] Review Request: rubygem-guard-shell - Guard gem for running shell commands

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538219

Jaroslav Prokop  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||rubygem-guard-shell-0.7.1-1
   ||.fc28
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-01-26 13:33:59



--- Comment #3 from Jaroslav Prokop  ---
Thanks for the review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955



--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System  ---
seqan2-2.4.0-0.4.20180103git8a875d.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1530771] Review Request: python-lupa - Lupa integrates the runtimes of Lua or LuaJIT2 into CPython

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530771



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-lupa-1.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534747] Review Request: libblocksruntime - Development files for LLVM's Blocks runtime

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534747

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-01-26 13:09:32



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
libblocksruntime-5.0.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533929] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929



--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System  ---
libkcapi-1.0.3-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-01-26 12:56:00



--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System  ---
seqan2-2.4.0-0.4.20180103git8a875d.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1533929] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-01-26 12:55:49



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
libkcapi-1.0.3-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1530771] Review Request: python-lupa - Lupa integrates the runtimes of Lua or LuaJIT2 into CPython

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1530771

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-01-26 12:55:40



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-lupa-1.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539116] New: Review Request: grass - GRASS GIS - Geographic Resources Analysis Support System

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539116

Bug ID: 1539116
   Summary: Review Request: grass - GRASS GIS - Geographic
Resources Analysis Support System
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: nete...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://trac.osgeo.org/grass/browser/grass/branches/releasebranch_7_4/rpm/grass.spec
SRPM URL: http://data.neteler.org/tmp/grass-7.4.0-1.fc27.src.rpm
Description: New upstream version GRASS GIS 7.4.0. The SPEC file received a
cleanup and also addresses latest FTBS issues.
Fedora Account System Username: neteler

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539078] Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078



--- Comment #4 from Patrick Uiterwijk  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cjose

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539078] Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
rpmlint says: 

cjose-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
cjose-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
cjose-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

All of which can be ignored. 

The "gitrev" in the source0 url needs to be %{version} instead. You can fix
that on import. 

License is ok and good. 

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538341] Review Request: python-testinfra - unit testing for server state

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538341



--- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz  ---
Spec URL:
https://wakko666.fedorapeople.org/python-testinfra/python-testinfra.spec

I've added in the python3 version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355



--- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jackson-dataformats-binary

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538356] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-text - Jackson standard text-format dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538356



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jackson-dataformats-text

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1534446] Review Request: timeshift - System restore tool for Linux

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534446



--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/timeshift

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1537398] Review Request: spectre-meltdown-checker - Spectre & Meltdown vulnerability/ mitigation checker

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537398



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/spectre-meltdown-checker

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538219] Review Request: rubygem-guard-shell - Guard gem for running shell commands

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538219



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-guard-shell

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539078] Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078

Kevin Fenzi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||ke...@scrye.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ke...@scrye.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
I'll review this. Look for a review in a few...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1537572] Review Request: corosync-qdevice - The Corosync Cluster Engine Qdevice

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1537572



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/corosync-qdevice

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538309] Review Request: python-google-auth - library for server-to-server authentication mechanisms to access Google APIs.

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538309



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-google-auth

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539078] New: Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078

Bug ID: 1539078
   Summary: Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the
Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: puiterw...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//cjose.spec
SRPM URL: http://puiterwijk.fedorapeople.org//cjose-0.5.1-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Implementation of JOSE for C/C++

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1539078] Review Request: cjose - C library implementing the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539078



--- Comment #1 from Patrick Uiterwijk  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24469949

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1506429] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-windowoverlay-icons - Show app icons on top of the windows thumbnails in Activities Overview

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdie...@gmail.com



--- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter  ---
Next steps (for submitter/maintainer):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1506428] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-historymanager-prefix-search - Use PageUp and PageDown to search for previous GNOME Shell commands

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdie...@gmail.com



--- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter  ---
Next steps (for submitter/maintainer):

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538188] Review Request: rust-cssparser - Rust implementation of CSS Syntax Level 3

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538188



--- Comment #2 from Patrick Uiterwijk  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-cssparser

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355



--- Comment #6 from Mat Booth  ---
New repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4299

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
Thanks, 

APPROVED

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355



--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth  ---
Fixed license header:

Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jackson-dataformats-binary.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jackson-dataformats-binary-2.9.4-2.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538356] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-text - Jackson standard text-format dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538356



--- Comment #4 from Mat Booth  ---
(In reply to Alexander Kurtakov from comment #3)
> Please fix the summary too long rpmlint error, not a blocker though.
> 
> APPROVED

I fixed all the rpmlint nits, for some reason these don't show when you run it
on the spec-file, only when you rpmlint the binary rpms...

Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jackson-dataformats-text.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~mbooth/reviews/jackson-dataformats-text-2.9.4-2.fc28.src.rpm

New repo requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/4298

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1536852] Review Request: molsketch - Molecular Structures Editor

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536852



--- Comment #20 from Alexander Ploumistos  ---
Created attachment 1386508
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1386508=edit
Fresh installation on default Live Workstation

(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #18)
> (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #15)
> > I am attaching a screenshot of the program from this scratch build for f27:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24441314
> > 
> > As you can see, all of the "extra" features are enabled.
> > 
> > I tried ~15 builds yesterday, the only change that made a difference was
> > that dot.
> 
> It does not work to me.
> Have you done additional settings? (From Edit --> Preference menu)
> Upstream bug: https://sourceforge.net/p/molsketch/bugs/24/

Are you sure you used this build?
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24441314

This screenshot is from a system running F27 Live Workstation and as you can
see everything is working.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538356] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-text - Jackson standard text-format dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538356

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 387 files have unknown license. 
README.md clearly states that everything is ASL licensed and the project
doesn't put individual license header.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 92160 bytes in 15 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager

[Bug 1538356] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-text - Jackson standard text-format dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538356

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||akurt...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
I'll do this one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355



--- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No
 copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 1148 files have unknown license.
Despite the license check output there is clear statement that all code is ASL
licensed even if misses header in README.md so it's fine. 
Misseing and BSD in License header.

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 9 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
 Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
 is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
 subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)

Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
 when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
 utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned

[Bug 1538355] Review Request: jackson-dataformats-binary - Jackson standard binary dataformat backends

2018-01-26 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1538355

Alexander Kurtakov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||akurt...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|akurt...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov  ---
I'll do this one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org