[Bug 1595493] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-phpdomain - Sphinx extension to enable documenting PHP code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595493 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinxcontrib-phpdomain-0.4.1-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5745cd8a22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FNEKT2IHKXGXBB7G2X5NGWIQD5OMTAUC/
[Bug 1595313] Review Request: php-opencloud-openstack - PHP SDK for OpenStack clouds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1595313 Christian Glombek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-07-05 20:18:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XFIQGJSBZKCWWTV2E7SXLXOUJWX7CKNK/
[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #69 from Ron Olson --- Okay, I fixed the issues. Thanks for reviewing this Tom, I feel like I've learned a lot and I think the package is far better than when we started. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.28.20180704gitf56a941.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang-4.2-0.28.20180704gitf56a941.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R5ZEK7H5WPRMK37DF27KIHPK6A3NHTKX/
[Bug 1598486] Review Request: prettyping - compact, colorful ping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598486
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/prettyping/review-
prettyping/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of
[Bug 1573634] Review Request: python3-img2pdf - a lossless images -> PDF converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1573634 --- Comment #8 from William Moreno --- OK Please see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I will trust your review and include Georg in the packager group in FAS, it is great to help new packagers to join the distribution, if you have another new packager needing a sponsor please ping me. @Georg please respond this message to confirm that you want to continue to join the Fedora Packager team with a link to the last version of your spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PGRODLVT57E63WVUQODTKW3RP65XQ6VV/
[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780
--- Comment #68 from Tom Stellard ---
Below is the full review report. I've listed two items in the issues section
that should be fixed before this request gets approved, but otherwise this
package looks good.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
Please fix these:
- /usr/lib/swift/linux/ in the %files section instead of
/usr/lib/swift/linux/*.so
This indicates that the package owns the directory.
- Remove explicit library requres:
Requires: libatomic
Requires: libbsd
These are OK as is:
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
This is OK other compiler packages, like clang do this.
- Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
These are internal libs not meant for any other package, so this is OK.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Package contains no static executables.
[ ]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Note: See rpmlint output
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
Generic:
[ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like) BSD (2 clause)", "Apache (v2.0)", "*No
copyright* CC by (v3.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* CC
by-sa (v4.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* PSF", "BSD
(unspecified)", "CC0", "*No copyright* CC0", "ISC", "Unicode strict",
"*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2
clause)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* Apache
(v2.0)". 60595 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/tstellar/1536780-swift-lang/licensecheck.txt
[ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/swift/linux, /usr/lib/swift
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/swift/linux,
/usr/lib/swift
[-]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
There was a long list of directories here, but they where all build-id
directories.
[ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[ ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[ ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]:
[Bug 1092149] Review Request: dib-utils - Standalone parts of diskimage-builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092149 Ben Nemec changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 14:46:18 --- Comment #11 from Ben Nemec --- This has been done for a long time now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AJCQXBARJBO55BWF3RO7MR4MKIHCXPR6/
[Bug 1594446] Review Request: R-foreach - Provides Foreach Looping Construct for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594446 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- R-foreach-1.4.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RLV2ZWRHUVQGBJLKZ4WKLY73UWLH4YW5/
[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #67 from Ron Olson --- I checked the regex and your change seems to do the trick, thanks! Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.27.20180704gitf56a941.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang-4.2-0.27.20180704gitf56a941.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3HBTJVSE25LY6HI4H5W5CZ4X7YVZ2HTW/
[Bug 1558683] Review Request: python-ucsmsdk - Python SDK for Cisco UCSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683 Alfredo Moralejo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(Brian.Demers@gmai | |l.com) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FLZP5G7DPTSUDZQJO2XXRMHHRJZWFA7Z/
[Bug 1558683] Review Request: python-ucsmsdk - Python SDK for Cisco UCSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683 --- Comment #28 from Alfredo Moralejo --- I'm requesting a new repo for this package in https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/7277 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Y74HDMRFK7D45VHKPRMYM2JHJRKSDV7E/
[Bug 1558683] Review Request: python-ucsmsdk - Python SDK for Cisco UCSM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558683 Alfredo Moralejo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #27 from Alfredo Moralejo --- Could someone sponsor Sandhya as packager to maintain this package in Fedora. Fedora user: sdasu Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KREM4XB2L4TU2O4GERWVU2ZFKZZZWVWE/
[Bug 1594446] Review Request: R-foreach - Provides Foreach Looping Construct for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594446 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-foreach-1.4.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ET5JO6FULBR5LARHS56STKLGJ5EWEQS4/
[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #66 from Tom Stellard --- The lldb shared objects are versioned e.g. liblldb.so.6.0.0, so the regex you are using to filter the provides does not match them. I think you can fix this by dropping the $ or by adding .* after so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5OQDF2BV47D6K3SYH76U4WKBUVVBIYG3/
[Bug 1598486] New: Review Request: prettyping - compact, colorful ping tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598486 Bug ID: 1598486 Summary: Review Request: prettyping - compact, colorful ping tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@svgames.pl QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://svgames.pl/fedora/prettyping-1.0.1-1.spec SRPM URL: https://svgames.pl/fedora/prettyping-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: prettyping runs the standard ping in background and parses its output, showing ping responses in a graphical way at the terminal, by using colors and Unicode characters. Fedora Account System Username: suve -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YEKCGKA52Z4FDIUWLRWC43RFARTMY25B/
[Bug 1594446] Review Request: R-foreach - Provides Foreach Looping Construct for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594446 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-05 11:17:39 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-foreach-1.4.4-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/44EPZXPAUVGYWZA4G3TKM27P6KITUISO/
[Bug 1594601] Review Request: LaTeXML - Converts TeX and LaTeX to XML/HTML /ePub/MathML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594601 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 10:13:27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T7WTDU4HYADXCV5EE2S7EKOAV53BILFQ/
[Bug 1594601] Review Request: LaTeXML - Converts TeX and LaTeX to XML/HTML /ePub/MathML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I37WL7REFEAAYSVQRER2XCTMZ773WFJZ/
[Bug 1597417] Review Request: python-pwntools - A CTF framework and exploit development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597417 W. Michael Petullo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 10:13:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HB2LDFO7KHV7Z4X3KP4IWKCAY2PBCXLT/
[Bug 1594601] Review Request: LaTeXML - Converts TeX and LaTeX to XML/HTML /ePub/MathML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594601 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- LaTeXML-0.8.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-969b3cd650 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IZO7W2GFKAN6IUG7Z5MWRYOH3AQKTWCS/
[Bug 1598073] Review Request: mpark-variant - C++17 std::variant for C++11 /14/17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598073 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 10:10:18 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BB3C23WPVS42FO2W25KPGFDXDJJN6KZB/
[Bug 1598066] Review Request: lmdbxx - C++ wrapper for the LMDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598066 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 10:10:06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZMPAQ4FEVX42JP6IX3A7RMCWODMMRI5Y/
[Bug 1598060] Review Request: tweeny - Modern C++ tweening library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598060 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-07-05 10:09:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VZHQ2Q54KGPMP5HF5NCTYOUPEPA3GAGP/
[Bug 1597417] Review Request: python-pwntools - A CTF framework and exploit development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597417 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GIFFMD6FZFDJNMGIG2MYBFILLVRXF7FM/
[Bug 1597417] Review Request: python-pwntools - A CTF framework and exploit development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597417 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-pwntools-3.12.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0b553b789e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GH7IXRMWLKBPON54KOE2CW36ZDPZPFCG/
[Bug 1570047] Review Request: prestopalette - A tool for artists to create harmonious color palettes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570047 --- Comment #16 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/prestopalette -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G5N2WWJR5JQ7P6MLVVBQOKL4IX3AWCIF/
[Bug 1594601] Review Request: LaTeXML - Converts TeX and LaTeX to XML/HTML /ePub/MathML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594601 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/LaTeXML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V7SYLCFGUHYLTPPPDIR57IULTVT6WTCM/
[Bug 1597287] Review Request: zchunk - Compressed file format that allows easy deltas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597287 --- Comment #19 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/zchunk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UBM3TRETUZ6GVTVR5U2LUSSWXPTYAYMU/
[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281 --- Comment #31 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-libsass -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OTEVF5U4Y2KZQFSYXSUTLQP43ITLGXDE/
[Bug 1596293] Review Request: gamemode - Optimise system performance for games on demand
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596293 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gamemode -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PE7EHOS5MBU2PXNADZRJ4B543MWAGCK5/
[Bug 1598073] Review Request: mpark-variant - C++17 std::variant for C++11 /14/17
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598073 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpark-variant -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ONO7ZHGFYWSFYKJTH23CRMHJILX7Y33U/
[Bug 1598066] Review Request: lmdbxx - C++ wrapper for the LMDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598066 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lmdbxx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3Y2ZYVU6IVHOKDR5NCB7GGVGFQTR2SYT/
[Bug 1598060] Review Request: tweeny - Modern C++ tweening library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1598060 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/tweeny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZE35MSNWLE6MNYJVAKGQOEGV67GXWZ7Z/
[Bug 725292] Review Request: s3fs-fuse - FUSE-based file system backed by Amazon S3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=725292 --- Comment #33 from Neil Horman --- I'm not sure what the issue is here. Years ago, I said I wanted to keep the name, and I'm not sure why that would change now. I admit that I've not had alot of time to maintain the package, but it works perfectly well for my needs here. What exactly is the problem with picking a new name? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6XXQLQUX267Y64NDFLPTBQI6ODQA5JL4/
[Bug 1597417] Review Request: python-pwntools - A CTF framework and exploit development library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597417 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pwntools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TP4SDDJQNINIG3MRSWQQSDUQT6NQTSSV/
[Bug 1594313] Review Request: java-11-openjdk - next LTS OpenJDK for Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594313 --- Comment #39 from Severin Gehwolf --- (In reply to jiri vanek from comment #37) > jdk11 havebeen forked. > > > > It's been suggested that http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk is the > > Shenandoah dev forest and we should not be using it. We should be using > > http://hg.openjdk.java.net/shenandoah/jdk11 once jdk/jdk11 has been forked. > > Either way, we'll be changing sources in an update: > > > > jdk/jdk => jdk/jdk11 > > > > or > > > > jdk/jdk => shenandoah/jdk11 > > Shenadoah was not. I guess it will anytime soon. > Once forked, is it ok enough tobe used? Once shenandoah/jdk11 exists, we should be sure equivalent jdk-11+BB tags exist and then we should use that tree on all arches. It's my understanding that shenandoah support will be built in by default on all arches that support it and left out on arches which don't. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IPBKFR5AJXMBYI3EA4ZSGHO2UMSAJTSZ/
