[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- bpftrace-0.0-1.20181107git029717b.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8a9fc94314 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5e77c7716f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: python-getmac - Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-getmac-0.6.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b719274ffd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-props-1.6.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0a500d2554 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ea295e864d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646543] Review Request: dnf-plugin-ovl - DNF plugin to work around overlayfs issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646543 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- dnf-plugin-ovl-0.0.2-1.20181107gitfd1a5a5.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-59665bc09f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9ccbc1b490 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: python-getmac - Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-getmac-0.6.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4c7dd563af -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- bpftrace-0.0-1.20181107git029717b.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb6dcca5d1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-props-1.6.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82141a6b52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e39db43366 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646543] Review Request: dnf-plugin-ovl - DNF plugin to work around overlayfs issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646543 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- dnf-plugin-ovl-0.0.2-1.20181107gitfd1a5a5.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8413279368 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3be256c3d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86f067b027 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48c5becff8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f50a900df5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646543] Review Request: dnf-plugin-ovl - DNF plugin to work around overlayfs issues
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646543 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- dnf-plugin-ovl-0.0.2-1.20181107gitfd1a5a5.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1972b3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fc72346d60 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638968] Review Request: libneurosim - Common interfaces for neuronal simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- libneurosim-0-2.20181028.git7d074da.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643365] Review Request: python-json-minify - Python port of the JSON-minify utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643365 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-json-minify-0.3.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1644194] Review Request: ursa-major - A utility for managing module tags in koji's tag inheritance
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644194 --- Comment #4 from Qixiang Wan --- The issue of missing libmodulemd has been fixed by Fedora team, scratch build on RHEL7 branch passed: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30769260 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643266] Review Request: python-libNeuroML - Python libNeuroML for working with neuronal models specified in NeuroML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643266 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- python-libNeuroML-0.2.45-5.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643365] Review Request: python-json-minify - Python port of the JSON-minify utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643365 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-09 22:17:26 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-json-minify-0.3.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638968] Review Request: libneurosim - Common interfaces for neuronal simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- libneurosim-0-2.20181028.git7d074da.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642736] Review Request: python-leveldb - Python bindings for leveldb database library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642736 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-leveldb-0.194-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-trimesh-2.35.24-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2e134c8112 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645852] Review Request: colobot - A game for teaching programming
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645852 --- Comment #5 from Artur Iwicki --- I did not notice that the music files kept their server-side timestamp. Fixed now. spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/colobot-0.1.11.1-5.spec srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/colobot-0.1.11.1-5.src.rpm koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30767165 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-trimesh-2.35.24-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5b5bcf99a6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1509679] Review Request: rofi - A window switcher, application launcher and dmenu replacement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679 --- Comment #14 from Jan Pokorný --- I think only these two points remain and I have nothing more (in Fedora, there's apparently nothing like x-terminal-emulator, older xdg initiative likely and sadly went nowhere as well: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2006-December/007290.html): - s/pkgconfig(xcb-util)/pkgconfig(xcb-aux)/ (same package but for consistency ...) - there's an interesting situation regarding licensing, and I was surprised not seeing that discussed anywhere in Fedora context, since lexer/theme-parser.[ch] (these are intermediate products likely provided for convenience for direct consumption by upstream, since they would get regenerated in mock anew otherwise) are effectively "GPLv3+ with exceptions", whereby the exception itself is that > [you may] distribute that work under terms of your choice [...] Also have found a direct reference indicating it's nothing accidental: https://spdx.org/licenses/GPL-2.0-with-bison-exception.html likely from times Bison used to be GPLv2[+], and that such exception wasn't granted before: https://www.gnu.org/software/bison/manual/bison.html#Conditions (it could also imply that some years back, rofi, if it existed, could not arbitrarily mix this GPL licensed generated code with its own MIT code, but take this with a grain of salt, and it's irrelevant these days, anyway). Perhaps would add a comment, that those files are "GPLv3+ with Bison exception" and hence the project's MIT license is applicable, to clear out any doubts from superficial peek into licensecheck output and whatnot. Thanks. Will fix the findings for grim/slurp shortly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648498] Review Request: hpx - HPX is a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648498 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Diehl --- This is my first package and I would be happy to find a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648498] New: Review Request: hpx - HPX is a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648498 Bug ID: 1648498 Summary: Review Request: hpx - HPX is a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: patrickdie...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/diehlpk/hpx_packaging/blob/fedora/29/Fedora/hpx.spec SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iS8s_TUbYSii33etF6Z9N1LP9Otg1AhU Description: HPX is a general purpose C++ runtime system for parallel and distributed applications of any scale. The goal of HPX is to create a high quality, freely available, open source implementation of the ParalleX model for conventional systems, such as classic Linux based Beowulf clusters or multi-socket highly parallel SMP nodes. At the same time, we want to have a very modular and well designed runtime system architecture which would allow us to port our implementation onto new computer system architectures. We want to use real world applications to drive the development of the runtime system, coining out required functionalities and converging onto a stable API which will provide a smooth migration path for developers. The API exposed by HPX is modelled after the interfaces defined by the C++11 ISO standard and adheres to the programming guidelines used by the Boost collection of C++ libraries. Fedora Account System Username: diehlpk Successful koji builds can be found here https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30764659 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645766] Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Devtools for Azure SDK and CLI for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645766 --- Comment #4 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Hello Robert-André, thanks for your review. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Latest version is 1.1.1, please bump your package I'm currently packaging 1.0.0, which is the latest one compatible with the current stable release of the Azure Python SDK. I'm the maintainer of the SDK (python-azure-sdk package). I'd like to make python-azure-devtools available in the repos to run check tests in the python-azure-sdk package. > > - Some tests deps seem to be missing: > > BUILDSTDERR: EEE. How did you get these errors? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645766] Review Request: python-azure-devtools - Devtools for Azure SDK and CLI for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645766 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Hello Robert-André, thanks for your review. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1) > - Latest version is 1.1.1, please bump your package I'm currently packaging 1.0.0, which is the latest one compatible with the current stable release of the Azure Python SDK. I'm the maintainer of the SDK (python-azure-sdk package). I'd like to make python-azure-devtools available in the repos to run check tests in the python-azure-sdk package. > > - Some tests deps seem to be missing: > > BUILDSTDERR: EEE. How did you get these errors? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647147] Review Request: pmdk-convert - Conversion tool for PMDK pools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647147 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Ślusarz --- Output of fedora-review is quite noisy and I don't see any way to fix the 2 issues that spit 800 lines of this noise. Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: pmdk-convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/common/out.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/common/sys_util.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/common/util.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/include/libpmem.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/include/libpmemobj.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemblk/blk.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemblk/btt_layout.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemlog/log.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/bucket.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/ctree.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/cuckoo.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/heap.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/heap_layout.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/lane.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/list.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/memops.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/obj.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/pmalloc.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/redo.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/libpmemobj/sync.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/tools/pmempool/common.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.0/src/tools/pmempool/output.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/common/out.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/common/sys_util.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/common/util.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/include/libpmem.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/include/libpmemobj.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemblk/blk.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemblk/btt.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemblk/btt_layout.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/bucket.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/ctree.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/cuckoo.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/heap.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/heap_layout.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/lane.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/list.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/memblock.h pmdk- convert-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/memops.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/obj.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/pmalloc.h pmdk-convert- debugsource : /usr/src/debug/pmdk- convert-1.5-1.fc28.x86_64/nvml-1.1/src/libpmemobj/pvector.h pmdk-convert- debugsource :
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #8) > Running scratchbuilds to see if it builds on f28 and f29. > > I'd happy to review and merge any PR if you'll ever need that, and give ACLs > based on previous happy cooperation, if that works for you. Or do you really > need push access for neuro-sig right away? Yeh, that works. I'll open PRs if they ever come up. I just thought I could help with the builds. :) (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #9) > Branches requested. > > Would updating to 2.35.24 break any of your dependent software? No, it says "trimesh>=2.22.28,<3", so that'll work. Thanks very much for doing this. Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: python-getmac - Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-getmac-0.6.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-4c7dd563af -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: python-getmac - Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-getmac-0.6.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b719274ffd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 --- Comment #9 from Miro Hrončok --- Branches requested. Would updating to 2.35.24 break any of your dependent software? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 --- Comment #8 from Miro Hrončok --- Running scratchbuilds to see if it builds on f28 and f29. I'd happy to review and merge any PR if you'll ever need that, and give ACLs based on previous happy cooperation, if that works for you. Or do you really need push access for neuro-sig right away? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645681] Review Request: golang-x-arch - Machine architecture information used by the Go toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645681 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-x-arch.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-x-arch-0-0.1.20181109gitb19384d.fc30.src.rpm Fixed the license as you said. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1624823] Review Request: python-trimesh - Import, export, process, analyze and view triangular meshes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1624823 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Miro, are you planning to build this one for F28 and F29? fsleyes uses trimesh, so I need it (https://pagure.io/neuro-sig/NeuroFedora/issue/3). I'm happy to co-maintain it if that's OK with you? Please give neuro-sig commit access and we'll maintain it along with the rest of the software. Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546459] Review Request: svgo-inkscape - Extension to optimize SVG files for Inkscape
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546459 --- Comment #4 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Sorr for the delay. I realize npm-svgo is already package. What will be the right way to symlink on this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647803] Review Request: vdr-osd2web - VDR skin interface for the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647803 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/vdr-osd2web -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647803] Review Request: vdr-osd2web - VDR skin interface for the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647803 --- Comment #4 from MartinKG --- Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648426] Review Request: graphlcd-base - GraphLCD drivers and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648426 MartinKG changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://projects.vdr-develo ||per.org/git/graphlcd-base.g ||it/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648426] Review Request: graphlcd-base - GraphLCD drivers and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648426 MartinKG changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1648444 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648444 [Bug 1648444] Review Request: vdr-graphlcd - VDR plugin: Output to graphic LCD -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648444] Review Request: vdr-graphlcd - VDR plugin: Output to graphic LCD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648444 MartinKG changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://projects.vdr-develo ||per.org/git/vdr-plugin-grap ||hlcd.git/ Depends On||1648426 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648426 [Bug 1648426] Review Request: graphlcd-base - GraphLCD drivers and tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648444] New: Review Request: vdr-graphlcd - VDR plugin: Output to graphic LCD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648444
Bug ID: 1648444
Summary: Review Request: vdr-graphlcd - VDR plugin: Output to
graphic LCD
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: mgans...@online.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-osd2web.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-graphlcd-1.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: graphlcd is a plugin for the Video Disc Recorder and shows
information about the current state of VDR on displays supported by the
GraphLCD driver library.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
rpmlint -i -v vdr-graphlcd.spec
/home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vdr-graphlcd-1.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-graphlcd-1.0.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-graphlcd-debugsource-1.0.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-graphlcd-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm
vdr-graphlcd.spec: I: checking
vdr-graphlcd.spec:54: W: macro-in-comment %config
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
vdr-graphlcd.spec:54: W: macro-in-comment %{vdr_plugin_cfgdir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
vdr-graphlcd.spec: I: checking-url
https://projects.vdr-developer.org/git/vdr-plugin-graphlcd.git/snapshot/vdr-plugin-graphlcd-1.0.0.tar.bz2
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-graphlcd.src: I: checking
vdr-graphlcd.src: I: checking-url http://graphlcd.berlios.de/ (timeout 10
seconds)
vdr-graphlcd.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://graphlcd.berlios.de/
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
vdr-graphlcd.src:54: W: macro-in-comment %config
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
vdr-graphlcd.src:54: W: macro-in-comment %{vdr_plugin_cfgdir}
There is a unescaped macro after a shell style comment in the specfile. Macros
are expanded everywhere, so check if it can cause a problem in this case and
escape the macro with another leading % if appropriate.
vdr-graphlcd.src: I: checking-url
https://projects.vdr-developer.org/git/vdr-plugin-graphlcd.git/snapshot/vdr-plugin-graphlcd-1.0.0.tar.bz2
(timeout 10 seconds)
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: I: checking
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: I: checking-url http://graphlcd.berlios.de/ (timeout 10
seconds)
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://graphlcd.berlios.de/
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile
/usr/share/vdr/plugins/graphlcd/channels.alias
A file not in /etc or /var is marked as being a configuration file. Please put
your conf files in /etc or /var.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/vdr-graphlcd/HISTORY
The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in
the specfile's %prep section for example using iconv(1).
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/vdr-graphlcd/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/vdr/plugins/graphlcd/fonts/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf
The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file
based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is
included in a package in this package's dependency chain.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/vdr/plugins/graphlcd/fonts/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf
The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file
based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is
included in a package in this package's dependency chain.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/share/vdr/plugins/graphlcd/fonts/Vera.ttf
/usr/share/fonts/bitstream-vera/Vera.ttf
The target of the symbolic link does not exist within this package or its file
based dependencies. Verify spelling of the link target and that the target is
included in a package in this package's dependency chain.
vdr-graphlcd.x86_64: W:
[Bug 1647803] Review Request: vdr-osd2web - VDR skin interface for the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647803 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- All ok, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638431] Review Request: python-getmac - Python3 module to get the MAC address of local network interfaces and LAN hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638431 --- Comment #12 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-getmac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648426] New: Review Request: graphlcd-base - GraphLCD drivers and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648426 Bug ID: 1648426 Summary: Review Request: graphlcd-base - GraphLCD drivers and tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@online.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/graphlcd-base.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/graphlcd-base-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: The GraphLCD base is a project to support graphical LC displays. It is mainly used by the graphlcd plugin for the Video Disc Recorder to display its information. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint -i -v graphlcd-base.spec /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/graphlcd-base-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcddrivers-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-devel-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcdgraphics-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcdskin-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-common-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-tools-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-base-debugsource-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-base-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcddrivers-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcdgraphics-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/glcdskin-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/graphlcd-tools-debuginfo-1.0.1-1.fc29.x86_64.rpm graphlcd-base.spec: I: checking graphlcd-base.spec: I: checking-url https://projects.vdr-developer.org/git/graphlcd-base.git/snapshot/graphlcd-base-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) graphlcd-base.src: I: checking graphlcd-base.src: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) graphlcd-base.src: I: checking-url https://projects.vdr-developer.org/git/graphlcd-base.git/snapshot/graphlcd-base-1.0.1.tar.bz2 (timeout 10 seconds) glcddrivers.x86_64: I: checking glcddrivers.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graphlcd -> graphical The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. glcddrivers.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) graphlcd-devel.x86_64: I: checking graphlcd-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on graphlcd/graphlcd-libs/libgraphlcd graphlcd-devel.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) glcdgraphics.x86_64: I: checking glcdgraphics.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graphlcd -> graphical The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. glcdgraphics.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) glcdskin.x86_64: I: checking glcdskin.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US graphlcd -> graphical The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. glcdskin.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) glcdskin.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. graphlcd-common.x86_64: I: checking graphlcd-common.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) graphlcd-common.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: I: checking graphlcd-tools.x86_64: I: checking-url http://projects.vdr-developer.org/projects/graphlcd (timeout 10 seconds) graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary convpic Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary crtfont Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary genfont Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary lcdtestpattern Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary showpic Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary showtext Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. graphlcd-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary skintest Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
[Bug 1647803] Review Request: vdr-osd2web - VDR skin interface for the browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647803
--- Comment #2 from MartinKG ---
upload new files:
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-osd2web.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-osd2web-0.2.48-2.fc29.src.rpm
%changelog
* Fri Nov 09 2018 Martin Gansser - 0.2.48-2
- Use %%{version] for SOURCE tag
- Use %%bcond_with/without for debugging flag
- Mark COPYING as %%license file
- Use korrekt license GPLv2+
- take ownership of unowned directory %%{vdr_configdir}/plugins/osd2web/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-persistence -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-reflection -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/php-doctrine-event-manager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-props-1.6.4-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-82141a6b52 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-props-1.6.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0a500d2554 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- bpftrace-0.0-1.20181107git029717b.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fb6dcca5d1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f50a900df5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3be256c3d7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9ccbc1b490 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Merci beaucoup :) https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8785 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 69 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/php-doctrine-persistence/review-php-doctrine-
persistence/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Event(php-doctrine-common),
/usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping(php-doctrine-
common), /usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common/Persistence/Mapping/Driver
(php-doctrine-common), /usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common/Persistence(php-
doctrine-common)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- bpftrace-0.0-1.20181107git029717b.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8a9fc94314 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ea295e864d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e39db43366 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- libb64-1.2-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-48c5becff8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Thanks again! SCm request https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8781 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Thanks! SCL request https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8780 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 35 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/php-doctrine-reflection/review-php-doctrine-
reflection/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common/Reflection(php-doctrine-common)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-nilearn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks! SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8776 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Ok, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review, Robert! Updated spec/srpm: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-nilearn/python-nilearn.spec https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-nilearn/python-nilearn-0.4.2-2.fc29.src.rpm rpmlint still gives this, but it's a false positive: python3-nilearn.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/surface/tests/data/test.label ascii label , from subject fsaverage5 vox2ras=TkReg python3-nilearn.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/surface/tests/data/test.label 644 ascii label , from subject fsaverage5 vox2ras=TkReg The file is a data file, the "shebang" is part of the header. * Fri Nov 09 2018 Ankur Sinha - 0.4.2-2 - Correct license - Remvoe shebangs - Remove pre-compiled files -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fc72346d60 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fsleyes-props -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5e77c7716f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-petlink-0.3.2-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-86f067b027 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #18 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libb64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/php-doctrine-event-manager/review-php-doctrine-event-
manager/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/php/Doctrine(php-
doctrine-cache, php-doctrine-collections),
/usr/share/php/Doctrine/Common(php-doctrine-cache, php-doctrine-
collections)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > - I'd recommend again %bcond_with Maybe I haven't understood how these are to be used properly. We can't use them in koji, can we? So they're only useful for testing in mock and then must be removed before we commit to SCM, right? > > Package approved. > Thanks for the review, Robert! Requested SCM: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8772 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 Augusto Caringi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(acaringi@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Augusto Caringi --- (In reply to Jerome Marchand from comment #5) > >%cmake . \ > >-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \ > >-DSYSTEM_BCC_LIBRARY:BOOL=ON \ > >-DENABLE_TESTS:BOOL=OFF \ > >-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF > > Any specific reason why we don't build the dynamic libraries? That's a good question, but the answer is: There is no dynamic libraries. I'll explain... By default, during the build, bpftrace creates 4 static libraries: - libresources.a - libparser.a - libarch.a - libast.a These "private" libraries are then statically linked in bpftrace binary (which is a dynamic linked executable regarding all the other external libraries). Then when I was working on this package I realized that %cmake macro has a "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON" which was forcing the build of these "private static by default" libraries as dynamic libraries. This behavior was causing some problems (bpftrace CMake files are not prepared to handle these libraries as dynamic ones, rpmbuild was identifying new dependencies based on these libraries and so on...) So, this line: "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF" is there just to force back the default behavior. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1648394 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 [Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1648394 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 [Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1648390, 1648393 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 [Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 [Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] New: Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 Bug ID: 1648394 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-persistence.git/plain/php-doctrine-persistence.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-persistence-1.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: The Doctrine Persistence project is a set of shared interfaces and functionality that the different Doctrine object mappers share. Fedora Account System Username: remi NOTICE: This package is split of php-doctrine-common so conflicts with 2.8 by design. Update to 2.9.1 is waiting for this new package https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-common.git/commit/?id=e4b58ff38847edb9492827719fd664107fca8e7b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] New: Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 Bug ID: 1648393 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-reflection.git/plain/php-doctrine-reflection.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-reflection-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: The Doctrine Reflection project is a simple library used by the various Doctrine projects which adds some additional functionality on top of the reflection functionality that comes with PHP. It allows you to get the reflection information about classes, methods and properties statically. Fedora Account System Username: remi NOTICE: This package is split of php-doctrine-common so conflicts with 2.8 by design. Update to 2.9.1 is waiting for this new package https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-common.git/commit/?id=e4b58ff38847edb9492827719fd664107fca8e7b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- I'd recommend again %bcond_with
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated",
"Apache License (v2.0)". 67 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-fsleyes-
props/review-python-fsleyes-props/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see
[Bug 1648390] New: Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 Bug ID: 1648390 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-event-manager.git/plain/php-doctrine-event-manager.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-doctrine-event-manager-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm Description: The Doctrine Event Manager is a simple PHP event system that was built to be used with the various Doctrine projects. Fedora Account System Username: remi NOTICE: This package is split of php-doctrine-common so conflicts with 2.8 by design. Update to 2.9.1 is waiting for this new package https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/doctrine/php-doctrine-common.git/commit/?id=e4b58ff38847edb9492827719fd664107fca8e7b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bpftrace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648251] Review Request: python-petlink - Decode and encode Petlink data streams (32 and 64 bit)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648251 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-petlink -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848 --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review, Robert. SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8768 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647825] Review Request: python-nilearn - Python module for fast and easy statistical learning on NeuroImaging data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647825
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
# Requires nibabel that is py3 only in Fedora
%global with_py2 0
- Use %bcond_with
- Main license seems to be BSD, not MIT
- Remove the shebang in %prep:
python3-nilearn.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/plotting/glass_brain_files/plot_align_svg.py
/usr/bin/env python
python3-nilearn.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/plotting/glass_brain_files/plot_align_svg.py
644 /usr/bin/env python
- I'd remove these two pre-bytecompiled files in %prep:
python3-nilearn.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/datasets/tests/data/__init__.pyc
expected 3390 or 3391 or 3392 or 3393 or 3394 (3.7), found 62211 (2.7)
python3-nilearn.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/nilearn/tests/data/__init__.pyc expected 3390
or 3391 or 3392 or 3393 or 3394 (3.7), found 62211 (2.7)
They will be byte-compiled correctly by the build process.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or
generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 188 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/python-nilearn/review-python-nilearn/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg
[Bug 1645367] Review Request: rcm - management suite for dotfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645367 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rcm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 Jerome Marchand changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(acaringi@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #5 from Jerome Marchand --- >%cmake . \ >-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \ >-DSYSTEM_BCC_LIBRARY:BOOL=ON \ >-DENABLE_TESTS:BOOL=OFF \ >-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF Any specific reason why we don't build the dynamic libraries? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645848] Review Request: libb64 - A library for fast encoding/ decoding data into and from a base64-encoded format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645848
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #16 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package is approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Public domain", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Public
domain". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/libb64/review-
libb64/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
present.
Note: Package has .a files: libb64-devel.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
libb64-devel , libb64-tools , libb64-debugsource
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 --- Comment #4 from Augusto Caringi --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > Perfect, package approved. Robert-André Mauchin, thank you very much for the quick review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Alias||python-fsleyes-props --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Rawhide scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30755793 It'll need a build root override for python-fslpy and python-fslpy-widgets to build for F28/29 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648269] Review Request: mod_psgi - Apache httpd plugin for handling PSGI applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648269 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- LGTM, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648360] New: Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx] Python event programming framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648360 Bug ID: 1648360 Summary: Review Request: python-fsleyes-props - [wx]Python event programming framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-fsleyes-props/python-fsleyes-props.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-fsleyes-props/python-fsleyes-props-1.6.4-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: fsleyes-props is a library which is used by used by FSLeyes, and which allows you to: - Listen for change to attributes on a python object, - Automatically generate wxpython widgets which are bound to attributes of a python object - Automatically generate a command line interface to set values of the attributes of a python object. Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
