[Bug 1645367] Review Request: rcm - management suite for dotfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645367 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- rcm-1.3.3-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-99413cf846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645367] Review Request: rcm - management suite for dotfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- rcm-1.3.3-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-16e09eabd9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d778a968be -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-indexed_gzip-0.8.7-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-256cb0c7e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- python-pybids-0.6.5-2.gite35ced6.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c4baca0d2f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642736] Review Request: python-leveldb - Python bindings for leveldb database library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642736 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-leveldb-0.194-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-pybids-0.6.5-2.gite35ced6.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1e92147c94 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2204562903 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-indexed_gzip-0.8.7-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-91502577f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1290995] Review Request: python-visionegg-quest - QUEST algorithm for finding threshold
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290995 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-visionegg-quest-1.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642118] Review Request: strawberry - An audio player and music collection organizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642118 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- strawberry-0.4.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642570] Review Request: rclone-browser - Simple cross platform GUI for rclone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642570 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- rclone-browser-1.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636549] Review Request: golang-github-azure-storage-blob - Microsoft Azure Blob Storage Library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636549 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-azure-storage-blob-0.2.0-0.1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636497] Review Request: golang-github-google-martian - Library for building custom HTTP/S proxies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636497 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-google-martian-2.1.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636471] Review Request: golang-github-azure-pipeline - Implements an HTTP request/ response middleware pipeline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636471 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-azure-pipeline-0.1.8-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638958] Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for Anime-style art using OpenCL and OpenCV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638958 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- waifu2x-converter-cpp-5.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1635367] Review Request: papirus-icon-theme - Free and open source SVG icon theme based on Paper Icon Set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635367 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- papirus-icon-theme-20181007-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642118] Review Request: strawberry - An audio player and music collection organizer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:21:40 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- strawberry-0.4.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642570] Review Request: rclone-browser - Simple cross platform GUI for rclone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642570 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- rclone-browser-1.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636549] Review Request: golang-github-azure-storage-blob - Microsoft Azure Blob Storage Library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:20:02 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-azure-storage-blob-0.2.0-0.1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636497] Review Request: golang-github-google-martian - Library for building custom HTTP/S proxies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636497 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:20:00 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-google-martian-2.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638959] Review Request: qtwaifu2x - Frontend for waifu2x-converter-cpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638959 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:19:51 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- qtwaifu2x-0-0.1.20181013git0907ef8.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1635367] Review Request: papirus-icon-theme - Free and open source SVG icon theme based on Paper Icon Set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635367 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- papirus-icon-theme-20181007-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636471] Review Request: golang-github-azure-pipeline - Implements an HTTP request/ response middleware pipeline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636471 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:19:58 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-azure-pipeline-0.1.8-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638958] Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for Anime-style art using OpenCL and OpenCV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638958 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- waifu2x-converter-cpp-5.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1642570] Review Request: rclone-browser - Simple cross platform GUI for rclone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642570 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:14:04 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- rclone-browser-1.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638958] Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for Anime-style art using OpenCL and OpenCV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638958 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:13:56 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- waifu2x-converter-cpp-5.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638959] Review Request: qtwaifu2x - Frontend for waifu2x-converter-cpp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638959 Bug 1638959 depends on bug 1638958, which changed state. Bug 1638958 Summary: Review Request: waifu2x-converter-cpp - Image Super-Resolution for Anime-style art using OpenCL and OpenCV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638958 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1635367] Review Request: papirus-icon-theme - Free and open source SVG icon theme based on Paper Icon Set
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1635367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-11-12 21:14:00 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- papirus-icon-theme-20181007-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649127] Review Request: python-brian2 - A clock-driven simulator for spiking neural networks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649127 --- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Rawhide scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30843505 F29 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30843512 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1150105] Review Request: python-pynn - Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||python-pynn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649127] Review Request: python-brian2 - A clock-driven simulator for spiking neural networks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649127 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Alias||python-brian2 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649127] New: Review Request: python-brian2 - A clock-driven simulator for spiking neural networks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649127 Bug ID: 1649127 Summary: Review Request: python-brian2 - A clock-driven simulator for spiking neural networks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-brian2/python-brian2.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-brian2/python-brian2-2.2-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Brian2 is a simulator for spiking neural networks available on almost all platforms. The motivation for this project is that a simulator should not only save the time of processors, but also the time of scientists. It is the successor of Brian1 and shares its approach of being highly flexible and easily extensible. It is based on a code generation framework that allows to execute simulations using other programming languages and/or on different devices. Please report issues to the github issue tracker (https://github.com/brian-team/brian2/issues) or to the brian support mailing list (http://groups.google.com/group/briansupport/) Documentation for Brian2 can be found at http://brian2.readthedocs.org Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 --- Comment #4 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Is this progressbar package incompatible with the other one? If yes, then I think the best option would be to rename the module in this one to progressbar2. The imports in users would have to be adjusted to match. But this would be a simple 'sed -i' in %prep, so not too cumbersome. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648966] Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648966 --- Comment #3 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > - Should this and other similar packages require golang which owns > /usr/share/gocode/src? > > I don't think so. Based on my understanding of the guidelines, I think they should either require the golang package, or own the directory themselves. This is what the guidelines say: "Packages must own all directories they put files in, except for: - any directories owned by the filesystem, man, or other explicitly created -filesystem packages - any directories owned by other packages in your package's natural dependency chain" So, here, since this package doesn't require golang explicitly and doesn't pull it in as a natural dependency either (not listed in requires as generated by fedora-review above), `/usr/share/gocode/src` (and /usr/share/gocode) is currently unowned. So when this package is removed, for example, this directory will get left behind. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership I'm not a golang user, but isn't golang required to use this package anyway? If it isn't, it is this case: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owned_by_a_package_which_is_not_required_for_your_package_to_function If it is, then it's this one: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_also_owned_by_a_package_implementing_required_functionality_of_your_package Either way, the two directories need to be owned here. > > - Shouldn't the release include snapshot information? > > It's computed automatically in dist by the gometa macro Ah, right. So many go marcos now, doing so many fancy things! > > - rpmlint says there's a hidden file in the directories---I expect this is > required, but please double check. > > It's the .goipath file, which is required. I thought so. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Yeah, I didn't check this. This needs to be figured out somehow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1218533 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review, Zbigniew. I've updated the spec accordingly. I'm worried that this conflicts with the python-progressbar package: sudo dnf whatprovides '/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/progressbar' Last metadata expiration check: 2:00:11 ago on Mon 12 Nov 2018 18:21:35 GMT. python3-progressbar-2.3-13.20170808git32422c1.fc29.noarch : Text progressbar library for Python 3 Repo: fedora Matched from: Filename: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/progressbar I reckon that means we can't have both packages without some hacking here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
> PR filed
An URL would be nice.
> find . -name "*.pyc" -exec rm -fv '{}' \;
find . -name '*.pyc' -print -delete
I think that the list of widgets in the description could be removed. It's not
necessary to the users of the package.
+ package name is OK
+ latest version
+ builds and installs OK
+ license is acceptable for Fedora (BSD)
+ license is specified correctly
+ fedora-review is happy (there's a lot of spam from rpmlint, but I think it's
all bogus).
Package is APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649059] New: Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059 Bug ID: 1649059 Summary: Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-0.3.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: This repository contains the Go implementation of the OpenCensus Agent (OC-Agent) Exporter. OC-Agent is a deamon process running in a VM that can retrieve spans/stats/metrics from OpenCensus Library, export them to other backends and possibly push configurations back to Library. See more details on OC-Agent Readme. Note: This is an experimental repository and is likely to get backwards-incompatible changes. Ultimately we may want to move the OC-Agent Go Exporter to OpenCensus Go core library. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648966] Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648966 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Should this and other similar packages require golang which owns /usr/share/gocode/src? I don't think so. - Shouldn't the release include snapshot information? It's computed automatically in dist by the gometa macro - rpmlint says there's a hidden file in the directories---I expect this is required, but please double check. It's the .goipath file, which is required. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649058] Review Request: golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649058 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1649059 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059 [Bug 1649059] Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649059] Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1649058 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649058 [Bug 1649058] Review Request: golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649058] New: Review Request: golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649058 Bug ID: 1649058 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto - Language Independent Interface Types For OpenCensus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-census-instrumentation-opencensus-proto-0.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30836643 Description: Census provides a framework to define and collect stats against metrics and to break those stats down across user-defined dimensions. The Census framework is natively available in many languages (e.g. C++, Go, and Java). The API interface types are defined using protos to ensure consistency and interoperability for the different implementations. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2204562903 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d778a968be -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-indexed_gzip-0.8.7-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-91502577f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-indexed_gzip-0.8.7-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-256cb0c7e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648728] Review Request: python-progressbar2 - A Progressbar library to provide visual progress to long running operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648728 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zbys...@in.waw.pl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-pybids-0.6.5-2.gite35ced6.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1e92147c94 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-pybids-0.6.5-2.gite35ced6.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c4baca0d2f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-indexed_gzip -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-fsleyes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648966] Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648966
--- Comment #1 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
It's mostly good. I found one or two nitpicks:
- Should this and other similar packages require golang which owns
/usr/share/gocode/src?
- Shouldn't the release include snapshot information?
- rpmlint says there's a hidden file in the directories---I expect this is
required, but please double check.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/asinha/1648966-golang-github-
pascaldekloe-goe/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
Should this golang module (and others in general) require golang which owns
/usr/share/gocode/src?
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang)
Related to the above issue
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[?]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
Upstream has never released a version, so the release field is fine, but since
it is a snapshot, should the release not include some snap information also?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Snapshots
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
See above issue.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
Please check this
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review, Robert. SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8812 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for the review, Robert. I'll correct that requires before import. SCM requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/8808 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648966] Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648966 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sanjay.an...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648269] Review Request: mod_psgi - Apache httpd plugin for handling PSGI applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648269 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||mod_psgi-0.0.1-0.1.20120822 ||git9732348.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-12 11:15:54 --- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648709] Review Request: python-indexed_gzip - Fast random access of gzip files in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648709
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "zlib/libpng license". 21 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-indexed_gzip/review-python-
indexed_gzip/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned
[Bug 1645765] Review Request: slurp - Select a region in a Wayland compositor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765 --- Comment #4 from Till Hofmann --- (In reply to Jan Pokorný from comment #3) > Sorry for my blindness to "issues" section, was concentrating merely > on the checkboxes since my brain was learnt that there's usually a lot > of ballast coming from fedora-review (meaning it likely needs some > love to catch up the evolution): Funny, I always do it the other way around: focus on issues, post the rest for completeness' sake. > > > - The file protocol/wlr-layer-shell-unstable-v1.xml is licensed with > > "NTP (legal disclaimer)". It's not on the list of good licenses. You > > should check with Fedora Legal whether this is a good license. > > Indeed it is a good license, and that's just unfortunate than > licensecheck provides a misleading verdict vs. how Fedora classifies > the license -- this is the matching text: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer > > but it contains "and sell" addition to the very first sentences, but > this matches with, e.g., > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style > > (see also [bug 1475962 comment 12]). > > Do you see any conflict here? I shall fix the wording in the spec to > this very interpretation since otherwise I am carrying this cargo cult > confusion (originating in wlroots since [bug 1529352 comment 5]), > though. OK, that makes sense. No conflict here, it just wasn't clear to me. > > And you should likely do the same with sway, since the protocol file > in question was borrowed there :-) Yes! > > > - Upstream files are not properly licensed, most files are missing > > license headers. This should at least be reported to upstream. > > Cannot find anyting to that effect in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/ > LicensingGuidelines > Can you point out the particular part to me that asks for this, please? It's not explicitly stated in the guidelines, but if the code is not properly licensed, then it cannot be shipped in Fedora. I think it's clear enough what upstream intends, but legally it's not 100% clear. Afaik, just putting a LICENSE file in your repository doesn't license all the files with that license. Since the upstream intention is clear, this is not a blocker, but it should definitely be pointed out to them so they can fix it, which should be in their interest. > > (Again, sway is in the same boat here.) Good point, I never checked that when I started maintaining sway (I did not create the initial package). > > My TODO is to to get the slurp-grim.desktop more into shape > (especially Categories). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Requires: %{py3_dist jinja} → Requires: %{py3_dist jinja2}
Package approved. Fix the aforementioned issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-fsleyes , python-fsleyes-doc
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files
[Bug 1648966] New: Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648966 Bug ID: 1648966 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe - Common enterprise features for the Go programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-github-pascaldekloe-goe-0-0.1.20181112git57f6aae.fc30.src.rpm Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30832189 Description: Common enterprise features for the Go programming language. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1647948] Review Request: bpftrace - High-level tracing language for Linux eBPF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647948 --- Comment #12 from Jerome Marchand --- (In reply to Augusto Caringi from comment #7) > (In reply to Jerome Marchand from comment #5) > > >%cmake . \ > > >-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo \ > > >-DSYSTEM_BCC_LIBRARY:BOOL=ON \ > > >-DENABLE_TESTS:BOOL=OFF \ > > >-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF > > > > Any specific reason why we don't build the dynamic libraries? > > That's a good question, but the answer is: There is no dynamic libraries. > > I'll explain... > > By default, during the build, bpftrace creates 4 static libraries: > > - libresources.a > - libparser.a > - libarch.a > - libast.a > > These "private" libraries are then statically linked in bpftrace binary > (which is a dynamic linked executable regarding all the other external > libraries). > > Then when I was working on this package I realized that %cmake macro has a > "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=ON" which was forcing the build of these "private > static by default" libraries as dynamic libraries. > > This behavior was causing some problems (bpftrace CMake files are not > prepared to handle these libraries as dynamic ones, rpmbuild was identifying > new dependencies based on these libraries and so on...) > > So, this line: "-DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS:BOOL=OFF" is there just to force back > the default behavior. OK, it makes sense. It's somewhat strange but if anything it should be fixed upstream first. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648269] Review Request: mod_psgi - Apache httpd plugin for handling PSGI applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648269 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mod_psgi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646579] Review Request: perl-Net-IMAP-Client - IMAP client library for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646579 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-IMAP-Client -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pybids -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646795] Review Request: linux-system-roles - Set of interfaces for unified system management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646795
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I couldn't find anymore info on this.
Anyhow, I think specifying %doc here is not needed as files are already in
pkgdocdir:
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/*/example-*-playbook.yml
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/network/example-inventory
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/timesync/example-multiple-ntp-servers.yml
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/timesync/example-single-pool.yml
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/*/README.md
%doc %{_pkgdocdir}/*/README.html
Also these are already in _pkgdocdir, so I don't thenk it is necessary to
specix them a second time:
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}kdump/README.md
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}postfix/README.md
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/README.md
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}timesync/README.md
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}network/README.md
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}kdump/README.html
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}postfix/README.html
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/README.html
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}timesync/README.html
%doc %{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}network/README.html
Instead of COPYING LICERSE and COPYING to pkgdocdir, copy them instead to
licensedir:
cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}kdump/README.md \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}kdump/README.html \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}kdump/COPYING \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/kdump
cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}postfix/README.md \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}postfix/README.html \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}postfix/COPYING \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/postfix
cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/README.md \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/README.html \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/COPYING \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/selinux
mv
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}selinux/selinux-playbook.yml
\
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/selinux/example-selinux-playbook.yml
cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}timesync/README.md
\
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}timesync/README.html
\
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}timesync/COPYING \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/timesync
cp -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}network/README.md \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}network/README.html \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ansible/roles/%{roleprefix}network/LICENSE \
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_pkgdocdir}/network
wOwn these directorx
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/doc/linux-system-roles/kdump,
/usr/share/doc/linux-system-roles/network, /usr/share/doc/linux-
system-roles/postfix, /usr/share/doc/linux-system-roles/selinux,
/usr/share/doc/linux-system-roles, /usr/share/doc/linux-system-
roles/timesync
Trx to fix rpmlint error by removing shebangs:
linux-system-roles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/.travis.yml
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/library/network_connections.py
644 /usr/bin/python
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/module_utils/network_lsr/__init__.py
644 /usr/bin/python3 -tt
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/module_utils/network_lsr/argument_validator.py
644 /usr/bin/python3 -tt
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/module_utils/network_lsr/utils.py
644 /usr/bin/python3 -tt
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/tests/test_network_connections.py
/usr/bin/env python
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.network/tests/test_network_connections.py
644 /usr/bin/env python
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.selinux/library/selogin.py 644
/usr/bin/python
linux-system-roles.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/share/ansible/roles/linux-system-roles.timesync/library/timesync_provider.sh
644 /bin/bash
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
[Bug 1509679] Review Request: rofi - A window switcher, application launcher and dmenu replacement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1509679 --- Comment #21 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rofi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645765] Review Request: slurp - Select a region in a Wayland compositor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645765 --- Comment #3 from Jan Pokorný --- Sorry for my blindness to "issues" section, was concentrating merely on the checkboxes since my brain was learnt that there's usually a lot of ballast coming from fedora-review (meaning it likely needs some love to catch up the evolution): > - The file protocol/wlr-layer-shell-unstable-v1.xml is licensed with > "NTP (legal disclaimer)". It's not on the list of good licenses. You > should check with Fedora Legal whether this is a good license. Indeed it is a good license, and that's just unfortunate than licensecheck provides a misleading verdict vs. how Fedora classifies the license -- this is the matching text: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style_with_legal_disclaimer but it contains "and sell" addition to the very first sentences, but this matches with, e.g., https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT#Old_Style (see also [bug 1475962 comment 12]). Do you see any conflict here? I shall fix the wording in the spec to this very interpretation since otherwise I am carrying this cargo cult confusion (originating in wlroots since [bug 1529352 comment 5]), though. And you should likely do the same with sway, since the protocol file in question was borrowed there :-) > - Upstream files are not properly licensed, most files are missing > license headers. This should at least be reported to upstream. Cannot find anyting to that effect in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Can you point out the particular part to me that asks for this, please? (Again, sway is in the same boat here.) My TODO is to to get the slurp-grim.desktop more into shape (especially Categories). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(vincent@casperlef | |antom.net) | Last Closed||2018-11-12 08:49:48 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1590423] Review Request: kata-proxy - Kata proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590423 --- Comment #3 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/kata-rpm-reviews/raw/master/f/kata-proxy/kata-proxy.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lsm5/kata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00822861-kata-proxy/kata-proxy-1.3.1-2.gitd364b2e.fc30.x86_64.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1590428] Review Request: kata-shim - Kata shim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590428 --- Comment #2 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/kata-rpm-reviews/raw/master/f/kata-shim/kata-shim.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lsm5/kata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00822862-kata-shim/kata-shim-1.3.1-2.git58f757d.fc30.x86_64.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1590417] Review Request: kata-ksm-throttler - Kata ksm throttler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590417 --- Comment #6 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/kata-rpm-reviews/blob/master/f/kata-ksm-throttler/kata-ksm-throttler.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lsm5/kata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00822858-kata-ksm-throttler/kata-ksm-throttler-1.3.1-2.git6e903fb.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Alias||python-fsleyes Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648916] New: Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648916 Bug ID: 1648916 Summary: Review Request: python-fsleyes - FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-fsleyes/python-fsleyes.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-fsleyes/python-fsleyes-0.26.4-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: FSLeyes, the FSL image viewer Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Petr Sklenar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(psklenar@redhat.c | |om) | |needinfo?(psklenar@redhat.c | |om) | |needinfo?(psklenar@redhat.c | |om) | |needinfo?(psklenar@redhat.c | |om) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 834747] Review Request: gps - IDE for C and Ada
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834747 Julian Leyh changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jul...@vgai.de) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-12 05:00:17 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- remi's php-doctrine-persistence-1.0.1-1.fc30 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1163257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648390] Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-12 04:48:12 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- remi's php-doctrine-event-manager-1.0.0-1.fc30 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1163225 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 Bug 1648394 depends on bug 1648390, which changed state. Bug 1648390 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-event-manager - Simple PHP event system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648390 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648394] Review Request: php-doctrine-persistence - Doctrine Persistence abstractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648394 Bug 1648394 depends on bug 1648393, which changed state. Bug 1648393 Summary: Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648393] Review Request: php-doctrine-reflection - Additional reflection functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648393 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-12 04:47:36 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- remi's php-doctrine-reflection-1.0.0-1.fc30 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1163226 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636689] Review Request: rust-rusty-fork - Library for running Rust tests in sub-processes using a fork-like interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636689 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-11-12 03:17:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
