[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
1643906-golang-github-rican7-retry/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-github-inconshreveable-
mousetrap-devel, golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-devel, golang, golang-
github-pelletier-go-toml-devel, golang-github-hashicorp-hcl-devel,
golang-github-magiconair-properties-devel, golang-github-stretchr-
testify-devel, golang-github-BurntSushi-toml-devel, golang-gopkg-yaml-
devel-v2, golang-github-spf13-pflag-devel, golang-github-urfave-cli-
devel, golang-github-mitchellh-go-homedir-devel, golang-github-kr-fs-
devel, golang-github-kr-pretty-devel, golang-github-kr-pty-devel,
golang-github-spf13-cobra-devel, golang-github-peterh-liner-devel,
golang-github-mattn-go-runewidth-devel, golang-github-pmezard-go-
difflib-devel, golang-github-spf13-cast-devel, golang-github-kr-text-
devel, golang-github-pkg-errors-devel, golang-github-blang-semver-
devel, golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel, golang-github-
spf13-viper-devel, golang-github-olekukonko-ts-devel, golang-github-
cpuguy83-go-md2man-devel, golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure-devel,
golang-github-cheggaaa-pb-devel, golang-github-pkg-sftp-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that
[Bug 1534567] Review Request: golang-github-spacemonkeygo-openssl - OpenSSL bindings for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534567 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Fixed In Version||golang-github-spacemonkeygo ||-openssl-0-0.3.20171219gite ||863d83.fc28 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-01-16 07:20:15 --- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This was built some time ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Bug 1512702 depends on bug 1578564, which changed state. Bug 1578564 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-wifi - Provides access to IEEE 802.11 WiFi device actions and statistics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578564 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1578564] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-wifi - Provides access to IEEE 802.11 WiFi device actions and statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578564 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Fixed In Version||golang-github-mdlayher-wifi ||-0-0.1.20180522git17fb838.f ||c29 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-01-16 06:52:29 --- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This is built; please close review requests when they're complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1663586] Review Request: python-kaitaistruct - A new way to develop parsers for binary structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663586 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666299] Review Request: python-tomlkit - Style preserving TOML library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666299
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
APPROVED
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 16 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
1666299-python-tomlkit/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve
[Bug 1666291] Review Request: python-cachy - Simple yet effective caching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666291
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
I only have two comments, but this would otherwise be fine, I think:
- You should ask upstream to include the license in their tarball. (It's
required by the license.)
- There are some optional dependencies that you may want to add; it seems
that it doesn't get picked up by the dependency generator.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 29 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in 1666291-python-cachy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary
[Bug 1661657] Review Request: helm - A free polyphonic synth with lots of modulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661657 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- I think you'll need to unbundle some of these things. For example, the fonts don't need to be shipped again in this package. And many of the things in the 'other licenses' comment should perhaps also be removed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1663586] Review Request: python-kaitaistruct - A new way to develop parsers for binary structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663586 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This is probably mostly okay, but the spec and srpm do not match. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9bfda02b8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-711319d914 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1540833] Review Request: racket - General-purpose programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1540833 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Fixed In Version||racket-7.0-2.fc28 ||racket-7.0-2.fc29 ||racket-7.0-2.fc30 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2018-02-12 13:25:34 |2019-01-16 02:48:32 --- Comment #22 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This seems to have been built for Fedora 28. David, please remember to tag your package updates with the relevant bug reports so that they are closed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662544] Review Request: python-tvb-gdist - Cython interface to geodesic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-tvb-gdist-1.5.6-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1654881] Review Request: golang-rsc-pdf - PDF Reader for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1654881 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||depar...@redhat.com, ||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(deparker@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- The current golang-x-arch package cannot be installed because this package has not been built. Are you planning to finish building this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner --- Maybe fedora-review insists to find any %license entry. We'd have to ask at packaging committee. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573
--- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: python-aiorpcx.spec should be python-aiorpcX.spec
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name
= MUST items =
Generic:
[!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
=> licensecheck.txt is empty?!
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
=> OK, no license file provided but setup.py mentions MIT.
https://github.com/kyuupichan/aiorpcX/blob/master/setup.py#L28
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for
licenses manually.
=> OK
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
=> See above.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[?]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
Note: Cannot find any build in BUILD directory (--prebuilt option?)
=> Maybe a bug in f-r?
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
=> OK, see above
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that
[Bug 1662544] Review Request: python-tvb-gdist - Cython interface to geodesic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662544 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-01-16 01:42:33 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-tvb-gdist-1.5.6-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1130098] Review Request: python-ejson - Extensible json serializer/deserializer library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130098 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2019-01-16 01:32:30 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- I think it's time to close this. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1130103] Review Request: blink - Real-time communications client using SIP protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130103 Bug 1130103 depends on bug 1130098, which changed state. Bug 1130098 Summary: Review Request: python-ejson - Extensible json serializer/deserializer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130098 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|projects...@smart.ms Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1663090] Review Request: direvent - GNU directory event monitoring daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663090 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- You should not use a wildcard, but %find_lang: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_handling_locale_files (Also, the guidelines have moved from the wiki to the above URL.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636111] Review Request: glyr - Glyr is a music related metadata searchengine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636111 --- Comment #33 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Matias, one last issue and then I can sponsor you. I apologize for yet another delay. [!]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. ---> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32052225 Package does not build ppc and arm. Looking at the build log, checks fail. please take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1636111] Review Request: glyr - Glyr is a music related metadata searchengine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1636111 --- Comment #32 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/blacklist.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/cache.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/cache_intern.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/core.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/glyr.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/common/amazon.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/common/google.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/common/mbid_lookup.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/common/musicbrainz.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/common/picsearch.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/intern/generic.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/jsmn/jsmn.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/misc.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/register_plugins.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/stringlib.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/lib/types.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/src/glyrc/autohelp.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/src/glyrc/colorprint.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/src/glyrc/escape.h glyr-debugsource : /usr/src/debug/glyr-1.0.10-10.20180824git618c418e.fc30.x86_64/src/glyrc/update.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: gcc See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in glyr-libs See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries ---> all these have been addressed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GNU Lesser General Public License (v3 or later)", "*No copyright* GNU Lesser General Public License (v3)", "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 37 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/mukundan/nextcloud/open_source_contrib/pkg_reviews/glyr/1636111-glyr/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/.build-id(qemu-ui- gtk, cups-client, efivar-libs, rsyslog, lz4-libs, qemu-block-gluster, rpm-plugin-selinux, python3-qt5-webkit, libimagequant, giflib, libreoffice-graphicfilter, trousers, libdb-utils, xorg-x11-font-utils, OpenEXR-libs, libcom_err, libseccomp, p11-kit, libabw, gtkspell, libvirt-daemon-driver-storage-iscsi, libmodman, parted, libdvdread, zstd, bluez-libs, libwebp, libxslt, system-config-printer-udev, perl- Encode, libverto-libev, python2-cryptography, libevdev, libgpg-error, lvm2-libs, perl-Digest-SHA, perl-Params-Classify, libsodium, python3-unbound, libzstd, gtk-murrine-engine, lua-lpeg, symlinks, python3-simplejson, libcdr, e2fsprogs-libs, pulseaudio-libs, lcms2, python3-Bottleneck, qemu-guest-agent, annobin, ntfs-3g, libxcb, libyubikey, python3-pycurl, openconnect, xcb-util-keysyms, m4, libgphoto2, xcb-util,
[Bug 1666545] New: Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666545 Bug ID: 1666545 Summary: Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: heg...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jonny.fedorapeople.org//python-qdarkstyle.spec SRPM URL: http://jonny.fedorapeople.org//python-qdarkstyle-2.6.5-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A dark stylesheet for Qt applications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666545] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666545 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666513 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666513 [Bug 1666513] nothing provides python3.6dist(qdarkstyle) < 3.0 needed by electrum-3.2.4-1.fc28.noarch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666545] Review Request: python-qdarkstyle - A dark stylesheet for Qt applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666545 --- Comment #1 from Jonny Heggheim --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32052203 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666493] New: Review Request: OpenLiberty - Server runtime for Java Developers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666493 Bug ID: 1666493 Summary: Review Request: OpenLiberty - Server runtime for Java Developers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: michael.zh...@ibm.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://app.box.com/s/9pd6nx4cxsu29r5i41kn3g33x5278nsy SRPM URL: https://app.box.com/s/hg2zdfcf83j2vlvhrkhes8jsy6y06oag Description: Open Liberty provides developers with proven Java EE 8 technology and the latest Eclipse MicroProfile™ capabilities for building microservices. Fedora Account System Username: zhangm13 - michael.zh...@ibm.com This will be my first package on Fedora. I am currently looking for a sponsor to help me package this in the next month. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1663642] Review Request: python-asynctest - Enhance the standard unittest package with features for testing asyncio libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1663642
--- Comment #6 from Carl George ---
> Why? SPEC must only be UTF-8 encoded, I don't recall any rules against using
> proper quoting characters.
> Why? The changelog entries are not sentences.
I thought these things were in the guidelines somewhere, but I can't find it
now so I must have been mistaken. My personal preferences aside, keep the
fancy quotes and lowercase if you like.
> My reading of the above is that it's not necessary if subpackage is named
> python3-%{pypi_name}.
"In order to make the switch from Python 2 to Python 3 automatic, all packages
that provide python3-%{srcname} (for any %{srcname}) SHOULD use the
%python_provide macro with the package name" [0]
It currently evaluates to an empty string with a python3-* argument, but in the
future the macro definition will change so that python3-asynctest provides
python-asynctest. As you can see it is a SHOULD item, so it's not strictly a
blocker, but if you leave it out you are adding to the manual work that must
eventually be done when unversioned python becomes python3 distribution-wide.
> No. All current Fedora releases and EPEL7 have setuptools newer than 30.3.0.
> Also, python3-setuptools is pulled in by python3-devel.
"MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires" [1]
Just because something happens to get installed in the build root doesn't mean
you don't need to list it. The project's setup.py file imports setuptools, so
it's a build requirement. You don't have to include the minimum version, but
there is no reason not to since upstream has been courteous enough to mention
it.
Thanks for taking care of the test suite stuff, I'm able to run fedora-review
now. Please take care of this rpmlint error [2]:
python3-asynctest.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Enhance the standard unittest
package with features for testing asyncio libraries
[0]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Python/#_the_python_provide_macro
[1]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/
[2]:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner --- Wrong bug referenced, see bug #1659777 instead for the review swap. Sorry for confusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Raphael Groner --- Thanks. I'll look into your request ASAP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645294] Review Request: delve - Debugger for Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645294 Derek Parker changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645294] Review Request: delve - Debugger for Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645294 --- Comment #16 from Derek Parker --- I've updated the package with some patches that enable the Delve test suite to run with all of the symlinkage. These patches will be removed on the next update once we release Delve 1.2.0. SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/derekparker/delve-fedpkg/v1.1.0-1/delve.spec SRPM: https://github.com/derekparker/delve-fedpkg/releases/download/v1.1.0-1/delve-1.1.0-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1652036] Review Request: cockpit-session-recording - Package provides session recording playback in Cockpit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652036 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Gliebov --- URL:https://github.com/Scribery/cockpit-session-recording Spec URL: https://sabbaka.fedorapeople.org/cockpit-session-recording.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/Scribery/cockpit-session-recording/releases/download/v1/cockpit-session-recording-1-1.fc28.src.rpm Source0: https://github.com/Scribery/cockpit-session-recording/archive/v1.tar.gz Description: Provides Session Recording module for Cockpit. Provides list of recorded by tlog terminal sessions from Journal. Allows to play them in a player with various controls. Shows correlated logs which happened during session. Fedora Account System Username: sabbaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #1) > Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you could look into bug #1662573. reviewed it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1481630] Review Request: virtualbox-guest-additions - VirtualBox Guest Additions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481630 --- Comment #86 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- BTW please review https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/virtualbox-guest-additions/blob/master/f/010-linux-4.16-mount-fixes.patch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/virtualbox-guest-additions/blob/master/f/0001-VBoxServiceAutoMount-Change-Linux-mount-code-to-use-.patch this last patch, I needed rebase to fit on vbox 6.0 Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659777] Review Request: python-vconnector - VMware vSphere Connector Module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659777 --- Comment #3 from Igor Gnatenko --- Apart from that, looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659777] Review Request: python-vconnector - VMware vSphere Connector Module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659777 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659777] Review Request: python-vconnector - VMware vSphere Connector Module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659777
Igor Gnatenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko ---
> %?python_enable_dependency_generator
%{?python_enable_dependency_generator}, please.
> %if 0%{?rhel} || 0%{?fedora} < 30
%if %{undefined __pythondist_requires}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1662573] Review Request: python-aiorpcx - Generic async RPC implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1662573 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you could look into bug #1662573. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1665504] Review Request: qt5-qtnetworkauth - Qt5 - NetworkAuth component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665504 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Maybe you could look into bug #1563831 for a review swap? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469767] Review Request: systemd-swap - Creating hybrid swap space from zram swaps, swap files and swap partitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767 --- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner --- Well, as far as I can understand there's nothing to block an official approval. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469767] Review Request: systemd-swap - Creating hybrid swap space from zram swaps, swap files and swap partitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(pa...@hubbitus.in | |fo) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1469767] Review Request: systemd-swap - Creating hybrid swap space from zram swaps, swap files and swap partitions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1469767 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(bunnyapocalypse@p ||rotonmail.com) --- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner --- > I am not yet sponsored as a package maintainer so this is an unofficial > review. FAS says you managed to get sponsored. Maybe you could continue with this review when I fixed the points mentioned in comment #9? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1481628] Review Request: Qt-SESAM - Super Easy & Secure Authentication Management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1481628 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2019-01-15 16:30:56 --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner --- Unfortunately, upstream is obviously not interested into packaging (except some special distributions). I've to close here then and finally, please feel free to use my work for another possible request if you think this package is useful in Fedora. https://github.com/ola-ct/Qt-SESAM/issues/19 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666293] Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you could look into bug #1659777. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1665749] Review Request: python-pipreqs - Generate requirements.txt file for any project based on imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665749 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you could look into bug #1659777. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1665749] Review Request: python-pipreqs - Generate requirements.txt file for any project based on imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1665749 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe you could look into büg #1659777. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-eb5fbe3e83 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-9bfda02b8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-711319d914 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645723] Review Request: slack-cleaner - Bulk delete messages/files on Slack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645723 --- Comment #5 from Raphael Groner --- SPEC: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/slack/slack-cleaner.spec SRPM: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/slack/slack-cleaner-0.5.0-1.fc29.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jan 15 2019 Raphael Groner <> - 0.5.0-1 - switch to fork from sgratzl - use rectified summary for description - split subpackage for python3 modules Sorry for the delay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1612092] Review Request: mailman3 - The GNU mailing list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092 --- Comment #21 from Neal Gompa --- Yes, in this circumstance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1612092] Review Request: mailman3 - The GNU mailing list manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1612092 Derek Atkins changed: What|Removed |Added CC||warl...@mit.edu --- Comment #20 from Derek Atkins --- So for future reference, "next release" here means F30, not F29? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658707] Review Request: python-confluent-kafka - Confluent's Apache Kafka client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658707 --- Comment #12 from Javier Peña --- Oh, now I remember why unit tests are disabled. They're absent from the tarball distribution, I opened https://github.com/confluentinc/confluent-kafka-python/issues/508 to get it fixed. So I can't fix it now, but I'll update it when a new release is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-Binary -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Thanks Jitka, copy and paste error there, will fix on import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658707] Review Request: python-confluent-kafka - Confluent's Apache Kafka client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658707 --- Comment #11 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-confluent-kafka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659833] Review Request: python-notify2 - Python interface to DBus notifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659833 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-notify2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661865] Review Request: smc-rachana-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661865 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-rachana-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661869] Review Request: smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661869 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-anjalioldlipi-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661866] Review Request: smc-meera-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661866 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-meera-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok FIX: URL is wrong. It is link to Data-UUID. Please replace it with https://metacpan.org/release/Data-Binary Source0 is ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Encode) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.1) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Data::Binary) = 0.01 1 perl-Data-Binary = 0.01-1.fc30 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Data-Binary* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok Please correct 'FIX' issue. Otherwise the package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661868] Review Request: smc-dyuthi-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661868 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-dyuthi-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661862] Review Request: smc-suruma-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661862 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/smc-suruma-fonts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658707] Review Request: python-confluent-kafka - Confluent's Apache Kafka client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658707 --- Comment #10 from Javier Peña --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9) > APPROVED > > Please reactivate %check. Why did you comment? I think it was due to the librdkafka version. I'll re-enable before importing. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666306] Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666311 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666311 [Bug 1666311] Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666311] Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666311 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1666306, 1666293, 1666294 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 [Bug 1666293] Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 [Bug 1666294] Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 [Bug 1666306] Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666294] Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666311 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666311 [Bug 1666311] Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666293] Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666311 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666311 [Bug 1666311] Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666311] New: Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666311 Bug ID: 1666311 Summary: Review Request: python-cleo - Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cleo.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cleo-0.6.8-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Create beautiful and testable command-line interfaces. Cleo is mostly a higher level wrapper for CliKit, so a lot of the components and utilities comes from it. Refer to its documentation for more information. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043595 This package depends on python-clikit, python-pastel, and python-pylev, which I've submitted for review, too. NOTE: I've packaged version 0.6.8 instead of 0.7.2 *on purpose*, because stable releases of poetry aren't compatible with cleo >= 0.7 yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666294] Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666306 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 [Bug 1666306] Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666293] Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666306 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 [Bug 1666306] Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666306] Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1666293, 1666294 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 [Bug 1666293] Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 [Bug 1666294] Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666306] New: Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666306 Bug ID: 1666306 Summary: Review Request: python-clikit - Utilities to build beautiful and testable CLIs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-clikit.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-clikit-0.2.3-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: CliKit is a group of utilities to build beautiful and testable command line interfaces. This is at the core of Cleo. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043558 This package depends on python-pastel and python-pylev at install-time and runtime. I've submitted them for review too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666299] New: Review Request: python-tomlkit - Style preserving TOML library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666299 Bug ID: 1666299 Summary: Review Request: python-tomlkit - Style preserving TOML library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tomlkit.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-tomlkit-0.5.3-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: TOML Kit is a 0.5.0-compliant TOML library. It includes a parser that preserves all comments, indentations, whitespace and internal element ordering, and makes them accessible and editable via an intuitive API. You can also create new TOML documents from scratch using the provided helpers. Part of the implementation as been adapted, improved and fixed from Molten. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043371 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1666227 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666227 [Bug 1666227] Upgrade perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse to 0.99 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666295] New: Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666295 Bug ID: 1666295 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Binary - Simple detection of binary versus text in strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: p...@city-fan.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://subversion.city-fan.org/repos/cfo-repo/perl-Data-Binary/branches/fedora/perl-Data-Binary.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Data-Binary/perl-Data-Binary-0.01-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: This simple module provides string equivalents to the -T / -B operators. Since these only work on file names and file handles, this module provides the same functions but on strings. Note that the actual implementation is currently different, basically because the -T / -B functions are in C/XS, and this module is written in pure Perl. For now, anyway. Fedora Account System Username: pghmcfc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666294] New: Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666294 Bug ID: 1666294 Summary: Review Request: python-pylev - Liberally licensed, pure Python Levenshtein implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pylev.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pylev-1.3.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A pure Python Levenshtein implementation that’s not freaking GPL’d. Based off the Wikipedia code samples at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein_distance. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043369 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666293] New: Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666293 Bug ID: 1666293 Summary: Review Request: python-pastel - Bring colors to your terminal Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pastel.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-pastel-0.1.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Pastel is a simple library to help you colorize strings in your terminal. It comes bundled with predefined styles: - info: green - comment: yellow - question: black on cyan - error: white on red Features: - Use predefined styles or add you own. - Disable colors all together by calling with_colors(False). - Automatically disables colors if the output is not a TTY. - Used in cleo. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043345 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666291] New: Review Request: python-cachy - Simple yet effective caching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666291 Bug ID: 1666291 Summary: Review Request: python-cachy - Simple yet effective caching library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cachy.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-cachy-0.2.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Cachy provides a simple yet effective caching library. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32043233 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659833] Review Request: python-notify2 - Python interface to DBus notifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659833 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini --- Well, I think we can move this forward, since executing (GUI) tests isn't a priority right now. Every other issue has been resolved AFAICT, so: package approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666285] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure - Get hash values for arbitrary values in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666285 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1567909 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567909 [Bug 1567909] hugo-0.53 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666221] Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-locker - Simple package for conveniently using named read/write locks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666221 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1567909 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567909 [Bug 1567909] hugo-0.53 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666285] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure - Get hash values for arbitrary values in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666285 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32042958 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666285] New: Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure - Get hash values for arbitrary values in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666285 Bug ID: 1666285 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure - Get hash values for arbitrary values in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure.spec SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-mitchellh-hashstructure-1.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: The hashstructure Go library is for creating a unique hash value for arbitrary values in Go. This can be used to key values in a hash (for use in a map, set, etc.) that are complex. The most common use case is comparing two values without sending data across the network, caching values locally (de-dup), and so on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643960] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-zstd - Zstd wrapper for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643960 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Are you unable to unvendor zstd? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1156492] Review Request: golang-github-cpuguy83-go-md2man - Process markdown into manpages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156492 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2014-11-19 16:00:37 |2019-01-15 09:33:32 --- Comment #25 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Why tag new updates to this Review Request? This bug should have been closed ages ago. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246500] Review Request: golang-googlecode-freetype-go - The Freetype font engine in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246500 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jchal...@redhat.com, ||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jchaloup@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Since Google Code is dead, should this be moved to some other hosting or just closed? Is https://github.com/BurntSushi/freetype-go (already packaged) a suitable replacement? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246498] Review Request: golang-googlecode-xsrftoken - Generating and validating secure XSRF tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246498 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jchal...@redhat.com, ||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jchaloup@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Since Google Code is dead, should this be moved to some other hosting or just closed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246493] Review Request: golang-googlecode-rsc - Random source code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246493 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jchal...@redhat.com, ||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jchaloup@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Since Google Code is dead, should this be moved to some other hosting or just closed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1661863] Review Request: smc-raghumalayalamsans-fonts - Open Type Fonts for Malayalam script
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661863 --- Comment #3 from vishalvvr --- SPEC URL : https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/smc-fonts/fedora-29-x86_64/00846765-smc-raghumalayalamsans-fonts/smc-raghumalayalamsans-fonts.spec SRPM URL : https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/vishalvvr/smc-fonts/fedora-29-x86_64/00846765-smc-raghumalayalamsans-fonts/smc-raghumalayalamsans-fonts-2.1.2-2.fc29.src.rpm Fixed above issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666221] Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-locker - Simple package for conveniently using named read/write locks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666221 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32040257 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1666221] New: Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-locker - Simple package for conveniently using named read/write locks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666221 Bug ID: 1666221 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-burntsushi-locker - Simple package for conveniently using named read/write locks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-burntsushi-locker.spec SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-burntsushi-locker-0-0.1.20190115gita6e239e.fc29.src.rpm Description: Simple package for conveniently using named read/write locks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658707] Review Request: python-confluent-kafka - Confluent's Apache Kafka client for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658707 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner --- APPROVED Please reactivate %check. Why did you comment? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
