[Bug 1686418] Review Request: R-ncdf4 - Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-ncdf4-1.16-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-21647cf3b9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686418] Review Request: R-ncdf4 - Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-ncdf4-1.16-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-44c5b5301f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686418] Review Request: R-ncdf4 - Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-ncdf4-1.16-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-19854b8cc0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686410] Review Request: R-nycflights13 - Flights that Departed NYC in 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686410 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-nycflights13-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d5c23c3ba9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686402] Review Request: R-jqr - Client for 'jq', a 'JSON' Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686402 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-jqr-1.1.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b962bcffd5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686244] Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-maps-3.3.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-846575e9b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686244] Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-maps-3.3.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f2be008349 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686244] Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-maps-3.3.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0d9b7a492b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685068] Review Request: libxls - Read binary Excel files from C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685068 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- libxls-1.5.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-129e28c44d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685068] Review Request: libxls - Read binary Excel files from C/C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685068 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- libxls-1.5.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9c37a50dbd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1683848] Review Request: python-cftime - Time-handling functionality from netcdf4-python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683848 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Sorry, I didn't see the noticex Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1683848] Review Request: python-cftime - Time-handling functionality from netcdf4-python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683848 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(zebo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658153] Review Request: wdune - wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 --- Comment #47 from J. Scheurich --- (In reply to Petr Menšík from comment #44) > Script, lets say named wdune-sound-editor could be set by default into > configure. It could contain something like: > > #!/bin/sh > > KNOWN_SOUND_EDITORS="audacity rezound wavesurfer gnusound sweep soundeditor" It looks like rezound, wavesurfer, gnusound and soundeditor are not part of fedora 30 # dnf install rezound wavesurfer gnusound sweep soundeditor Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:32 ago on Sat 09 Mar 2019 01:25:39 AM CET. No match for argument: rezound No match for argument: wavesurfer No match for argument: gnusound No match for argument: soundeditor Error: Unable to find a match # -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1683321] Review Request: plasma-pass - Plasma applet to access passwords from the pass password manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683321 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-08 23:51:15 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- plasma-pass-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 --- Comment #11 from J. Scheurich --- Spec URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib.spec SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/vcglib-1.0.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: The Visualization and Computer Graphics Library (VCG for short) is a open source portable C++ templated library for manipulation, processing and displaying with OpenGL of triangle and tetrahedral meshes. Fedora Account System Username: mufti11 Update: Removed Eigen3 from library (incompatible with fedoras more recent Eigen3 lib) Added /usr/share/pkgconfig/vcglib.pc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684906] Review Request: golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream - Small golang library for decoding the snappy streaming format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream-0-0.1.20190307gitf967730.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cf607ef326 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof-0-0.1.20190307git323002c.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-77b958a281 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643742] Review Request: golang-etcd-bbolt - An embedded key/value database for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643742 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-etcd-bbolt-1.3.2-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9495d9893b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572826] Review Request: python-Pallets-Sphinx-Themes - Sphinx themes for Pallets and related projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572826 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added CC||f...@fcami.net, ||rel...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(rel...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #2 from François Cami --- Hi Rick, It looks like this was never built. Can you build? Also I've noticed 1.1.3 was out. Cheers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687010] New: Review Request: golang-github-koofr-koofrclient - Go Koofr client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687010 Bug ID: 1687010 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-koofr-koofrclient - Go Koofr client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865872-golang-github-koofr-koofrclient/golang-github-koofr-go-koofrclient.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865872-golang-github-koofr-koofrclient/golang-github-koofr-koofrclient-0-0.1.20190308git7f32759.fc29.src.rpm Description: Go Koofr client. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687008] New: Review Request: golang-github-koofr-httpclient - Go HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687008 Bug ID: 1687008 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-koofr-httpclient - Go HTTP client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865868-golang-github-koofr-httpclient/golang-github-koofr-httpclient.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865868-golang-github-koofr-httpclient/golang-github-koofr-httpclient-0-0.1.20190308git0378617.fc29.src.rpm Description: Go HTTP client. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687007] New: Review Request: golang-github-hpcloud-tail - Go package for reading from continously updated files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687007 Bug ID: 1687007 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-hpcloud-tail - Go package for reading from continously updated files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865864-golang-github-hpcloud-tail/golang-github-hpcloud-tail.specSRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-29-x86_64/00865864-golang-github-hpcloud-tail/golang-github-hpcloud-tail-1.0.0-1.20190308gita1dbeea.fc29.src.rpm Description: Go package for reading from continously updated files. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686506] Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 --- Comment #8 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- It's unfortunate you had that misguided discussion without the input of upstream. I disagree with the conclusion there of WireGuard being merely, "a piece of software, which just happens to require a kernel module in order to operate." We rather expect that many different types of software will be formed from the small basic building block of a WireGuard tunnel. The name of the tools is wireguard-tools. As soon as WireGuard is upstreamed, the name of the repo will be wireguard-tools. The tarballs of that software will be called wireguard-tools-1.0.tar.xz. Extremely common nomenclature for tools that operate particular network interface types is -tools. So I urge you to both stick with the naming conventions used by both numerous upstream kernel networking projects and by the WireGuard project itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1384917] Review Request: python-pykwalify - Python lib/cli for JSON/YAML schema validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384917 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pykwalify-1.7.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686506] Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Jason A. Donenfeld from comment #6) > Somebody asked me to chime in here about naming. The WireGuard project has > long had an "official" set of packages maintained by jdoss on copr, and the > usage there is fairly high. I think it'd be prudent to stick with the > existing package names. You can see how it boils down by distro here: > https://www.wireguard.com/install/ > > Packages that install the tools (wg, wg-quick, man pages, etc) should be > called "wireguard-tools". > > Packages that install a dkms module should be called "wireguard-dkms". > > Packages that install a binary module should be called "wireguard-kmod". > > Packages that install all of the above or pull in multiple as dependencies > or are otherwise some sort of meta-package should be called "wireguard". We already had this discussion over at RPMFusion and it had then be decided to drop the "tools" suffix: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5020#c2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684906] Review Request: golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream - Small golang library for decoding the snappy streaming format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream-0-0.1.20190307gitf967730.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-790d41043a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof-0-0.1.20190307git323002c.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3b426a79fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643742] Review Request: golang-etcd-bbolt - An embedded key/value database for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643742 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-etcd-bbolt-1.3.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8ae4c94e3b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672833] Review Request: python38 - Version 3.8 of the Python interpreter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672833 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1686977 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686977 [Bug 1686977] Python 3.8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686506] Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 Jason A. Donenfeld changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ja...@zx2c4.com, ||j...@solidadmin.com Flags||needinfo?(j...@solidadmin.co ||m) --- Comment #6 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- Somebody asked me to chime in here about naming. The WireGuard project has long had an "official" set of packages maintained by jdoss on copr, and the usage there is fairly high. I think it'd be prudent to stick with the existing package names. You can see how it boils down by distro here: https://www.wireguard.com/install/ Packages that install the tools (wg, wg-quick, man pages, etc) should be called "wireguard-tools". Packages that install a dkms module should be called "wireguard-dkms". Packages that install a binary module should be called "wireguard-kmod". Packages that install all of the above or pull in multiple as dependencies or are otherwise some sort of meta-package should be called "wireguard". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686024] Review Request: pforth - Portable ANS-like Forth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686024 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-03-08 16:56:14 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel --- Imported and built. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686024] Review Request: pforth - Portable ANS-like Forth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686024 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pforth -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686841] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance-Fast - C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- URL and Source addresses are Ok. Source archive (SHA-256: 4b026ca45329f889a512f5e6f610219b293116aca752d18f981abcc7f4e62631) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/GIS/Distance/Fast.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/GIS/Distance/Fast.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/GIS/Distance/Fast.pm and README.md. Ok. XS code, BuildArch is Ok. $ rpmlint perl-GIS-Distance-Fast.spec review-perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/results/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.10-1.fc31.src.rpm review-perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/results/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.10-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm perl-GIS-Distance-Fast.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplements -> re implements, re-implements, implements perl-GIS-Distance-Fast.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reimplements -> re implements, re-implements, implements 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpm -q -lv -p perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.10-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib/.build-id drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib/.build-id/4d lrwxrwxrwx1 rootroot 70 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib/.build-id/4d/d33a433614dce6fa66541a2499bdf9fb2a05a8 -> ../../../../usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GIS/Distance/Fast/Fast.so drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance/Fast -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1327 mars 8 00:17 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance/Fast.pm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 729 mars 8 00:17 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance/Fast/Cosine.pm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 750 mars 8 00:17 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance/Fast/Haversine.pm -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 902 mars 8 00:17 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/GIS/Distance/Fast/Vincenty.pm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GIS drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GIS/Distance drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GIS/Distance/Fast -rwxr-xr-x1 rootroot20600 mars 8 17:15 /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/GIS/Distance/Fast/Fast.so drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/doc/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1120 mars 8 00:17 /usr/share/doc/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1261 mars 8 00:17 /usr/share/doc/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/README.md drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/licenses/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast -rw-r--r--1 rootroot18421 mars 8 00:17 /usr/share/licenses/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/LICENSE -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1592 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/man/man3/GIS::Distance::Fast.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1284 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/man/man3/GIS::Distance::Fast::Cosine.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1287 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/man/man3/GIS::Distance::Fast::Haversine.3pm.gz -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1367 mars 8 17:15 /usr/share/man/man3/GIS::Distance::Fast::Vincenty.3pm.gz File permissions and layout are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.10-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 libm.so.6()(64bit) 1 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.28()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0()(64bit) 1 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.1) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.1 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Constants) >= 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Fast) 1 perl(namespace::clean) >= 0.24 1 perl(strictures) >= 2 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p
[Bug 1686023] Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023 Lubomir Rintel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2019-03-08 16:16:03 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel --- How could I miss this. Thank you and sorry for the noise. Created a PR for an existing package instead: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/console-setup/pull-request/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659556] Review Request: cockpit-composer - Composer GUI for use with Cockpit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556 --- Comment #21 from Miroslav Suchý --- > But I suppose that happens at "fedpkg request-repo" time? Yes, or any time later he can go to src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cockpit-composer click on the settings tab and add anyone as co-maintainer. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659556] Review Request: cockpit-composer - Composer GUI for use with Cockpit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556 --- Comment #20 from Martin Pitt --- @Miroslav: Fixed the description in https://github.com/weldr/welder-web/pull/588 , thanks for pointing out! Anthony, Miroslav: We need the "cockpit" Fedora user to be able to push to this dist-git, and preferably also me (martinpitt) as a co-maintainer. But I suppose that happens at "fedpkg request-repo" time? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686418] Review Request: R-ncdf4 - Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-ncdf4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686244] Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-maps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686402] Review Request: R-jqr - Client for 'jq', a 'JSON' Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686402 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-jqr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686410] Review Request: R-nycflights13 - Flights that Departed NYC in 2013
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686410 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-nycflights13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922 --- Comment #11 from Frantisek Lachman --- > Upstream issue created: https://github.com/packit-service/packit/issues/132 Fixed on master: https://github.com/packit-service/packit/pull/134 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1686841 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841 [Bug 1686841] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance-Fast - C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686841] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance-Fast - C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1686788 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 [Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686841] New: Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance-Fast - C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686841 Bug ID: 1686841 Summary: Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance-Fast - C implementation of GIS::Distance formulas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast/perl-GIS-Distance-Fast-0.10-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: This Perl module reimplements some, but not all, of the formulas that come with GIS::Distance in the C programming language. C code is generally much faster than the Perl equivalent. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922 --- Comment #10 from Frantisek Lachman --- Spec URL: https://github.com/packit-service/packit/raw/9e2b2a9d56673a8815aedf90729265c16a71e9c6/packit.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/packit-service/packit/raw/9e2b2a9d56673a8815aedf90729265c16a71e9c6/packit-0.0.1-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922 --- Comment #9 from Frantisek Lachman --- Thank you for the feedback. > python3-packit.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/packit/cli/watch_sg_pr.py 644 > /usr/bin/python3 > python3-packit.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/packit/cli/watch_upstream_release.py 644 > /usr/bin/python3 > If the script has shebang, then it should be executable script by setting > executable bit (and either be in /usr/bin/ or /usr/libexec) or when it does > not have executable bit then > it should not have shebang. Upstream issue created: https://github.com/packit-service/packit/issues/132 I've resolved other issues about summary/description and will send new links soon. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658153] Review Request: wdune - wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 --- Comment #46 from J. Scheurich --- > Well it does requires it as dependency. Bundled eigenlib must not be used if > there is already package for the same project. If vcglib had pkgconfig file > installed, it could have use Requires: eigen3 inside. > They you would have to only use pkg-config --cflags vcglib, and it would > include also all cflags required from eigen3 automatically. > > vcglib-devel should have Requires: eigen3-devel The example code shipped in the orginal vcglib is not compatible with the fedora eigen3-devel (misssing include file). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 --- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík --- Found by coincidence, that meshlab project [1] already bundles this library. That is a another reason to produce separate package that can be reused also by it. Is seems to be high-quality project without separate compilation support. Maintainers of meshlab, are you willing to help to prepare vcglib to reuse from meshlab? 1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/meshlab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686506] Review Request: wireguard - Fast, modern, secure VPN tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686506 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- I'm not sure, it shows up as an error en Fedora-review. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/wireguard-0.0.20190227-2.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685922] Review Request: packit - A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora operating system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685922
--- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchý ---
echo A set of tools to integrate upstream open source projects into Fedora
operating system |wc -c
87
The summary should be less than 80 characters:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description
Summary:%{summary}
This is ... ehm lazy? :)
I guess something like:
Python libraries for Packit
will work
packit.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.0-1 ['0.0.1-1.fc29',
'0.0.1-1']
The Y and Z from X.Y.Z-R does not match.
python3-packit.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/packit/cli/watch_sg_pr.py 644 /usr/bin/python3
python3-packit.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/packit/cli/watch_upstream_release.py 644
/usr/bin/python3
If the script has shebang, then it should be executable script by setting
executable bit (and either be in /usr/bin/ or /usr/libexec) or when it does not
have executable bit then it should not have shebang.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-GIS-Distance-0.11-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Class::Measure::Length) 1 perl(Const::Fast) >= 0.014 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Constants) 1 perl(Math::Trig) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.1) 1 perl(namespace::clean) >= 0.24 1 perl(strictures) >= 2 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.1 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-GIS-Distance-0.11-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(GIS::Distance) = 0.11 1 perl-GIS-Distance = 0.11-1.fc30 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Constants) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Cosine) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::GreatCircle) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Haversine) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::MathTrig) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Polar) = 0.11 1 perl(GIS::Distance::Vincenty) = 0.11 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-GIS-Distance* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658153] Review Request: wdune - wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #45 from Petr Menšík ---
Usually subpackage sections of %package docs and %description docs follows
after main %description, before %prep section. %files docs should follow after
%files. Best practice for defining %global macros is to place them before all
tags like Summary.
%global extraver pl1414
%global upstream_version %{version}%{?extraver}
...
Version: 0.99
Release: 2%{?extraver}%{?dist}
...
Source: ftp://ftp.ourproject.org/pub/wdune/wdune-%{upstream_version}.tar.bz2
I would recommend also using macro in --with-about="wdune-%{upstream_version}"
in %configure
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686753] Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Class-Measure-0.06-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Class::Measure) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.1) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Sub::Exporter) >= 0.982 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Class-Measure-0.06-1.fc30.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Class::Measure) = 0.06 1 perl-Class-Measure = 0.06-1.fc30 1 perl(Class::Measure::Length) = 0.06 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Class-Measure* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686753] Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658153] Review Request: wdune - wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153
--- Comment #44 from Petr Menšík ---
I think I found possible improvement for default programs support.
I think runtime detection is required, compile-time detection of supported
programs is far from user-friendly.
Script, lets say named wdune-sound-editor could be set by default into
configure. It could contain something like:
#!/bin/sh
KNOWN_SOUND_EDITORS="audacity rezound wavesurfer gnusound sweep soundeditor"
FOUND=
for APP in ${KNOWN_SOUND_EDITORS}; do
FOUND="`command -v $APP`"
if test -n "$FOUND"
then
$FOUND $@
exit $?
fi
done
if test -z "$FOUND"
then
echo "ERROR: No supported editor was found!" 2>&1
exit 1
fi
It would run first program in list, similar to configure script. But would not
require reconfiguration when editors available are changed. EDITORS could be
initialized by configure variables if required.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659556] Review Request: cockpit-composer - Composer GUI for use with Cockpit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556 --- Comment #19 from Miroslav Suchý --- the %description can be more descriptive. E.g., the first paragraph from README is just fine. And it should end with a dot (you are missing it there). https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1658153] Review Request: wdune - wdune (white_dune) is a graphical VRML97/X3D editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153 --- Comment #43 from Petr Menšík --- > white_dune do not use Eigen3, it only uses vcglib without any eigen > requirement. Maybe it is not a good idea to split the vcglib include > files in new fedora package. Well it does requires it as dependency. Bundled eigenlib must not be used if there is already package for the same project. If vcglib had pkgconfig file installed, it could have use Requires: eigen3 inside. They you would have to only use pkg-config --cflags vcglib, and it would include also all cflags required from eigen3 automatically. vcglib-devel should have Requires: eigen3-devel Because no pkgconfig file is shipped by vcglib-devel, wdune has to mention it explicitly to compile. Fix it by shipping vcglib.pc in vcglib-devel and it can be used in more simple way. Until that, just include eigen3 in build flags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1659556] Review Request: cockpit-composer - Composer GUI for use with Cockpit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659556 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msu...@redhat.com Assignee|zebo...@gmail.com |msu...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Miroslav Suchý --- I can sponsor Anthony. Anthony, I will contact you via email with more details. Robert - thank you for the review, it made things easier to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989
--- Comment #9 from Petr Menšík ---
comment #1 states main package vcglib should be empty. It does not mean you
have to remove examples from tarball. I think on contrary, it should not be
deleted from source archive. We expect you would release one source archive for
all distributions, always the same. It can be chosen in spec file, which part
would be packaged and which should not be packaged. If you have to delete some
parts, delete them in build process only. Deleted from sources should be just
parts with incompatible license, nothing else.
I am not sure about that. Main package usually contains only compiled library,
check [1] for information. However, this library does not compile any shared
library that can be reused. That might be fixed later, I think it does not work
as library now but should. Instead, examples could have subpackage examples,
with more runtime dependencies on them, especially is they are visually
atractive and not simple to compile yourself. Ok, proposal is this. Includes
would not contain eigenlib, it has its own project.
Because vcglib as its own project on github [2], it definitely requires its own
package and must NOT be part of wdune package.
Ok, examples are not ready to use system-wide eigen3. But here we can reuse
pkgconfig as well [3]. Just append to all used .pro files:
cat > fedora.unix << QMAKE
unix {
CONFIG += link_pkgconfig
PKGCONFIG += eigen3
}
QMAKE
find -name '*.pro' | while read P; do cat fedora.unix >> "$P"; done
Then tools can be built. It seems they are not only samples, but also useful
tools. They should be packed definitely. utils subpackage could be used for
them, with all dependencies required to install them. I think it is strange
there is no script to build all those tools in single command, it should be
proposed to the project. It can be solved in spec file until that happens.
Generated makefiles have no working install target unfortunately.
I think such modifications should be recommended to the project in general, not
just for Fedora.
1.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_libraries_and_applications
2. https://github.com/cnr-isti-vclab/vcglib
3. http://qt.shoutwiki.com/wiki/Using_pkg-config_with_qmake
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1686667 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686667 [Bug 1686667] perl-Geo-Distance-0.21 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686753] Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1686788 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 [Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1686753 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753 [Bug 1686753] Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686788] New: Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686788 Bug ID: 1686788 Summary: Review Request: perl-GIS-Distance - Calculate geographic distances Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-GIS-Distance/perl-GIS-Distance.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-GIS-Distance/perl-GIS-Distance-0.11-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: This Perl module calculates distances between geographic points on, at the moment, planet Earth. Various "FORMULAS" are available that provide different levels of accuracy versus speed. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671790] Review Request: python-vistir - python library including utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671790 --- Comment #18 from Miro Hrončok --- What changed in the specfile? If upstream merges a patch (or even when it is proposed) it is good to add a link to the comment. Liek this: # https://github.com/sarugaku/vistir/issues/59 Patch0: python_to_sys.executable.patch Also, have you tested the upstream's patch instead of yours? I remember there were a lot of little changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671790] Review Request: python-vistir - python library including utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671790 --- Comment #17 from Patrik Kopkan --- Spec URl: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pkopkan/python-vistir/fedora-29-x86_64/00865704-python-vistir/python-vistir.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pkopkan/python-vistir/fedora-29-x86_64/00865704-python-vistir/python3-vistir-0.3.0-1.fc29.noarch.rpm upstream agreed on patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #17 from Miro Hrončok --- Don't be :) It's perfectly OK to not now everything from the beginning (or ever). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 --- Comment #16 from Jan Macku --- I'm sorry. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686753] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686753 Bug ID: 1686753 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Measure - Create, compare and convert units of measurement Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Measure/perl-Class-Measure.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Class-Measure/perl-Class-Measure-0.06-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: This Perl module allows you to create, compare and convert units of measurement. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686418] Review Request: R-ncdf4 - Interface to Unidata netCDF (Version 4 or Earlier) Format Data Files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686418 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671787] Review Request: python-cursor - python package for hiding terminal cursor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671787 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #15 from Miro Hrončok --- Until sponsored, please don't set those flags. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
