[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-3b88c02582 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3b88c02582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744243] Review Request: wimlib - Open source Windows Imaging (WIM) library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744243 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- wimlib-1.13.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744267] Review Request: python-fontconfig - Python bindings for Fontconfig library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744267 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-fontconfig-0.5.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741833] Review Request: liberation-circuit - Real-time strategy game with programmable units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741833 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- liberation-circuit-1.3-2.20190824git29bc0ce0.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745846] Review Request: f31-backgrounds - Fedora 31 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745846 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-8b2cccfabf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8b2cccfabf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744243] Review Request: wimlib - Open source Windows Imaging (WIM) library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744243 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-04 03:11:34 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- wimlib-1.13.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741833] Review Request: liberation-circuit - Real-time strategy game with programmable units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-04 03:11:41 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- liberation-circuit-1.3-2.20190824git29bc0ce0.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744267] Review Request: python-fontconfig - Python bindings for Fontconfig library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744267 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-04 03:11:33 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-fontconfig-0.5.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748678] New: Review Request: usbtop - Utility to show USB bandwidth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748678 Bug ID: 1748678 Summary: Review Request: usbtop - Utility to show USB bandwidth Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: carl@george.computer QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01027810-usbtop/usbtop.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01027810-usbtop/usbtop-1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: usbtop is a top-like utility that shows an estimated instantaneous bandwidth on USB buses and devices. Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747623] Review Request: golang-github-vultr-govultr - Vultr Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747623 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-5ba2a2690d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5ba2a2690d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747623] Review Request: golang-github-vultr-govultr - Vultr Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747623 --- Comment #3 from Carl George --- rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-72fef5302f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748637] Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748637
Jared Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith ---
Package is APPROVED. I think the package now only provides Python 3 bindings,
but the description in the spec file still specifies Python 2 and 3.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
Note: Package contains %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
See: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/782
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 17 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/jsmith/Documents/Fedora/Reviews/1748637-pulsectl/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]:
[Bug 1748637] Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748637 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jsmith.fed...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748637] Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748637 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields --- Note for reviewer: I can't cleanly run %check on this package in mock/koji because some tests require a local network connection to the pulseaudio server to complete. However, in local non-mock builds, all tests complete OK as expected. No other automatic failures found in fedora-review, so I hope this should be an easy one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748637] New: Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748637 Bug ID: 1748637 Summary: Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sticks...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/pulsectl.spec SRPM URL: https://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pulsectl-18.12.5-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Python 3.x high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse), mostly focused on mixer-like controls and introspection-related operations (as opposed to e.g. submitting sound samples to play, player-like client). Fedora Account System Username: pfrields -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748634] Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748634 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2019-09-03 23:26:38 --- Comment #2 from Paul W. Frields --- Oops, filed with wrong account. 'Scuse the mess. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748634] Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748634 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields --- Note for reviewer: I can't cleanly run %check on this package in mock/koji because some tests require a local network connection to the pulseaudio server to complete. However, in local non-mock builds, all tests complete OK as expected. No other automatic failures found in fedora-review, so I hope this should be an easy one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748634] New: Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748634 Bug ID: 1748634 Summary: Review Request: pulsectl - Python high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pfrie...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/pulsectl.spec SRPM URL: https://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/pulsectl-18.12.5-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Python 3.x high-level interface and ctypes-based bindings for PulseAudio (libpulse), mostly focused on mixer-like controls and introspection-related operations (as opposed to e.g. submitting sound samples to play, player-like client). Fedora Account System Username: pfrields -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/erlang-yconf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 --- Comment #4 from Randy Barlow --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16230 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jer...@jcline.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745846] Review Request: f31-backgrounds - Fedora 31 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745846 Geoffrey Marr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gm...@redhat.com Whiteboard||AcceptedBlocker --- Comment #23 from Geoffrey Marr --- Discussed during the 2019-09-03 blocker review meeting: [1] The decision to classify this bug as an "AcceptedBlocker" was made as it violates the following criteria: "The default desktop background must be different from that of the last two stable releases" [1] https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2019-09-03/f31-blocker-review.2019-09-03-16.01.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 --- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16229 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Jeremy Cline changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jer...@jcline.org Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jeremy Cline --- The spec itself looks good and the license is correct so I'm going to go ahead and approve this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1748545 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748545 [Bug 1748545] undefined function rebar:main/1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1742538 Depends On||1742455 --- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow --- There is a bit of a chicken-and-egg situation with this package. It requires a newer version of fast_yaml than is in Rawhide, but I cannot update fast_yaml until I also update ejabberd to the version that can use the new fast_yaml. I cannot upgrade ejabberd to that version unless this package is in Rawhide. Thus, I will need it to be reviewed even though it cannot be built on Rawhide yet. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742455 [Bug 1742455] erlang-fast_yaml-1.0.20 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1742538 [Bug 1742538] ejabberd-19.08 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748530] New: Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748530 Bug ID: 1748530 Summary: Review Request: erlang-yconf - YAML configuration processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/erlang-yconf.spec SRPM URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/erlang-yconf-1.0.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: YAML configuration processor. Fedora Account System Username: bowlofeggs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741805] Review Request: lolcat - a colorful version of 'cat'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805 --- Comment #5 from josef radinger --- i think i have all your suggestions in place. yours josef new versions: Spec URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/temp/lolcat.spec SRPM URL: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/30/SRPMS/lolcat-1.0-5.fc30.src.rpm compiled version for f30 x86_64: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/30/x86_64/lolcat-1.0-5.fc30.x86_64.rpm compiled version for f30 i386: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/30/i386/lolcat-1.0-5.fc30.i686.rpm compiled version for f29 x86_64: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/29/x86_64/lolcat-1.0-5.fc29.x86_64.rpm compiled version for f29 i386: http://www.nosuchhost.net/~cheese/fedora/packages/29/i386/lolcat-1.0-5.fc29.i686.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747138] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Helpers - A collection of various components for DBIx::Class
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747138 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-09-03 17:39:50 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- This package is now in Rawhide and updates have been released for the stable distributions. Thank you for the review, Jikta. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747142] Review Request: perl-Mojo-JWT - JSON Web Token the Mojo way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747142 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-09-03 17:39:50 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- This package is now in Rawhide and updates have been released for the stable distributions. Thank you for the review, Jikta. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747012] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-BloomFilter - A simple bloom filter data structure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747012 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-09-03 17:39:49 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- This package is now in Rawhide and updates have been released for the stable distributions. Thank you for the review, Jikta. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748471] New: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748471 Bug ID: 1748471 Summary: xtensor-python - Python bindings for xtensor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguel...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-python-0.23.1-0.fc31.src.rpm Description: xtensor-python enables inplace use of numpy arrays in C++ with all the benefits from xtensor: C++ universal function and broadcasting, STL-compliant APIs, A broad coverage of Numpy APIs. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748470] New: xtensor - C++ tensors with broadcasting and lazy computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748470 Bug ID: 1748470 Summary: xtensor - C++ tensors with broadcasting and lazy computing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguel...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtensor-0.20.8-0.fc31.src.rpm Description: xtensor is a C++ library meant for numerical analysis with multi-dimensional array expressions. xtensor provides an extensible expression system enabling lazy broadcasting, an API following the idioms of the C++ standard library, tools to manipulate array expressions and build upon xtensor. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748469] New: xtl - Basic tools (containers, algorithms) used by xtensor-* packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748469 Bug ID: 1748469 Summary: xtl - Basic tools (containers, algorithms) used by xtensor-* packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sguel...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtl.spec SRPM URL: https://sergesanspaille.fedorapeople.org/xtl-0.6.5-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: xtl provides implementation of C++ utilities like complex, span, hash, optional, variant and similar classes used by xtensor-* packages. Fedora Account System Username: sergesanspaille -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1726400] Review Request: python-text-unidecode - A Python module for handling non-Roman text data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726400 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | --- Comment #7 from Fabian Affolter --- Well, here is the new files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-text-unidecode.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-text-unidecode-1.3-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1743767] Review Request: monitor-edid - simple tool for reading the EDID from a monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743767 --- Comment #4 from Pat Riehecky --- I've loaded a new build addressing the comments listed here: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jcpunk/ocsinventory-review/package/monitor-edid/ I'm working with upstream to determine what suitable manpages for the binaries would look like. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745846] Review Request: f31-backgrounds - Fedora 31 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745846 --- Comment #22 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/f31-backgrounds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748233] Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 --- Comment #4 from Lukas Javorsky --- Updated URLS: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ljavorsk/pgloader/master/pgloader.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/ljavorsk/pgloader/raw/master/pgloader-3.6.1-1.fc30.src.rpm pgloader.x86_64: E: devel-dependency openssl-devel - this dependency is needed as we spoke about it becasue of /usr/lib64/libcrypto.so pgloader.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/pgloader/docs/conf.py /usr/bin/env python3 - fixed, don't include the docs/ directory at all pgloader.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pgloader - python-sphinx generated man pages from docs/ directory So it means, that it can't use it like this, and require every package there, or package them if needed? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747623] Review Request: golang-github-vultr-govultr - Vultr Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747623 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-vultr-govultr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748233] Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 --- Comment #3 from Miroslav Suchý --- Please always provide links to the raw version of files. - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ Please address these - we discussed that in person: pgloader.x86_64: E: devel-dependency openssl-devel pgloader.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/pgloader/docs/conf.py /usr/bin/env python3 pgloader.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pgloader Hmm, I am really woried about those bundles in tarball - all those pgloader-bundle-3.6.1/software/* Instead of that you have to use normal libraries and packages in Fedora. And if they do not exists there yet, they need to be packaged separately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748233] Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||msu...@redhat.com Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msu...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Miroslav Suchý --- I will do this one. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1711611] Review Request: pdfarranger - PDF file merging, rearranging, and splitting. Maintained fork of pdfshuffler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711611 --- Comment #6 from David Auer --- I'd like to take Felix Schwarz's offer to take this package as a maintainer and add me as co-maintainer afterwards since I haven't been able to take the steps required for sponsorship yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748323] New: Review Request:rubygem-http-accept - Parse Accept and Accept-Language HTTP headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748323 Bug ID: 1748323 Summary: Review Request:rubygem-http-accept - Parse Accept and Accept-Language HTTP headers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pval...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01027219-rubygem-http-accept/rubygem-http-accept.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/pvalena/rubygems/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01027219-rubygem-http-accept/rubygem-http-accept-2.1.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Parse Accept and Accept-Language HTTP headers Fedora Account System Username: pvalena Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pvalena/rubygems/build/1027219/ Koji scratch-build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37431450 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 --- Comment #16 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) --- This was the mistake which i did while creating the upstream name and the original package name(fc_txptd). It should be fctxpd. Sorry for the mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 --- Comment #15 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) --- Is the missing second "t" on purpose? >>Yes -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||decatho...@gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini --- Is the missing second "t" on purpose? I mean fctxp(t)d. It's there in the upstream name and the original package name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747152] Review Request: perl-MojoX-Log-Log4perl-Tiny - Minimalistic Log4perl adapter for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MojoX-Log-Log4perl-Tiny-0.01-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-08f45e1775 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762
--- Comment #13 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) ---
THis is the change i did.
rename from fc_txptd.spec to fctxpd.spec
and in spec file i made the below change
-Name: fc_txptd
+Name: fctxpd
Version:0.1
Release:1.%{snapshotdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}
Summary:Fibrechannel transport daemo
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 --- Comment #12 from MUNEENDRA (Broadcom) --- Hi Robert, Updated the spec and SRPM as the package name and the spec file does not match. I have made the changes and build the package for few distributions. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/muneendra/fctxpd/build/1027382/ And below is the links for the updated Spec and SRPM URL Spec URL:https://github.com/brocade/bsn-fc-txptd/blob/master/SPEC/fctxpd.spec SRPM URL:https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/muneendra/fctxpd/epel-7-x86_64/01027382-fctxpd/fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.el7.src.rpm Regards, Muneendra. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar --- The spec file name does not match the package name. Please pick up one and redo the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747152] Review Request: perl-MojoX-Log-Log4perl-Tiny - Minimalistic Log4perl adapter for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-08f45e1775 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-08f45e1775 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748259] Review Request: emacs-hcl-mode - Emacs major mode of HCL (Hashicorp Configuration Language)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748259 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1748262 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748262 [Bug 1748262] Review Request: emacs-terraform-mode - Major mode of Terraform configuration file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748262] Review Request: emacs-terraform-mode - Major mode of Terraform configuration file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748262 Mohamed El Morabity changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1748259 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748259 [Bug 1748259] Review Request: emacs-hcl-mode - Emacs major mode of HCL (Hashicorp Configuration Language) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748262] New: Review Request: emacs-terraform-mode - Major mode of Terraform configuration file
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748262 Bug ID: 1748262 Summary: Review Request: emacs-terraform-mode - Major mode of Terraform configuration file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-terraform-mode/emacs-terraform-mode.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-terraform-mode/emacs-terraform-mode-0.06-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Major mode of terraform configuration file. terraform-mode provides syntax highlighting, indentation function and formatting. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748259] New: Review Request: emacs-hcl-mode - Emacs major mode of HCL (Hashicorp Configuration Language)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748259 Bug ID: 1748259 Summary: Review Request: emacs-hcl-mode - Emacs major mode of HCL (Hashicorp Configuration Language) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-hcl-mode/emacs-hcl-mode.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-hcl-mode/emacs-hcl-mode-0.03-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Emacs major mode of HCL Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748257] New: Review Request: emacs-dockerfile-mode - An emacs mode for handling Dockerfiles
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748257 Bug ID: 1748257 Summary: Review Request: emacs-dockerfile-mode - An emacs mode for handling Dockerfiles Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-dockerfile-mode/emacs-dockerfile-mode.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-dockerfile-mode/emacs-dockerfile-mode-1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: This package provides a major mode `dockerfile-mode' for use with the standard `Dockerfile' file format. Additional convenience functions allow images to be built easily. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747552] Review Request: libdfp - Decimal Floating Point library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747552
Artur Iwicki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@svgames.pl
--- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki ---
>Group: System Environment/Libraries
>BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
>[...]
>Group: Development/Libraries
The Group and BuildRoot tags are not used in Fedora.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
>%install
>rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
>[...]
>%clean
>rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Don't remove the buildroot during %install. The %clean section is not needed.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_tags_and_sections
>%install
>make install install_root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
You can probably use %{make_install} here.
>cd Build
>[...]
>cd ..
Maybe use pushd / popd instead?
You should also include the COPYING.txt file in %files (and mark it as
%license).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748233] Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748243] New: Review Request: emacs-blacken - Python Black for Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748243 Bug ID: 1748243 Summary: Review Request: emacs-blacken - Python Black for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-blacken/emacs-blacken.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/emacs-blacken/emacs-blacken-0-0.1.20190521git1874018.fc30.src.rpm Description: Blacken uses black to format a Python buffer. It can be called explicitly on a certain buffer, but more conveniently, a minor-mode 'blacken-mode' is provided that turns on automatically running black on a buffer before saving. Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748228] Review Request: ghc-xdg-userdirs - Basic implementation of XDG user directories specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748228 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37437377 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748233] New: Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748233 Bug ID: 1748233 Summary: Review Request: pgloader - Data loading tool for PostgreSQL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ljavo...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://github.com/ljavorsk/pgloader/blob/master/pgloader.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/ljavorsk/pgloader/blob/master/pgloader-3.6.1-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Data loading tool that allows to implement continuous migration from current database to PostreSQL. It uses the COPY PostreSQL protocol to stream the data into the server. Pgloader can read data from CSV and DBF files, or SQLite, MySQL, MS SQL Server, PostgreSQL, Redshift databases. Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37437306 Fedora Account System Username: ljavorsk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748228] New: Review Request: ghc-xdg-userdirs - Basic implementation of XDG user directories specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748228 Bug ID: 1748228 Summary: Review Request: ghc-xdg-userdirs - Basic implementation of XDG user directories specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-xdg-userdirs.spec SRPM URL: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews//ghc-xdg-userdirs-0.1.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: On Unix platforms, this should be a very straightforward implementation of the XDG User Directory spec. On Windows, it will attempt to do the right thing with regards to choosing appropriate directories. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1409780] Review Request: golang-github-hanwen-go-fuse - FUSE bindings for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409780 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2019-09-03 06:36:17 --- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1712280 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1712280] Review Request: golang-github-hanwen-fuse - FUSE bindings for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1712280 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) CC||christophe.dela...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #23 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** Bug 1409780 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377262] Review Request: golang-github-go-macaron-gzip - Provides Gzip compress to responses for Macaron
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377262 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2019-09-03 06:33:25 --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1691948 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691948] Review Request: golang-github-macaron-gzip - Provides Gzip compress to responses for Macaron
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691948 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1376389 CC||mru...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** Bug 1377262 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376389 [Bug 1376389] Tracker for grafana dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1412152] Review Request: golang-github-blang-semver - Semantic Versioning library written in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412152 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1340560 --- Comment #14 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** Bug 1340558 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340560 [Bug 1340560] Update to v1.0.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1340558] Review Request: golang-github-blang-semver - Semantic Versioning (semver) library written in golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1340558 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2019-09-03 06:31:37 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1412152 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747843] Review Request: golang-github-test-deep - Golang deep variable equality test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747843 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747622] Review Request: golang-github-cmd - Go library wrapper around os/exec.Cmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747622
--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
When running tests now, one of them fails:
--- FAIL: TestCmdNotFound (0.00s)
cmd_test.go:272: {Cmd:cmd-does-not-exist PID:0 Complete:false Exit:-1
Error:exec: "cmd-does-not-exist": executable file not found in $PATH StartTs:0
StopTs:0 Runtime:0 Stdout:[] Stderr:[]}
cmd_test.go:273: [Error: *exec.Error != *errors.errorString]
I guess this might be a bug in deep against Go 1.13, maybe? It seems to be
incorrectly comparing the expected Error types.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747843] Review Request: golang-github-test-deep - Golang deep variable equality test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747843
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Tests don't run for the same reason as bug 1747622, but they do pass when
go-rpm-integration is fixed.
Approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat
License". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/elliott/rpmbuild/review/1747843-golang-github-
test-deep/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI
