[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #23 from Karishma Singh --- You did such a great job and I wish you'll share more updates in future also. Thanks for making my day. http://www.rituwalia.in/delhi-call-girls.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 --- Comment #22 from Karishma Singh --- After a long time, I found some fresh information from this wonderful post. I know you have many great ideas to share with all of us. http://www.a1delhiescort.in/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 810049] Review Request: netbeans-ide - Netbeans Integrated Development Environment (IDE)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=810049 Karishma Singh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karishmasingh4...@gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Karishma Singh --- Usually, it is a good thing to get that much information from this amazing post. I really like to be here on this website. http://www.aliasharma.in/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1316526] Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316526 Daein Park changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dap...@redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Daein Park --- Hi Fabian, sorry for late response too. Would you review updated spec and srpm of this package ? Update to v1.2 of jo : - SPEC URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/bysnupy/toolbox/master/jo/jo.spec - SRPM URL: https://github.com/bysnupy/toolbox/raw/master/jo/jo-1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm Thanks a lot, Daein -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750580] Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750580 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1750590 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750590 [Bug 1750590] Review Request: password-safe - Password manager for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750579] Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750579 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1750590 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750590 [Bug 1750590] Review Request: password-safe - Password manager for GNOME -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750590] New: Review Request: password-safe - Password manager for GNOME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750590 Bug ID: 1750590 Summary: Review Request: password-safe - Password manager for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 1750579, 1750580 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/password-safe.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/password-safe-3.32.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Password Safe is a password manager which makes use of the KeePass v.4 format. It integrates perfectly with the GNOME desktop and provides an easy and uncluttered interface for the management of password databases. Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/password-safe ! NOTE: there is a problem with python-pycryptodome package which is patched in Fedora repos: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pycryptodomex/blob/master/f/python-pycryptodomex.spec #HELPWANTED Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750579 [Bug 1750579] Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750580 [Bug 1750580] Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750579] Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750579 --- Comment #1 from Artem --- Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-argon2-cffi.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-argon2-cffi-19.1.0-2.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750541] Review Request: python-json5 - A Python implementation of the JSON5 data format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Remove 'A' from Summary.
The pyjson5 subpackage should use a fully versioned Requires.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Apache License (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated",
"Apache License (v2.0)". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in 1750541-python-json5/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[x]: Python packages must not contain %{pythonX_site(lib|arch)}/* in %files
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires
[Bug 1750580] New: Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750580 Bug ID: 1750580 Summary: Review Request: python-pykeepass - Python library to interact with keepass databases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-pykeepass-3.0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: This library allows you to write entries to a KeePass database. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750579] New: Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750579 Bug ID: 1750579 Summary: Review Request: python-argon2-cffi - The secure Argon2 password hashing algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-argon2-cffi.spec SRPM URL: https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-argon2-cffi-19.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: CFFI-based Argon2 Bindings for Python. Fedora Account System Username: atim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1740416] Review Request: gthree - Gthree is a GObject/Gtk+ port of three.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1750567 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750567 [Bug 1750567] Review Request: gnome-hexgl - Gthree port of HexGL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750567] New: Review Request: gnome-hexgl - Gthree port of HexGL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750567 Bug ID: 1750567 Summary: Review Request: gnome-hexgl - Gthree port of HexGL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Depends On: 1740416 Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/gthree/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01030905-gnome-hexgl/gnome-hexgl.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/gthree/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01030905-gnome-hexgl/gnome-hexgl-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm Description: Gthree port of HexGL. Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/gthree Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416 [Bug 1740416] Review Request: gthree - Gthree is a GObject/Gtk+ port of three.js -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1740416] Review Request: gthree - Gthree is a GObject/Gtk+ port of three.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740416 --- Comment #3 from Artem --- New release 0.2! https://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2019/09/09/gthree-ready-to-play/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/gthree/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01030897-gthree/gthree.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/gthree/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01030897-gthree/gthree-0.2.0-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750541] New: Review Request: python-json5 - A Python implementation of the JSON5 data format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750541 Bug ID: 1750541 Summary: Review Request: python-json5 - A Python implementation of the JSON5 data format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@fabian-affolter.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-json5.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-json5-0.8.5-1.fc30.src.rpm Project URL: https://github.com/dpranke/pyjson5 Description: JSON5 extends the JSON data interchange format to make it slightly more usable as a configuration language: - JavaScript-style comments (both single and multi-line) are legal. - Object keys may be unquoted if they are legal ECMAScript identifiers - Objects and arrays may end with trailing commas. - Strings can be single-quoted, and multi-line string literals are allowed. Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37563867 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint python-json5-0.8.5-1.fc30.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python3-json5-0.8.5-1.fc30.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Fedora Account System Username: fab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-d432f6be51 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-d432f6be51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750506] Review Request: hasciicam - ascii video cam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506 Alessio changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750506] New: Review Request: hasciicam - ascii video cam
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750506 Bug ID: 1750506 Summary: Review Request: hasciicam - ascii video cam Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: alcir...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alciregi/hasciicam/ SRPM URL: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/alciregi/hasciicam/ Scratch koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37562085 Description: HasciiCam makes it possible to have live ascii video on the web. It captures video from a tv card and renders it into ascii letters, formatting the output into an html page with a refresh tag, or in a live ascii window, or in a simple text file. It gives the possiblity to anybody that has a bttv card, a unix box and a cheap modem line to show live (h)ascii video can be viewed without any need for extra applications, plugins, java etc. Fedora Account System Username: alciregi This is my first package. In case I need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750499] New: Review Request: ladspa-swh-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750499 Bug ID: 1750499 Summary: Review Request: ladspa-swh-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: guido.aul...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://tartina.fedorapeople.org/ladspa-swh-plugins.spec SRPM URL: https://tartina.fedorapeople.org/ladspa-swh-plugins-0.4.17-3.fc32.src.rpm Description: A set of audio plugins for LADSPA (see http://plugin.org.uk/ for more details) Fedora Account System Username: tartina Review request to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins Link to koji successful scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37562823 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-b69ffe01d3 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b69ffe01d3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3b60eecbf1 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3b60eecbf1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-677cb60b49 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-677cb60b49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/video-downloader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 --- Comment #10 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mate-optimus -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- LGTM now. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 --- Comment #4 from Artem --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-30-x86_64/01030729-video-downloader/video-downloader.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-30-x86_64/01030729-video-downloader/video-downloader-0.1.5-6.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #3 from Artem --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-31-x86_64/01030717-video-downloader/video-downloader.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-31-x86_64/01030717-video-downloader/video-downloader-0.1.5-5.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1731487] Review Request: MUSIC - The MUltiSimulation Coordinator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731487 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Created attachment 1613186 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1613186=edit build log failure ppc It isn't a test failure, unfortunately. On ppc, it can't find MPI for openmpi. Any ideas? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GPL (v3 or later)". 19 files have
unknown license.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: video-downloader-0.1.5-3.fc32.noarch.rpm
video-downloader-0.1.5-3.fc32.src.rpm
video-downloader.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlists ->
play
[Bug 1750376] Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||vit...@easycoding.org
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
I will review this.
Replace %{_datadir}/appdata/*.xml to %{_metainfodir}/%{name}.appdata.xml.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750376] New: Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750376 Bug ID: 1750376 Summary: Review Request: video-downloader - Download videos from websites like YouTube and many others Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ego.corda...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-30-x86_64/01030687-video-downloader/video-downloader.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/video-downloader/fedora-30-x86_64/01030687-video-downloader/video-downloader-0.1.5-3.fc30.src.rpm Description: Download videos from websites with an easy-to-use interface. Provides the following features: - Convert videos to MP3 - Supports password-protected and private videos - Download single videos or whole playlists - Automatically selects a video format based on your preferred resolution Based on youtube-dl. Fedora Account System Username: atim Working COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/atim/video-downloader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 --- Comment #9 from Artem --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/mate-optimus/fedora-30-x86_64/01030679-mate-optimus/mate-optimus.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/mate-optimus/fedora-30-x86_64/01030679-mate-optimus/mate-optimus-19.10.3-4.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- LGTM now. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047
--- Comment #7 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: mate-optimus-19.10.3-3.fc32.noarch.rpm
mate-optimus-19.10.3-3.fc32.src.rpm
mate-optimus.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency
[Bug 1750047] Review Request: mate-optimus - NVIDIA Optimus GPU switcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750047 --- Comment #6 from Artem --- https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/mate-optimus/fedora-30-x86_64/01030670-mate-optimus/mate-optimus.spec https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/atim/mate-optimus/fedora-30-x86_64/01030670-mate-optimus/mate-optimus-19.10.3-3.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1727348] Review Request: patat - Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727348 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- patat-0.8.2.3-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2a6f7aed2b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741805] Review Request: lolcat - a colorful version of 'cat'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741805] Review Request: lolcat - a colorful version of 'cat'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805 Lukas Javorsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1727348] Review Request: patat - Terminal-based presentations using Pandoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1727348 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- patat-0.8.2.3-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-850e7f3aad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1741805] Review Request: lolcat - a colorful version of 'cat'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1741805
Lukas Javorsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ljavo...@redhat.com
--- Comment #6 from Lukas Javorsky ---
Hi, I've tried to build it in container and test the functionality, but I don't
think it works right.
Example:
lolcat /dev/urandom # It doesn't print anything
Tried it with cat first:
cat /dev/urandom > foo # Stop it manually (^C)
lolcat foo # Still nothing
And a few things that I've noticed in spec:
- Use macros everywhere you can
- Source, URL: change the lolcat to %{name}
- This is not a mistake, but I think that your Changelog doesn't need that many
releases, try to make them useful,
IMHO your package would be great only with the "Initial package" one, but
it's totally up to you how you make it.
Not diving into deep review, I will wait until your review on the functionality
of the program
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1440687] Review Request: shc - Shell script compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440687 Mosaab Alzoubi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(moc...@hotmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Mosaab Alzoubi --- All Fixed. And Updated. SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/moceap/Ojuba/fedora-30-x86_64/01030608-shc/shc-4.0.3-1.fc30.src.rpm Spec: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/moceap/Ojuba/fedora-30-x86_64/01030608-shc/shc.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1316526] Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316526 Kenjiro Nakayama changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(knakayam@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #8 from Kenjiro Nakayama --- Hi Fabian, sorry for my late response. Daein Park is interested in releasing this package, so I would like to hand over it to him. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268698] Review Request: rubygem-guard-bundler - Guard gem for Bundler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268698 Jaroslav Prokop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2019-09-09 08:13:51 --- Comment #8 from Jaroslav Prokop --- Closing as stalled package review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750263] New: Review Request: eralchemy - Entity Relation Diagrams generation tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750263 Bug ID: 1750263 Summary: Review Request: eralchemy - Entity Relation Diagrams generation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: prais...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/praiskup/rpm-eralchemy/dd96bfa7bb1057c1f9602d8661b83ddc4f67928a/eralchemy.spec SRPM URL: http://praiskup.fedorapeople.org/eralchemy-1.2.10-0.src.rpm Description: ERAlchemy generates Entity Relation (ER) diagram from databases or from SQLAlchemy models. Fedora Account System Username: praiskup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
