[Bug 1745770] Review Request: rpki-client - RPKI client implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745770 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- rpki-client-0.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- conmon-2.0.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-db49f44789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745770] Review Request: rpki-client - RPKI client implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745770 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- rpki-client-0.2.0-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746179] Review Request: python-ifcfg - Python cross-platform network interface discovery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746179 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-ifcfg-0.18-1.el8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- oomd-0.2.0-4.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a92a124efe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- conmon-2.0.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fe216d6d80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747811] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-appindicator - AppIndicator/KStatusNotifierItem support for GNOME Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747811 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-30-7.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- oomd-0.2.0-4.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c1d03c403b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- conmon-2.0.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-58623d56ee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1722656] Review Request: python-sybil - Automated testing for the examples in your documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1722656 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-sybil-1.2.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c404f682c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751535] Review Request: python-fsspec - File-system specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751535 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-fsspec-0.4.4-1.fc31~bootstrap has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a343d3ae1e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748956] Review Request: python-dateparser - A Python parser for human readable dates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748956 Bug 1748956 depends on bug 1748938, which changed state. Bug 1748938 Summary: Review Request: python-convertdate - A Python module to convert date formats and calculating holidays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748938 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 01:12:58 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-firmware-3.34.0-4.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748938] Review Request: python-convertdate - A Python module to convert date formats and calculating holidays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748938 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 01:12:39 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-convertdate-2.1.3-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746179] Review Request: python-ifcfg - Python cross-platform network interface discovery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746179 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-ifcfg-0.18-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745770] Review Request: rpki-client - RPKI client implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745770 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- rpki-client-0.2.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745834] Review Request: R-lifecycle - Manage the Life Cycle of your Package Functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745834 --- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- (In reply to Gwyn Ciesla from comment #6) > Done. Thanks. I've removed you now since that seemed to be a mistake. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749869] Review Request: libeconf - Enhanced config file parser library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749869 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- libeconf-0.3.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747626] Review Request: golang-github-labbsr0x-goh - Go library for writing simple webhooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747626 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:10:04 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-labbsr0x-goh-0-0.1.20190905git6360eb5.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747622] Review Request: golang-github-cmd - Go library wrapper around os/exec.Cmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747622 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:10:02 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-cmd-1.0.5-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747627] Review Request: golang-github-labbsr0x-bindman-dns-webhook - Go library for Bindman DNS Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747627 Bug 1747627 depends on bug 1747626, which changed state. Bug 1747626 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-labbsr0x-goh - Go library for writing simple webhooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747626 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747627] Review Request: golang-github-labbsr0x-bindman-dns-webhook - Go library for Bindman DNS Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747627 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:10:23 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-labbsr0x-bindman-dns-webhook-1.0.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747622] Review Request: golang-github-cmd - Go library wrapper around os/exec.Cmd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747622 Bug 1747622 depends on bug 1747843, which changed state. Bug 1747843 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-test-deep - Golang deep variable equality test https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747843 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747843] Review Request: golang-github-test-deep - Golang deep variable equality test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747843 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:09:50 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-test-deep-1.0.3-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1748678] Review Request: usbtop - Utility to show USB bandwidth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748678 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- usbtop-1.0-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747626] Review Request: golang-github-labbsr0x-goh - Go library for writing simple webhooks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747626 Bug 1747626 depends on bug 1747622, which changed state. Bug 1747622 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-cmd - Go library wrapper around os/exec.Cmd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747622 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1735762] Review Request: fctxpd - This daemon adds FC network intelligence in host and host intelligence in FC network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1735762 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:09:38 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- fctxpd-0.1-1.20190813gitc195e67.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747152] Review Request: perl-MojoX-Log-Log4perl-Tiny - Minimalistic Log4perl adapter for Mojolicious
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:09:09 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MojoX-Log-Log4perl-Tiny-0.01-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747623] Review Request: golang-github-vultr-govultr - Vultr Go API client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747623 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:09:32 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-vultr-govultr-0.1.4-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747624] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-namesilo - Go library for accessing the Namesilo API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747624 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:08:47 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nrdcg-namesilo-0.2.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747852] Review Request: golang-github-aablinov-caddy-geoip - Caddy plugin to resolve user GeoIP data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747852 Bug 1747852 depends on bug 1746215, which changed state. Bug 1746215 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mmcloughlin-geohash - Golang geohash library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746215 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746215] Review Request: golang-github-mmcloughlin-geohash - Golang geohash library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746215 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:08:41 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mmcloughlin-geohash-0.9.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1747361] Review Request: python-ruamel-yaml-clib - C version of reader, parser and emitter for ruamel.yaml derived from libyaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747361 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-ruamel-yaml-clib-0.1.2-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746017] Review Request: python-timeout-decorator - a timeout decorator for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746017 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-timeout-decorator-0.4.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1733293] Review Request: golang-xorm-core - Lightweight & Compitable wrapper of database/sql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733293 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:07:25 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-xorm-core-0.7.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746179] Review Request: python-ifcfg - Python cross-platform network interface discovery
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746179 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-ifcfg-0.18-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746939] Review Request: is-it-in-rhel - Command line tool to find out if a package is in RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746939 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- is-it-in-rhel-1.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1744282] Review Request: libspng - Simple, modern libpng alternativeSimple, modern libpng alternative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744282 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:07:22 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- libspng-0.5.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745770] Review Request: rpki-client - RPKI client implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745770 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- rpki-client-0.2.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1733280] Review Request: golang-xorm-builder - Lightweight and fast SQL builder for Go language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733280 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:07:24 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-xorm-builder-0.3.5-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745834] Review Request: R-lifecycle - Manage the Life Cycle of your Package Functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:07:11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-lifecycle-0.1.0-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745833] Review Request: R-gargle - Utilities for Working with Google APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745833 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:07:10 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-gargle-0.3.1-1.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1743045] Review Request: golang-github-git-lfs-ntlm - NTLM Implementation for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1743045 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-git-lfs-ntlm-0-0.1.20190827gitc5056e7.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1664399] Review Request: mp3gain - Lossless MP3 volume adjustment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664399 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-09-14 00:06:07 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- mp3gain-1.6.2-2.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745478] Review Request: libbpf - The bpf library from kernel source
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745478
--- Comment #9 from Jiri Olsa ---
(In reply to Dan Horák from comment #8)
> further comments
> - missing BuildRequires: gcc
> - fails to rebuild on ppc64le, because it installs the libs into /usr/lib/ -
> https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/blob/master/src/Makefile#L57 is wrong
> - distro-wide CFLAGS and LDFLAGS are not used, adding CFLAGS=%{build_cflags}
> LDFLAGS=%{build_ldflags} to "make" might help
new version is in here:
http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/libbpf/v3/
thanks,
jirka
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752158] Review Request: termbox - Legacy-free alternative to ncurses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158 a...@php.net changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752158] New: Review Request: termbox - Legacy-free alternative to ncurses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752158 Bug ID: 1752158 Summary: Review Request: termbox - Legacy-free alternative to ncurses Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: a...@php.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/adsr/termbox/rpm/rpm/termbox.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/adsr/termbox/blob/rpm/rpm/termbox-1.1.2-1.fc30.src.rpm?raw=true Description: (This is the C version of golang-github-nsf-termbox[0].) Termbox is a library that provides minimalistic API which allows the programmer to write text-based user interfaces. It is based on a very simple abstraction. The main idea is viewing terminals as a table of fixed-size cells and input being a stream of structured messages. Would be fair to say that the model is inspired by windows console API. The abstraction itself is not perfect and it may create problems in certain areas. The most sensitive ones are copy & pasting and wide characters (mostly Chinese, Japanese, Korean (CJK) characters). When it comes to copy & pasting, the notion of cells is not really compatible with the idea of text. And CJK runes often require more than one cell to display them nicely. Despite the mentioned flaws, using such a simple model brings benefits in a form of simplicity. And KISS principle is important. At this point one should realize, that CLI (command-line interfaces) aren't really a thing termbox is aimed at. But rather pseudo-graphical user interfaces. Fedora Account System Username: adsr [0] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-nsf-termbox -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1752139] New: Review Request: ucblogo - logo programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1752139 Bug ID: 1752139 Summary: Review Request: ucblogo - logo programming language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jjcogliati...@yahoo.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/jrincayc/rpms/ucblogo/blob/fix_fedora_30/f/ucblogo.spec SRPM URL: http://jjc.freeshell.org/ucblogo-6.0-26.fc30.src.rpm Description: Berkeley Logo (ucblogo) is an interpreter for the Logo programming language. Logo is a computer programming language designed for use by learners, including children. This dialect of Logo features random-access arrays, variable number of inputs to user-defined procedures, various error handling improvements, comments and continuation lines, first-class instruction and expression templates, and macros. Note that ucblogo was previously packaged for fedora, but due to FTBFS it was removed in Fedora 30. I have emailed gemi and Gerard said "it would be great if you would take over ucblogo." Fedora Account System Username: jrincayc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-db49f44789 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-db49f44789 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745846] Review Request: f31-backgrounds - Fedora 31 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745846 --- Comment #28 from Miro Hrončok --- I've asked why it should not pass the check, I have not demanded the desktop file is changed ;) Anyway, here, a followup: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/925 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #11 from Filipe Brandenburger --- > > Should I add it to "updates" for f31 and f30? > > Yes. You need to submit Bodhi updates. Awesome, that's now done (as reported to the bug.) > > Should I add it to comps.xml? > > Well, you'd need to discuss it with Workstation WG. Just adding packages is > not good idea. Open a ticket on https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation. Ah, I actually think it's not really appropriate to add it at this point... Was asking here mostly to confirm that. Will leave that out for now. Thanks for all your help! Cheers, Filipe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-c1d03c403b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c1d03c403b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-a92a124efe has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a92a124efe -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-1c0bbc4aca has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1c0bbc4aca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750499] Review Request: ladspa-swh-plugins - A set of audio plugins for LADSPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750499 --- Comment #2 from Guido Aulisi --- Spec URL: https://tartina.fedorapeople.org/ladspa-swh-plugins.spec SRPM URL: https://tartina.fedorapeople.org/ladspa-swh-plugins-0.4.17-4.fc32.src.rpm Restored most changelog history, I didn't restore some very old bad formatted lines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750983] Review Request: oomd - Userspace Out-Of-Memory (OOM) killer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750983 --- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko --- (In reply to Filipe Brandenburger from comment #7) > Packages built! :champagne: \o/ > rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376965 > f31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376974 > f30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1376978 > > Should I add it to "updates" for f31 and f30? Yes. You need to submit Bodhi updates. > Should I add it to comps.xml? Well, you'd need to discuss it with Workstation WG. Just adding packages is not good idea. Open a ticket on https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1745846] Review Request: f31-backgrounds - Fedora 31 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745846 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||awill...@redhat.com --- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson --- Miro: for the record, the rules about FDO desktop file spec apply only to .desktop files that are actually application launchers, by my reading. This file is not an application launcher and is not actually intended to comply with the FDO spec, and 'correcting' it to pass desktop-file-validate actually breaks it. So please don't require that for any future reviews of background packages :) See https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411876 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-firmware -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- LGTM now. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590
--- Comment #6 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 33 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in gnome-
firmware
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 --- Comment #5 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware-3.34.0-4.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/svt-vp9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #4 from Artem --- https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware-3.34.0-3.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590
--- Comment #3 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
1. Add BuildRequires: systemd-devel.
2. Replace
> Obsoletes: %{oldname}
Provides: %{oldname} = %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: %{oldname} < %{?epoch:%{epoch}:}%{version}-%{release}
3. Remove
> meson.add_install_script('meson_post_install.sh')
sed -e '/meson_post_install/d' -i meson.build
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1750823] Review Request: virt-p2v - Convert a physical machine to run on KVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750823 --- Comment #5 from Pino Toscano --- (In reply to Pino Toscano from comment #0) > Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ptoscano/virt-p2v.spec > SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ptoscano/virt-p2v-1.41.0-1.fc30.src.rpm URLs updated according to comment 4. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- I will review this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 Artem changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |gnome-firmware-updater -|gnome-firmware - Install |Install firmware on devices |firmware on devices -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1746590] Review Request: gnome-firmware-updater - Install firmware on devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1746590 --- Comment #1 from Artem --- First release today 3.34.0 https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware.spec https://atim.fedorapeople.org/for-review/gnome-firmware-3.34.0-2.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- Please remove custom compiler flags -O2 -O3 from meson build script to use Fedora standard flags. This minor issue can be fixed during package import. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987
--- Comment #5 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
"Expat License", "ISC License", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised"
License". 348 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in svt-vp9
, svt-vp9-devel , gstreamer1-svt-vp9
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-fe216d6d80 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fe216d6d80 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1715821] Review Request: conmon - OCI container runtime monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715821 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2019-58623d56ee has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-58623d56ee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Vascom/svt-vp9/master/svt-vp9.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6732/37646732/svt-vp9-0-1.20190906gite9653d9.fc32.src.rpm All done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-kramdown-syntax-cod ||eray-1.0.1-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-09-13 13:28:26 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1377190 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm ||-1.1.0-1.fc32 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-09-13 13:27:57 --- Comment #6 from Fabio Valentini --- Built for rawhide. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1377189 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987
Artem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ego.corda...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Artem ---
1. In order to avoid unintentional soname bump, we forbid globbing the major
soname version, be more specific instead:
%{_libdir}/libSvtVp9Enc.so.1 -> %{_libdir}/libSvtVp9Enc.so.1*
2. fedora-review tool say that license is incorrect but it correct according to
this list
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
3. There few more licenses found and probably should add MIT and BSD
BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License
-
OpenVisualCloud-SVT-VP9-e9653d9/LICENSE.md
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
---
OpenVisualCloud-SVT-VP9-e9653d9/Source/Lib/VPX/LICENSE
Expat License
-
OpenVisualCloud-SVT-VP9-e9653d9/Source/App/EbAppFifo.c
ISC License
---
OpenVisualCloud-SVT-VP9-e9653d9/Source/Lib/ASM_SSE2/x86inc.asm
4. Package should not depend on package which is not available in official
Fedora repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987
Vitaly Zaitsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Vitaly Zaitsev ---
> # Patch build gstreamer plugin
Just use one one sed command:
sed -e "/svtvp9enc_dep =/d" -e "s|install: true,|install: true,
include_directories : '../Source/API', link_args : '-lSvtVp9Enc',|" -e "s|,
svtvp9enc_dep||" -e "s|svtvp9enc_dep.found()|true|" -i
gstreamer-plugin/meson.build
> mkdir -p release
mkdir -p %{_target_platform}
> pushd release
> %cmake3 \
> -DCMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH=TRUE \
> ..
> %make_build
> popd
pushd %{_target_platform}
%cmake -G Ninja \
-DCMAKE_SKIP_BUILD_RPATH=TRUE \
..
popd
%ninja_build -C %{_target_platform}
> pushd gstreamer-plugin
> export LIBRARY_PATH="$PWD/../Bin/Release:$LIBRARY_PATH"
> %meson
> %meson_build
> popd
%meson_build -C gstreamer-plugin
> pushd release
> %make_install
> popd
> pushd gstreamer-plugin
> %meson_install
> popd
%ninja_install -C %{_target_platform}
%meson_install -C gstreamer-plugin
> export LIBRARY_PATH="$PWD/../Bin/Release:$LIBRARY_PATH"
Do you really need this during build?
> %{_libdir}/gstreamer-1.0/libgstsvtvp9enc.so
Add Requires: gstreamer1-plugins-base%{?_isa}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739787] Review Request: python-decopatch - A helper to write python decorators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739787 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-decopatch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 Vitaly Zaitsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vit...@easycoding.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|vit...@easycoding.org Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Vitaly Zaitsev --- I will review this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] Review Request: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 Vasiliy Glazov changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Rewuest: svt-vp9 - |Review Request: svt-vp9 - |Scalable Video Technology |Scalable Video Technology |for VP9 Encoder |for VP9 Encoder -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751987] New: Review Rewuest: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751987 Bug ID: 1751987 Summary: Review Rewuest: svt-vp9 - Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: vasc...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Vascom/svt-vp9/master/svt-vp9.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4483/37644483/svt-vp9-0-1.20190906gite9653d9.fc32.src.rpm Description: The Scalable Video Technology for VP9 Encoder (SVT-VP9 Encoder) is a VP9-compliant encoder library core. The SVT-VP9 Encoder development is a work-in-progress targeting performance levels applicable to both VOD and Live encoding/transcoding video applications. The SVT-VP9 Encoder is being optimized to achieve excellent performance levels currently supporting 10 density-quality presets (please refer to the user guide for more details) on a system with a dual Intel® Xeon® Scalable processor targeting: Real-time encoding of up to two 4Kp60 streams on the Gold 6140 with M8. SVT-VP9 Encoder also supports 3 modes: A visually optimized mode for visual quality (-tune 0) An PSNR/SSIM optimized mode for PSNR / SSIM benchmarking (-tune 1 (Default setting)) An VMAF optimized mode for VMAF benchmarking (-tune 2) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16686 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16685 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749751] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm - Kramdown parser for GitHub-flavored markdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749751 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thanks for the review! BuildRequires: rubygem(kramdown) >= 2.0.0 is already in the .spec file. ;) I only intend to push this to fedora 32, since it's a breaking change (in both kramdown and jekyll 4). See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Jekyll4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mamoru TASAKA --- = This package (rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay) is APPROVED by mtasaka = -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1749755] Review Request: rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay - Coderay syntax highlighting for kramdown
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749755 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- 1. Review * license okay (overall: MIT) * spec file clean * mock build okay for F-32 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37641779 * binary rpm installable on F-32 * rpmlint clean - src.rpm, binary rpms, installed rpm * at least "require"ing installed gem works ``` [mockbuild@6a90abd4ac174b7b845382de2995036e ~]$ ruby -e 'require "kramdown" ; require "kramdown-syntax-coderay"' ``` All okay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1704522] Review Request: zork - Public Domain source code to the original DUNGEON game (Zork I)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1704522 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jflo...@gmail.com ||) --- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739787] Review Request: python-decopatch - A helper to write python decorators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739787 --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks! - new version - add missing %python_provides Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-decopatch.spec SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-decopatch-1.4.6-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1739786] Review Request: python-makefun - Dynamically create python functions with a proper signature
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1739786 --- Comment #17 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks for all the discussion and sorry for the delay. - update to latest version - add .toml override - add missing %python_provide Spec URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-makefun.spec SRPM URL: https://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/python-makefun-1.6.11-1.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751947] New: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1 - A PSR-5 based resolver of Class names, Types and Structural Element Names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751947 Bug ID: 1751947 Summary: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1 - A PSR-5 based resolver of Class names, Types and Structural Element Names Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpdocumentor/php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1.git/plain/php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1.spec?id=5174a2a8bffee73d358928953393d8abc22ad04f SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1-1.0.1-1.remi.src.rpm Description: The specification on types in DocBlocks (PSR-5) describes various keywords and special constructs but also how to statically resolve the partial name of a Class into a Fully Qualified Class Name (FQCN). PSR-5 also introduces an additional way to describe deeper elements than Classes, Interfaces and Traits called the Fully Qualified Structural Element Name (FQSEN). Using this it is possible to refer to methods, properties and class constants but also functions and global constants. This package provides two Resolvers that are capable of: 1. Returning a series of Value Object for given expression while resolving any partial class names, and 2. Returning an FQSEN object after resolving any partial Structural Element Names into Fully Qualified Structural Element names. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/phpDocumentor/Reflection2/autoload-type-resolver.php Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751946] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2 - Common reflection classes used by phpdocumentor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751946 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1751947 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751947 [Bug 1751947] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1 - A PSR-5 based resolver of Class names, Types and Structural Element Names -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751947] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-type-resolver1 - A PSR-5 based resolver of Class names, Types and Structural Element Names
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751947 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1751946 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751946 [Bug 1751946] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2 - Common reflection classes used by phpdocumentor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1751946] New: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2 - Common reflection classes used by phpdocumentor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751946 Bug ID: 1751946 Summary: Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2 - Common reflection classes used by phpdocumentor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://git.remirepo.net/cgit/rpms/php/phpdocumentor/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2.git/plain/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2.spec?id=6b472a269087f0ee80a42ddac0ff2500da29dcc3 SRPM URL: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-common2-2.0.0-2.remi.src.rpm Description: Common reflection classes used by phpdocumentor to reflect the code structure. Autoloader: /usr/share/php/phpDocumentor/Reflection2/autoload-common.php Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
